Connect with us

Country Lifestyles

[AgriLife Today] Research shows Texas Grow! Eat! Go! interventions having positive impact on youth

Published

on

By: Paul Schattenberg

COLLEGE STATION — Research has shown that efforts through the Texas Grow! Eat! Go! program have had a positive effect on improving the health and wellness of youth in the five participating Texas counties.

The study is a five-year collaboration among AgriLife Extension, the University of Texas School of Public Health at the Austin Regional Campus, Texas A&M University and the Texas A&M Health Science Center School of Public Health.

“The goal of the study was to determine the effect of specific interventions on improving the physical activity and eating behaviors of children and families, especially in low-income and underserved areas, and prevent obesity and overweight in children,” said Dr. Alex McIntosh of Texas A&M AgriLife Research, College Station.

Research conducted ion the Texas Grow! Eat! Go! program shows the program is having a positive effect on childhood obesity. (Texas AgriLife Extension Service graphic)

The Texas Grow! Eat! Go! study engaged 28 resource-limited Title I elementary schools in five geographically diverse counties to determine the efficacy of two programs in conjunction with Coordinated Approach to Child Health, or CATCH, efforts, said Dr. Judy Warren, AgriLife Extension special initiatives coordinator and principal investigator for the study.

“CATCH is a coordinated school health program of the type mandated by the state,” Warren explained. “The programs being assessed in the study are two AgriLife Extension programs — Walk Across Texas, which promotes physical activity, and the Junior Master Gardener program, which promotes youth gardening and nutrition.”

She said these programs were selected for study as interventions because they had already been successful in engaging youth, but had never been evaluated on health outcomes using typical research methods and practices.

McIntosh, who is among a team of cross-university researchers involved with the Texas Grow! Eat! Go! study, said the study was designed to help assess the separate and joint effects of the two experiential programs on weight status, diet and physical activity among third-grade students.

Walk Across Texas is a physical activity program being addressed in the study. (Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service photo)

 

 

 

 

 

 

“Schools in the research study were randomly assigned to four treatment groups, using schools implementing the CATCH  program,” McIntosh said. “The four groups were CATCH-only, CATCH and Walk Across Texas, CATCH and Junior Master Gardeners, and CATCH in combination with both programs.”

The study was conducted in schools with a high degree of ethnic diversity. Youth enrollment in the study was 54 percent Hispanic and 18 percent African-American. Forty-three percent of their parents indicated some degree of family food insecurity.

“We collected data from 28 elementary schools in the diverse geographic areas of Texas — north central, coastal south, central and east central areas — with from three to eight classrooms in each participating school,” McIntosh said. “There were 759 third-graders in the group that participated in the first year of the study and 567 who participated in the second year.”

Data were collected from student, parent and teacher questionnaires, interviews with principals and program coordinators and from public sources. Student body mass index, or BMI,  was also measured for students. Research methodology called for the data to be collected at four points in time: pre-test or baseline, immediate post-test, four-month post-test and one-year post-test.

The seven key outcome variables to be assessed for the students in the study were knowledge of nutrition and gardening, vegetable preference, usual vegetable consumption, vegetable consumption at school, sugar-sweetened beverage consumption, physical activity behaviors and sedentary behaviors.

The four key outcome variables to be assessed for parents in the study were home availability of vegetables, home availability of sugar-sweetened beverages, parental support of physical activity and parental support for decreasing sedentary behavior.

The four key child-parent interaction outcome variables for the study were gardening together, preparing food together, being physically active together and eating meals together.

“To determine within-group effects, pre-post differences for each condition were examined,” McIntosh said. “For each outcome, pre-post differences in each treatment condition were compared against the pre-post differences observed in the comparison group.”

Preliminary results from the overall study showed single and combined interventions were effective in changing variables related to weight status in children, significantly improving twelve of the fifteen behaviors targeted, while maintaining child weight status.

“We also were able to determine through our data analysis that positive behavioral and knowledge changes were largely due to the in-person participation of the students in these interventions, such as the physical activity of Walk Across Texas and working and tending the school gardens that were established as part of Junior Master Gardener activities,” McIntosh  said.

-30-

LikeTweet

Find more stories, photos, videos and audio at http://today.agrilife.org

Continue Reading

Country Lifestyles

History of the Cattle Guard

Published

on

By

On most ranches, a cattle guard is something you drive over without thinking about it. It sits across a road or at a pasture entrance, doing its job without needing attention. No gate to open, no chain to fasten, no reason to stop. It’s simple, and that’s exactly why it stuck.

