Connect with us

Farm & Ranch

[AgriLife Today] Texas Crop Weather Report – Feb. 9

Published

on

By: Adam Russell

Wet weather headed to Texas

COLLEGE STATION – A pattern of wet weather lies ahead for much of the state following a dry winter, said the state climatologist.

The rain could mean a short-term reprieve for much of the state needing moisture following the warmest winter months for Texas in decades.

A rain gauge at the Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center in Overton sits empty. Expected rains this coming weekend could change that. (Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service photo by Adam Russell)

Dr. John Nielsen-Gammon, in the Texas A&M University department of atmospheric sciences in College Station said expectations going into winter were for weather conditions to be warmer and drier than average throughout the season.

Nielsen-Gammon said records show it was the warmest November through January for the state of Texas since the Dust Bowl of the 1930s. A few stations in the lower Rio Grande Valley recorded temperatures as high as 96 degrees in January. Many stations in that region and along the coast never recorded a low daily temperature below 70 degrees throughout the month.

On the cold side, temperatures did reach -9 degrees in the Panhandle at Dalhart, he said. But cold fronts were short-lived and intermittent for much of the state.

Rainfall was a mixed bag for Texas since November, Nielsen-Gammon said. Most of West Texas received higher-than-normal rainfall amounts, while North Central Texas and surrounding areas received below-normal rainfall.

Nielsen-Gammon does expect chances of wet weather for most of the state starting over the weekend. The rains should pacify concerns about wildfires as the state heads into the season when dead foliage and grass can become dangerous fuel for fires when mixed with high winds and a spark.

“We haven’t seen any substantial drought developing except maybe in the Corpus Christi area, but there have been lingering drought conditions in parts of the state from early fall,” he said.

Nielsen-Gammon also expects temperatures to fall briefly in the near future.

There may be a brief cool front later this week, with a slow moving cold front expected for the beginning of next week, he said.

“We could see a front slowly creeping across Texas with decent blasts of cold air especially in North Texas,” he said. “We’ll just have to see how far that cold air makes it.”

But he does expect fairly warmer patterns to prevail and to keep temperatures at or above average.

“I just don’t see any prolonged cool weather at this point,” he said.

AgriLife Extension district reporters compiled the following summaries:

CENTRAL: Fields with small grains were starting to dry. Field work resumed with fertilization and weed control. Wheat fields looked good. Livestock were looking good with supplemental feeding. Farmers were about to start planting corn. Rangeland was in good shape. Pest numbers increased due to warmer weather. Precipitation kept subsoil moisture at above-average levels. Rains helped tanks, creeks and rivers maintain high levels. Wheat continued to grow well.

ROLLING PLAINS: Soil conditions continued to be dry in parts of the district with above-normal temperatures and zero moisture. Windy conditions were drying out pastures and rangelands, which caused wildfire concerns for producers. The lack of moisture and spring-type weather allowed cotton farmers to harvest fields quickly without any down time. This year’s crop yielded better than expected. Subsoil moisture was good. Stocker cattle were being turned out on wheat fields. Livestock were in good condition. Calving season continued. Range and pastures were in good condition.

COASTAL BEND: Mild temperatures and adequate moisture levels were reported. Producers were preparing for corn planting within the next few weeks. Preplant fertilizer applications and bedding activity occurred. Spring-like weather prompted some peach varieties to bloom. Some areas reported some damage to pastures after the freeze, but they were greening with the above-normal temperatures. Cattle and calves were doing well for this time of the year, and livestock continued to be fed from an oversupply of older hay as well as plenty baled in 2016.

EAST: Dry weather conditions were reported for most of the region. A few counties reported light drizzle. Windy weather contributed to a drying out of soil moisture. Subsoil and topsoil were still mostly adequate. All counties needed rain. Pasture and rangeland conditions were fair to good. Producers were planting gardens and getting spring beds ready. Some growers were concerned about not getting enough chill hours for fruit trees. Temperatures remained warm during the day and cool to cold at night. Some ryegrass was growing. Winter pastures were growing slowly due to a shortage of rain. Shelby County reported winter pastures were in good shape. Producers were making forage management plans regarding establishment and maintenance in Polk County. Hay and supplemental feeding continued. In Trinity County, some cattle were not eating hay during the day as they chased green grass sprouts, but they returned to the hay rings at night. Spring calves were being born and growing well. Producers were getting bulls ready or making purchases in preparation for the spring breeding season. Cattle were in good condition. Cattle prices were lower at local markets. Wild pigs were active with several being seen on the highways after being hit by vehicles.

