Connect with us

Farm & Ranch

Texas Crop and Weather Report for April 18 [Texas AgriLife]

Published

on

By: Adam Russell

Texas calf crop looking good

COLLEGE STATION –  Most of the state’s calf crop is on the ground and looking good amid spring conditions, said Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service beef cattle and livestock specialists.

Most regions were helped by decent to good rains and warmer-than-usual winter and early spring temperatures, specialists said. Most cattle body condition scores around the state were good as herds had plenty of available forage and did not endure lengthy frigid conditions, even in North Texas and the Panhandle.

Specialists said most producers had completed calving and calves on the ground were generally 2-3 months old and looking good. Many producers were beginning to castrate, vaccinate and dehorn calves.

Dr. Ted McCollum, AgriLife Extension beef cattle specialist, Amarillo, said pastures and rangeland had improved dramatically following spring rain events. Grazing areas affected by wildfires in early March were beginning to recover as well.

McCollum said a count of total lost beef cows was not available but that he expects the number to be less than 1 percent of the approximately 350,000 head in the Panhandle-South Plains regions.

McCollum said he expected regional herd numbers to remain steady despite lower prices on cattle and damages to herds and grazing areas from wildfire. Dropping crop prices are driving some producers to enter the cattle market for alternative income, and regional cattle producers are holding on to replacements as they continue to restock years after severe drought in 2011.

“Cattle prices may have dampened enthusiasm, but producers in the region are not necessarily looking to reduce cow numbers because of the market,” McCollum said.

Dr. Joe Paschal, AgriLife Extension livestock specialist, Corpus Christi, said good rain and grazing conditions were allowing producers in most of southern Texas to make similar decisions regarding stocking rates. He said most areas in south and southwest Texas looked good but that pockets, such as Zapata County, are very dry.

“About one in four producers at every program I attend are saying they will be holding on to more replacement heifers than normal,” he said. “They’re cattle people. It’s what they do, and they want to raise a few more calves and have more weaning weight to sell.”

Paschal said fever tick quarantine in Live Oak County has not affected producers’ willingness to hold cattle but he is recommending diligence in watching herds for ticks they don’t recognize and signs of unusual infestations.

After three wet springs, conditions have “returned to normal” in West Texas, said Dr. Bruce Carpenter AgriLife Extension beef cattle specialist, Fort Stockton. Carpenter said the region typically is dry in the spring and receives rain during the summer months but the previous three years were exceptional during the spring and summer.

Cattle haven’t been affected by the return to dry conditions yet, Carpenter said, and small rain events had occurred or were in the forecast that may help grazing until summer.

“We’re pretty dry,” he said. “There’s been no rain before a few days ago, but maybe that will be enough to get us to summer when typical weather patterns show up. I usually don’t give up hope until September.”

On the other side of the state, Dr. Jason Banta, AgriLife Extension beef cattle specialist, Overton, said the wet spring weather has ryegrass growing well and is setting conditions up nicely for Bermuda grass in the next few weeks.

“The calf crop in East Texas is pretty consistent,” he said. “Most producers are calving from December through March and conditions were good for most operations.”

Dr. Jason Cleere, AgriLife Extension, beef cattle specialist, College Station, said mild winter and spring temperatures, good rains and early spring conditions have cattle looking good. Some producers are beginning to work calves.

Cleere said winter pastures and warm-season forages were about two to four weeks ahead of a typical spring and timely rains through the summer would continue to help producers avoid some costs amid low beef prices.

“Cattle prices are what they are,” he said. “They’re one-third to one-half of what they were at their peak, but costs have risen, so from a producer perspective margins are tight. Shorter winter feeding, mild temperatures and good rain to allow producers to put up hay could help. Moisture always helps.”

AgriLife Extension district reporters compiled the following summaries:

CENTRAL: Storms produced large amounts of rainfall with some areas receiving up to 6 inches. Some areas flooded, especially along rivers and low-lying areas. Many fields with black soil were still holding water. Straight-line winds and some tornado damage was also reported. Tanks were full. Temperatures were normal for this time of year. Oats and wheat fields were having large amounts of rust. Corn fields looked good, and grain sorghum was rowing up nicely. Pecan producers were spraying zinc, and some sprayed fungicide. Small colonies of sugarcane aphids were present in ditches on johnsongrass. Cotton and soybean planting was hindered due to rain. Rangelands and pastures were in excellent condition. Summer green up was progressing with warm weather. Livestock were in great condition. However, fly pressure began to increase on cattle and livestock. No supplemental feeding was needed for range cattle.

