Connect with us

Farm & Ranch

[AgriLife Today] Texas crop, weather for Jan. 20, 2016

Published

on

Snow cover from the winter storm Goliath persisted for weeks in the Texas Panhandle, according to Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service county agent reports. (Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service photo by Dr. Ted McCollum)

By: Robert Burns

Further strengthening El Niño could mean elevated rainfall through May

Writer: Robert Burns, 903-834-6191, rd-burns@tamu.edu

COLLEGE STATION – A further strengthening of the current El Niño will likely mean wetter-than-normal conditions continue into spring, according to Dr. John Nielsen-Gammon, state climatologist and Regents Professor at Texas A&M University, College Station.

“There’s the possibility that this El Niño, although it’s already pretty strong, is actually going to strengthen a bit more because of the wind patterns in the Pacific Ocean,” Nielsen-Gammon said. “You can think of the tropical Pacific as a giant bathtub, and the winds blow the warm water typically over toward the far west end.

Download or preview a two-minute MP3 audio version of this report
“When those winds weaken and even reverse, that’s what causes El Niño. The winds bring the warm water over to the east, toward South America. And recently we’ve had an increase in those west to east winds. That’s going to reinforce the effects of El Niño.”

As for summer conditions, long-range predictions are always a gamble, he said. But there is some evidence that the current super-strong El Niño will be followed by its counterpoint, a strong La Niña that could mean next winter will be dry.

“Eventually, as the winds change, the warm water is going to slosh back,” Nielsen-Gammon said. “About half of the moderate-to-strong El Niños switch over to La Niñas. They basically overshoot the average conditions. It takes several months. The Pacific Ocean is a pretty big bathtub.”

This means the wet winter is going to more than likely continue for another few months, with elevated chances of rain through May, especially in the northern part of Texas, he said.

“Summer in Texas is always a roll of the dice or a flip of a coin, but next winter is almost certainly not going to be as wet as this winter has been. It could be a dry winter if La Niña does develop this fall,” Nielsen-Gammon said.

AgriLife Extension district reporters compiled the following summaries:


The 12 Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Districts

Central: Soil moisture was rated as good across the region. Rangeland, pastures and crops were generally rated as fair. Wet conditions continued to dominate the region’s weather. Wheat and oat plantings were down due to wet conditions during the fall planting season. Rangeland and pastures were in less-than-favorable condition. Producers were applying fertilizer on those wheat fields that weren’t too wet to get into. Many producers were behind on preparing for 2016 crops. Some were pre-plant fertilizing corn ground. Stock-water tanks were full; creeks and rivers were in good shape. The pecan harvest neared completion, with average to below-average yields. Pecan prices were very good. Cattle were in good condition, with producers providing supplemental feed.

Coastal Bend: Wet, cool weather raised producer expectations of having good subsoil moisture for spring planting. Most row-crop fields were wet, delaying fertilizer applications. Winter forages were producing well thanks to the favorable weather conditions. Cattle remained in good condition with prices steady. Most cow-calf producers continued providing hay protein supplements to herds.

East: Wet conditions persisted across the region. Ponds and lakes were overflowing. Pastures and fields remained wet and soggy. Smith County ended 2015 with more than 90 inches of rain. Houston County had rivers still out of their banks on both sides of the county. Temperatures continued to be cold at night and warmer during the day. Warmer weather promoted the growth of some fresh forages. Volunteer ryegrass stands were growing. Producers were topdressing pastures with fertilizer where field conditions allowed. Trinity County producers continued to look out of county for hay to buy. Cattle remained in fair to good condition with supplemental feeding. Cattle in Cherokee County were consuming more hay than normal, which caused concern for producers. Beef producers were treating both internal and external parasites. Spring calving was in progress. Producers continued to sell any market-ready calves and cull cows. Fruit tree producers began pruning. Feral hogs were active and continued to destroy pastures. Beaver control was underway in Upshur County.

Far West: Mild winter weather prevailed throughout the region with nighttime lows in the 30s and daily highs in the upper-50s to mid-60s. Most producers were providing livestock with supplemental feed. Early calving herds began to calve. Rangeland and pastures were in fair condition. Topsoil and subsoil moisture were short.