SOUTH PLAINS: Subsoil and topsoil moisture conditions continued to drop due to lack of moisture. Pastures and rangeland remained in fair condition but needed rain. Harvests were completed, and producers were preparing land for spring planting. Winter wheat growth rates were slow, and field conditions were poor due to cold weather. Temperatures in Hale County were above normal. Winter wheat in Floyd County was in decent shape. Most cotton gins had completed operations for the season. Field activities included shredding of stalks and fertilizer applications. Producers were booking seed, working to negotiate lease agreements and arranging operating loans. Other activities included deep tillage, herbicide applications and incorporation procedures.

PANHANDLE: Conditions were dry and windy with near normal temperatures. Soil moisture levels were mostly adequate. Some field work was in progress. Hall County pastures and range conditions continued to improve as spring-like conditions emerged. Cotton harvest was close to completion with yields and quality grades looking good. Cattle condition scores continued to decline with pasture conditions. Some land preparation was in progress for spring planting. Moisture helped land preparation. Cattle were supplemented.

NORTH: Topsoil and subsoil moisture levels varied from adequate to short. There was no significant rainfall, as warm and windy conditions predominated. Wheat and oat pastures were actively growing and looked good due to the warm weather. Producers applied fertilizer where needed. The dry conditions allowed farmers to get into fields earlier to prepare for spring planting. Stockers were beginning to get some measurable grazing and were in good shape. Cow and calf outfits reported cows in good shape with spring calving going smoothly so far. Cow body condition scores averaged from 6-7. Ranchers were not shy about feeding plenty of hay due to an overabundance of bales. The biggest challenge for livestock were major swings in temperatures. Feral hogs were a problem and were being caught through the trapping program.

FAR WEST: Temperature highs were in the 70s with lows in the 30s. No precipitation was reported. Windy conditions prevailed. Wheat continued to make slow progress. Fertilization of fields began, and growing points were nearing the soil surface. Cattle conditions were holding. There was little green forage in pastures due to a lack of rainfall.

WEST CENTRAL: Unseasonably warm and windy conditions continued and were expected to continue. Chances of rain were forecast. Most areas needed rain for good soil moisture. Preparations for spring planting were underway in some areas. Many producers were waiting on rain to help soil moisture levels before plowing. Cotton harvest was mostly complete. Gins were about 80 percent finished. Wheat emerged and was in fair to good condition. Cotton producers shredded stalks and plowed. Rangeland and pasture conditions were prime for wildfires and prescribed burning. Livestock remained in fair to good condition. Small grains were grazed by livestock. Supplemental feeding continued. Cattle markets remained active, and demand was good.

SOUTHEAST: Livestock were in good condition. Farmers will likely start planting corn in the next week. Unusually warm temperatures were reported. Topsoil was beginning to dry somewhat depending on the soil type. A cold front dropped temperatures in Waller County considerably. Most days were clear; however, some mornings had fog. Most deciduous trees budded out. Bermuda grass pastures showed light greening and growth. Ryegrass started to head out in ungrazed areas. Weather conditions allowed spring pasture planting activities. Jefferson County experienced scattered showers. Soil moisture levels throughout the region ranged widely from adequate to surplus with most ratings in the adequate range. Rangeland and pasture ratings varied widely too, from excellent to very poor, with fair ratings being most common.

SOUTHWEST: Conditions remained the same. Soil moisture levels were drying. Most of the area experienced unseasonably warm temperatures. Fields were being prepared for corn planting. Livestock, rangeland and pasture conditions remained fair.

SOUTH: Weather was cool in the evening and warm during the day, including lows in the 40s and mid-80s in some areas. No significant rain was reported, but light scattered showers fell in parts of the district. Field work started or continued for spring cotton, corn and sorghum planting. Potato planting continued. Wheat and oat crops emerged and were under irrigation throughout the area. Pasture and range conditions were fair to poor and were declining in most areas. Supplemental feeding for livestock continued. Live Oak County experienced another freeze and two dry and windy northern fronts. Producers were actively burning old pasture grass. Cattle body condition scores remained fair. Soil moisture conditions ranged from adequate to short. The cattle market was on a positive trend. Some farmers applied pre-emergence herbicides and fertilizers in some areas. Warm-season grasses tried to green but were slowed by lack of moisture. Coastal Bermuda grass remained dormant and yellow. Conditions forced producers to apply irrigation to wheat, oats, cabbage, spinach, onions, carrots and broccoli. Some cabbage harvesting occurred in local fields, but cabbage market prices were low. Crop producers also prepared to plant tomatoes and onions.

