Farm & Ranch
Texas crop, weather for April 21,2015
By: Robert Burns
Heavy rains continue to benefit wheat but delay other plantings
Writer: Robert Burns, 903-834-6191, rd-burns@tamu.edu
COLLEGE STATION – More rainstorms swept over much of the state, leaving fields too soggy to work in many areas, but generally benefiting wheat, pastures and rangeland, according to Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service personnel.
Planting of corn, cotton, rice, grain sorghum and soybeans continued to lag behind the five-year average. Planting of sunflowers, at 10 percent completed, was actually slightly ahead of the five-year average of 9 percent, according to the AgriLife Extension agent reports.
Thunderstorms and high winds and/or hail in parts of the Panhandle and South Texas knocked down some wheat. In other areas, dryland wheat didn’t receive moisture at the right time and was stressed. But generally, winter wheat was doing well, thanks to plentiful moisture, according to the AgriLife Extension agent reports.
According to the National Weather Service, most of the Coastal Bend and Southeast regions, and parts of South and East Texas received 10 inches or more of rain in the last two weeks. More than 15 inches was received in isolated areas.
Download or preview a two-minute MP3 version of this report
Parts of the Panhandle remained the exception. Producers in Deaf Smith and Randall counties still needed rain for newly planted corn and dryland wheat. Rolling Plains producers were still welcoming any rain received as it helped rangeland recover from the drought and will give spring plantings a good chance this year.
In many parts of the state to the east of U.S. Interstate 35, the continued rain was too much of a good thing. However, comments from AgriLife Extension county agents indicated producers weren’t complaining that much, despite soggy, muddy fields and delayed plantings.
In North Texas, continued rain caused flooding and delayed corn planting past the crop insurance deadline and made it too wet to fertilize wheat. In Van Zandt County, the Tawakoni and Fork lakes were nearly full for the first time in more than five years, said Tommy Phillips, AgriLife Extension agent there.
Lakes and streams were also full to overflowing in East Texas, according to reports from AgriLife Extension agents there. Winter pastures were doing well – perhaps too well – as ryegrass could not be removed from pastures because of wet conditions, and was over-shading warm-season grasses and hindering their growth.
In the Coastal Bend region, continued saturated field conditions in Nueces County prompted cotton growers to exercise prevented-planting options and leave acreage not yet planted fallow due to crop insurance planting deadlines.
AgriLife Extension district reporters compiled the following summaries:
Central: Parts of the region received scattered showers, with 0.5 to 1 inch accumulations. Livestock remained in good condition as spring grasses came on strong. Corn and cotton emerged. Wheat and oats were maturing. Wheat growers seemed to have avoided a major rust outbreak. Stock-water tanks and rivers were full. With enough sunny days, hay harvesting was expected to begin within a week or so. Because of delays from wet weather, many producers switched from planting corn to planting grain sorghum or soybeans. Soil moisture, crops overall, and rangeland, pastures and livestock were all in good condition.
Coastal Bend: The region had another week of heavy rains, with most areas receiving 3 to 6 inches. Strong winds associated with the rains may have damaged some wheat and cornfields, reducing yields. Hail was also reported in isolated areas. Rice planting was also behind. Most growers needed just two to three more good days to finish planting sorghum. Rangeland and pastures were in very good condition due to consistent rains. Pecan producers were scouting for pecan nut casebearer moths. Livestock were also in good condition as they had plenty of grass to eat.
East: Fields throughout the area remained extremely wet. Continued rainfall was making it difficult to get into pastures and fields. Producers were waiting on drier conditions to move equipment stuck in muddy fields. Lakes, ponds, streams and creeks were full. Subsoil and topsoil moisture was adequate or surplus. Some trees were uprooted and toppled because of saturated soils and heavy leaf canopies. Winds from a recent storm system also damaged trees. Newly planted trees were not doing well in the wet soils. Herbicide and fertilizer applications were being applied where equipment could go and not get stuck. Livestock were doing well with very little supplemental feeding taking place. Spring calving continued. Cows were gaining weight on the new grass. Bulls were turned out for the breeding season.
