Connect with us

Farm & Ranch

[AgriLife Today] Texas Crop and Weather report for Oct. 12

Published

on

By: Adam Russell

Peanut harvests expected to be average

LUBBOCK – Peanut harvesting is underway, and Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service experts expect average yields and low prices for producers.

Dr. Calvin Trostle, AgriLife Extension agronomist, Lubbock, said digging on early planted peanuts and mature varieties have specialists and producers expecting an average year for the crop.

Trostle said peanut producers in Terry, Yoakum and Gaines counties, where more than 80 percent of West Texas’ peanut acres are normally planted, were concerned about their fields in mid-summer. Conditions were hot and dry from June through July, and irrigation was having trouble keeping up with plants’ daily water requirements.

On a windy 93-degree day with low humidity, peanuts could easily use 0.4 of an inch of water each day, which pushes weekly water requirements to around 3 inches, Trostle said.

“Peanuts have a higher water requirement than most crops in the area,” he said. “There was some significant concern among producers until the rains arrived in August and September.”

Trostle heard of no insect issues in peanut fields this year. But diseases, such as pod rot and leaf spot, may have affected some growers.

“I think the heat stress was the main concern but there was some talk about diseases,” he said. “But most producers make fungicide applications as part of their management to ensure pod rot is held in check. But some years, certain conditions can mean more applications or use of more expensive applications to address those problems.”

Producers began harvesting Valencia and Spanish peanuts two weeks ago and fields with runner and Virginia peanuts will likely be dug through the next few weeks, Trostle said. Conditions and forecasts for final maturation of those fields and harvest time appear to be good with no signs of frost.

Trostle said expectations are for an average year for nearly 100,000 irrigated acres of peanuts planted this year in West Texas.

“That means some fields will do very well, in the 5,000 pounds per acre to upwards of 6,000 pounds, but some irrigated fields that might have received less rain or had less irrigation capacity might be in the 2,500-3,000-pound range,” Trostle said.

AgriLife Extension district reporters compiled the following summaries:

CENTRAL: Producers were holding off planting small grains due to armyworms. Field work continued with most crops harvested except for cotton, which was wrapping up. Pasture growth slowed due to cooler morning temperatures. Pecans were looking good in managed orchards. Auctions reported higher prices on steers, slaughter bulls and cows. Prices on bred cows were steady. Cattle were in good condition. All counties reported good soil moisture. Nearly all counties reported good overall range and pasture conditions, and most reported fair crop conditions.

ROLLING PLAINS: Rain fell for the third straight week in parts of the district. Totals ranged from 1-4 inches, and some hail was reported. Pastures and rangeland were in good condition. Fall armyworms continued to give wheat producers problems. Cotton was opening and looked promising. Producers continued to put up hay. Livestock were in good condition.

COASTAL BEND: Unseasonably warm temperatures in the low 90s were reported. Rain late in the week shut down picking with only a few acres of cotton left to harvest. Very little farming activity occurred because of wet soil conditions, but land was drying. Producers worked fallow land where they were able. Pecan harvest should begin soon. Winter pasture planting continued. Pastures looked really good with the exception of armyworm damage in some areas. Producers were making hay, but some were opting to not cut due to ample supply. Cattle were in good to excellent condition.

EAST: Dry weather continued across the region. Pasture and range conditions were fair to good. Counties needed rain. Soil moisture levels continued to decrease. Subsoil was mostly adequate, and topsoil was short to adequate. Pastures were drying up. Grass growth was starting to slow due to lack of moisture and cooler nights. Many producers were getting the last cutting of hay. In Trinity County, producers worried they would not get another cutting of hay. Some producers were still buying out-of-county hay. Producers in Wood and Smith counties were waiting for moisture before planting winter pastures. Livestock were in fair to good condition. Fall calving and cattle work were underway. Weaning and selling of market-ready calves and cull cows continued in Polk County. The cattle market continued to drop. Some Trinity County producers were selling calves even if they were not market-ready because they feared the market would continue downward as some economist predicted. Horn fly numbers increased on cattle. Wild pigs continued to be active. Chinch bugs were causing damage to home lawns.