-30-

LikeTweet

Find more stories, photos, videos and audio at http://today.agrilife.org

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Beyond Crude Protein

Published

on

By

By NTFR Staff

A stack of hay may look good from the outside. The bales may be heavy, green and free of obvious weeds or mold. None of that tells a cattle producer what the hay will provide once it reaches the feed bunk.

Two bales from the same field can differ noticeably in nutrition if they were cut at different stages of maturity, weathered differently or stored under different conditions. The differences grow even larger when you compare hay bought from separate farms or produced in different growing seasons.

A forage analysis takes much of the guesswork out by showing what the hay contains and where you may need to supplement.

Crude protein is often the first number producers check, but it is only one part of the report. Energy, fiber, moisture and possible toxicity concerns can matter just as much when deciding whether a lot of hay suits dry cows, lactating cows, replacement heifers or growing calves.

Reading beyond the protein number

Most forage reports show results on both an “as received” and a dry-matter basis. The as-received column includes the water in the hay. The dry-matter column takes moisture out of the calculation so you can compare feeds with different moisture levels fairly.

For ration planning, the dry-matter values are usually the most useful. If you’re comparing dry hay with silage, cubes or another feed, make the comparison on a dry-matter basis rather than on the numbers as fed.

Moisture still deserves attention. Hay baled too wet is more likely to heat, mold or deteriorate in storage. In severe cases, heating can create a fire risk. Moisture also affects how many pounds of actual nutrients you are buying. A heavy bale isn’t necessarily a nutrient-dense bale if much of its weight is water.

Crude protein, usually listed as CP, estimates the protein in the forage based on its nitrogen content. Protein keeps the rumen microbes that help cattle digest forage working. When forage protein drops too low, intake and digestion may decline because those microbes can’t function as well.

The amount of protein a cow needs changes a great deal through the year. A mature, dry cow in mid-pregnancy needs less than a cow in late pregnancy or early lactation. Young, growing cattle and first-calf heifers may also need more protein than mature dry cows. Hay that is adequate for one group may fall short for another.

Always compare a forage report with the needs of the cattle that will eat the hay. Oklahoma State University notes that cattle requirements vary with weight, age, stage of production, desired gain and milk production. A single protein target can’t describe the needs of an entire herd.

Energy is another major piece of the feeding decision. Many forage reports express energy as total digestible nutrients, or TDN, an estimate of the digestible energy in the feed. Protein supports rumen function and tissue growth, while energy fuels maintenance, pregnancy, milk production and weight gain.

Hay can test well for protein and still come up short on energy. That matters most for cows nearing calving or producing milk. Low-energy hay may leave cattle feeling full without giving them enough nutrition to hold body condition. University of Nebraska Extension stresses evaluating both protein and energy when judging the feeding value of forage.

Fiber measurements help explain why cattle eat one hay readily and less of another. Neutral detergent fiber, or NDF, represents much of the plant’s structural material, including cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. As NDF rises, cattle generally eat less because bulky, fibrous forage stays in the digestive tract longer.

Acid detergent fiber, or ADF, includes the least digestible parts of the plant. Higher ADF generally means lower digestibility and less available energy. Put simply, high NDF can limit how much cattle eat, and high ADF can mean they get less energy from what they do eat.

Both numbers tend to climb as forage plants mature. Mature hay usually has more stem and less leaf than hay cut earlier. It may still be acceptable feed for animals with lower needs, but it is less likely to support lactating cows or growing cattle without supplementation.

Some reports also include relative feed value, or RFV. This index uses ADF and NDF to compare forage quality, particularly for alfalfa and other legumes. It can help when you compare similar types of hay, but it doesn’t account for every nutrient cattle need. Don’t let RFV replace a closer look at crude protein, energy and the animal’s stage of production.

Depending on the lab package you choose, the report may include minerals. Labs commonly report calcium and phosphorus, but a forage analysis can’t replace a well-designed mineral program. Water quality, other feeds and interactions among minerals all affect mineral needs and availability. Work with an Extension specialist, veterinarian or livestock nutritionist before making major mineral changes.