North: Topsoil moisture varied from adequate to surplus. Fields were still wet. Weather varied from mild temperatures to intermittent freezing conditions. Because of heavy rains received in November and December, wheat and oat conditions were poor to very poor. Since emergence, much wheat had been continually in standing water. In some areas, only about 11 percent of the intended wheat acreage was planted because of rain. Winter pastures that were planted early were doing well, but pastures were not being grazed because soil conditions were too wet. The wet conditions caused cattle producers to have to feed more hay and supplements. Feral hog activity increased. Tornadoes that touched down in northeast Collin County on Dec. 26 caused damage to many farm structures.

Panhandle: Wet and cold conditions prevailed since the first of the year. Scattered snow cover remained in some areas. Winter wheat was doing reasonably well in most locations. Some cotton was left in fields due to wet conditions, stalling harvesting. Yield grades were expected to be lower due to the snow and moisture. Producers were planning for the spring planting season. In Deaf Smith County, total cattle losses from the recent snowstorms were still being calculated, but individual producers lost from five head to hundreds. The high losses were generally associated with dairy producers. Livestock producers were supplementing cattle on rangeland and wheat pasture.

Rolling Plains: Wet conditions continued. The cotton harvest was completed in some counties, while producers in other counties were waiting for fields to dry out. Livestock continued to recover from winter storm Goliath. Some losses were reported. There were some reports of blackleg, a potentially fatal disease in cattle. Small grains showed significant growth when days were warm and sunny.

South: Conditions throughout the region remained cloudy and mild, with high daytime temperatures in the 70s and nighttime lows in the 30s. The northern and eastern parts of the region received varying amounts of rain. Soil moisture was rated as adequate throughout the region. In the northern part of the region, pastures remained in good condition. Potato and wheat planting began. In the eastern part of the region, pastures remained dormant, and livestock were being fed hay and other supplemental feed. Most row-crop farmers were preparing for the upcoming planting season. In the western part of the region, growing conditions were great, pastures were green, and oats and wheat made good progress. Harvesting of cabbage and processing spinach began, and carrots did well with no insect pressure. In Zapata County, fever ticks affected wildlife and livestock. In the southern part of the region, vegetable, citrus and sugarcane harvesting continued in Hidalgo County. In Starr County, fall vegetable crops were in good shape. Livestock producers were providing some supplemental feed as native rangeland and pastures grasses remained dormant.

South Plains: Winter storms brought moisture but made conditions difficult for producers. More snow in fell in Floyd County, but it didn’t stay long. Soils were extremely saturated from a December blizzard. Winter wheat looked good. In Hale County, wet and cold conditions were particularly challenging for producers with livestock. In Swisher County, weeks after the winter storm Goliath, large snowdrifts had still not melted. More than 95 percent of the cattle that were roaming after the storm were accounted for, but death losses were expected to be high. Wheat planted in September fared well and was benefiting from the slow melt. Later-planted wheat was lost due to high winds. Cochran County moisture levels were good with the additional moisture from the recent snow. All fall crops were harvested, and producers were preparing for spring planting. Pastures and rangeland were in good condition. Daytime temperatures in Lubbock County were mild for this time of year — 67 degrees on Jan. 14. However, there were still many snowdrifts left from the earlier blizzard. Wheat continued to recover from the snowpack and cold nighttime temperatures. In Garza County, temperatures were moderate with highs in the 60s earlier in the week. Later in the week, highs dropped to the 40s and nighttime lows were in the upper 20s. Most cotton was harvested, but a few producers were not able to complete their harvest before the return of wet conditions. Rangeland and pastures were mostly in good to excellent condition for this time of year. Mitchell County producers were still harvesting cotton. There was still a lot of cotton on the ground, however. The Scurry County cotton harvest was expected to be finished soon.

