Connect with us

Farm & Ranch

Expert: White wooly sheep don’t reflect today’s sheep industry

Published

on

By: Steve Byrns

Hair sheep surpass wool sheep in historical wool producing region

Writer: Steve Byrns, 325-653-4576, s-byrns@tamu.edu

Contact: Bill Thompson, 325-653-4576, d-waldron@tamu.edu

SAN ANGELO – The hair sheep industry has grown considerably since the mid-1990s when U.S. sheep producers first started to take notice of the meat producing breeds, said an agricultural economist at San Angelo.

Bill Thompson, with the Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service, said he and Dr. Dan Waldron, Texas A&M AgriLife Research geneticist at San Angelo, recently secured data from Producers Livestock Auction Company to determine the sheep industry’s current market trends.

Hair sheep continue to gain market share within the sheep industry, a recent Texas A&M AgriLife study noted. (Texas A&M AgriLife Communications photo by Steve Byrns)

Thompson said the San Angelo auction reportedly remains the largest sheep and goat market in the U.S.. He said San Angelo, long known as the nation’s Wool Capital, has seen a turn of events in recent years.

“Looking at those numbers, they’ve sold more hair sheep through that auction since 2011 than they have wool lambs, so the market has changed considerably over the last several years,” Thompson said.

He also said their study only dealt with animals sold through the ring and did not take into consideration those animals sold straight off the range through an order buyer. Those sales, he said, are generally large offerings of strictly wool sheep.

He said there has been a steady downward trend in wool sheep numbers for years for a variety of reasons including predation, lack of shearers, general labor and sluggish markets to name a few.

He pointed to the drought and subsequent wildfires across West Texas in 2011 as factors that sped up the loss of wool sheep numbers. He said the combination of drought and fire across prime sheep range forced a large number of operations to greatly reduce their flocks and a smaller number of producers to liquidate their flocks altogether. A percentage of those returning appear to have restocked with hair sheep.

“We get asked a lot what the differences are between hair lamb prices and wool lamb prices and we specifically went to the sale barn for data so we could analyze those differences,” Thompson said. “We found some interesting things.”

One point of particular interest was lot size or the number of animals sold at a given time.

“Wool lamb producers will be compensated for putting together larger lots of uniform lambs,” Thompson said. “The bigger the lot size, the higher the price they get for them. We don’t see that same advantage for the hair sheep. I think their market is segmented enough that those buyers can’t necessarily buy large lots because they are actually filling very specific orders on their direct slaughter market.”

Thompson said as is the case with most livestock, most of the time, lighter animals bring more dollars per pound, but heavier animals typically bring more dollars per head.

“For any livestock, that’s typically the case,” he said. “What we saw in the hair sheep though is as the animals get bigger, that discount relative to wool sheep actually increases. So that tells us a couple things.

“On a 70-100 pound wool lamb, there are actually two separate markets bidding for those lambs. They can just as easily go to a terminal or slaughter market somewhere or they are capable of being fed to even greater weights as they do well in a feedlot. Because they’ve also got order buyers bidding on them to put them in a feedlot, there’s more competition. They seem to get a considerably better price than the same 70-100 pound hair lamb would, which is just basically being bid on by people buying for the direct slaughter market.”

Thompson said hair sheep tend to become too fat to make feeding them for any length of time profitable in today’s markets.

He said there are basically two segments of the lamb-consuming–public. Some eat very little lamb and others eat quite a bit of lamb on a regular basis. Nationally, the per capita consumption of lamb is right around a half pound per person per year.

“But again,” he said, “the people that do eat lamb, eat quite a bit of it and that’s largely the ethnic markets, certainly on both coasts. But we’re now seeing more developing markets in the interior as well.”

Thompson said the growth in the hair sheep industry stems largely from their ease of care. He said many who become interested in the hair sheep breeds, do so because they do not require shearing, are hardy, often have multiple births and if properly managed, can quickly turn a profit. And unlike wool sheep, which are highly seasonal breeders, hair sheep can lamb year around.

“As far as price per pound, both wool and hair sheep bring the best price per pound at that 50-55 pound range,” Thompson said. “But again, as they get heavier, the price falls off quite a bit quicker for the hair sheep than for the wool sheep. There seems to be a market preference for the lighter hair sheep relative to the wool lambs.