Nitrate and prussic acid

A standard forage analysis may not include nitrates, and you often have to request that test separately. Nitrate testing is especially important for drought-stressed forage, heavily fertilized fields and crops such as sorghum, sudangrass, sorghum-sudan hybrids, millet, oats and some weeds.

Nitrate can remain in cured hay and doesn’t reliably disappear in storage. Test any hay you suspect of high nitrate before feeding it. Oklahoma State University recommends a laboratory analysis because field screening tests can show that nitrate is present but can’t measure how much.

Prussic acid is a different concern. Unlike nitrate, prussic acid usually dissipates as properly cured hay sits in storage, though suspect forage still needs careful management and professional guidance. Be sure which test you need, and don’t treat the terms nitrate and prussic acid as interchangeable.

Putting the numbers to work

A hay test pays off when it leads to a feeding plan. Once you have the results, you can match the hay to the right class of cattle. Save better hay for replacement heifers, thin cows, late-gestation cows or cows with calves at side. Feed lower-quality hay to mature dry cows with modest requirements.

Testing can also prevent unnecessary supplementation. Without an analysis, you may buy protein tubs, cubes or other supplements your cattle don’t need. The opposite mistake costs just as much. Assuming hay is better than it is can lead to lost body condition, lower milk production, poor breed-back rates and lighter calves.

Visual inspection still matters. Don’t ignore mold, foreign material, weeds, dust or heat damage because a lab report shows acceptable numbers. At the same time, color and appearance can’t reliably predict nutrient content. University of Nebraska notes that forage nutrient values vary widely, which makes average book values a poor substitute for testing the feed you have on hand.

A forage analysis won’t make poor hay better, but it can show you how to use that hay well. For the cost of a test, you get information that can guide hay purchases, cut supplement waste and put each lot of hay where it will do the most good.

The protein number may get the most attention, but it doesn’t tell the whole story. Understanding moisture, TDN, NDF, ADF and potential toxicity gives you a much clearer picture of what is inside the bale.

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Don’t Be Caught Off Guard

Published

on

By

By Savannah Magoteaux

A September rain can be exactly what a North Texas pasture needs, but that flush of green can bring an unwelcome guest.

Fall armyworms are a familiar late-summer and early-fall pest across Texas, and they can do serious damage to pastures and hay fields when conditions are right. Bermudagrass is a common target, but armyworms also feed on small grains, ryegrass and other forage crops. The key is catching them early, before a manageable infestation turns into a field that seems to disappear overnight.

Despite the name, fall armyworms are caterpillars. The adult moths migrate into Texas and lay masses of eggs on grasses, fence posts, buildings and other surfaces. Once the larvae hatch, they start feeding on plants.

Young armyworms are small and hard to spot unless you are actively scouting. As they grow, their appetite climbs. Larger larvae can strip leaves fast, leaving stems behind and cutting into available forage or hay yield.

Look for an inverted, light-colored “Y” on the caterpillar’s head. Mature larvae can reach about 1½ inches long and often have several dark and light stripes running the length of the body.

Armyworms feed most actively during the cooler parts of the day, so early morning and late afternoon are good times to scout. Walk through several areas of the pasture rather than checking only along the edge. Look closely near the soil surface and beneath grass leaves, especially where you see fresh feeding damage.

Scouting matters most after rain or irrigation. New grass growth draws newly hatched larvae, and populations can build quickly when conditions favor them.

Texas A&M AgriLife Extension generally recommends considering treatment in improved pastures when you find about three or more armyworms per square foot. The decision should also weigh the size of the larvae, how much forage is present, the expected hay value and how severe the damage is.

Timing matters. Small armyworms are easier to control than large ones, and an insecticide does less good once the caterpillars are nearly mature and have already eaten much of the forage. If you treat, follow the product label carefully, including grazing and hay-harvest restrictions.

Don’t assume one treatment or one scouting trip will carry a pasture through the season. Fall armyworm moths can keep moving into an area, laying more eggs and starting another generation of larvae. Keep checking fields even after you have controlled an infestation.

For hay producers, an approaching harvest date can also shape the decision. When the crop is close to harvest, cutting the field may be a better option than spraying. The best choice depends on the number and size of the armyworms, how much forage remains and whether the weather allows you to cut hay.

September rain is usually welcome across North Texas, especially after a long, hot summer. Just remember that fresh green grass deserves a closer look. A few minutes of scouting can make the difference between catching fall armyworms early and finding the damage after they have eaten their fill.