SOUTH PLAINS: Topsoil and subsoil moisture levels in Cochran County are still adequate. Producers continued corn harvest and dug peanuts. Cotton was finishing out, and sorghum continued to mature. Pastures and rangeland were in good condition, as were cattle. Warm dry conditions allowed some Floyd County farmers to start applying harvest aids to cotton. Field activities included late-season weed control, cotton defoliation and harvest of grain crops and cotton. Several Lubbock County cotton gins started ginning. In Lynn County, recent brief rains slowed down cotton harvest. Scurry County had a cold front move in with trace amounts of rainfall. Cool temperatures were expected. Wheat planted in early September could use moisture.

PANHANDLE: Above-average temperatures were reported. Soil moisture levels varied from very short to adequate with most reporting adequate. Deaf Smith County producers harvested corn and grain sorghum fields as quickly as possible. Most corn was harvested, and grain sorghum harvest was going to stretch out this year due to a wide range of maturity in fields. Moore County reported average corn yields. Cotton was coming along even with the cooler temperatures. Some cotton started to open, and several fields will receive harvest-aide chemicals soon. Winter wheat was planted with earlier planted fields up and looking good but in need of a rain. Cattle looked good. Rangeland and pastures varied in rating from poor to excellent, with most reported fair to good.

NORTH: Topsoil and subsoil moisture levels varied from adequate to short. Weather was very dry with mild temperatures. Stock ponds were 3-4 feet low in many areas. Nighttime temperatures dropped into the 40s and 50s. Livestock were being watched for signs of illness. Summer grasses were shutting down.  Producers held off planting winter pastures until the threat of armyworms lessens and more precipitation comes. Soybean harvests continued, and the cotton harvest had begun. Farmers started to plant wheat and oats. A few ranchers baled some late hay. Wild hogs were still causing damage. Fly and mosquito numbers were high.

FAR WEST: Temperatures were in the low 90s but dropped drastically with a cold front. Rain showers occurred. Rain amounts ranged up to 1.5 inches. Rangeland grasses were showing stress in drier areas. Many producers defoliated more cotton and were waiting on plants to die. High humidity was slowing producer activities. Yields were decent so far. Wheat planting started. Supplemental feeding of livestock and wildlife continued.

WEST CENTRAL: Cooler weather and scattered showers were reported. Cotton was maturing and bolls were opening. Pasture conditions were good with the exception of broomweed. Rain delayed some wheat planting and other field work. Armyworms continued to be a problem. Livestock remained in good condition, and stock tanks were mostly full. Pecans were progressing with above average yields in most orchards. Livestock producers have not planted winter wheat for fear of armyworm infestation.

SOUTHEAST: There was still rice in the field in Chambers County. Livestock were in good condition with plenty of grass. Hay producers put up additional hay. Cotton farmers were finally making progress, but yields and quality were low. Cool season forages were planted. Waller and Brazos counties experienced cooler temperatures. Overall humidity was low. Livestock looked good. Topsoil moisture was beginning to decline. Soil moisture levels ranged widely from adequate to surplus, with most ratings in the adequate range.

SOUTHWEST: Dry conditions continued with no precipitation forecast. Pecan harvests were underway. Some pecans were affected by scab and mildew due to high humidity. Pasture and rangeland conditions were good. Wildlife and livestock were in good condition.