ROLLING PLAINS: Conditions were very favorable for producers over the past few weeks. The district received beneficial rains, and temperatures were very pleasant. Pastures and rangeland were in good to excellent condition with only a small amount being poor. Livestock were in good condition with plenty of grazing. Winter wheat and grasses were growing. Stocker cattle were being shipped as they grazed out wheat fields. Farmers prepared fields and found adequate subsoil moisture.

COASTAL BEND: Despite spotty rains, many areas received timely rainfall in good amounts this spring. But range conditions were starting to deteriorate in some areas due to a lack of rain. Crops in general looked good. Early planted corn was beginning to tassel, and cotton was emerging well. Producers were working to control thrips in cotton fields. Rice planting continued. Herbicide and fertilizer applications were applied to pastures and hay fields. Livestock were in good condition, with many producers still trying to finish off winter ryegrass

EAST: Rain reported around the district helped dry conditions. Pasture and rangeland conditions were mostly good with Rusk County reporting excellent conditions. Wood and Trinity counties reported hard rains. Wood County had more than 4 inches of rain, and Trinity County had up to 2.5 inches. Subsoil and topsoil conditions were adequate, with only Shelby County reporting as short. Oat conditions in Jasper County were reported as very poor. The cooler nights slowed forage growth. Producers applied fertilizer to hay fields and prepared for hay season. Vegetable farmers were planting crops. Onion and potato harvests will soon be underway. Cattle prices were solid in Shelby County, and calves were higher in Houston County. The bulk of spring calves were on the ground, and calf work was in progress. Flies were an issue for some producers. Livestock conditions were mostly good. Wood County producers were still feeding some supplementation. Wild pigs continued to be a problem in many counties. Smith County reported activity in pastures, yards and areas wild pigs were not spotted before.

SOUTH PLAINS: The district received beneficial and timely rainfall that ranged from 0.5 to 1 inch. Damaging golf- and tennis ball-sized hail was reported near Abernathy, Shallowater, Plainview and Slaton. A tornado was confirmed near Edmonson. The rains improved subsoil and topsoil moisture levels. Producers continued to prepare for planting. Many cotton producers were prepared for the rain by having fields plowed and pre-emergent herbicide applied. Much of the wheat was headed out. There were some cases of wheat streak mosaic virus and rust noted in fields. Pastures and rangeland conditions should improve with recent rains.

PANHANDLE: The weather was warm and windy. Rain reports were mixed, with some counties reporting none and others up to several inches. Field preparations continued, and some producers were getting an early start on planting corn and cotton. Across the district, more acres were going to cotton and fewer to grain sorghum this year. Some dryland sorghum was planted. The winter wheat crop was beginning to head out, with much of it reported in good to fair condition. Many acres of wheat were being grazed out or baled. Some dryland wheat did not survive from lack of moisture. Some soybeans were planted in Deaf Smith County for co-ops or to be marketed to area dairies for feed. Most pastures and rangelands were in fair shape with short to adequate subsoil moisture, though a few counties reported poor conditions. Cattle were in good shape.

NORTH: Topsoil and subsoil moisture levels ranged from adequate to surplus. Rain was received, with amounts ranging from 1-2 inches in most areas. Strong winds and pea-size hail caused some damage but nothing significant to crops. Cotton planting started but was delayed by rain. Bluebonnets were emerging. Livestock pastures looked very good, and cattle were doing well. Area reservoirs and livestock tank levels improved due to the rain.

FAR WEST: Temperature highs were in the 90s with lows in the 50s. Damaging winds occurred, and were still a concern for producers because of potential fires and drying out pastures. Precipitation reported averaged between 0.3 and 2 inches. Most rain soaked in and helped restore soil moisture profiles. Corn and sorghum started to emerge. Wheat looked decent, but leaf rust was increasing. Most fields will not be treated even if rust does get bad due to the poor economic outlook for wheat. Field preparations for cotton continued. Many producers were applying herbicides this year. Pecan trees needed irrigation. Supplemental feeding continued for livestock and wildlife. Marking of lambs and goats started and should finish by the end of April.

