Connect with us

Farm & Ranch

[AgriLife Today] Texas Crop and Weather Report for March 17, 2018

Published

on

By: Adam Russell

Most planted sorghum fields in good shape, unplanted areas dealing with drought

COLLEGE STATION – Sorghum fields have been planted in much of the state, but lack of soil moisture could be problematic for areas yet to be planted, said a Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service expert.

“Moisture is good in some areas, a little wet in some areas, drier in others, but good overall for this point,” he said. “A lot of acres are planted already, but it’s still early to know how many acres will be planted this year.”Dr. Ronnie Schnell, AgriLife Extension cropping systems specialist, College Station, said sorghum planting is complete or well underway in major production regions like the Coastal Bend, Rio Grande Valley and Central Texas. Overall, soil moisture indexes in those regions is good, but another production region – the Panhandle – will need significant rainfall to improve conditions as planting approaches.

Concern regarding sugarcane aphids has largely subsided in regions devastated by the pest in 2014 and 2015, Schnell said. Utilizing effective insecticide treatments and increased planting of aphid tolerant varieties has allowed producers to approach sorghum more confidently.

“Producers appear to be comfortable managing aphids with tolerant hybrids and insecticides, and I think we’ve seen the impact of that over the last few years,” he said. “The combination of favorable environmental conditions, tolerant hybrids and improved management has reduced the impact of sugarcane aphids for many producers.”

Schnell said the concern this year, especially in the Panhandle where no significant precipitation has been received since October, will be drought. There are pockets of the state experiencing differing levels of drought. Whether it subsides or worsens will have a major impact on production.

“A lot of the state is in decent shape overall,” he said. “We’ll have to wait and see how weather plays out.”

AgriLife Extension district reporters compiled the following summaries:

CENTRAL: Corn planting was nearly complete.  Cool soil temperatures slowed down Bermuda grass emergence, but upper 80-degree days in the forecast should change that. The local cattle, sheep and goat markets were up some. Pasture and rangeland conditions continued to improve. Expected rain should help keep wheat and oats growing. Most producers reduced hay for cattle but continued to supplement feed. Producers were irrigating in preparation to plant cotton, and pecans and alfalfa fields were being irrigated. Pastures were green with spring forage, but Coastal Bermuda grass fields were extremely short due to colder than normal temperatures this winter that included multiple freezes. All counties reported good soil moisture. Most counties reported good overall crop, rangeland and pasture conditions.

The 12 Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Districts

ROLLING PLAINS: Conditions were dry, windy, and warm. Some producers in the western part of the district were extremely short on moisture. Cotton farmers were busy preparing fields for the upcoming season but were finding even subsoil moisture was extremely low. Livestock were in good condition with producers feeding supplements daily. Some producers were beginning to wean calves earlier to relieve some pressure on cows. Several wheat acreages were being evaluated for insurance. One county reported wheat will not be harvested, but will serve as grazing for stocker cattle. Wheat looked better in areas that received moisture, but is still behind where it should be. Mites were reported in wheat.

COASTAL BEND: Dry, windy conditions continued to cause concern as soil moisture diminished in many areas. The weather forecast called for scattered showers, and some farmers said they would wait to see how much rain materialized before resuming planting. Cotton planting was in full swing with corn and sorghum coming up and doing well. Rice planting was also starting up, and some fertilizer and herbicide applications were made. The calf crop looked good, and cattle were doing well.

EAST: The district received traces of rainfall with mostly warm weather conditions day and night. Cherokee County reported ponds were full, and Harrison County reported fields were still soggy. Producers around the district reported growth and greening of all grasses. Pasture and rangeland conditions were fair to good throughout the district apart from Anderson, Newton, and Shelby counties, which reported poor conditions. Panola County peach producers were extremely excited due to abundant chilling hours for the first time in numerous years. Vegetable producers continued to prepare and plant throughout the district. Wheat fields were in very good condition in Anderson and Cherokee counties while Panola County reported very poor conditions. Cherokee County also reported oats were in good condition. Subsoil conditions were adequate. All district topsoil conditions were adequate except for Marion County which reported a surplus. Cattle were in good condition with deworming and calving in full swing throughout the district. Cattle sale numbers were good with low prices at sale barns in Gregg, Houston, and Shelby counties. Small amounts of supplemental feeding were reported by producers throughout the area. Gregg County reported summer weeds were emerging while Upshur County reported preparations being made for spraying winter weeds. Very costly wild pig damage was reported in Anderson, Trinity, Wood and Upshur counties. Flies caused worry to producers in Houston County.