Southwest: Soil moisture remained good, and recent precipitation benefited winter pastures and native rangeland. Several borderline freezes caused some brush and tree species to go dormant, but there were many species that were still green. Crops were harvested, and fields were being cultivated. Some wheat and oats were in good condition and were being grazed. Livestock and wildlife were in good condition but will still need supplemental feed through the winter.

West Central: Conditions were cold and windy, but turned mild later in the week. Soil moisture continued to be very high. Most producers reported winter wheat was off to a good start with excellent growing conditions. A few noted that their wheat was not growing and appeared yellow. Some fields still had standing water. No major insect problems at this time. Cotton harvesting neared completion but slowly due to wet conditions. Ginning was wrapping up. Cotton yields were generally fair but grades were low. Growers were preparing fields for spring planting. Rangeland and pasture conditions were fair to good for this time of year. Cool-season grasses provided good grazing for livestock on much of the rangeland. Livestock remained in fair to good condition.

-30-

LikeTweet

Find more stories, photos, videos and audio at http://today.agrilife.org

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Forage Needs in the Fall

Published

on

By

By Savannah Magoteaux

Two bales can look almost identical and feed very differently. Color, smell and leafiness tell part of the story, but a forage test tells you what your cattle are actually being offered. If you buy hay by the ton or are trying to stretch winter feed, that little lab sheet can be one of the cheapest management tools on the place.

Reading the report

Start with dry matter. Hay contains water, and labs report nutrients either “as fed” or on a dry-matter basis. Feeds are easiest to compare on a dry-matter basis because it takes moisture out of the comparison. Hay that is 90 percent dry matter is about 10 percent water.

Crude protein, usually abbreviated CP, is the number most people recognize. It estimates protein from the forage’s nitrogen content. Higher isn’t automatically better. The goal is to match the hay to the animal. A dry, mature cow in mid-gestation doesn’t need the same protein as a lactating cow, a growing replacement heifer or a young calf.

Energy matters just as much. Beef cattle forage reports commonly estimate energy as total digestible nutrients, or TDN. Low-TDN hay may fill a cow up before it supplies enough energy, particularly when her requirements rise late in gestation or during lactation. That is when you may need better forage, an energy supplement or a different feeding plan.

Fiber numbers explain why some hay looks coarse and why animals may not be able to eat enough of it. Neutral detergent fiber, or NDF, is closely tied to intake. As NDF climbs, cattle generally eat less because the forage moves through the digestive tract more slowly. Acid detergent fiber, or ADF, is tied to digestibility. Higher ADF generally means lower digestibility.

Some reports also include relative feed value or relative forage quality. These indexes help compare lots of forage, particularly alfalfa and mixed hay, but they aren’t a complete ration. They don’t replace looking at protein, energy, minerals, animal class and expected intake.

Then come the numbers you hope are boring. Nitrate testing matters when drought, heavy nitrogen fertilization, cloudy weather or other conditions have stressed the forage enough to cause nitrate accumulation. Sorghum-type forages, johnsongrass, corn and some weeds deserve particular attention. Nitrates stay in hay after it is cut and baled, so a risky crop doesn’t become safe just because it dried.

Minerals deserve a look, but this is where a hay report gets harder to interpret. Calcium, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium and other minerals may be listed, yet a complete mineral program depends on water, other feeds and local conditions. A high number isn’t always an advantage. Excessive potassium, for example, can interfere with magnesium use under some circumstances. If you are balancing a ration for high-risk animals, work with a nutritionist or Extension specialist rather than treating the lab sheet as a stand-alone mineral prescription.

Moisture tells another story. Hay baled too wet is at greater risk of heating and mold, and very wet hay can become a fire hazard as microbial activity raises its internal temperature. A test taken months later can’t reconstruct every storage problem, so inspect the stack, too. A musty odor, visible mold, unusual heat and dark discoloration are all reasons to investigate.

Getting a good sample

A hay test is only as good as the sample, and sampling is the step most likely to ruin a good analysis. A handful pulled from the outside of one convenient bale doesn’t represent a stack of 100 bales. Round bales aren’t uniform from the outside to the center, and one bale may not represent the whole cutting.