Before cattle guards, gates were the only way to control livestock. That worked when travel was slower and less frequent, but as trucks and equipment became part of everyday ranch work, gates became a problem. Every one meant stopping, getting out, opening it, driving through, and closing it again. Over the course of a day, that added up. More importantly, a gate left open could cause trouble fast. Cattle didn’t need much opportunity to end up where they weren’t supposed to be.

The cattle guard solved both issues at once.

The idea is straightforward. A series of parallel bars is set over a shallow pit. Vehicles pass over it easily, but livestock usually won’t. The spacing between the bars makes footing uncertain, and cattle tend to avoid stepping onto it. It doesn’t rely on force. It relies on behavior.

Early cattle guards were built from wood, using poles or timbers laid across a trench. They worked, but they didn’t last. As steel became more available, the design improved. Metal rails held up better under traffic, required less maintenance, and provided more consistent spacing. Over time, that became the standard.

By the early 1900s, cattle guards were becoming more common as rural roads expanded and vehicle use increased. In places like Texas and Oklahoma, where roads often cut through grazing land, they offered a practical way to keep cattle contained without slowing down movement. Fewer gates meant less labor and fewer chances for mistakes.

Modern cattle guards follow the same basic design, with adjustments for durability and use. Heavier versions are built to handle highway traffic and loaded trucks, while lighter ones are used on private roads. Proper installation matters. If the pit is too shallow or the spacing is off, cattle may be more willing to cross. If dirt or debris fills in the gaps, the guard loses effectiveness.

They’re not perfect. Young or pressured animals will sometimes try to cross, and poorly maintained guards can fail. But when built and maintained correctly, they remain one of the most efficient tools for managing livestock around roads.

What makes the cattle guard stand out is its simplicity. It doesn’t require daily effort, and it doesn’t depend on someone remembering to use it. It solves a specific problem in a way that fits how ranches actually operate.

It’s easy to overlook because it works the way it’s supposed to. But across ranch country, it’s one of the reasons things move a little smoother every day.

Continue Reading

Country Lifestyles

When Peppers Bite Back

Published

on

By

Most of us have been there. You take a bite of something that looks harmless enough, and within seconds, your mouth is on fire. Your eyes water, your nose runs, and suddenly you’re questioning every decision that led you to that moment. Whether it’s a jalapeño that packed more punch than expected or a sauce someone swore “wasn’t that bad,” peppers have a way of keeping people humble.

There is, however, a way to measure that heat before you ever take a bite. It’s called the Scoville scale, and it’s the standard used to rank just how hot a pepper can be. The measurement is expressed in Scoville Heat Units, or SHU. The higher the number, the more heat you can expect. A bell pepper sits at zero, meaning no heat at all. Jalapeños usually land somewhere between 2,500 and 8,000 SHU, while the upper end of the scale climbs into the millions.

The system dates back to 1912, when pharmacist Wilbur Scoville developed a method to test pepper heat. His approach was simple, if not a little impractical by today’s standards. Pepper extract was diluted with sugar water until a panel of tasters could no longer detect the burn. The more dilution required, the hotter the pepper. It worked, but it depended heavily on human perception, which is far from consistent.

Today, the process is far more precise. Instead of relying on taste, scientists measure the concentration of compounds called capsaicinoids using laboratory equipment. Those numbers are then converted into Scoville Heat Units. It takes the guesswork out of the equation and gives growers, processors, and consumers a reliable way to compare peppers.

Capsaicinoids are the group of compounds responsible for heat, with capsaicin being the main contributor. Contrary to what a lot of people believe, the seeds are not where the heat lives. Most of it is concentrated in the white inner ribs of the pepper. The seeds can seem hot because they come into contact with those oils, but removing the inner ribs is the most effective way to dial the heat back while keeping the flavor.

That burning sensation you feel isn’t actually heat in the traditional sense. Capsaicin interacts with receptors in your mouth that are designed to detect pain and temperature. Your brain reads that signal as burning, even though there’s no physical damage being done at typical levels. Depending on how much you’ve had, that sensation can linger anywhere from a few minutes to well over half an hour.

One thing worth keeping in mind is that not all peppers are created equal, even within the same variety. Growing conditions, soil, weather, and maturity all play a role in how much capsaicin a pepper develops. Two jalapeños from different fields, or even different plants in the same field, can vary more than you might expect.

At the far end of the scale are peppers that push the limits of what most people would consider edible. Varieties like the Carolina Reaper have recorded levels exceeding 2 million SHU. That’s well beyond the point of casual consumption and into territory where even a small amount can be overwhelming. While some people seek that level of heat for the challenge, it’s not something to take lightly.