Far West: Most counties received from 0.5 to 1 inch of rain. Some counties received strong to severe thunderstorms with the rain. Pastures and rangeland were in fair to good condition, and many ranchers were able to stop supplemental feeding of livestock early. Subsoil and topsoil moisture was adequate to short. Wheat was headed out in many areas and in fair to good condition. Producers were either planting upland cotton and grain sorghum or preparing fields to do so. Most counties had average temperatures for mid-April, but parts of Presidio County had a high of 105. Most producers were finishing working goats, lambs and spring calves.
North: Topsoil moisture was adequate to surplus. With the corn-planting deadline passed, it was estimated that only about 15 to 20 percent of designated corn acreage had been planted. The moisture received from late February through mid-April prevented most farmers in the county from planting their corn crop. Most will turn to an alternate crop of either grain sorghum or soybeans. Wheat was continuing to do well with the recent moisture, and producers were beginning to topdress with fertilizer. Winter annual pastures were also doing very well, and Bermuda grass pastures were starting to come out of dormancy. The weed population was on the rise. Drier conditions were needed for other crops to be planted. Livestock were doing well, and spring-born calves looked good. Fly and bug populations were increasing. Feral hog activity was on the rise.
Panhandle: The region had near to slightly above average temperatures with some rain received. Amounts mostly ranged from a trace to 1 inch, with a few areas getting 3 to 6 inches. Soil moisture continued to be rated mostly adequate to short. In Carson County, hail accompanied the rain and damaged wheat. Deaf Smith County producers only received 0.10 to 0.30 inch, and winds as high as 50 mph quickly dried out that small amount of moisture. In Hansford County, areas east and south of the city of Spearman received 5 inches of hail, which damaged wheat. Producers were busy trying to finish up fertilizer and herbicide applications in anticipation of planting corn. Once they’ve planted corn, producers will likely move to planting cotton and/or sunflowers. Grain sorghum planting dates were still two weeks away. In some areas, dryland winter wheat was suffering from lack of moisture. Dryland wheat that received rain may make a gr ain crop, depending upon how much rain it received. Some wheat under center pivots was already being watered or being grazed out, while some dryland wheat was being grazed out because of lack of rain. Wheat streak was starting to show up in some fields. Ochiltree County received some much-needed moisture, but it was a little late for most of the dryland wheat. Cattle on wheat were performing well. Rangeland and pastures continued to vary from poor to fair condition, with most counties reporting good to fair.
Rolling Plains: Parts of the region received as much as 2 inches of rain. Dryland wheat was already headed out, and it was expected that if more rain is received, it could do better than early planted wheat. Producers continued to scout fields for stripe rust. Though rust was found in most wheat, it currently was not at severe enough levels to warrant treatment. In some instances, the decision to treat was dependent upon whether the wheat will make a grain crop. The recent rains benefited pastures, rangeland and filled stock tanks. Grasses continued to flourish. Farmers continued to prepare fields for cotton planting. Livestock were in good condition with plenty of grazing. Cow/calf producers were busy working spring calves. Winter-annual grasses headed out and warm-season grasses were greening up. The peach crop showed promise with minimal damage from earlier storms.
South: The region’s weather continued to be cloudy with scattered showers. Rangeland and pastures were in good condition, and supplemental feeding of livestock was unnecessary throughout the region. In the northern part of the region, most areas received rains of 1.5 inches or more. Live Oak County received 4 to 9 inches of rain throughout the week. In the northern part of the region, producers were spraying wheat and oats for rust. Potatoes were flowering. Corn was doing well, and sorghum planting was completed, with most of the crop emerged. Soil moisture ranged from adequate to surplus. In the eastern part of the region, some wheat was knocked down by high winds, and producers were uncertain if it would stand back up for harvesting. Early planted grain sorghum fields were beginning to emerge. Kleberg and Kenedy counties received about 4 inches of rain, which stopped grain sorghum and cotton planting until the saturate d fields dried out. Soil moisture was adequate throughout the area. In the western part of the region, thunderstorms brought strong winds and large hailstones that knocked down or damaged trees. Zapata County received from 5 to 10 inches of rain. The heavy rainfall halted all spinach, cabbage and carrot harvesting. However, cool temperatures favored spinach growth. The spinach season should be extended by an additional two to three weeks as a result. Also in Zavala County, corn and sorghum crops were already emerged, onions progressed well, and watermelon planting was planned as soon as fields dried out. Soil moisture was adequate throughout the western counties. In the southern part of the region, more rain fell and fields remained saturated, further delaying planting and other activities. The rains hampered the harvesting of vegetables, citrus and sugarcane. Soil moisture was adequate to surplus.