“Both the hair and wool sheep lambs display that seasonal pattern where we see the sharp drop-off in price in June, July and August due to the seasonality of our breeding system whereby we are bringing most of our lambs to town to market. We oversupply the market in that pretty narrow window and prices decrease as a result.

“We may have a little more flexibility, a little less seasonality in the breeding of the hair sheep so we might be able to adjust our breeding season to lamb them a little bit earlier, thus wean them a little bit earlier and get them marketed before that price really falls off. Or push our breeding season forward so we can maybe market them a little bit later after the market picks back up.”

-30-

 

LikeTweet

Find more stories, photos, videos and audio at http://today.agrilife.org

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Frog Fruit

Published

on

By

By Tony Dean, tonydean.tx1@gmail.com

Frog fruit is a native, low-growing perennial forb adapted to most of the eastern U.S., but few grazers know it well. It contributes more to our plant communities than we realize. It generally grows no more than a few inches tall and roots at the nodes. It can form dense mats several feet across and develop runners up to 3 feet long.

The leaves are thick, one to two inches long and 3/8 inch wide, and toothed from the middle to the tip. Tiny white flowers form a ring around a flower head, and the head then elongates into a cylinder an inch long or longer. Frog fruit has a four-angled stem.

Frog fruit can grow almost anywhere in Texas and on many soil types. It can grow in drier soils and likes good drainage, but it needs additional moisture to survive the hottest months. You can find it almost anywhere in a pasture, though it often grows in depressions and near water sources.

“Frog fruit is used as forage by livestock and deer. I recall an instance when I was moving cattle from one pasture to the next on a Jack County ranch. As I opened the gate, I stood by a beautiful green plant of switchgrass which I expected to be immediately grazed down. The cattle walked right by the switchgrass and stuck their heads in a small patch of frog fruit a few feet away,” Dean said.

Frog fruit is gaining popularity as a ground cover for homes and gardens for these reasons:

  1. Frog fruit grows quickly, maybe too quickly. If it gets out of bounds, you can always trim it back.
  2. Frog fruit is low maintenance. Once you get it established with adequate watering, it can survive with little care.
  3. Frog fruit has a long bloom period, from April to October.
  4. It is a host plant for several butterfly species and other insects.
Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Theileria orientalis

Published

on

By

By Barry Whitworth, DVM

Over the past few years, veterinarians have detected Theileria orientalis in Oklahoma cattle. Early cases were primarily diagnosed in adult cattle, but more recent Oklahoma cases have been identified in stocker cattle. All cattle producers should be familiar with the clinical signs of this disease and check their cattle daily for signs of trouble.

The first U.S. case of theileriosis was identified in Virginia in August 2017. Those cattle showed weakness and anemia, and veterinarians made an initial diagnosis of anaplasmosis. Blood samples from the animals were tested for Anaplasma, Babesia and Leptospira. Results were negative for all three, but the tests revealed a blood protozoan, later identified as T. orientalis genotype Ikeda. Since that first herd outbreak, the organism has been detected in several states.

Cattle sick with T. orientalis genotype Ikeda may show fever, weakness, anorexia and exercise intolerance. If forced to move, affected cattle may stagger and gasp for air. If stressed excessively, they may collapse and die. On examination, the gums, eyes or vaginal mucosa may appear pale (white) or yellow. Reproductive losses, including stillbirths and late-term abortions, may occur, along with a drop in milk production.

Clinical signs reported in adult cattle in Oklahoma include anemia, sudden death, weight loss, abortion, failure to thrive and failure to calve. In stocker cattle, producers have reported weight loss, anemia, poor performance and sudden death.

Because Anaplasma marginale and T. orientalis genotype Ikeda produce similar clinical signs, telling the two apart can be difficult. One difference is that clinical signs are more common in young cattle infected with T. orientalis than in young cattle infected with A. marginale. Cattle with anaplasmosis also often display aggression, while those with T. orientalis genotype Ikeda typically do not. A laboratory test is required to tell the two diseases apart with certainty.