For everyday use, the Scoville scale is less about chasing extremes and more about making informed choices. If you know your comfort level, you can select peppers that add flavor without overpowering a dish. It also helps explain why a recipe that calls for “one pepper” can turn out very differently depending on what you pick up at the store or out of the garden.

In the end, that moment when your mouth feels like it’s on fire isn’t as mysterious as it seems. There’s a system behind it, and a little understanding of the Scoville scale can go a long way in keeping your next bite from turning into a regret.

Continue Reading

Country Lifestyles

The Fence That Changed the West

Published

on

By

Few inventions altered the American landscape as quickly or as permanently as barbed wire. At first glance, it was nothing more than twisted strands of metal with sharp points. But in the 1870s and 1880s, it transformed open prairies into enclosed pastures, reshaped cattle ranching, and set the stage for modern agriculture across Oklahoma, Texas, and the Great Plains.

For generations, settlers and ranchers wrestled with the challenge of fencing the open prairie. Traditional wooden fences required lumber, which was scarce on the plains. Stone walls were impractical across vast tracts of land. Homesteaders needed a boundary that was durable, affordable, and easy to construct.

The solution arrived in 1874, when Joseph Glidden of DeKalb, Illinois, received a patent for his version of barbed wire. He twisted two wires together, anchoring sharp barbs in place so they would not slide. His design proved cheap to produce and easy to stretch across posts. Within just a few years, Glidden’s invention spread like wildfire across the West.

For farmers, barbed wire was liberation. They could protect crops from roaming livestock, keep their own animals contained, and finally bring order to what had been the open range. Small homesteads suddenly had a way to defend their fields from massive cattle herds being driven north to railheads.

But not everyone welcomed the wire. Large cattle outfits, used to driving herds across unfenced land, saw it as a threat. Cowboys called it “the devil’s rope.” Tensions boiled over in the 1880s during the so-called “fence-cutting wars,” particularly in Texas. Cattlemen and farmers clashed as hired hands cut through miles of wire to reopen blocked trails and water sources. Violence erupted in some areas, leading to new laws that punished fence cutting as a felony.

Despite the resistance, the march of barbed wire could not be stopped. Its low cost and effectiveness made it indispensable. By the end of the 19th century, millions of miles of barbed wire crisscrossed the United States, dividing prairies into ranches, farms, and towns.

Once established, barbed wire did more than mark boundaries. It changed the very nature of ranching and agriculture. No longer could cattle roam freely over open ranges; instead, ranchers had to provide feed and water within enclosed pastures. This spurred improvements in breeding, grazing management, and stewardship of land. The great cattle drives that once defined Texas and Oklahoma largely faded, replaced by fenced ranching operations closer to railroads and towns.

The wire also influenced settlement patterns. Homesteads became more secure, encouraging more families to take root on the prairie. Conflicts with Native tribes intensified, as traditional hunting grounds were fenced off. In this sense, barbed wire became a physical symbol of westward expansion—an emblem of progress to some, a barrier to freedom for others.

Culturally, barbed wire has carried layered meaning ever since. Cowboys and poets have written about its sting, while farmers praised its dependability. During World War I, it found new use on battlefields, stretched across trenches as a weapon of defense. In art and literature, it often stands for confinement, conflict, or the taming of wild places.

Even today, the sight of rusty wire strung across weathered posts remains iconic. Drive through Oklahoma or North Texas, and you’ll see it outlining pastures, sometimes still holding cattle, sometimes falling into the grass like a relic of earlier generations. Ranchers continue to rely on barbed wire alongside newer fencing materials, proof that a 150-year-old invention still holds its ground.

The story of barbed wire is not just about technology. It is about how a simple invention shifted the balance between open freedom and private control, between the frontier and settlement. It made agriculture sustainable in places where farming had once seemed impossible. It forced ranchers to rethink livestock management. It even gave rise to laws, conflicts, and a new rhythm of life on the plains.

Like the cowboy hat, barbed wire transcended its original purpose. It became a defining feature of the American West—sharp, unyielding, and practical. It reminds us of the challenges faced by those who carved out lives in Oklahoma, Texas, and across the Great Plains, and how innovation, for better or worse, can change landscapes and livelihoods forever.

References

  • McCallum, Henry. The Wire That Fenced the West. University of Oklahoma Press, 1965.
  • Oklahoma Historical Society. Barbed Wire. https://www.okhistory.org
  • Texas State Historical Association. Barbed Wire and the Fence Cutting Wars. https://www.tshaonline.org
  • Smithsonian Institution. “How Barbed Wire Changed the West.” (2018).
  • Library of Congress. Joseph Glidden and the Invention of Barbed Wire.
Continue Reading
Ad
Ad
Ad

Trending