Connect with us

Farm & Ranch

AgriLife Today – Texas weather and crop report for August 29

Published

on

By: Adam Russell

AgriLife Extension personnel to assess flooding impact on livestock, pets

COLLEGE STATION — Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service personnel will soon begin assessing recovery needs for livestock producers and pet owners as residents grapple with ongoing flooding along the Gulf Coast.

AgriLife Extension experts said the U.S. Department of Agriculture inventory estimated there were more than 1.2 million beef cattle alone within the 54 Texas counties on the emergency declaration list.

Dr. Andy Vestal, AgriLife Extension specialist in emergency management, College Station, said many ranchers along the coast moved their animals to higher ground and several sale barns and fairgrounds were acting as holding stations for livestock.

Vestal said shelters for companion animals and livestock have been set up around the state to harbor and care for displaced pets and farm animals.

Pet and livestock owners can call 2-1-1 if they are seeking a small or large animal shelter or holding facility in an area that is not listed or contact the emergency management department in the area.

Below is a list of 50 shelters/holding facilities. Residents are encouraged to call the facility first to check availability and capacity because conditions change frequently.   http://www.tahc.state.tx.us/emergency/TAHC_SheltersHoldingFacilities.pdf

Dr. Ron Gill, AgriLife Extension livestock specialist and associate department head for animal science at Texas A&M University, College Station, said he and other AgriLife Extension personnel will be cooperating with lead agencies as they prepare to enter affected areas to assess losses and short- and long-term needs for producers and their animals there.

“We will be following the lead of the Texas Animal Health Commission and alongside professional organizations like the Texas and Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association to start assessing where and when we can go in to see what producers and landowners need now and will need over the next few months,” he said. “The flooding is making it difficult and we can’t get in the way while first responders are trying to get people out. Livestock are a secondary concern right now, but we do want producers and landowners to start thinking about what kind of help they will need long-term.”

Gill said responders expect needs for supplies, veterinary assistance and feed, but that agencies will begin announcing those needs to the public as assessments are made.

“We don’t want to get ahead of ourselves,” he said. “We know that there are ample supplies of hay in Texas that were not affected, and we know cattle producers along the coast will need to be supplied because many of their grazing pastures could be underwater to a point that they may go dormant or die. We are working to meet the veterinary and nutritional needs for those producers over the short- and long-term, but we need to make assessments and that’s difficult right now because it’s still raining.”

Gill said waters appear to be receding quicker after this storm due to relatively low runoff from tributaries to the north of the flooding. But those conditions could change as the storm continues to move across areas already flooded.

“We will probably go to the west side of the storm where the hurricane made landfall to begin our assessment and then work our way toward the remaining areas,” he said. “We also have AgriLife Extension agents in those areas who are helping make early assessments and coordinating the overall efforts to evacuate animals.”

The 12 Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Districts

AgriLife Extension district reporters compiled the following summaries:

CENTRAL: Hurricane Harvey brought heavy rainfall. Some areas received more than 8 inches. Rains have hindered harvesting efforts. Producers saw an increase in Bermudagrass stem maggot damage. Livestock were in good condition. Rains have hindered harvesting efforts. Some farmers were still trying to harvest corn, and cotton was waiting to be stripped. Producers expected to soon look at their cotton fields for damages incurred. Grasses and forages were good. Livestock had plenty to eat, and tanks and streams were full. Nearly all counties reported good soil moisture. Overall crop conditions were good.

ROLLING PLAINS: Cooler weather set in with rainfall in different areas. Pastures looked a lot better with the recent rains and were providing adequate grazing for livestock. Producers greatly decreased supplemental feeding. Cotton acres planted back in haygrazer were looking very promising after timely rains. Some producers cut and baled some haygrazer and will likely get a second cutting. Sorghum and corn fields looked good, but farmers couldn’t get in the fields to harvest due to high moisture. Producers got another cutting of hay and may get another thanks to moisture received over the past few weeks. Wise County reported a record setting corn harvest in areas.

COASTAL BEND: No report.

