Farm & Ranch
Texas, crop weather for Dec. 1,2015
By: Robert Burns
Wet freezing weather further delays cotton harvest
Writer: Robert Burns, 903-834-6191, rd-burns@tamu.edu
COLLEGE STATION – Some farmers were concerned about the recent ice and rain in the High Plains causing deterioration of cotton grade and quality, according to Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service reports.
However, Dr. Gaylon Morgan, AgriLife Extension state cotton specialist, College Station, said past studies have shown one such event usually does not adversely affect grade or quality to any significant degree.
Morgan cited a study done Dr. Randy Boman and Mark Kelley in 2001 that showed weathering can impact fiber quality over time.
Boman, now with Oklahoma State University, is the past regional cotton agronomist based in Lubbock. Kelley is the current program specialist for AgriLife Extension’s South Plains region.
“There’s no doubt that over time, fiber quality does decrease, but it’s a gradual process,” Morgan said. “And I don’t think the rain and ice storm is going to make a dramatic impact on fiber quality.”
Download or preview a two-minute MP3 version of this report.
“Now if we were getting into January or February, then yes, the quality does progressively go down over time. But given the storm happened at the end of November, we do not expect this one event to affect quality much.”
The intensity of such a storm can also be a factor as well, Morgan said. An extremely heavy rain can literally pull the lint off the plant.
“But it is my impression that most of this precipitation was not intense,” he said.
If several ice and rain storms follow, further delaying harvest, then over time, bark content would be expected to increase for stripper harvested cotton. Leaf grades would typically increase, while strength, length and color would diminish, which can result in substantial discounts, Morgan noted.
AgriLife Extension district reporters compiled the following summaries:
Central: Rangeland, pastures and livestock were all rated in good condition. Overall, crops were in fair condition. Soils were saturated. Temperatures remained above freezing. Stock-water tanks were full, and creeks and rivers were running. The Brazos River swelled to nearly overflowing. Producers who had earlier managed to get their wheat and oats planted had good stands, but there was concern about the future effect of standing water in fields. Livestock were holding strong. Some producers started feeding hay.
Coastal Bend: The region received more rain. Soil moisture was good, but the planting of wheat continued to be delayed by the wet conditions. Cooler temperatures and better soil moisture improved winter crops and forages in general. Cattle feeding was increased due to the cool, wet conditions.
East: Wet conditions continued throughout the region. From 2 to 4 inches of rain fell in some areas. Pasture and rangeland were in fair to very poor condition. Standing grass that had been stockpiled for winter use for beef cows was laid over and covered with water. Winter forages were getting established as warm-season forages finally entered dormancy. Topsoil moisture was adequate to surplus, while subsoil was mostly adequate. Ponds and creeks were full to overflowing. Trinity River flooding in Henderson County closed some county roads. Producers were moving cattle out of river bottoms. Feeding and working cattle was difficult due to saturated fields. Winter feeding was in full swing, with producers supplying supplements due to the poor quality of hay cut in the summer. Livestock were in fair to good condition. Fall calving was underway. Some producers in Trinity County were selling calves while others were holding them and watching the market. Polk County producers continued to market cull cows and calves with most of the bigger calves already gone. Angelina County was two weeks behind the historical average for the first frost. Feral hogs were active.
Far West: Topsoil and subsoil moisture were adequate. Glasscock County received a hard freeze that finally stopped cotton regrowth. Including moisture from melting ice, Culberson County received 0.2 inch to 1.75 inches of precipitation. Pecos County received 2.8 inches of rain. Presidio County had freezing drizzle with accumulations of 1 inch to 2 inches. Ward County received 2 to 5 inches of rain. Winkler, Loving, Reagan and Upton counties all reported up to 2 inches of rain in some places. Mule deer season began. Pasture and rangeland were in fair condition.
North: Topsoil moisture varied from adequate to surplus. On Nov. 26, a strong weather system brought much cooler air and heavy rain — from 10 to 14 inches in some areas. Temperatures remained in the 30s. Runoff created erosion problems. Winter wheat growth was stalled out by standing water. Winter pastures were doing well but needed some sunshine to help with growth. Livestock producers were providing feed and hay. Some producers were able to stockpile Bermuda grass hay to carry cows into winter a bit. Cattle were in good condition. Fall-born calves were doing well. Pastures were saturated, and feeding hay was sloppy work. Ponds and creeks were full. Timber harvesting came to a standstill. Wild hogs continued to cause damage.