SOUTH PLAINS: Dry, windy conditions during March caused problems for producers. The soil profile was lacking moisture going into spring planting. Some producers were beginning to pre-irrigate and prepare for spring planting. Cattle were being moved from wheat that was grazed completely, and irrigation increased on wheat intended for grain. Irrigated winter wheat fields looked good. Cow/calf producers were supplementing their herds to make up for poor range conditions.

PANHANDLE: Dry, windy conditions continued with warmer temperatures. Moisture was needed throughout the district, and fire danger was high. Soil moisture was very short. Areas reported no precipitation so far in 2018. Irrigation was active on wheat and alfalfa, and some pre-irrigation was made in preparation for corn planting. Warmer weather caused wheat to green up in irrigated fields, but growth was still below average. Calving season continued. Supplemental feeding was very active. Horn flies on cattle were reported much earlier than usual. Producers reported field work would be limited until a good general rain occurs.

NORTH: Topsoil and subsoil moisture levels ranged from mostly adequate to short in most counties. Temperatures were warmer with high winds and no rain. A heavy rainfall event was in the forecast. Winter wheat and oat fields were doing well, and many producers took advantage of the dry week to fertilize pastures. Corn farmers continued to plant, with about 15-20 percent complete. Producers have not planted any cotton or grain sorghum yet. Volunteer ryegrass was starting to grow, and cattle were starting to graze. Livestock were in good condition, and spring-born calves looked good. Wild pigs were active in some counties.

FAR WEST: Temperatures ranged, with highs in the 90s and lows in the 50s. Some rain showers were reported through the area but no measurable amounts. More and more pre-irrigation occurs each week. However, many producers said they would not pre-water until it rains since irrigation alone will not be enough to get a crop going. Crop outlooks were not positive. Afternoon winds increased, compounding dry conditions. Some counties were under red flag warnings because of fire dangers. Pastures were showing some slight greening in the bottoms of grass due to spring, but will not last without some rain. Fruits, pecans and vineyards needed irrigation. Lambing and kidding continued.

WEST CENTRAL: Cool mornings and warm windy days were reported. Dry conditions and wind continued fire dangers. Water tanks were very low. Small grain fields were growing, and pasture grasses and weeds were greening up as well. Winter wheat was green and looked good, but behind for the year. Very low grain yields were expected due to low moisture. Field work and planting of cotton continued in anticipation of heavy rainfall in the forecast. Fruit trees were putting on early fruit. Producers were hoping to avoid an Easter frost. Livestock conditions were slowly improving with more grazing available, but livestock producers continued supplement feeding. Cattle prices were still holding steady.

SOUTHEAST: Dry weather in Chambers County allowed for substantial rice to be planted. However, expected wet weather might slow down progress. In Fort Bend County, livestock were in good condition. The last bit of dryland grain sorghum and some cotton were planted. Some farmers were waiting on rain to continue planting. Corn and early planted sorghum emerged with good stands reported. Late-planted sorghum came up slower and spottier due to lack of moisture and weeds. In Walker County, growing conditions were mostly good. Some areas were too wet for vegetable planting, depending on the location. Ryegrass, small grains and clovers were doing very well. Rain was expected, and humidity levels were expected to rise. Rangeland and pasture ratings varied from excellent to very poor with good ratings most common. Soil-moisture levels ranged from adequate to very short with adequate being most common.

SOUTHWEST: Moisture conditions continued to decrease without significant rain. Dry, windy and extreme fire dangers were reported. Rangeland and pasture conditions continued to decline. Tanks needed a runoff rain event. Livestock conditions remained good. However, supplemental feeding and monitoring water availability was necessary for livestock and wildlife.