EAST: Rain continued to fall across the region as Hurricane Harvey moved inland. Pasture and rangeland conditions were mostly fair to good. Panola, Rusk, Shelby and Gregg counties reported excellent conditions. Fields and pastures were saturated in Cherokee County. Jasper County reported heavy rains and flooding. Subsoil and topsoil conditions were adequate to surplus. In Smith County, hay still needed cutting but producers were holding off due to showers in the area. In Gregg County, conditions were too wet for many producers to harvest warm-season forages. Panola County reported lush grazing pastures and plenty of forages. Armyworms were reported in Shelby and Wood counties. Vegetable crops slowed in production or stopped. Producers were putting in fall gardens in Marion County. Cattle were in good to excellent condition. Cows and calves were fat and growing.

SOUTH PLAINS: Weather was cooler and subsoil and topsoil moisture remained adequate due to continued rain. Scouting reports indicated cotton ranged from just starting to bloom to hard cut-out. Heat units were still needed to finish out the cotton. Grain sorghum was being scouted on a weekly basis now for sugarcane aphids. All other crops continued to mature. Pasture and rangeland conditions improved with the recent moisture. Cattle were in good condition.

PANHANDLE: Conditions were cloudy, and temperatures continued to be below normal. Some areas received traces of rain. Soil moisture was good to adequate and was received off and on throughout most of the district. Irrigation ceased on all crops for the summer growing season. Rangelands were in very good condition for this time of year. Producers plowed and sprayed for weeds in fields to be planted with wheat. Planting for wheat should start soon. Corn progressed well with good growth. Sorghum headed out, and grain fill was rapid. Sugarcane aphid numbers were starting to increase, and some producers were spraying. Cotton looked good but needed sunshine and heat.

NORTH: Topsoil and subsoil moisture levels ranged from mostly adequate to surplus. Most counties received rain ranging from 2-5 inches. Pastures looked great for this time of year and were thriving due to above-normal rainfall and below average temperatures. Cotton and soybeans were doing well. The corn harvest continued to produce above-average yields. Hay production continued in spite of the rain. Livestock were in great condition and were relieved by cooler weather, but horn flies were bad in some counties. Spring-born calves looked good. Armyworms were reported in some counties, and sugarcane aphids were present on sorghum and Sudan varieties. Pecans looked good and should produce a decent crop this year.

FAR WEST: Temperature highs were in the 90s and lows in the 60s. Rain amounts were 0.45 to 3 inches for the reporting period. Much of the district continued to receive daily rain showers. Corn and sorghum harvests made steady progress in between scattered, spotty showers. Rain was beneficial to cotton as many fields continued blooming at the same node for two weeks. Dryland cotton was putting a lot of fruit on and holding it. Irrigated cotton started to shed some small bolls. Pastures were greening up and looked much better. Weeds and grasses were growing due to the moisture.  Alfalfa and Sudan producers were most affected by weeds because they have not been able to harvest fields. Pecan trees still needed water. Water was standing in ditches causing an influx of weeds, snakes and mosquitos. Late sheep, goats and bad ewes were shipped. Producers continued to feed livestock and wildlife.

WEST CENTRAL: No report.

SOUTHEAST: No report.

SOUTHWEST: Some counties received much needed rain, but others remained dry as Hurricane Harvey passed. Temperatures remained high and humid. Hay was rolled up in some areas, and corn harvest neared the end. Pasture conditions should improve for counties that received rain. Others remained dry but in decent condition.

SOUTH: The district received rainfall in some areas. The area was spared from damaging winds and any storm damage. Rain amounts ranged from half an inch to almost 5 inches. Conditions were hot, dry and windy for other areas. Temperature highs fluctuated from 80-100 degrees. Soil moisture levels were short in areas that did not receive rain. Cotton harvest was ongoing in some areas and was close to harvest in others, and peanuts were getting close to harvest time as well. Pasture and rangeland conditions improved with recent rainfall, but supplemental feeding was occurring at a steady pace. Some producers began planting oats on dryland fields. Sorghum and corn harvests were complete. No major livestock issues were reported due to Hurricane Harvey. Some vegetables were planted and more planting was to come.

-30-

LikeTweet

Find more stories, photos, videos and audio at http://today.agrilife.org

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Beyond Crude Protein

Published

on

By

By NTFR Staff

A stack of hay may look good from the outside. The bales may be heavy, green and free of obvious weeds or mold. None of that tells a cattle producer what the hay will provide once it reaches the feed bunk.