Panhandle: Temperatures were slightly above average for the first part of the reporting period, then dropped to below average on Nov. 26. By that evening, a wintery mix of precipitation came to most of the region. Soil moisture continued to be rated mostly adequate. Collingsworth County received about 1 inch of ice countywide. The ice load toppled many mature trees. Harvest activities were delayed indefinitely by the wet conditions. Deaf Smith County had similar weather, and harvesting came to abrupt halt there as well. Producers had earlier wrapped up all corn and grain sorghum harvesting before the winter storm came. Yields were average to slightly below average despite all the hail and wind events of the previous two months. There were still many acres of cotton yet to be harvested, but producers were more concerned about the damage done to cotton quality than finishing the harvest. Winter wheat was in good condition, with some fields yet to be planted. Hemphill County temperatures plunged into the 20s with the coming of the light rain and snow. Ranchers were supplementing cattle with protein and hay during the stressful conditions. Wheat pasture became dormant. Ochiltree County still had a few scattered fields of corn, cotton and sorghum left to be harvested, as well as wheat to be planted. Producers were able to work only a couple of days before the freezing rain hit. Depending upon how long it takes fields to dry out, it could be a week or more before harvesting is finished. Randall County had three days of below-freezing weather. Wheeler County cotton was covered with ice.
Rolling Plains: Winter weather brought rain, sleet, ice and snow that damaged trees and downed power lines. Rain accumulations totaled more than 7 inches in some counties. The moisture was expected to boost the growth of late-planted winter wheat that had received only minimal moisture during the past few weeks. Although the moisture helped winter wheat and pastures, it wasn’t welcomed by most cotton farmers. The cotton harvest had started in many areas, but the wet conditions will keep producers out of fields for several days. However, the freezing weather was helpful. Producers who hadn’t already applied defoliants were saved the extra expense by the killing freeze. Livestock were in good condition, and producers began supplying supplemental feed daily in order to sustain cattle until wheat fields produce enough grazing. Hay supplies remained high in most areas due to almost-perfect growing conditions earlier this year. Pecans were being harvested.
South: A cold front brought cooler temperatures and drizzle but no freezing weather. Soil moisture was adequate throughout the region. In the northern part of the region, some peanut crops were harvested before rains halted fieldwork. In La Salle County, conditions were cold, rainy and misty most of the week. In the eastern part of the region, row-crop farmers sprayed weeds and grasses in fields that had sprouted after harvest. In the western part of the region, conditions remained favorable for forb and pasture growth. Winter oats were doing well with all the moisture received, and coastal Bermuda grass remained green but stopped growing due to lower temperatures. Spinach harvesting for both processed and fresh market varieties was active. Cabbage, spinach and onions made good progress. Livestock producers only had to provide minimal supplemental feed because of good grazing conditions. In the southern part of the region, fields were saturated in parts of Cameron County. Fall corn, tomatoes and onions were doing well. Harvesting these crops was expected to begin at the end of December.
South Plains: Rain and ice fell in varying amounts across the region during the Thanksgiving weekend, completely shutting down cotton harvesting. In most cases, it will be quite a while before farmers can get back into the fields to finish. In Swisher County, about 25 to 30 percent of cotton was yet to be harvested. Earlier yield reports of dryland yields ranged from 700-900 pounds per acre. Irrigated cotton averaged 1,500 pounds per acre. The winter wheat crop was shaping up to be the best in recent years due to all the early season moisture. Corn yields were between 200-240 bushels per acre. Lubbock County had temperatures near or below freezing for three days. Garza County received from 2 to 3.5 inches of rain, with temperatures dropping to the upper 20s at night. Daytime highs hovered just above freezing. Supplemental feeding of cattle during the cold weather continued. Mitchell County reported the first hard freeze of the season, finally killing the leaves of some of the confused trees and plants that had put on blooms and/or started new growth. Scurry County received from 2 to 4 inches of rain. The outlook for all other aspects of agriculture was positive.
Southeast: Soil moisture throughout the region varied widely, but was mostly adequate to surplus, with adequate ratings being the most common. Fort Bend, Lee and Walker counties had 100 percent adequate moisture. San Jacinto County had 100 surplus levels. Rangeland and pasture ratings varied from fair to poor, with fair ratings being the most common. Walker County had a few days of warm weather that promoted the growth of cool-season forages. Most ponds were filled by frequent rainfall. Rainy conditions continued in Brazos County as well. Grimes County had wet weather with intermittent cold snaps. Some pastures were too wet to work in. Montgomery County pastures were also wet, and accessing them was a problem. Fort Bend County livestock were in good condition with remaining warm-season and cool-season grasses coming on strong.