SOUTH: Daytime temperatures ranged from hot to mild with cold nights and most areas receiving no moisture. Dimmit County reported temperatures reaching into the high 90s. Conditions were windy in some areas. Some areas received showers with no measurable amounts, while Duval County reported 0.25-1 inch. Moisture levels were mostly short. Rain was in the forecast for some areas. Subsoil moisture was declining. Potato and corn crops emerged and were under irrigation. Irrigated wheat and oats were in the heading stage. Pasture and rangeland conditions were fair to good but showing stress and needed rainfall. Body condition scores on cattle remained fair. Fall-planted crops struggled to survive all season due to the lack of rainfall. Irrigated fields, including Coastal Bermuda grass were in good condition and the first cutting was expected in April. Producers were busy applying irrigation water to corn, cotton, sorghum, onions, spinach and other crops. Spinach harvest was still active. Livestock continued to do well as native rangelands and pastures continued to green and provide adequate forage. Pastures and rangelands improved in areas that received rain. No insect pressure was reported. Most crops should be planted by the end of the month. Ranchers were preparing to plant their fields for hay grazer or other grain sorghums. Ranchers and deer breeders were providing supplemental feed. In Hidalgo County, harvest of sugarcane, citrus and vegetables continued. Sesame planting was underway.

-30-

Find more stories, photos, videos and audio at http://today.agrilife.org

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Frog Fruit

Published

on

By

By Tony Dean, tonydean.tx1@gmail.com

Frog fruit is a native, low-growing perennial forb adapted to most of the eastern U.S., but few grazers know it well. It contributes more to our plant communities than we realize. It generally grows no more than a few inches tall and roots at the nodes. It can form dense mats several feet across and develop runners up to 3 feet long.

The leaves are thick, one to two inches long and 3/8 inch wide, and toothed from the middle to the tip. Tiny white flowers form a ring around a flower head, and the head then elongates into a cylinder an inch long or longer. Frog fruit has a four-angled stem.

Frog fruit can grow almost anywhere in Texas and on many soil types. It can grow in drier soils and likes good drainage, but it needs additional moisture to survive the hottest months. You can find it almost anywhere in a pasture, though it often grows in depressions and near water sources.

“Frog fruit is used as forage by livestock and deer. I recall an instance when I was moving cattle from one pasture to the next on a Jack County ranch. As I opened the gate, I stood by a beautiful green plant of switchgrass which I expected to be immediately grazed down. The cattle walked right by the switchgrass and stuck their heads in a small patch of frog fruit a few feet away,” Dean said.

Frog fruit is gaining popularity as a ground cover for homes and gardens for these reasons:

  1. Frog fruit grows quickly, maybe too quickly. If it gets out of bounds, you can always trim it back.
  2. Frog fruit is low maintenance. Once you get it established with adequate watering, it can survive with little care.
  3. Frog fruit has a long bloom period, from April to October.
  4. It is a host plant for several butterfly species and other insects.
Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Theileria orientalis

Published

on

By

By Barry Whitworth, DVM

Over the past few years, veterinarians have detected Theileria orientalis in Oklahoma cattle. Early cases were primarily diagnosed in adult cattle, but more recent Oklahoma cases have been identified in stocker cattle. All cattle producers should be familiar with the clinical signs of this disease and check their cattle daily for signs of trouble.

The first U.S. case of theileriosis was identified in Virginia in August 2017. Those cattle showed weakness and anemia, and veterinarians made an initial diagnosis of anaplasmosis. Blood samples from the animals were tested for Anaplasma, Babesia and Leptospira. Results were negative for all three, but the tests revealed a blood protozoan, later identified as T. orientalis genotype Ikeda. Since that first herd outbreak, the organism has been detected in several states.

Cattle sick with T. orientalis genotype Ikeda may show fever, weakness, anorexia and exercise intolerance. If forced to move, affected cattle may stagger and gasp for air. If stressed excessively, they may collapse and die. On examination, the gums, eyes or vaginal mucosa may appear pale (white) or yellow. Reproductive losses, including stillbirths and late-term abortions, may occur, along with a drop in milk production.

Clinical signs reported in adult cattle in Oklahoma include anemia, sudden death, weight loss, abortion, failure to thrive and failure to calve. In stocker cattle, producers have reported weight loss, anemia, poor performance and sudden death.

Because Anaplasma marginale and T. orientalis genotype Ikeda produce similar clinical signs, telling the two apart can be difficult. One difference is that clinical signs are more common in young cattle infected with T. orientalis than in young cattle infected with A. marginale. Cattle with anaplasmosis also often display aggression, while those with T. orientalis genotype Ikeda typically do not. A laboratory test is required to tell the two diseases apart with certainty.