SOUTH: Temperatures began to cool in the evenings but remained warm in the day. Some spotty showers were reported in some areas, but soil moisture levels were declining. Peanut harvest preparations continued. Irrigation on crops including wheat continued. Wheat and oat planting continued. Peanut fields were under irrigation and being prepared for harvest. The cotton harvest was complete except for late-season fields. Most rangeland and pasture conditions remained good, but some areas were turning brown, and grazing was fair. Some hay was baled, but forage production was slowing due to declining moisture levels. Fall armyworms remained a potential problem. Body condition scores on cattle remained excellent. Soil moisture conditions were mostly adequate with some areas reporting short moisture levels. Cattle prices were trending downward. Livestock markets reported an increase in volume sold. Market conditions dropped significantly in one county with 500-pound steers averaging 96 cents per pound down from $1.14 reported the previous week and down from $1.65 per pound at the start of the year. Ponds were full and in some instances overflowing a bit, with good, continual rainfall. Sugarcane and citrus harvesting began in Hidalgo County.

-30-

LikeTweet

Find more stories, photos, videos and audio at http://today.agrilife.org

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Forage Needs in the Fall

Published

on

By

By Savannah Magoteaux

Two bales can look almost identical and feed very differently. Color, smell and leafiness tell part of the story, but a forage test tells you what your cattle are actually being offered. If you buy hay by the ton or are trying to stretch winter feed, that little lab sheet can be one of the cheapest management tools on the place.

Reading the report

Start with dry matter. Hay contains water, and labs report nutrients either “as fed” or on a dry-matter basis. Feeds are easiest to compare on a dry-matter basis because it takes moisture out of the comparison. Hay that is 90 percent dry matter is about 10 percent water.

Crude protein, usually abbreviated CP, is the number most people recognize. It estimates protein from the forage’s nitrogen content. Higher isn’t automatically better. The goal is to match the hay to the animal. A dry, mature cow in mid-gestation doesn’t need the same protein as a lactating cow, a growing replacement heifer or a young calf.

Energy matters just as much. Beef cattle forage reports commonly estimate energy as total digestible nutrients, or TDN. Low-TDN hay may fill a cow up before it supplies enough energy, particularly when her requirements rise late in gestation or during lactation. That is when you may need better forage, an energy supplement or a different feeding plan.

Fiber numbers explain why some hay looks coarse and why animals may not be able to eat enough of it. Neutral detergent fiber, or NDF, is closely tied to intake. As NDF climbs, cattle generally eat less because the forage moves through the digestive tract more slowly. Acid detergent fiber, or ADF, is tied to digestibility. Higher ADF generally means lower digestibility.

Some reports also include relative feed value or relative forage quality. These indexes help compare lots of forage, particularly alfalfa and mixed hay, but they aren’t a complete ration. They don’t replace looking at protein, energy, minerals, animal class and expected intake.

Then come the numbers you hope are boring. Nitrate testing matters when drought, heavy nitrogen fertilization, cloudy weather or other conditions have stressed the forage enough to cause nitrate accumulation. Sorghum-type forages, johnsongrass, corn and some weeds deserve particular attention. Nitrates stay in hay after it is cut and baled, so a risky crop doesn’t become safe just because it dried.

Minerals deserve a look, but this is where a hay report gets harder to interpret. Calcium, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium and other minerals may be listed, yet a complete mineral program depends on water, other feeds and local conditions. A high number isn’t always an advantage. Excessive potassium, for example, can interfere with magnesium use under some circumstances. If you are balancing a ration for high-risk animals, work with a nutritionist or Extension specialist rather than treating the lab sheet as a stand-alone mineral prescription.

Moisture tells another story. Hay baled too wet is at greater risk of heating and mold, and very wet hay can become a fire hazard as microbial activity raises its internal temperature. A test taken months later can’t reconstruct every storage problem, so inspect the stack, too. A musty odor, visible mold, unusual heat and dark discoloration are all reasons to investigate.

Getting a good sample

A hay test is only as good as the sample, and sampling is the step most likely to ruin a good analysis. A handful pulled from the outside of one convenient bale doesn’t represent a stack of 100 bales. Round bales aren’t uniform from the outside to the center, and one bale may not represent the whole cutting.

Texas A&M AgriLife recommends using a hay probe and collecting cores from multiple bales in a lot, then combining them into one representative sample. A coring probe reaches through the layers of the bale and gives the lab a much better cross-section. Test different cuttings, fields or hay types separately, and don’t blend samples from separate fields or cuttings to save the cost of a test if you will feed them as separate lots.

