Connect with us

Farm & Ranch

Texas AgriLife Extension crop, weather report for Oct. 27, 2015

Published

on

By: Robert Burns

For most Texas pecans, Hurricane Patricia was the perfect storm

Except for Far West Texas, most pecan growers typically only have enough irrigation capacity to supplement, not supply, all the orchards’ water needs during a drought, said a Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service horticulturist. (Texas A&M AgriLife Communications photo by Robert Burns)

Writer: Robert Burns, 903-834-6191, rd-burns@tamu.edu

COLLEGE STATION – Heavy rains in many parts of the state may have damaged some crops, but for this year’s pecan crop, it was “just what the doctor ordered,” said a Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service specialist.

Comprehensive reports of damages to row crops and structures such as fences and roads are not in yet, but in most cases the rains and cooler weather couldn’t have come at a better time for pecans, said Dr. Larry Stein, AgriLife Extension horticulturist at Uvalde.

“Pawnee, the earliest commercial pecan variety, has been harvested, and most people were working on Wichita and starting in on Cheyenne pecans,” said Stein. “But some of these varieties have a ways to go. They weren’t totally full. So this rain we just received was very beneficial to finishing out the kernel and causing the shucks to open on the trees.”

 

Download or preview a two-minute MP3 audio version of this report
Far West Texas pecan growers anticipate dry weather during the growing season and typically have enough irrigation capacity to see the crop through a drought, he said.

Pecan growers in other parts of the state usually do not have adequate irrigation systems for their orchards. If they do, their systems may have only enough capacity to supplement the crop’s water needs, not offset months of drought, he said.

“And make no mistake about it, irrigation is just not as good as rain,” Stein said.

The main effect of water stress is for the nuts not to completely fill out, he said.

“Typically, then the nuts have trouble opening up, and when they have trouble opening up, then there’s a chance for the nuts to sprout and the shuck to stick tight to the nut itself,” he said.

The cooler weather accompanying the storms was also ideal for the crop.

“The cooler weather actually causes the maturing to go faster,” Stein said. “Out west, they hope for freeze to knock the leaves off the tree and help open up the shucks.”

There might be instances where the rains were too much, too fast, such as where 10, 12 or 18 inches of rain fell.

“Too much rain can cause the nuts to sprout, depending upon the stage of maturity,” he said. “But I don’t expect that to be a common problem this year.”

And there were instances of hail storms severely damaging pecan orchards this year in El Paso County, but that is a risk growers face every year, Stein said.

Climatologists posted the first hurricane watch early in the morning of Oct. 21, just six hours after Patricia was named a tropical storm, said Dr. John Nielsen-Gammon, state climatologist and Regents Professor at Texas A&M University, College Station.

“The median rainfall total for the event across all reporting gauges in the state, partially adjusted for data coverage, was 3.95 inches,” he said. “The biggest surprise to forecasters with this event was that the rain was concentrated in Texas rather than spread over a wider area. For northern Oklahoma and central and eastern Kansas, which were also expecting lots of rain from this event, it was a complete bust.”

AgriLife Extension district reporters compiled the following summaries for the reporting period of Oct. 20–26:

The 12 Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Districts

Central: Soil moisture, livestock, rangeland and pasture were rated as being in good condition. Crops were in fair condition. From 4 to 15 inches of rain caused severe flooding in some areas. Many wheat fields were expected to have to be replanted. The wet conditions delayed cotton harvesting, but benefited pastures and rangeland. Runoff filled stock-water tanks and streams. The Brazos River was up to its banks. Producers were providing livestock with hay and supplemental feed.

Coastal Bend: The region received from 2 to 8 inches of rain, which raised soil moisture. Winter pasture seed that had been lying dormant in dry soil was expected to emerge soon. Many producers, responding to the forecast, applied fertilizer before the rains. Ranchers hoped the rain would spur forage growth enough to allow one more hay cutting. Pecans were being harvested with low to fair yields. Fall calving continued.

East: The entire region received much-needed rains, with accumulations of more than 11 inches. Many producers had planted winter pastures in anticipation of the forecasted rain. Stock-water ponds were replenished. Most of the rain fell slowly, and there was very little runoff. Producers hoped to soon see regrowth in cool-season grasses. Cattle remained in good condition with producers providing supplemental feed and hay. Weaning of fall calves continued. Most spring calves had been sold. Prices of steers and heifers were steady to $7 per hundredweight higher. Houston County calf prices were slightly higher. Some producers had been selling because of the drought conditions. Feral hog problems increased.

Far West: The region received from 1 inch to 7 inches of rain, with Upton County getting the most. The rain slowed or halted all field activities, including cotton harvesting and the planting of winter wheat. In El Paso County, hail damaged many crops – some pecan farmers reported 100 percent losses. Producers in Brewster and Jeff Davis counties were in the middle of fall cattle working. Weaning weights were good, as well as the overall condition of cattle. Pastures and rangeland were in good to fair condition.