Southwest: The week was wet and cool. Rain raised topsoil and subsoil moisture levels. Pastures and winter crops were doing well. Wheat and oats improved from fair to good condition with the largely favorable weather of the past few weeks. Many warm-season plants were going dormant. Livestock remained in good condition.
West Central: Days were rainy and cold with some ice accumulations. Many areas had the first freeze. Cotton harvesting and wheat planting were halted by wet conditions. Farmers were concerned about cotton quality and grade deterioration on unharvested acres. Wheat and oats remained in good condition, but sunny weather was needed to promote growth. Rangeland and pastures continued to improve, with winter grasses emerging and greening up. Livestock were in fair to good condition with increased supplemental feeding. Stock tanks and ponds were full. Though the pecan crop was late to mature, the harvest was finally underway.
-30-
Find more stories, photos, videos and audio at http://today.agrilife.org
Farm & Ranch
Frog Fruit
By Tony Dean, tonydean.tx1@gmail.com
Frog fruit is a native, low-growing perennial forb adapted to most of the eastern U.S., but few grazers know it well. It contributes more to our plant communities than we realize. It generally grows no more than a few inches tall and roots at the nodes. It can form dense mats several feet across and develop runners up to 3 feet long.
The leaves are thick, one to two inches long and 3/8 inch wide, and toothed from the middle to the tip. Tiny white flowers form a ring around a flower head, and the head then elongates into a cylinder an inch long or longer. Frog fruit has a four-angled stem.
Frog fruit can grow almost anywhere in Texas and on many soil types. It can grow in drier soils and likes good drainage, but it needs additional moisture to survive the hottest months. You can find it almost anywhere in a pasture, though it often grows in depressions and near water sources.
“Frog fruit is used as forage by livestock and deer. I recall an instance when I was moving cattle from one pasture to the next on a Jack County ranch. As I opened the gate, I stood by a beautiful green plant of switchgrass which I expected to be immediately grazed down. The cattle walked right by the switchgrass and stuck their heads in a small patch of frog fruit a few feet away,” Dean said.
Frog fruit is gaining popularity as a ground cover for homes and gardens for these reasons:
- Frog fruit grows quickly, maybe too quickly. If it gets out of bounds, you can always trim it back.
- Frog fruit is low maintenance. Once you get it established with adequate watering, it can survive with little care.
- Frog fruit has a long bloom period, from April to October.
- It is a host plant for several butterfly species and other insects.
Farm & Ranch
Theileria orientalis
By Barry Whitworth, DVM
Over the past few years, veterinarians have detected Theileria orientalis in Oklahoma cattle. Early cases were primarily diagnosed in adult cattle, but more recent Oklahoma cases have been identified in stocker cattle. All cattle producers should be familiar with the clinical signs of this disease and check their cattle daily for signs of trouble.
The first U.S. case of theileriosis was identified in Virginia in August 2017. Those cattle showed weakness and anemia, and veterinarians made an initial diagnosis of anaplasmosis. Blood samples from the animals were tested for Anaplasma, Babesia and Leptospira. Results were negative for all three, but the tests revealed a blood protozoan, later identified as T. orientalis genotype Ikeda. Since that first herd outbreak, the organism has been detected in several states.
Cattle sick with T. orientalis genotype Ikeda may show fever, weakness, anorexia and exercise intolerance. If forced to move, affected cattle may stagger and gasp for air. If stressed excessively, they may collapse and die. On examination, the gums, eyes or vaginal mucosa may appear pale (white) or yellow. Reproductive losses, including stillbirths and late-term abortions, may occur, along with a drop in milk production.
Clinical signs reported in adult cattle in Oklahoma include anemia, sudden death, weight loss, abortion, failure to thrive and failure to calve. In stocker cattle, producers have reported weight loss, anemia, poor performance and sudden death.
Because Anaplasma marginale and T. orientalis genotype Ikeda produce similar clinical signs, telling the two apart can be difficult. One difference is that clinical signs are more common in young cattle infected with T. orientalis than in young cattle infected with A. marginale. Cattle with anaplasmosis also often display aggression, while those with T. orientalis genotype Ikeda typically do not. A laboratory test is required to tell the two diseases apart with certainty.