South Plains: The region received good rains, with totals from 0.5 to 1 inch over much of the region. Garza County received from 1.5 to more than 4 inches. Scurry County got from 0.75 to 11 inches in a few locations, but the average was 1.5 inches. Wheat looked great, with some fields starting to head out. More corn was being planted; no cotton was planted yet. Lubbock County reported good moisture received across the county with producers continuing to prepare for planting season. Wet conditions in some areas halted field preparations and stopped prewatering. Moisture conditions in rangeland and pastures continued to improve, and warm-season grasses continued to grow. Cattle continued to improve as well.
Southeast: Soil moisture throughout the region varied widely, but was mostly adequate to surplus. Brazos, Galveston and San Jacinto counties reported 100 percent surplus. Rangeland and pasture ratings varied widely too, with fair ratings being the most common. San Jacinto County reported pastures to be 100 percent excellent. The scattered showers continued to keep already wet fields soggy. Winter annuals were still producing grazing thanks to adequate moisture and mild temperatures. Warm-season perennial grasses were beginning to grow. Fields were too wet to allow for fertility and herbicide applications until recently. In Fort Bend County, rain continued to delay planting. Some producers were able to plant a little this week, but for the most part, everything was on hold. Livestock were in good condition.
Southwest: Recent rains were good, though some counties remained dry, and winter grasses were starting to show signs of water stress. Bluebonnets and other wildflowers were in bloom. The peach crop remained on track, with a lot of thinning expected to be needed. Temperatures were normal for mid-April. Rangeland was much improved. Livestock were in good condition. Wild turkeys were nesting.
West Central: Days were warm and nights mild, with isolated and scattered thunderstorms in most areas. Hail accompanied some of the thunderstorms. Soil moisture remained very good. All areas needed more rain to fill stock tanks, ponds and lakes. Cotton producers were applying herbicides. Rust continued to infest wheat, but producers were waiting to determine if treatment was economically justified. Winter wheat continued to improve, with most fields in good to excellent condition. Some producers were harvesting wheat for hay. Grain sorghum planting was underway. Some forage sorghum was being planted as well. The potential yields for oats looked good. Rangeland and pastures were in good condition as warm-season grasses and forbs continued rapid growth with recent rains and warm temperatures. Livestock were in fair to good condition. Spring cattle working was underway. Wildlife, including wild turkeys, seemed to be doing well .
-30-
LikeTweet
Farm & Ranch
Forage Needs in the Fall
By Savannah Magoteaux
Two bales can look almost identical and feed very differently. Color, smell and leafiness tell part of the story, but a forage test tells you what your cattle are actually being offered. If you buy hay by the ton or are trying to stretch winter feed, that little lab sheet can be one of the cheapest management tools on the place.
Reading the report
Start with dry matter. Hay contains water, and labs report nutrients either “as fed” or on a dry-matter basis. Feeds are easiest to compare on a dry-matter basis because it takes moisture out of the comparison. Hay that is 90 percent dry matter is about 10 percent water.
Crude protein, usually abbreviated CP, is the number most people recognize. It estimates protein from the forage’s nitrogen content. Higher isn’t automatically better. The goal is to match the hay to the animal. A dry, mature cow in mid-gestation doesn’t need the same protein as a lactating cow, a growing replacement heifer or a young calf.
Energy matters just as much. Beef cattle forage reports commonly estimate energy as total digestible nutrients, or TDN. Low-TDN hay may fill a cow up before it supplies enough energy, particularly when her requirements rise late in gestation or during lactation. That is when you may need better forage, an energy supplement or a different feeding plan.