WEST CENTRAL: Weather was seasonable with mostly warm, dry and windy conditions. A few areas reported some scattered showers that improved growing conditions. All areas continued to need additional rainfall. Producers were preparing fields for cotton planting. Many producers started preparing pastures, and some planted Sudan grass for grazing and hay production. Summer annual forage planting was underway. Wheat was in fair to good condition. Corn and sorghum was planted in some areas. With recent rains, there should be good emergence in the coming weeks. Rangeland forages were growing well. Pastures were greening and looked good with plenty of winter grasses and forbs for grazing. Wildflowers continued to grow. Livestock remained in mostly fair to good condition. Spring cattle work continued. The cattle market remained strong and steady with good demand.

SOUTHEAST: Some areas were experiencing typical spring growing conditions. Waller County was expecting forecasted rain. In Brazos County, warm-season grasses continued to improve. A few cool nights slowed grass growth in Montgomery County. Insect populations were increasing. Livestock and pasture conditions were good. Rice was coming along well. Soil moisture levels ranged widely from adequate to surplus with most ratings in the adequate range.

SOUTHWEST: Spring green up continued. Most of the district received between 1-4 inches of rain that helped improve subsoil and topsoil conditions. Corn and milo looked good and cotton planting was nearing completion. Pastures looked great. Spring lambing and kidding continued. Livestock were in good condition.

SOUTH: The weather was good throughout the district. Rainfall occurred throughout most of the district.  Some areas received light showers, and some areas received good, steady beneficial rainfall with reports ranging from a quarter inch to 3 inches. Weather conditions were cool and damp in some areas. Cotton was being planted. Peanut land preparations occurred, and the first hay cutting began. Potato fields were sprayed and prepared for harvest. Wheat fields were turning color and maturing. Corn crops were irrigated. Sorghum crops were still being planted. Planted cotton, corn and sorghum progressed well. Pasture and rangeland conditions were good. Some pastures were turning brown before the rains but greened up since. Some areas could use additional rainfall to help livestock tank water levels. Onions were doing well following good rain. Cabbage harvesting continued in some fields, and late-planted fields were still three to four weeks from harvesting in Zavala County. No major insect pressure was reported. Harvesting of vegetables, citrus and sugarcane continued in Hidalgo County. Soil moisture levels ranged from adequate in most areas to short in some areas.

 

-30-

LikeTweet

Find more stories, photos, videos and audio at http://today.agrilife.org

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Forage Needs in the Fall

Published

on

By

By Savannah Magoteaux

Two bales can look almost identical and feed very differently. Color, smell and leafiness tell part of the story, but a forage test tells you what your cattle are actually being offered. If you buy hay by the ton or are trying to stretch winter feed, that little lab sheet can be one of the cheapest management tools on the place.

Reading the report

Start with dry matter. Hay contains water, and labs report nutrients either “as fed” or on a dry-matter basis. Feeds are easiest to compare on a dry-matter basis because it takes moisture out of the comparison. Hay that is 90 percent dry matter is about 10 percent water.

Crude protein, usually abbreviated CP, is the number most people recognize. It estimates protein from the forage’s nitrogen content. Higher isn’t automatically better. The goal is to match the hay to the animal. A dry, mature cow in mid-gestation doesn’t need the same protein as a lactating cow, a growing replacement heifer or a young calf.

Energy matters just as much. Beef cattle forage reports commonly estimate energy as total digestible nutrients, or TDN. Low-TDN hay may fill a cow up before it supplies enough energy, particularly when her requirements rise late in gestation or during lactation. That is when you may need better forage, an energy supplement or a different feeding plan.

Fiber numbers explain why some hay looks coarse and why animals may not be able to eat enough of it. Neutral detergent fiber, or NDF, is closely tied to intake. As NDF climbs, cattle generally eat less because the forage moves through the digestive tract more slowly. Acid detergent fiber, or ADF, is tied to digestibility. Higher ADF generally means lower digestibility.

Some reports also include relative feed value or relative forage quality. These indexes help compare lots of forage, particularly alfalfa and mixed hay, but they aren’t a complete ration. They don’t replace looking at protein, energy, minerals, animal class and expected intake.

Then come the numbers you hope are boring. Nitrate testing matters when drought, heavy nitrogen fertilization, cloudy weather or other conditions have stressed the forage enough to cause nitrate accumulation. Sorghum-type forages, johnsongrass, corn and some weeds deserve particular attention. Nitrates stay in hay after it is cut and baled, so a risky crop doesn’t become safe just because it dried.

Minerals deserve a look, but this is where a hay report gets harder to interpret. Calcium, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium and other minerals may be listed, yet a complete mineral program depends on water, other feeds and local conditions. A high number isn’t always an advantage. Excessive potassium, for example, can interfere with magnesium use under some circumstances. If you are balancing a ration for high-risk animals, work with a nutritionist or Extension specialist rather than treating the lab sheet as a stand-alone mineral prescription.