Researchers have identified Haemaphysalis longicornis as a possible vector of T. orientalis genotype Ikeda. In 2017, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL) confirmed the presence of H. longicornis, commonly called the Asian longhorned tick (ALT) or bush tick. While trying to determine how the tick arrived in the United States, USDA officials discovered it had been present in West Virginia as early as 2010. The tick has now been confirmed in at least 26 states, including Oklahoma. Some evidence suggests other insect vectors may also transmit T. orientalis genotype Ikeda. Needle transfer is another possible route of transmission.

The ALT has been identified in Craig and Mayes counties in Oklahoma. This tick thrives in areas with high humidity, such as wooded regions, brush or tall grass. Ticks are often found where large numbers of wildlife gather, such as along deer trails. Producers can find more information about the ALT on the USDA website at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/livestock-poultry-disease/cattle/ticks/asian-longhorned.

Other countries have developed treatments for T. orientalis, but no approved treatments are available in the United States, and no vaccine exists for this disease. The best defense is prevention: buying cattle free of the organism, avoiding blood transfer between animals and using effective tick control. Producers should purchase cattle from reputable sources. Clean instruments between animals during procedures such as castration or dehorning, and change needles between every animal. Control external parasites with appropriate insecticide treatments. Pasture management also helps, such as rotating cattle away from wooded or brushy areas where ticks thrive. Patch burning may also help reduce tick populations.

Theileria orientalis remains a concern for some cow/calf and stocker producers in Oklahoma. Producers who want more information about T. orientalis genotype Ikeda should contact their local veterinarian or Oklahoma State University County Extension agriculture educator.

References

Hammer, J. F., Emery, D., Bogema, D. R., & Jenkins, C. (2015). Detection of Theileria orientalis genotypes in Haemaphysalis longicornis ticks from southern Australia. Parasites & Vectors, 8, 229.

Oakes, V. J., Yabsley, M. J., Schwartz, D., LeRoith, T., Bissett, C., Broaddus, C., Schlater, J. L., Todd, S. M., Boes, K. M., Brookhart, M., & Lahmers, K. K. (2019). Theileria orientalis Ikeda genotype in cattle, Virginia, USA. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 25(9), 1653-1659.

Spickler, Anna Rovid. (2019). Theileriosis. Retrieved from http://www.cfsph.iastate.edu/DiseaseInfo/factsheets.php.

Watts, J. G., Playford, M. C., & Hickey, K. L. (2016). Theileria orientalis: A review. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 64(1), 3-9.

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Is the Pond Safe for Livestock?

Published

on

By

By OKFR Staff

During the hottest part of summer, a farm pond can look like a welcome source of water. Cattle may be standing belly-deep along the bank, and the pond may still hold enough water to seem dependable. Looks alone won’t tell you whether that water is safe.

Hot weather, limited rainfall and falling pond levels can create water-quality problems. As water evaporates, salts, minerals, nutrients and other substances become more concentrated. Warm, still water can also encourage blue-green algae, and some forms can produce toxins capable of killing livestock.

Producers sometimes treat water as an afterthought compared to grass, hay and supplemental feed. Livestock need a dependable supply of clean water to maintain feed intake, regulate body temperature and support production. Poor-quality water can reduce consumption and performance even when it does not cause obvious poisoning.

A pond that has watered cattle for years is not safe under every set of conditions. Pay particular attention during drought, extreme heat or any period when the water level drops significantly.

Watch the Water and the Livestock

One of the most serious late-summer concerns is a bloom of cyanobacteria, commonly called blue-green algae. These organisms live naturally in many bodies of water, and most do not produce dangerous toxins. The risk rises when certain toxin-producing species multiply rapidly under favorable conditions.

According to Oklahoma State University Extension, toxic blue-green algal blooms typically develop in standing water after periods of hot, dry, calm weather. Nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus can fuel excessive growth. Those nutrients may reach a pond through manure, fertilizer runoff, soil erosion and decaying vegetation.

A suspicious bloom may turn the water bright green, blue-green, pea-soup green or even brownish. Scum, foam or mats may collect along the shoreline, particularly where the wind pushes floating material into one area. Some blooms look like spilled paint.