Researchers have identified Haemaphysalis longicornis as a possible vector of T. orientalis genotype Ikeda. In 2017, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL) confirmed the presence of H. longicornis, commonly called the Asian longhorned tick (ALT) or bush tick. While trying to determine how the tick arrived in the United States, USDA officials discovered it had been present in West Virginia as early as 2010. The tick has now been confirmed in at least 26 states, including Oklahoma. Some evidence suggests other insect vectors may also transmit T. orientalis genotype Ikeda. Needle transfer is another possible route of transmission.
The ALT has been identified in Craig and Mayes counties in Oklahoma. This tick thrives in areas with high humidity, such as wooded regions, brush or tall grass. Ticks are often found where large numbers of wildlife gather, such as along deer trails. Producers can find more information about the ALT on the USDA website at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/livestock-poultry-disease/cattle/ticks/asian-longhorned.
Other countries have developed treatments for T. orientalis, but no approved treatments are available in the United States, and no vaccine exists for this disease. The best defense is prevention: buying cattle free of the organism, avoiding blood transfer between animals and using effective tick control. Producers should purchase cattle from reputable sources. Clean instruments between animals during procedures such as castration or dehorning, and change needles between every animal. Control external parasites with appropriate insecticide treatments. Pasture management also helps, such as rotating cattle away from wooded or brushy areas where ticks thrive. Patch burning may also help reduce tick populations.
Theileria orientalis remains a concern for some cow/calf and stocker producers in Oklahoma. Producers who want more information about T. orientalis genotype Ikeda should contact their local veterinarian or Oklahoma State University County Extension agriculture educator.
References
Hammer, J. F., Emery, D., Bogema, D. R., & Jenkins, C. (2015). Detection of Theileria orientalis genotypes in Haemaphysalis longicornis ticks from southern Australia. Parasites & Vectors, 8, 229.
Oakes, V. J., Yabsley, M. J., Schwartz, D., LeRoith, T., Bissett, C., Broaddus, C., Schlater, J. L., Todd, S. M., Boes, K. M., Brookhart, M., & Lahmers, K. K. (2019). Theileria orientalis Ikeda genotype in cattle, Virginia, USA. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 25(9), 1653-1659.
Spickler, Anna Rovid. (2019). Theileriosis. Retrieved from http://www.cfsph.iastate.edu/DiseaseInfo/factsheets.php.
Watts, J. G., Playford, M. C., & Hickey, K. L. (2016). Theileria orientalis: A review. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 64(1), 3-9.
Farm & Ranch
Is the Pond Safe for Livestock?
By OKFR Staff
During the hottest part of summer, a farm pond can look like a welcome source of water. Cattle may be standing belly-deep along the bank, and the pond may still hold enough water to seem dependable. Looks alone won’t tell you whether that water is safe.
Hot weather, limited rainfall and falling pond levels can create water-quality problems. As water evaporates, salts, minerals, nutrients and other substances become more concentrated. Warm, still water can also encourage blue-green algae, and some forms can produce toxins capable of killing livestock.
Producers sometimes treat water as an afterthought compared to grass, hay and supplemental feed. Livestock need a dependable supply of clean water to maintain feed intake, regulate body temperature and support production. Poor-quality water can reduce consumption and performance even when it does not cause obvious poisoning.
A pond that has watered cattle for years is not safe under every set of conditions. Pay particular attention during drought, extreme heat or any period when the water level drops significantly.
Watch the Water and the Livestock
One of the most serious late-summer concerns is a bloom of cyanobacteria, commonly called blue-green algae. These organisms live naturally in many bodies of water, and most do not produce dangerous toxins. The risk rises when certain toxin-producing species multiply rapidly under favorable conditions.
According to Oklahoma State University Extension, toxic blue-green algal blooms typically develop in standing water after periods of hot, dry, calm weather. Nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus can fuel excessive growth. Those nutrients may reach a pond through manure, fertilizer runoff, soil erosion and decaying vegetation.
A suspicious bloom may turn the water bright green, blue-green, pea-soup green or even brownish. Scum, foam or mats may collect along the shoreline, particularly where the wind pushes floating material into one area. Some blooms look like spilled paint.
Not every green pond is poisonous. Common aquatic plants and harmless algae can also change the color or surface of the water. You usually cannot tell whether a bloom is toxic by looking at it, and a pond can contain toxin-producing cyanobacteria without showing every commonly described warning sign.
Keep livestock, horses, pets and people away from water that has an unusual color, heavy surface scum, a bad odor or unexplained dead fish or wildlife nearby. Do not let livestock drink from another part of the same pond on the assumption that the water is safe there. Wind can move a bloom, and toxin levels may vary across the pond.