Researchers have identified Haemaphysalis longicornis as a possible vector of T. orientalis genotype Ikeda. In 2017, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL) confirmed the presence of H. longicornis, commonly called the Asian longhorned tick (ALT) or bush tick. While trying to determine how the tick arrived in the United States, USDA officials discovered it had been present in West Virginia as early as 2010. The tick has now been confirmed in at least 26 states, including Oklahoma. Some evidence suggests other insect vectors may also transmit T. orientalis genotype Ikeda. Needle transfer is another possible route of transmission.

The ALT has been identified in Craig and Mayes counties in Oklahoma. This tick thrives in areas with high humidity, such as wooded regions, brush or tall grass. Ticks are often found where large numbers of wildlife gather, such as along deer trails. Producers can find more information about the ALT on the USDA website at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/livestock-poultry-disease/cattle/ticks/asian-longhorned.

Other countries have developed treatments for T. orientalis, but no approved treatments are available in the United States, and no vaccine exists for this disease. The best defense is prevention: buying cattle free of the organism, avoiding blood transfer between animals and using effective tick control. Producers should purchase cattle from reputable sources. Clean instruments between animals during procedures such as castration or dehorning, and change needles between every animal. Control external parasites with appropriate insecticide treatments. Pasture management also helps, such as rotating cattle away from wooded or brushy areas where ticks thrive. Patch burning may also help reduce tick populations.

Theileria orientalis remains a concern for some cow/calf and stocker producers in Oklahoma. Producers who want more information about T. orientalis genotype Ikeda should contact their local veterinarian or Oklahoma State University County Extension agriculture educator.

References

Hammer, J. F., Emery, D., Bogema, D. R., & Jenkins, C. (2015). Detection of Theileria orientalis genotypes in Haemaphysalis longicornis ticks from southern Australia. Parasites & Vectors, 8, 229.

Oakes, V. J., Yabsley, M. J., Schwartz, D., LeRoith, T., Bissett, C., Broaddus, C., Schlater, J. L., Todd, S. M., Boes, K. M., Brookhart, M., & Lahmers, K. K. (2019). Theileria orientalis Ikeda genotype in cattle, Virginia, USA. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 25(9), 1653-1659.

Spickler, Anna Rovid. (2019). Theileriosis. Retrieved from http://www.cfsph.iastate.edu/DiseaseInfo/factsheets.php.

Watts, J. G., Playford, M. C., & Hickey, K. L. (2016). Theileria orientalis: A review. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 64(1), 3-9.

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Is the Pond Safe for Livestock?

Published

on

By

By OKFR Staff

During the hottest part of summer, a farm pond can look like a welcome source of water. Cattle may be standing belly-deep along the bank, and the pond may still hold enough water to seem dependable. Looks alone won’t tell you whether that water is safe.

Hot weather, limited rainfall and falling pond levels can create water-quality problems. As water evaporates, salts, minerals, nutrients and other substances become more concentrated. Warm, still water can also encourage blue-green algae, and some forms can produce toxins capable of killing livestock.

Producers sometimes treat water as an afterthought compared to grass, hay and supplemental feed. Livestock need a dependable supply of clean water to maintain feed intake, regulate body temperature and support production. Poor-quality water can reduce consumption and performance even when it does not cause obvious poisoning.

A pond that has watered cattle for years is not safe under every set of conditions. Pay particular attention during drought, extreme heat or any period when the water level drops significantly.

Watch the Water and the Livestock

One of the most serious late-summer concerns is a bloom of cyanobacteria, commonly called blue-green algae. These organisms live naturally in many bodies of water, and most do not produce dangerous toxins. The risk rises when certain toxin-producing species multiply rapidly under favorable conditions.

According to Oklahoma State University Extension, toxic blue-green algal blooms typically develop in standing water after periods of hot, dry, calm weather. Nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus can fuel excessive growth. Those nutrients may reach a pond through manure, fertilizer runoff, soil erosion and decaying vegetation.

A suspicious bloom may turn the water bright green, blue-green, pea-soup green or even brownish. Scum, foam or mats may collect along the shoreline, particularly where the wind pushes floating material into one area. Some blooms look like spilled paint.