Texas A&M AgriLife recommends using a hay probe and collecting cores from multiple bales in a lot, then combining them into one representative sample. A coring probe reaches through the layers of the bale and gives the lab a much better cross-section. Test different cuttings, fields or hay types separately, and don’t blend samples from separate fields or cuttings to save the cost of a test if you will feed them as separate lots.

Putting the numbers to work

The most useful way to read the report is backward from the cattle. What class of animal will eat this hay, at what stage of production, and how much is she likely to eat? Once you answer those questions, the lab numbers start to mean something.

A mature dry cow in good body condition can often use lower-quality forage than a first-calf heifer nursing a calf. Young cattle need nutrients for growth on top of maintenance, and cold stress raises energy demand. A hay test becomes valuable when you pair it with those real-world differences.

Remember that price per bale isn’t the same as price per unit of nutrition. A cheap bale with very low energy and protein may require expensive supplementation, and better hay can turn out to be the lower-cost feed once you count waste and supplements.

Before buying, try putting two hay reports side by side. Compare dry matter, crude protein, TDN and fiber first. Then add delivered cost and likely feeding waste. A heavier, denser bale isn’t automatically more economical, and a greener bale isn’t automatically more nutritious. The numbers make the comparison fair.

Testing is especially valuable after a hard weather year. Drought hay may be lower in yield and higher in nitrate risk. Mature, rain-damaged hay may test lower in protein and energy than it looks. Hay cut from a fertilized field after stress may deserve a safety screen before it ever reaches a feeder.

A forage test won’t make poor hay better. It shows you where the gaps are before your cattle show them through lost condition or lower performance. One report can’t answer every feeding question, but it replaces several guesses with measurements, and that makes winter nutrition planning much more accurate.

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

When Acorns Become a Problem

Published

on

By

By Savannah Magoteaux

A heavy crop of acorns under an oak tree usually looks more like a sign of fall than a livestock problem. For most cattle in most years, that is all it is. Trouble starts when acorns stop being an occasional bite and become a meaningful part of the diet.

Oak leaves, buds and acorns contain tannins that can damage the digestive tract and kidneys when cattle eat enough of them. Green acorns are generally considered more toxic than mature brown ones, but either can cause problems if cattle eat too many.

The risk climbs when forage is short and cattle go looking for something else to eat. Drought, overgrazed pastures or simply a heavy acorn crop can set up that situation.

Cattle aren’t equally interested in acorns. A few animals in a herd may eat far more than the rest, which helps explain why cases can appear scattered.

Early signs can be vague. Affected cattle may go off feed, look depressed or become constipated. As the damage progresses, you may see dark or bloody manure, abdominal pain, frequent urination followed by reduced urine output, dehydration and weakness. Kidney failure is the most serious concern.

You can’t remove every acorn from a wooded pasture, so prevention comes down to keeping cattle from relying on them. Adequate forage and supplementation take away the incentive to eat large amounts.

You can also fence cattle away from heavily producing oaks for a while, especially when pasture conditions are poor. If several animals seem to be seeking out acorns, take a close look at the rest of the ration instead of assuming they will quit on their own.

If you suspect oak poisoning, call a veterinarian early. Treatment is supportive and does much more good before severe kidney damage sets in. Moving unaffected cattle away from the source and providing good-quality feed and water may prevent more cases.

Acorns are an important fall food for deer, squirrels and other wildlife, and a few acorns generally don’t spell disaster for cattle. The concern is quantity. A pasture full of oaks becomes a different management problem when grass is short, cattle are hungry and the ground is covered with something they are willing to eat.

Oak toxicity comes up most often in cattle, but other livestock can be affected, too. And the risk isn’t limited to acorns. Oak buds and young leaves also contain tannins, so spring can occasionally bring problems as well. In fall, though, the obvious temptation is lying on the ground where cattle can eat it quickly.

Watch where your cattle spend their time. If cows that normally graze open grass start camping under oaks and hunting acorns, that behavior tells you something.

Walk the pasture, estimate how much usable forage is left and check whether a few dominant animals are eating more than the rest. Hay or supplemental feed may help, but place it where all the cattle can reach it rather than assuming one feeder will solve the problem.