Fiber numbers explain why some hay looks coarse and why animals may not be able to eat enough of it. Neutral detergent fiber, or NDF, is closely tied to intake. As NDF climbs, cattle generally eat less because the forage moves through the digestive tract more slowly. Acid detergent fiber, or ADF, is tied to digestibility. Higher ADF generally means lower digestibility.
Some reports also include relative feed value or relative forage quality. These indexes help compare lots of forage, particularly alfalfa and mixed hay, but they aren’t a complete ration. They don’t replace looking at protein, energy, minerals, animal class and expected intake.
Then come the numbers you hope are boring. Nitrate testing matters when drought, heavy nitrogen fertilization, cloudy weather or other conditions have stressed the forage enough to cause nitrate accumulation. Sorghum-type forages, johnsongrass, corn and some weeds deserve particular attention. Nitrates stay in hay after it is cut and baled, so a risky crop doesn’t become safe just because it dried.
Minerals deserve a look, but this is where a hay report gets harder to interpret. Calcium, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium and other minerals may be listed, yet a complete mineral program depends on water, other feeds and local conditions. A high number isn’t always an advantage. Excessive potassium, for example, can interfere with magnesium use under some circumstances. If you are balancing a ration for high-risk animals, work with a nutritionist or Extension specialist rather than treating the lab sheet as a stand-alone mineral prescription.
Moisture tells another story. Hay baled too wet is at greater risk of heating and mold, and very wet hay can become a fire hazard as microbial activity raises its internal temperature. A test taken months later can’t reconstruct every storage problem, so inspect the stack, too. A musty odor, visible mold, unusual heat and dark discoloration are all reasons to investigate.
Getting a good sample
A hay test is only as good as the sample, and sampling is the step most likely to ruin a good analysis. A handful pulled from the outside of one convenient bale doesn’t represent a stack of 100 bales. Round bales aren’t uniform from the outside to the center, and one bale may not represent the whole cutting.
Texas A&M AgriLife recommends using a hay probe and collecting cores from multiple bales in a lot, then combining them into one representative sample. A coring probe reaches through the layers of the bale and gives the lab a much better cross-section. Test different cuttings, fields or hay types separately, and don’t blend samples from separate fields or cuttings to save the cost of a test if you will feed them as separate lots.
Putting the numbers to work
The most useful way to read the report is backward from the cattle. What class of animal will eat this hay, at what stage of production, and how much is she likely to eat? Once you answer those questions, the lab numbers start to mean something.
A mature dry cow in good body condition can often use lower-quality forage than a first-calf heifer nursing a calf. Young cattle need nutrients for growth on top of maintenance, and cold stress raises energy demand. A hay test becomes valuable when you pair it with those real-world differences.
Remember that price per bale isn’t the same as price per unit of nutrition. A cheap bale with very low energy and protein may require expensive supplementation, and better hay can turn out to be the lower-cost feed once you count waste and supplements.
Before buying, try putting two hay reports side by side. Compare dry matter, crude protein, TDN and fiber first. Then add delivered cost and likely feeding waste. A heavier, denser bale isn’t automatically more economical, and a greener bale isn’t automatically more nutritious. The numbers make the comparison fair.
Testing is especially valuable after a hard weather year. Drought hay may be lower in yield and higher in nitrate risk. Mature, rain-damaged hay may test lower in protein and energy than it looks. Hay cut from a fertilized field after stress may deserve a safety screen before it ever reaches a feeder.
A forage test won’t make poor hay better. It shows you where the gaps are before your cattle show them through lost condition or lower performance. One report can’t answer every feeding question, but it replaces several guesses with measurements, and that makes winter nutrition planning much more accurate.
Farm & Ranch
When Acorns Become a Problem
By Savannah Magoteaux
A heavy crop of acorns under an oak tree usually looks more like a sign of fall than a livestock problem. For most cattle in most years, that is all it is. Trouble starts when acorns stop being an occasional bite and become a meaningful part of the diet.