Not every green pond is poisonous. Common aquatic plants and harmless algae can also change the color or surface of the water. You usually cannot tell whether a bloom is toxic by looking at it, and a pond can contain toxin-producing cyanobacteria without showing every commonly described warning sign.

Keep livestock, horses, pets and people away from water that has an unusual color, heavy surface scum, a bad odor or unexplained dead fish or wildlife nearby. Do not let livestock drink from another part of the same pond on the assumption that the water is safe there. Wind can move a bloom, and toxin levels may vary across the pond.

Blue-green algae can produce toxins that affect the nervous system or liver. Depending on the toxin and the amount consumed, affected animals may develop weakness, staggering, difficulty breathing, tremors, convulsions, diarrhea or collapse. In severe cases, owners find animals dead near the water before realizing anything is wrong. Treatment often fails, which makes prevention especially important.

Treat any suspected poisoning as an emergency. Move the herd away from the water source without driving or stressing animals that may already be affected. Provide another clean water supply and contact a veterinarian immediately. Your county Extension office can also help you determine where and how to submit a water sample.

Blue-green algae is not the only potential problem. Pond water may contain elevated levels of dissolved salts, sulfates, nitrates, bacteria or other contaminants. Runoff can carry manure, fertilizer, pesticides and organic matter into the pond. Low water levels make some of these problems worse because the remaining water grows more concentrated.

Water with excessive dissolved solids may taste bitter or salty, so animals drink less of it. Depending on the substances involved and their concentrations, poor-quality water may contribute to diarrhea, reduced feed intake, poor weight gain or other health concerns. Young animals and livestock that are not used to the water may be more vulnerable.

Watch the cattle themselves, too. Are they reluctant to drink? Are they crowding around a different water source? Has feed intake or weight gain dropped without an obvious explanation? Are several animals having digestive problems? Changes across multiple animals can be an early clue that you need to look at the feed or water.

OSU Extension recommends collecting a representative sample and submitting it for a livestock water test whenever you suspect a water supply is harming animal health or performance. A standard livestock water test covers several characteristics, but blue-green algae can require different sampling and testing procedures. Contact the laboratory or county Extension office before collecting the sample so you take it from the right location, use the proper container and handle it correctly.

Reduce Problems Before They Develop

Good pond management cannot eliminate every water-quality problem, but it can lower the risk. One of the most effective steps is limiting the manure, soil and nutrients that enter the water.

Cattle with unrestricted access to an entire pond can damage the banks, muddy the water and deposit large amounts of manure in or near it. Hoof traffic strips vegetation and speeds erosion. Sediment fills the pond over time, while manure supplies nutrients that can encourage excessive algae growth.

Where practical, fence livestock away from most of the pond and provide a limited-access watering point. Another option is piping water to a trough below the dam or elsewhere in the pasture. OSU notes that reducing cattle manure in the pond can reduce the conditions that favor toxic algae and make the water more palatable.

A vegetated buffer around the pond can slow runoff and trap soil and nutrients before they reach the water. Apply fertilizer and manure carefully in the watershed, particularly before heavy rain, and do not let large amounts of hay, feed or organic debris pile up at the water’s edge.

Alternative watering systems need maintenance, too. Check troughs for algae, manure, drowned animals and other contamination. Install wildlife escape ramps in tanks so birds and small animals can climb out instead of drowning and fouling the water.

Be cautious about treating a pond on your own. Some owners use copper sulfate and other algaecides for algae control, but improper treatment can create new problems. Killing a large amount of algae or aquatic vegetation at once can deplete dissolved oxygen as the material decomposes, which can lead to a fish kill. Treatment may also release toxins from affected cyanobacteria into the water. Base any chemical application on proper identification and professional recommendations, not guesswork.

Livestock should always have enough water for the weather, their size and their stage of production. Demand rises sharply in hot weather, and a pond that barely meets the herd’s needs in spring may fall short in August. Check the source regularly instead of waiting for cattle to gather around a muddy shoreline.

Ponds can fool you. Crystal-clear water isn’t always safe, and a green pond doesn’t always mean toxic algae. Regular observation, testing and prevention are the best ways to keep a pond safe for your herd.

Continue Reading
Ad
Ad
Ad

Trending