Blue-green algae can produce toxins that affect the nervous system or liver. Depending on the toxin and the amount consumed, affected animals may develop weakness, staggering, difficulty breathing, tremors, convulsions, diarrhea or collapse. In severe cases, owners find animals dead near the water before realizing anything is wrong. Treatment often fails, which makes prevention especially important.
Treat any suspected poisoning as an emergency. Move the herd away from the water source without driving or stressing animals that may already be affected. Provide another clean water supply and contact a veterinarian immediately. Your county Extension office can also help you determine where and how to submit a water sample.
Blue-green algae is not the only potential problem. Pond water may contain elevated levels of dissolved salts, sulfates, nitrates, bacteria or other contaminants. Runoff can carry manure, fertilizer, pesticides and organic matter into the pond. Low water levels make some of these problems worse because the remaining water grows more concentrated.
Water with excessive dissolved solids may taste bitter or salty, so animals drink less of it. Depending on the substances involved and their concentrations, poor-quality water may contribute to diarrhea, reduced feed intake, poor weight gain or other health concerns. Young animals and livestock that are not used to the water may be more vulnerable.
Watch the cattle themselves, too. Are they reluctant to drink? Are they crowding around a different water source? Has feed intake or weight gain dropped without an obvious explanation? Are several animals having digestive problems? Changes across multiple animals can be an early clue that you need to look at the feed or water.
OSU Extension recommends collecting a representative sample and submitting it for a livestock water test whenever you suspect a water supply is harming animal health or performance. A standard livestock water test covers several characteristics, but blue-green algae can require different sampling and testing procedures. Contact the laboratory or county Extension office before collecting the sample so you take it from the right location, use the proper container and handle it correctly.
Reduce Problems Before They Develop
Good pond management cannot eliminate every water-quality problem, but it can lower the risk. One of the most effective steps is limiting the manure, soil and nutrients that enter the water.
Cattle with unrestricted access to an entire pond can damage the banks, muddy the water and deposit large amounts of manure in or near it. Hoof traffic strips vegetation and speeds erosion. Sediment fills the pond over time, while manure supplies nutrients that can encourage excessive algae growth.
Where practical, fence livestock away from most of the pond and provide a limited-access watering point. Another option is piping water to a trough below the dam or elsewhere in the pasture. OSU notes that reducing cattle manure in the pond can reduce the conditions that favor toxic algae and make the water more palatable.
A vegetated buffer around the pond can slow runoff and trap soil and nutrients before they reach the water. Apply fertilizer and manure carefully in the watershed, particularly before heavy rain, and do not let large amounts of hay, feed or organic debris pile up at the water’s edge.
Alternative watering systems need maintenance, too. Check troughs for algae, manure, drowned animals and other contamination. Install wildlife escape ramps in tanks so birds and small animals can climb out instead of drowning and fouling the water.
Be cautious about treating a pond on your own. Some owners use copper sulfate and other algaecides for algae control, but improper treatment can create new problems. Killing a large amount of algae or aquatic vegetation at once can deplete dissolved oxygen as the material decomposes, which can lead to a fish kill. Treatment may also release toxins from affected cyanobacteria into the water. Base any chemical application on proper identification and professional recommendations, not guesswork.
Livestock should always have enough water for the weather, their size and their stage of production. Demand rises sharply in hot weather, and a pond that barely meets the herd’s needs in spring may fall short in August. Check the source regularly instead of waiting for cattle to gather around a muddy shoreline.
Ponds can fool you. Crystal-clear water isn’t always safe, and a green pond doesn’t always mean toxic algae. Regular observation, testing and prevention are the best ways to keep a pond safe for your herd.
-
Country Lifestyles4 years agoScott & Stacey Schumacher: A Growth Mindset
-
Country Lifestyles10 years agoStyle Your Profile – What your style cowboy hat says about you and new trends in 2017
-
Horsefeathers12 years agoMount Scott: Country Humor with David Gregory
-
Country Lifestyles10 years agoJune 2016 Profile – The man behind the mic: Bob Tallman
-
Outdoor11 years agoButtercup or Primrose?
-
Country Lifestyles10 years agoDecember 2016 Profile, Rusty Riddle – The Riddle Way
-
HOME10 years agoGrazing North Texas – Wilman Lovegrass
-
The Natural Horseman9 years agoThis is why we do what we do — RayeAnn and Cisco