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

When the Pond Shrinks

Published

on

By

By NTFR Staff

By midsummer, many farm ponds across Oklahoma and North Texas look a lot different than they did a few months earlier. Water levels have dropped, shorelines have spread into muddy flats, and the green banks of spring have given way to cracked soil and dried vegetation. For many livestock producers, these ponds are still the main water source for their animals. As the water recedes, you have to ask whether it is still safe.

A shrinking pond doesn’t automatically become unsafe, but falling water levels can change water quality fast. During long stretches of heat and drought, contaminants concentrate, algae can flourish and livestock may have to drink water that isn’t as clean as it once was.

Water is the most important nutrient livestock consume, so watching your ponds through the summer matters as much as watching your forage.

Less water, more concentrated problems

When rain is scarce and evaporation outpaces refill, ponds shrink while much of what is dissolved or suspended in the water stays behind. Minerals, nutrients, bacteria and organic matter grow more concentrated as the water volume drops.

That doesn’t make the water dangerous overnight, but it can let problems develop much faster than they would in a full pond.

One of the biggest hot-weather concerns is blue-green algae, more accurately called cyanobacteria. Warm temperatures, sunlight and extra nutrients from manure or fertilizer runoff give these organisms ideal conditions to multiply. Some species produce toxins that can affect the nervous system or liver of livestock, wildlife, pets and even people.

Not every algae bloom is toxic, and not every green pond is dangerous. You can’t tell whether a bloom is toxic by looking at it, though, so treat blooms seriously until someone can evaluate them.

Blue-green algae often looks like bright green, paint-like scum floating on the surface, but it can also form streaks, mats or clumps that collect along shorelines where the wind pushes them.

Heat changes water quality

Summer heat also lowers the amount of oxygen dissolved in water. Fish kills can happen when oxygen drops too low, especially after several cloudy days or when large amounts of algae die and decompose.

Dead fish are more than an unpleasant sight. They can signal that the pond is under stress and water quality has declined.

As water levels fall, livestock also crowd around fewer access points. More hoof traffic stirs up sediment, and manure builds up in the shallows. Bacteria levels can rise, making the water less appealing and possibly less healthy for livestock.

In some areas, dissolved salts can also concentrate as ponds shrink. Higher salinity may cut water intake, hurt animal performance and, in severe cases, contribute to health problems.

Watch your livestock

Your animals are often one of the best indicators of water quality.

Healthy cattle generally drink 10 to 20 gallons of water a day, depending on the weather, body size and stage of production. Horses may drink even more in intense heat or during hard work.

If livestock suddenly seem reluctant to drink, spend less time around the pond or start looking for water elsewhere, find out why. Also watch for diarrhea, lethargy, poor weight gain or unexplained illness during long stretches of hot weather. Many things can cause those symptoms, but don’t rule out poor water quality.

What you can do

Protecting livestock doesn’t always take expensive improvements.

Walk the pond regularly. Watch for changes in water color, unusual odors, heavy algae growth, dead fish or wildlife, and manure piling up around watering areas.

Limiting livestock access to the shoreline can also improve water quality. Many producers fence ponds and let animals drink from one limited access point, or pump pond water into stock tanks. Either approach reduces bank erosion, keeps manure out of the water and helps the pond stay healthier over time.

If an algae bloom appears, keep livestock away until someone can evaluate it. Some blooms disappear within days, while others last for weeks, depending on the weather.

Keeping vegetation around the pond also reduces erosion and slows nutrient runoff from surrounding pastures.

If you question the water, a laboratory test can tell you about bacteria levels, salinity, sulfates and other concerns. Your local Extension office or veterinarian can help you decide whether testing makes sense and recommend a lab.

Plan ahead for dry years

Drought reminds us that water deserves the same attention as forage. Many operations keep backup hay for dry years, but few have a backup water plan. Developing other water sources, maintaining wells, setting up portable tanks or improving existing ponds before drought hits can ease the strain on livestock and producers when rain stops falling.

Farm ponds remain a valuable resource across the Southern Plains, but they aren’t maintenance-free. As water levels fall, a few minutes each week spent watching for changes can help you catch problems before they affect animal health.

A pond doesn’t have to be full to provide safe drinking water, but it does need attention. During long, hot summers, the quality of the water left in the pond often matters more than the amount.

Continue Reading
Ad
Ad
Ad

Trending