Oak leaves, buds and acorns contain tannins that can damage the digestive tract and kidneys when cattle eat enough of them. Green acorns are generally considered more toxic than mature brown ones, but either can cause problems if cattle eat too many.
The risk climbs when forage is short and cattle go looking for something else to eat. Drought, overgrazed pastures or simply a heavy acorn crop can set up that situation.
Cattle aren’t equally interested in acorns. A few animals in a herd may eat far more than the rest, which helps explain why cases can appear scattered.
Early signs can be vague. Affected cattle may go off feed, look depressed or become constipated. As the damage progresses, you may see dark or bloody manure, abdominal pain, frequent urination followed by reduced urine output, dehydration and weakness. Kidney failure is the most serious concern.
You can’t remove every acorn from a wooded pasture, so prevention comes down to keeping cattle from relying on them. Adequate forage and supplementation take away the incentive to eat large amounts.
You can also fence cattle away from heavily producing oaks for a while, especially when pasture conditions are poor. If several animals seem to be seeking out acorns, take a close look at the rest of the ration instead of assuming they will quit on their own.
If you suspect oak poisoning, call a veterinarian early. Treatment is supportive and does much more good before severe kidney damage sets in. Moving unaffected cattle away from the source and providing good-quality feed and water may prevent more cases.
Acorns are an important fall food for deer, squirrels and other wildlife, and a few acorns generally don’t spell disaster for cattle. The concern is quantity. A pasture full of oaks becomes a different management problem when grass is short, cattle are hungry and the ground is covered with something they are willing to eat.
Oak toxicity comes up most often in cattle, but other livestock can be affected, too. And the risk isn’t limited to acorns. Oak buds and young leaves also contain tannins, so spring can occasionally bring problems as well. In fall, though, the obvious temptation is lying on the ground where cattle can eat it quickly.
Watch where your cattle spend their time. If cows that normally graze open grass start camping under oaks and hunting acorns, that behavior tells you something.
Walk the pasture, estimate how much usable forage is left and check whether a few dominant animals are eating more than the rest. Hay or supplemental feed may help, but place it where all the cattle can reach it rather than assuming one feeder will solve the problem.
Oak poisoning can look like other illnesses, and no one can diagnose kidney damage from pasture observation alone. A veterinarian may use history, clinical signs and lab work to separate it from dehydration, digestive disease or other toxicities. That is another reason to mention a heavy acorn crop when you call. A detail that seems like an ordinary part of fall can be an important part of the history.
Your pasture plan doesn’t have to be complicated. If one wooded trap has a much heavier acorn crop than the rest, use another pasture while you still have the choice.
If you can’t move the herd, make sure hay and supplement are adequate before the animals get hungry enough to seek out acorns aggressively. Salt or mineral by itself won’t make up for a shortage of forage.
The problem usually fades as cattle eat through the crop or the acorns weather or get covered. Don’t return cattle that have already shown signs as soon as they look better, though. Kidney injury can be serious. Follow your veterinarian’s recommendations and reassess the pasture before turning recovered animals back out.
Farm & Ranch
Land Market Report
By Jared Groce
Late summer has been brutal on our livestock, our grass and the rural land market in North Texas. We currently have an astounding 42 months of inventory on hand in our report area, and the only properties selling are the ones priced right. Overpriced properties aren’t even getting looked at, much less receiving offers, so pricing your property correctly matters more than ever right now.
Many sellers are still picturing the daily price increases we saw in 2020 to 2023, but those days are behind us, and agents need to be more realistic with listing prices to get any activity for their clients. Hopefully the rains will come soon and bring more land buyers with them this fall, but right now it is still very much a buyer’s market. No one knows how long this dry spell will last, but it will likely take a flood to end it. The same is true of the weather!