Not every green pond is poisonous. Common aquatic plants and harmless algae can also change the color or surface of the water. You usually cannot tell whether a bloom is toxic by looking at it, and a pond can contain toxin-producing cyanobacteria without showing every commonly described warning sign.

Keep livestock, horses, pets and people away from water that has an unusual color, heavy surface scum, a bad odor or unexplained dead fish or wildlife nearby. Do not let livestock drink from another part of the same pond on the assumption that the water is safe there. Wind can move a bloom, and toxin levels may vary across the pond.

Blue-green algae can produce toxins that affect the nervous system or liver. Depending on the toxin and the amount consumed, affected animals may develop weakness, staggering, difficulty breathing, tremors, convulsions, diarrhea or collapse. In severe cases, owners find animals dead near the water before realizing anything is wrong. Treatment often fails, which makes prevention especially important.

Treat any suspected poisoning as an emergency. Move the herd away from the water source without driving or stressing animals that may already be affected. Provide another clean water supply and contact a veterinarian immediately. Your county Extension office can also help you determine where and how to submit a water sample.

Blue-green algae is not the only potential problem. Pond water may contain elevated levels of dissolved salts, sulfates, nitrates, bacteria or other contaminants. Runoff can carry manure, fertilizer, pesticides and organic matter into the pond. Low water levels make some of these problems worse because the remaining water grows more concentrated.

Water with excessive dissolved solids may taste bitter or salty, so animals drink less of it. Depending on the substances involved and their concentrations, poor-quality water may contribute to diarrhea, reduced feed intake, poor weight gain or other health concerns. Young animals and livestock that are not used to the water may be more vulnerable.

Watch the cattle themselves, too. Are they reluctant to drink? Are they crowding around a different water source? Has feed intake or weight gain dropped without an obvious explanation? Are several animals having digestive problems? Changes across multiple animals can be an early clue that you need to look at the feed or water.

OSU Extension recommends collecting a representative sample and submitting it for a livestock water test whenever you suspect a water supply is harming animal health or performance. A standard livestock water test covers several characteristics, but blue-green algae can require different sampling and testing procedures. Contact the laboratory or county Extension office before collecting the sample so you take it from the right location, use the proper container and handle it correctly.

Reduce Problems Before They Develop

Good pond management cannot eliminate every water-quality problem, but it can lower the risk. One of the most effective steps is limiting the manure, soil and nutrients that enter the water.

Cattle with unrestricted access to an entire pond can damage the banks, muddy the water and deposit large amounts of manure in or near it. Hoof traffic strips vegetation and speeds erosion. Sediment fills the pond over time, while manure supplies nutrients that can encourage excessive algae growth.

Where practical, fence livestock away from most of the pond and provide a limited-access watering point. Another option is piping water to a trough below the dam or elsewhere in the pasture. OSU notes that reducing cattle manure in the pond can reduce the conditions that favor toxic algae and make the water more palatable.

A vegetated buffer around the pond can slow runoff and trap soil and nutrients before they reach the water. Apply fertilizer and manure carefully in the watershed, particularly before heavy rain, and do not let large amounts of hay, feed or organic debris pile up at the water’s edge.

Alternative watering systems need maintenance, too. Check troughs for algae, manure, drowned animals and other contamination. Install wildlife escape ramps in tanks so birds and small animals can climb out instead of drowning and fouling the water.

Be cautious about treating a pond on your own. Some owners use copper sulfate and other algaecides for algae control, but improper treatment can create new problems. Killing a large amount of algae or aquatic vegetation at once can deplete dissolved oxygen as the material decomposes, which can lead to a fish kill. Treatment may also release toxins from affected cyanobacteria into the water. Base any chemical application on proper identification and professional recommendations, not guesswork.

Livestock should always have enough water for the weather, their size and their stage of production. Demand rises sharply in hot weather, and a pond that barely meets the herd’s needs in spring may fall short in August. Check the source regularly instead of waiting for cattle to gather around a muddy shoreline.

Ponds can fool you. Crystal-clear water isn’t always safe, and a green pond doesn’t always mean toxic algae. Regular observation, testing and prevention are the best ways to keep a pond safe for your herd.

Continue Reading
Ad
Ad
Ad

Trending