Two bales from the same field can differ noticeably in nutrition if they were cut at different stages of maturity, weathered differently or stored under different conditions. The differences grow even larger when you compare hay bought from separate farms or produced in different growing seasons.

A forage analysis takes much of the guesswork out by showing what the hay contains and where you may need to supplement.

Crude protein is often the first number producers check, but it is only one part of the report. Energy, fiber, moisture and possible toxicity concerns can matter just as much when deciding whether a lot of hay suits dry cows, lactating cows, replacement heifers or growing calves.

Reading beyond the protein number

Most forage reports show results on both an “as received” and a dry-matter basis. The as-received column includes the water in the hay. The dry-matter column takes moisture out of the calculation so you can compare feeds with different moisture levels fairly.

For ration planning, the dry-matter values are usually the most useful. If you’re comparing dry hay with silage, cubes or another feed, make the comparison on a dry-matter basis rather than on the numbers as fed.

Moisture still deserves attention. Hay baled too wet is more likely to heat, mold or deteriorate in storage. In severe cases, heating can create a fire risk. Moisture also affects how many pounds of actual nutrients you are buying. A heavy bale isn’t necessarily a nutrient-dense bale if much of its weight is water.

Crude protein, usually listed as CP, estimates the protein in the forage based on its nitrogen content. Protein keeps the rumen microbes that help cattle digest forage working. When forage protein drops too low, intake and digestion may decline because those microbes can’t function as well.

The amount of protein a cow needs changes a great deal through the year. A mature, dry cow in mid-pregnancy needs less than a cow in late pregnancy or early lactation. Young, growing cattle and first-calf heifers may also need more protein than mature dry cows. Hay that is adequate for one group may fall short for another.

Always compare a forage report with the needs of the cattle that will eat the hay. Oklahoma State University notes that cattle requirements vary with weight, age, stage of production, desired gain and milk production. A single protein target can’t describe the needs of an entire herd.

Energy is another major piece of the feeding decision. Many forage reports express energy as total digestible nutrients, or TDN, an estimate of the digestible energy in the feed. Protein supports rumen function and tissue growth, while energy fuels maintenance, pregnancy, milk production and weight gain.

Hay can test well for protein and still come up short on energy. That matters most for cows nearing calving or producing milk. Low-energy hay may leave cattle feeling full without giving them enough nutrition to hold body condition. University of Nebraska Extension stresses evaluating both protein and energy when judging the feeding value of forage.

Fiber measurements help explain why cattle eat one hay readily and less of another. Neutral detergent fiber, or NDF, represents much of the plant’s structural material, including cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. As NDF rises, cattle generally eat less because bulky, fibrous forage stays in the digestive tract longer.

Acid detergent fiber, or ADF, includes the least digestible parts of the plant. Higher ADF generally means lower digestibility and less available energy. Put simply, high NDF can limit how much cattle eat, and high ADF can mean they get less energy from what they do eat.

Both numbers tend to climb as forage plants mature. Mature hay usually has more stem and less leaf than hay cut earlier. It may still be acceptable feed for animals with lower needs, but it is less likely to support lactating cows or growing cattle without supplementation.

Some reports also include relative feed value, or RFV. This index uses ADF and NDF to compare forage quality, particularly for alfalfa and other legumes. It can help when you compare similar types of hay, but it doesn’t account for every nutrient cattle need. Don’t let RFV replace a closer look at crude protein, energy and the animal’s stage of production.

Depending on the lab package you choose, the report may include minerals. Labs commonly report calcium and phosphorus, but a forage analysis can’t replace a well-designed mineral program. Water quality, other feeds and interactions among minerals all affect mineral needs and availability. Work with an Extension specialist, veterinarian or livestock nutritionist before making major mineral changes.

Nitrate and prussic acid

A standard forage analysis may not include nitrates, and you often have to request that test separately. Nitrate testing is especially important for drought-stressed forage, heavily fertilized fields and crops such as sorghum, sudangrass, sorghum-sudan hybrids, millet, oats and some weeds.

Nitrate can remain in cured hay and doesn’t reliably disappear in storage. Test any hay you suspect of high nitrate before feeding it. Oklahoma State University recommends a laboratory analysis because field screening tests can show that nitrate is present but can’t measure how much.