They say the best time to plant a tree, or buy land, was 20 years ago, and the second-best time is today.
| County | Area | Acres | $/Acre | List Price | Sold Price | Sale/List | DOM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clay | Henrietta | 120.07 | $5,150 | $714,000 | $618,309 | 86.60% | 434 |
| Clay | Bellevue | 159.44 | $6,184 | $981,000 | $985,959 | 100.50% | 48 |
| Clay | Henrietta | 293 | $4,982 | $1,538,250 | $1,459,600 | 94.90% | 212 |
| Clay | Average | 190.84 | $5,438 | $1,077,750 | $1,021,289 | 94.00% | 231 |
| Collin | Anna | 11.08 | $84,356 | $1,200,000 | $935,000 | 77.90% | 634 |
| Collin | Average | 11.08 | $84,356 | $1,200,000 | $935,000 | 77.90% | 634 |
| Cooke | Muenster | 11 | $18,000 | $209,000 | $198,000 | 94.70% | 250 |
| Cooke | Gainesville | 19.3 | $16,580 | $345,000 | $320,000 | 92.80% | 541 |
| Cooke | Valley View | 96.23 | $15,500 | $1,679,215 | $1,491,565 | 88.80% | 194 |
| Cooke | Average | 42.18 | $16,693 | $744,405 | $669,855 | 92.10% | 328 |
| Denton | Sanger | 16.46 | $39,422 | $649,000 | $649,000 | 100.00% | 47 |
| Denton | Cross Roads | 10.35 | $97,575 | $1,200,000 | $1,010,000 | 84.20% | 40 |
| Denton | Sanger | 300 | $14,000 | $4,999,999 | $4,200,000 | 84.00% | 1,327 |
| Denton | Aubrey | 74.09 | $57,684 | $4,815,525 | $4,273,550 | 88.70% | 302 |
| Denton | Average | 100.22 | $52,170 | $2,916,131 | $2,533,138 | 89.20% | 429 |
| Grayson | Collinsville | 11.61 | $46,516 | $600,000 | $540,000 | 90.00% | 280 |
| Grayson | Van Alstyne | 18.8 | $58,511 | $1,175,000 | $1,100,000 | 93.60% | 280 |
| Grayson | Whitesboro | 30 | $37,984 | $1,170,000 | $1,139,506 | 97.40% | 277 |
| Grayson | Average | 20.14 | $47,670 | $981,667 | $926,502 | 93.70% | 237 |
| Jack | No sales reported | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Montague | Montague | 485 | N/A | $5,566,000 | N/A | N/A | 333 |
| Montague | Bowie | 26 | $12,244 | $323,500 | $318,352 | 98.40% | 743 |
| Montague | Montague | 37.3 | $10,327 | $428,950 | $385,195 | 89.80% | 1 |
| Montague | Saint Jo | 1,185 | $7,764 | $10,000,000 | $9,199,829 | 92.00% | 19 |
| Montague | Average | 433.33 | $10,112 | $4,079,613 | $3,301,125 | 93.40% | 274 |
| Wise | Sunset | 12 | $19,027 | $234,000 | $228,320 | 97.60% | 16 |
| Wise | Sunset | 12 | $19,027 | $234,000 | $228,320 | 97.60% | 14 |
| Wise | Chico | 11.44 | $24,476 | $299,000 | $280,000 | 93.60% | 24 |
| Wise | Chico | 10.25 | $29,265 | $315,000 | $300,000 | 95.20% | 12 |
| Wise | Average | 11.42 | $22,949 | $270,000 | $259,160 | 96.00% | 17 |
DOM = days on market
-
Country Lifestyles4 years agoScott & Stacey Schumacher: A Growth Mindset
-
Country Lifestyles10 years agoStyle Your Profile – What your style cowboy hat says about you and new trends in 2017
-
Horsefeathers13 years agoMount Scott: Country Humor with David Gregory
-
Outdoor11 years agoButtercup or Primrose?
-
Country Lifestyles10 years agoJune 2016 Profile – The man behind the mic: Bob Tallman
-
HOME10 years agoGrazing North Texas – Wilman Lovegrass
-
Country Lifestyles10 years agoDecember 2016 Profile, Rusty Riddle – The Riddle Way
-
The Natural Horseman9 years agoThis is why we do what we do — RayeAnn and Cisco