Putting the numbers to work

The most useful way to read the report is backward from the cattle. What class of animal will eat this hay, at what stage of production, and how much is she likely to eat? Once you answer those questions, the lab numbers start to mean something.

A mature dry cow in good body condition can often use lower-quality forage than a first-calf heifer nursing a calf. Young cattle need nutrients for growth on top of maintenance, and cold stress raises energy demand. A hay test becomes valuable when you pair it with those real-world differences.

Remember that price per bale isn’t the same as price per unit of nutrition. A cheap bale with very low energy and protein may require expensive supplementation, and better hay can turn out to be the lower-cost feed once you count waste and supplements.

Before buying, try putting two hay reports side by side. Compare dry matter, crude protein, TDN and fiber first. Then add delivered cost and likely feeding waste. A heavier, denser bale isn’t automatically more economical, and a greener bale isn’t automatically more nutritious. The numbers make the comparison fair.

Testing is especially valuable after a hard weather year. Drought hay may be lower in yield and higher in nitrate risk. Mature, rain-damaged hay may test lower in protein and energy than it looks. Hay cut from a fertilized field after stress may deserve a safety screen before it ever reaches a feeder.

A forage test won’t make poor hay better. It shows you where the gaps are before your cattle show them through lost condition or lower performance. One report can’t answer every feeding question, but it replaces several guesses with measurements, and that makes winter nutrition planning much more accurate.

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

When Acorns Become a Problem

Published

on

By

By Savannah Magoteaux

A heavy crop of acorns under an oak tree usually looks more like a sign of fall than a livestock problem. For most cattle in most years, that is all it is. Trouble starts when acorns stop being an occasional bite and become a meaningful part of the diet.

Oak leaves, buds and acorns contain tannins that can damage the digestive tract and kidneys when cattle eat enough of them. Green acorns are generally considered more toxic than mature brown ones, but either can cause problems if cattle eat too many.

The risk climbs when forage is short and cattle go looking for something else to eat. Drought, overgrazed pastures or simply a heavy acorn crop can set up that situation.

Cattle aren’t equally interested in acorns. A few animals in a herd may eat far more than the rest, which helps explain why cases can appear scattered.

Early signs can be vague. Affected cattle may go off feed, look depressed or become constipated. As the damage progresses, you may see dark or bloody manure, abdominal pain, frequent urination followed by reduced urine output, dehydration and weakness. Kidney failure is the most serious concern.

You can’t remove every acorn from a wooded pasture, so prevention comes down to keeping cattle from relying on them. Adequate forage and supplementation take away the incentive to eat large amounts.

You can also fence cattle away from heavily producing oaks for a while, especially when pasture conditions are poor. If several animals seem to be seeking out acorns, take a close look at the rest of the ration instead of assuming they will quit on their own.

If you suspect oak poisoning, call a veterinarian early. Treatment is supportive and does much more good before severe kidney damage sets in. Moving unaffected cattle away from the source and providing good-quality feed and water may prevent more cases.

Acorns are an important fall food for deer, squirrels and other wildlife, and a few acorns generally don’t spell disaster for cattle. The concern is quantity. A pasture full of oaks becomes a different management problem when grass is short, cattle are hungry and the ground is covered with something they are willing to eat.

Oak toxicity comes up most often in cattle, but other livestock can be affected, too. And the risk isn’t limited to acorns. Oak buds and young leaves also contain tannins, so spring can occasionally bring problems as well. In fall, though, the obvious temptation is lying on the ground where cattle can eat it quickly.

Watch where your cattle spend their time. If cows that normally graze open grass start camping under oaks and hunting acorns, that behavior tells you something.

Walk the pasture, estimate how much usable forage is left and check whether a few dominant animals are eating more than the rest. Hay or supplemental feed may help, but place it where all the cattle can reach it rather than assuming one feeder will solve the problem.