Moisture tells another story. Hay baled too wet is at greater risk of heating and mold, and very wet hay can become a fire hazard as microbial activity raises its internal temperature. A test taken months later can’t reconstruct every storage problem, so inspect the stack, too. A musty odor, visible mold, unusual heat and dark discoloration are all reasons to investigate.

Getting a good sample

A hay test is only as good as the sample, and sampling is the step most likely to ruin a good analysis. A handful pulled from the outside of one convenient bale doesn’t represent a stack of 100 bales. Round bales aren’t uniform from the outside to the center, and one bale may not represent the whole cutting.

Texas A&M AgriLife recommends using a hay probe and collecting cores from multiple bales in a lot, then combining them into one representative sample. A coring probe reaches through the layers of the bale and gives the lab a much better cross-section. Test different cuttings, fields or hay types separately, and don’t blend samples from separate fields or cuttings to save the cost of a test if you will feed them as separate lots.

Putting the numbers to work

The most useful way to read the report is backward from the cattle. What class of animal will eat this hay, at what stage of production, and how much is she likely to eat? Once you answer those questions, the lab numbers start to mean something.

A mature dry cow in good body condition can often use lower-quality forage than a first-calf heifer nursing a calf. Young cattle need nutrients for growth on top of maintenance, and cold stress raises energy demand. A hay test becomes valuable when you pair it with those real-world differences.

Remember that price per bale isn’t the same as price per unit of nutrition. A cheap bale with very low energy and protein may require expensive supplementation, and better hay can turn out to be the lower-cost feed once you count waste and supplements.

Before buying, try putting two hay reports side by side. Compare dry matter, crude protein, TDN and fiber first. Then add delivered cost and likely feeding waste. A heavier, denser bale isn’t automatically more economical, and a greener bale isn’t automatically more nutritious. The numbers make the comparison fair.

Testing is especially valuable after a hard weather year. Drought hay may be lower in yield and higher in nitrate risk. Mature, rain-damaged hay may test lower in protein and energy than it looks. Hay cut from a fertilized field after stress may deserve a safety screen before it ever reaches a feeder.

A forage test won’t make poor hay better. It shows you where the gaps are before your cattle show them through lost condition or lower performance. One report can’t answer every feeding question, but it replaces several guesses with measurements, and that makes winter nutrition planning much more accurate.

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

When Acorns Become a Problem

Published

on

By

By Savannah Magoteaux

A heavy crop of acorns under an oak tree usually looks more like a sign of fall than a livestock problem. For most cattle in most years, that is all it is. Trouble starts when acorns stop being an occasional bite and become a meaningful part of the diet.

Oak leaves, buds and acorns contain tannins that can damage the digestive tract and kidneys when cattle eat enough of them. Green acorns are generally considered more toxic than mature brown ones, but either can cause problems if cattle eat too many.

The risk climbs when forage is short and cattle go looking for something else to eat. Drought, overgrazed pastures or simply a heavy acorn crop can set up that situation.

Cattle aren’t equally interested in acorns. A few animals in a herd may eat far more than the rest, which helps explain why cases can appear scattered.

Early signs can be vague. Affected cattle may go off feed, look depressed or become constipated. As the damage progresses, you may see dark or bloody manure, abdominal pain, frequent urination followed by reduced urine output, dehydration and weakness. Kidney failure is the most serious concern.

You can’t remove every acorn from a wooded pasture, so prevention comes down to keeping cattle from relying on them. Adequate forage and supplementation take away the incentive to eat large amounts.

You can also fence cattle away from heavily producing oaks for a while, especially when pasture conditions are poor. If several animals seem to be seeking out acorns, take a close look at the rest of the ration instead of assuming they will quit on their own.

If you suspect oak poisoning, call a veterinarian early. Treatment is supportive and does much more good before severe kidney damage sets in. Moving unaffected cattle away from the source and providing good-quality feed and water may prevent more cases.

Acorns are an important fall food for deer, squirrels and other wildlife, and a few acorns generally don’t spell disaster for cattle. The concern is quantity. A pasture full of oaks becomes a different management problem when grass is short, cattle are hungry and the ground is covered with something they are willing to eat.