Prussic acid is a different concern. Unlike nitrate, prussic acid usually dissipates as properly cured hay sits in storage, though suspect forage still needs careful management and professional guidance. Be sure which test you need, and don’t treat the terms nitrate and prussic acid as interchangeable.

Putting the numbers to work

A hay test pays off when it leads to a feeding plan. Once you have the results, you can match the hay to the right class of cattle. Save better hay for replacement heifers, thin cows, late-gestation cows or cows with calves at side. Feed lower-quality hay to mature dry cows with modest requirements.

Testing can also prevent unnecessary supplementation. Without an analysis, you may buy protein tubs, cubes or other supplements your cattle don’t need. The opposite mistake costs just as much. Assuming hay is better than it is can lead to lost body condition, lower milk production, poor breed-back rates and lighter calves.

Visual inspection still matters. Don’t ignore mold, foreign material, weeds, dust or heat damage because a lab report shows acceptable numbers. At the same time, color and appearance can’t reliably predict nutrient content. University of Nebraska notes that forage nutrient values vary widely, which makes average book values a poor substitute for testing the feed you have on hand.

A forage analysis won’t make poor hay better, but it can show you how to use that hay well. For the cost of a test, you get information that can guide hay purchases, cut supplement waste and put each lot of hay where it will do the most good.

The protein number may get the most attention, but it doesn’t tell the whole story. Understanding moisture, TDN, NDF, ADF and potential toxicity gives you a much clearer picture of what is inside the bale.

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Don’t Be Caught Off Guard

Published

on

By

By Savannah Magoteaux

A September rain can be exactly what a North Texas pasture needs, but that flush of green can bring an unwelcome guest.

Fall armyworms are a familiar late-summer and early-fall pest across Texas, and they can do serious damage to pastures and hay fields when conditions are right. Bermudagrass is a common target, but armyworms also feed on small grains, ryegrass and other forage crops. The key is catching them early, before a manageable infestation turns into a field that seems to disappear overnight.

Despite the name, fall armyworms are caterpillars. The adult moths migrate into Texas and lay masses of eggs on grasses, fence posts, buildings and other surfaces. Once the larvae hatch, they start feeding on plants.

Young armyworms are small and hard to spot unless you are actively scouting. As they grow, their appetite climbs. Larger larvae can strip leaves fast, leaving stems behind and cutting into available forage or hay yield.

Look for an inverted, light-colored “Y” on the caterpillar’s head. Mature larvae can reach about 1½ inches long and often have several dark and light stripes running the length of the body.

Armyworms feed most actively during the cooler parts of the day, so early morning and late afternoon are good times to scout. Walk through several areas of the pasture rather than checking only along the edge. Look closely near the soil surface and beneath grass leaves, especially where you see fresh feeding damage.

Scouting matters most after rain or irrigation. New grass growth draws newly hatched larvae, and populations can build quickly when conditions favor them.

Texas A&M AgriLife Extension generally recommends considering treatment in improved pastures when you find about three or more armyworms per square foot. The decision should also weigh the size of the larvae, how much forage is present, the expected hay value and how severe the damage is.

Timing matters. Small armyworms are easier to control than large ones, and an insecticide does less good once the caterpillars are nearly mature and have already eaten much of the forage. If you treat, follow the product label carefully, including grazing and hay-harvest restrictions.

Don’t assume one treatment or one scouting trip will carry a pasture through the season. Fall armyworm moths can keep moving into an area, laying more eggs and starting another generation of larvae. Keep checking fields even after you have controlled an infestation.

For hay producers, an approaching harvest date can also shape the decision. When the crop is close to harvest, cutting the field may be a better option than spraying. The best choice depends on the number and size of the armyworms, how much forage remains and whether the weather allows you to cut hay.

September rain is usually welcome across North Texas, especially after a long, hot summer. Just remember that fresh green grass deserves a closer look. A few minutes of scouting can make the difference between catching fall armyworms early and finding the damage after they have eaten their fill.