Oak poisoning can look like other illnesses, and no one can diagnose kidney damage from pasture observation alone. A veterinarian may use history, clinical signs and lab work to separate it from dehydration, digestive disease or other toxicities. That is another reason to mention a heavy acorn crop when you call. A detail that seems like an ordinary part of fall can be an important part of the history.

Your pasture plan doesn’t have to be complicated. If one wooded trap has a much heavier acorn crop than the rest, use another pasture while you still have the choice.

If you can’t move the herd, make sure hay and supplement are adequate before the animals get hungry enough to seek out acorns aggressively. Salt or mineral by itself won’t make up for a shortage of forage.

The problem usually fades as cattle eat through the crop or the acorns weather or get covered. Don’t return cattle that have already shown signs as soon as they look better, though. Kidney injury can be serious. Follow your veterinarian’s recommendations and reassess the pasture before turning recovered animals back out.

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Land Market Report

Published

on

By

By Jared Groce

Late summer has been brutal on our livestock, our grass and the rural land market in North Texas. We currently have an astounding 42 months of inventory on hand in our report area, and the only properties selling are the ones priced right. Overpriced properties aren’t even getting looked at, much less receiving offers, so pricing your property correctly matters more than ever right now.

Many sellers are still picturing the daily price increases we saw in 2020 to 2023, but those days are behind us, and agents need to be more realistic with listing prices to get any activity for their clients. Hopefully the rains will come soon and bring more land buyers with them this fall, but right now it is still very much a buyer’s market. No one knows how long this dry spell will last, but it will likely take a flood to end it. The same is true of the weather!

They say the best time to plant a tree, or buy land, was 20 years ago, and the second-best time is today.

CountyAreaAcres$/AcreList PriceSold PriceSale/ListDOM
ClayHenrietta120.07$5,150$714,000$618,30986.60%434
ClayBellevue159.44$6,184$981,000$985,959100.50%48
ClayHenrietta293$4,982$1,538,250$1,459,60094.90%212
ClayAverage190.84$5,438$1,077,750$1,021,28994.00%231
CollinAnna11.08$84,356$1,200,000$935,00077.90%634
CollinAverage11.08$84,356$1,200,000$935,00077.90%634
CookeMuenster11$18,000$209,000$198,00094.70%250
CookeGainesville19.3$16,580$345,000$320,00092.80%541
CookeValley View96.23$15,500$1,679,215$1,491,56588.80%194
CookeAverage42.18$16,693$744,405$669,85592.10%328
DentonSanger16.46$39,422$649,000$649,000100.00%47
DentonCross Roads10.35$97,575$1,200,000$1,010,00084.20%40
DentonSanger300$14,000$4,999,999$4,200,00084.00%1,327
DentonAubrey74.09$57,684$4,815,525$4,273,55088.70%302
DentonAverage100.22$52,170$2,916,131$2,533,13889.20%429
GraysonCollinsville11.61$46,516$600,000$540,00090.00%280
GraysonVan Alstyne18.8$58,511$1,175,000$1,100,00093.60%280
GraysonWhitesboro30$37,984$1,170,000$1,139,50697.40%277
GraysonAverage20.14$47,670$981,667$926,50293.70%237
JackNo sales reported——————
MontagueMontague485N/A$5,566,000N/AN/A333
MontagueBowie26$12,244$323,500$318,35298.40%743
MontagueMontague37.3$10,327$428,950$385,19589.80%1
MontagueSaint Jo1,185$7,764$10,000,000$9,199,82992.00%19
MontagueAverage433.33$10,112$4,079,613$3,301,12593.40%274
WiseSunset12$19,027$234,000$228,32097.60%16
WiseSunset12$19,027$234,000$228,32097.60%14
WiseChico11.44$24,476$299,000$280,00093.60%24
WiseChico10.25$29,265$315,000$300,00095.20%12
WiseAverage11.42$22,949$270,000$259,16096.00%17

DOM = days on market

Continue Reading
Ad
Ad
Ad

Trending