Oak toxicity comes up most often in cattle, but other livestock can be affected, too. And the risk isn’t limited to acorns. Oak buds and young leaves also contain tannins, so spring can occasionally bring problems as well. In fall, though, the obvious temptation is lying on the ground where cattle can eat it quickly.

Watch where your cattle spend their time. If cows that normally graze open grass start camping under oaks and hunting acorns, that behavior tells you something.

Walk the pasture, estimate how much usable forage is left and check whether a few dominant animals are eating more than the rest. Hay or supplemental feed may help, but place it where all the cattle can reach it rather than assuming one feeder will solve the problem.

Oak poisoning can look like other illnesses, and no one can diagnose kidney damage from pasture observation alone. A veterinarian may use history, clinical signs and lab work to separate it from dehydration, digestive disease or other toxicities. That is another reason to mention a heavy acorn crop when you call. A detail that seems like an ordinary part of fall can be an important part of the history.

Your pasture plan doesn’t have to be complicated. If one wooded trap has a much heavier acorn crop than the rest, use another pasture while you still have the choice.

If you can’t move the herd, make sure hay and supplement are adequate before the animals get hungry enough to seek out acorns aggressively. Salt or mineral by itself won’t make up for a shortage of forage.

The problem usually fades as cattle eat through the crop or the acorns weather or get covered. Don’t return cattle that have already shown signs as soon as they look better, though. Kidney injury can be serious. Follow your veterinarian’s recommendations and reassess the pasture before turning recovered animals back out.

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Land Market Report

Published

on

By

By Jared Groce

Late summer has been brutal on our livestock, our grass and the rural land market in North Texas. We currently have an astounding 42 months of inventory on hand in our report area, and the only properties selling are the ones priced right. Overpriced properties aren’t even getting looked at, much less receiving offers, so pricing your property correctly matters more than ever right now.

Many sellers are still picturing the daily price increases we saw in 2020 to 2023, but those days are behind us, and agents need to be more realistic with listing prices to get any activity for their clients. Hopefully the rains will come soon and bring more land buyers with them this fall, but right now it is still very much a buyer’s market. No one knows how long this dry spell will last, but it will likely take a flood to end it. The same is true of the weather!

They say the best time to plant a tree, or buy land, was 20 years ago, and the second-best time is today.

CountyAreaAcres$/AcreList PriceSold PriceSale/ListDOM
ClayHenrietta120.07$5,150$714,000$618,30986.60%434
ClayBellevue159.44$6,184$981,000$985,959100.50%48
ClayHenrietta293$4,982$1,538,250$1,459,60094.90%212
ClayAverage190.84$5,438$1,077,750$1,021,28994.00%231
CollinAnna11.08$84,356$1,200,000$935,00077.90%634
CollinAverage11.08$84,356$1,200,000$935,00077.90%634
CookeMuenster11$18,000$209,000$198,00094.70%250
CookeGainesville19.3$16,580$345,000$320,00092.80%541
CookeValley View96.23$15,500$1,679,215$1,491,56588.80%194
CookeAverage42.18$16,693$744,405$669,85592.10%328
DentonSanger16.46$39,422$649,000$649,000100.00%47
DentonCross Roads10.35$97,575$1,200,000$1,010,00084.20%40
DentonSanger300$14,000$4,999,999$4,200,00084.00%1,327
DentonAubrey74.09$57,684$4,815,525$4,273,55088.70%302
DentonAverage100.22$52,170$2,916,131$2,533,13889.20%429
GraysonCollinsville11.61$46,516$600,000$540,00090.00%280
GraysonVan Alstyne18.8$58,511$1,175,000$1,100,00093.60%280
GraysonWhitesboro30$37,984$1,170,000$1,139,50697.40%277
GraysonAverage20.14$47,670$981,667$926,50293.70%237
JackNo sales reported——————
MontagueMontague485N/A$5,566,000N/AN/A333
MontagueBowie26$12,244$323,500$318,35298.40%743
MontagueMontague37.3$10,327$428,950$385,19589.80%1
MontagueSaint Jo1,185$7,764$10,000,000$9,199,82992.00%19
MontagueAverage433.33$10,112$4,079,613$3,301,12593.40%274
WiseSunset12$19,027$234,000$228,32097.60%16
WiseSunset12$19,027$234,000$228,32097.60%14
WiseChico11.44$24,476$299,000$280,00093.60%24
WiseChico10.25$29,265$315,000$300,00095.20%12
WiseAverage11.42$22,949$270,000$259,16096.00%17

DOM = days on market

Continue Reading
Ad
Ad
Ad

Trending