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

When the Pond Shrinks

Published

on

By

By NTFR Staff

By midsummer, many farm ponds across Oklahoma and North Texas look a lot different than they did a few months earlier. Water levels have dropped, shorelines have spread into muddy flats, and the green banks of spring have given way to cracked soil and dried vegetation. For many livestock producers, these ponds are still the main water source for their animals. As the water recedes, you have to ask whether it is still safe.

A shrinking pond doesn’t automatically become unsafe, but falling water levels can change water quality fast. During long stretches of heat and drought, contaminants concentrate, algae can flourish and livestock may have to drink water that isn’t as clean as it once was.

Water is the most important nutrient livestock consume, so watching your ponds through the summer matters as much as watching your forage.

Less water, more concentrated problems

When rain is scarce and evaporation outpaces refill, ponds shrink while much of what is dissolved or suspended in the water stays behind. Minerals, nutrients, bacteria and organic matter grow more concentrated as the water volume drops.

That doesn’t make the water dangerous overnight, but it can let problems develop much faster than they would in a full pond.

One of the biggest hot-weather concerns is blue-green algae, more accurately called cyanobacteria. Warm temperatures, sunlight and extra nutrients from manure or fertilizer runoff give these organisms ideal conditions to multiply. Some species produce toxins that can affect the nervous system or liver of livestock, wildlife, pets and even people.

Not every algae bloom is toxic, and not every green pond is dangerous. You can’t tell whether a bloom is toxic by looking at it, though, so treat blooms seriously until someone can evaluate them.

Blue-green algae often looks like bright green, paint-like scum floating on the surface, but it can also form streaks, mats or clumps that collect along shorelines where the wind pushes them.

Heat changes water quality

Summer heat also lowers the amount of oxygen dissolved in water. Fish kills can happen when oxygen drops too low, especially after several cloudy days or when large amounts of algae die and decompose.

Dead fish are more than an unpleasant sight. They can signal that the pond is under stress and water quality has declined.

As water levels fall, livestock also crowd around fewer access points. More hoof traffic stirs up sediment, and manure builds up in the shallows. Bacteria levels can rise, making the water less appealing and possibly less healthy for livestock.

In some areas, dissolved salts can also concentrate as ponds shrink. Higher salinity may cut water intake, hurt animal performance and, in severe cases, contribute to health problems.

Watch your livestock

Your animals are often one of the best indicators of water quality.

Healthy cattle generally drink 10 to 20 gallons of water a day, depending on the weather, body size and stage of production. Horses may drink even more in intense heat or during hard work.

If livestock suddenly seem reluctant to drink, spend less time around the pond or start looking for water elsewhere, find out why. Also watch for diarrhea, lethargy, poor weight gain or unexplained illness during long stretches of hot weather. Many things can cause those symptoms, but don’t rule out poor water quality.

What you can do

Protecting livestock doesn’t always take expensive improvements.

Walk the pond regularly. Watch for changes in water color, unusual odors, heavy algae growth, dead fish or wildlife, and manure piling up around watering areas.

Limiting livestock access to the shoreline can also improve water quality. Many producers fence ponds and let animals drink from one limited access point, or pump pond water into stock tanks. Either approach reduces bank erosion, keeps manure out of the water and helps the pond stay healthier over time.

If an algae bloom appears, keep livestock away until someone can evaluate it. Some blooms disappear within days, while others last for weeks, depending on the weather.

Keeping vegetation around the pond also reduces erosion and slows nutrient runoff from surrounding pastures.

If you question the water, a laboratory test can tell you about bacteria levels, salinity, sulfates and other concerns. Your local Extension office or veterinarian can help you decide whether testing makes sense and recommend a lab.

Plan ahead for dry years

Drought reminds us that water deserves the same attention as forage. Many operations keep backup hay for dry years, but few have a backup water plan. Developing other water sources, maintaining wells, setting up portable tanks or improving existing ponds before drought hits can ease the strain on livestock and producers when rain stops falling.

Farm ponds remain a valuable resource across the Southern Plains, but they aren’t maintenance-free. As water levels fall, a few minutes each week spent watching for changes can help you catch problems before they affect animal health.

A pond doesn’t have to be full to provide safe drinking water, but it does need attention. During long, hot summers, the quality of the water left in the pond often matters more than the amount.

Continue Reading
Ad
Ad
Ad

Trending