Oak poisoning can look like other illnesses, and no one can diagnose kidney damage from pasture observation alone. A veterinarian may use history, clinical signs and lab work to separate it from dehydration, digestive disease or other toxicities. That is another reason to mention a heavy acorn crop when you call. A detail that seems like an ordinary part of fall can be an important part of the history.

Your pasture plan doesn’t have to be complicated. If one wooded trap has a much heavier acorn crop than the rest, use another pasture while you still have the choice.

If you can’t move the herd, make sure hay and supplement are adequate before the animals get hungry enough to seek out acorns aggressively. Salt or mineral by itself won’t make up for a shortage of forage.

The problem usually fades as cattle eat through the crop or the acorns weather or get covered. Don’t return cattle that have already shown signs as soon as they look better, though. Kidney injury can be serious. Follow your veterinarian’s recommendations and reassess the pasture before turning recovered animals back out.

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Land Market Report

Published

on

By

By Jared Groce

Late summer has been brutal on our livestock, our grass and the rural land market in North Texas. We currently have an astounding 42 months of inventory on hand in our report area, and the only properties selling are the ones priced right. Overpriced properties aren’t even getting looked at, much less receiving offers, so pricing your property correctly matters more than ever right now.

Many sellers are still picturing the daily price increases we saw in 2020 to 2023, but those days are behind us, and agents need to be more realistic with listing prices to get any activity for their clients. Hopefully the rains will come soon and bring more land buyers with them this fall, but right now it is still very much a buyer’s market. No one knows how long this dry spell will last, but it will likely take a flood to end it. The same is true of the weather!

They say the best time to plant a tree, or buy land, was 20 years ago, and the second-best time is today.

CountyAreaAcres$/AcreList PriceSold PriceSale/ListDOM
ClayHenrietta120.07$5,150$714,000$618,30986.60%434
ClayBellevue159.44$6,184$981,000$985,959100.50%48
ClayHenrietta293$4,982$1,538,250$1,459,60094.90%212
ClayAverage190.84$5,438$1,077,750$1,021,28994.00%231
CollinAnna11.08$84,356$1,200,000$935,00077.90%634
CollinAverage11.08$84,356$1,200,000$935,00077.90%634
CookeMuenster11$18,000$209,000$198,00094.70%250
CookeGainesville19.3$16,580$345,000$320,00092.80%541
CookeValley View96.23$15,500$1,679,215$1,491,56588.80%194
CookeAverage42.18$16,693$744,405$669,85592.10%328
DentonSanger16.46$39,422$649,000$649,000100.00%47
DentonCross Roads10.35$97,575$1,200,000$1,010,00084.20%40
DentonSanger300$14,000$4,999,999$4,200,00084.00%1,327
DentonAubrey74.09$57,684$4,815,525$4,273,55088.70%302
DentonAverage100.22$52,170$2,916,131$2,533,13889.20%429
GraysonCollinsville11.61$46,516$600,000$540,00090.00%280
GraysonVan Alstyne18.8$58,511$1,175,000$1,100,00093.60%280
GraysonWhitesboro30$37,984$1,170,000$1,139,50697.40%277
GraysonAverage20.14$47,670$981,667$926,50293.70%237
JackNo sales reported——————
MontagueMontague485N/A$5,566,000N/AN/A333
MontagueBowie26$12,244$323,500$318,35298.40%743
MontagueMontague37.3$10,327$428,950$385,19589.80%1
MontagueSaint Jo1,185$7,764$10,000,000$9,199,82992.00%19
MontagueAverage433.33$10,112$4,079,613$3,301,12593.40%274
WiseSunset12$19,027$234,000$228,32097.60%16
WiseSunset12$19,027$234,000$228,32097.60%14
WiseChico11.44$24,476$299,000$280,00093.60%24
WiseChico10.25$29,265$315,000$300,00095.20%12
WiseAverage11.42$22,949$270,000$259,16096.00%17

DOM = days on market

Continue Reading
Ad
Ad
Ad

Trending