North: Topsoil moisture was short at the beginning of the reporting period but surplus in some areas by the end. Hurricane Patricia provided some much needed drought relief Oct. 23-25, bringing from 6 to 7 inches of mostly slow-falling rain. The rain was probably too late to revive warm-season grasses but should be good for wheat and winter pastures. Anticipating the rain, producers amped up wheat planting the previous week. The runoff raised pond levels and caused flooding and erosion of fields and farm-to-market roads. Saturated soils and standing water may pose problems for future production of wheat and other forage crops. Wild hogs were still causing costly damage to fields.

Panhandle: Temperatures were near normal for the week. Rainfall ranged from 0.5 inch to as much as 7 inches in some areas. Harvesting was halted by rain throughout most of the region. Collingsworth County received from 1.5 to 2 inches of rain that halted harvest activities but benefited earlier-planted wheat. Dallam and Hartley counties received 2 to 4.5 inches of rain this week. So far this year, the county has received 20 to 25 inches of precipitation, which is about 5 to 8 inches above normal. Because of forecast cool temperatures, it was expected to take some time before fields dried out enough to resume harvest activities. Deaf Smith County got 2 to 7 inches of rain, with 4 inches common. Lipscomb County received 1.3 to 2.4 inches, but that was enough to bring harvesting to a standstill. Moore County got 4 to 6 inches of rain. Randall County received 2-4 inches, which delayed harvest, but was excellent for recently planted winter wheat. The sorghum harvest was nearly completed before the rain, with yields varying from 2,000 to 8,000 pounds per acre – the average was about 4,000 pounds per acre. Corn harvesting was mostly completed, with yields of about 240 bushels per acre.

Rolling Plains: The region received as much as 5 inches of rain in some areas. The rain halted cotton stripping but helped producers who wanted to plant wheat for grazing. Livestock were in good condition. Rangeland and pastures were also in good condition. Runoff helped replenish reservoirs and ponds.

South: The region received widespread rains as a result of Hurricane Patricia and another weather system in the upper and mid parts of Texas. In the northern part of the region, the peanut harvest was in full swing and the cotton harvest was winding down. Harvesting was interrupted by rain at the end of the week. Oats and wheat began to emerge. Producers also continued to plant wheat and oats. In McMullen County, rainfall amounts ranged from 1 inch to 3 inches, which improved soil moisture but most likely came too late for the summer perennial grasses. Soil moisture was mostly adequate in the northern counties. In the eastern part of the region, from 1 inch to 6 inches of rain helped improve rangeland and pastures. Soil moisture was mostly adequate in the eastern counties. In the western part of the region, rains boosted grass growth and pasture greenup. Supplemental feeding of livestock was minimal; in some cases, no supplemental feed at all was required. Cotton gins continued activities, but were expected to finish by the end of October. Cabbage and spinach crops made good progress. Some early planted cabbage fields will be ready for harvest in the first week of November. Pecan harvesting was active. Wheat and oats emerged thanks to the recent rains. Soil moisture was mostly adequate in Dimmit and Maverick counties, but short to very short in Zavala County. In the southern part of the region, fields and pastures were saturated after heavy rains. The end of week brought ample moisture with strong rainfall to the Cameron County area, saturating fields and pastures throughout the area. Vegetables progressed well, and draining of irrigated fields with vegetables continued. By the end of the weekend, more than 4 inches of rainfall was reported in the Cameron County area. In the Hidalgo County area, winter vegetable planting continued. In Starr County, fall vegetable crops were progressing well. Rangeland and pastures continued to improve. Soil moisture was 100 percent surplus in Cameron County, and 100 percent adequate in Hidalgo and Starr counties.

South Plains: Rainfall varied from 1.5 to as much as 7 inches, which halted cotton and corn harvesting for several days to a week. The effect of the rain on cotton lint and grain quality was not yet known. The rains benefited pastures and winter grasses. Cattle were in good condition. Rainfall amounts were: Floyd County, from 2.5 to 3.5 inches; Swisher County, 3.5 inches; Crosby County, as much as 5 inches; Lubbock County, from 1.5 to 4 inches; Garza County, 2 to 3.75 inches; Mitchell County, 3 to 7 inches; and Scurry County, 3 to 4 inches.

Southeast: Soil moisture varied widely, but was mostly adequate to surplus, with adequate being the most common rating. Rangeland and pastures varied widely too, being mostly fair to poor, with fair ratings the most common. Rainfall amounts varied widely too. Brazos, Galveston, Chambers and Lee counties received heavy rains. Chambers County accumulations totaled 6 to 10 inches. Brazoria County only received light showers. Montgomery County got less than 0.1 inch, and dry conditions persisted in Waller County. Fort Bend County remained dry enough for producers to catch up on fieldwork. A burn ban remained in place in Waller County.

Southwest: The region received from 1.5 to 4 inches of rain. Most producers had winter wheat planted before the rain, though many had to rush to get it done ahead of the rain. Many ranchers also seeded winter grasses and put out some fertilizer. Brush and grasses responded to the rain, but growth was slow with the cooler weather. The condition of livestock slightly improved with the greener grasses. Wildlife continued to be in good condition.

West Central: The region had milder temperatures with very cool nights. Heavy rains, a side effect of Hurricane Patricia in Mexico, fell in many parts of the region. Some flooding occurred, along with damage to roads and fences. Some creeks became impassable at times, and ranchers had to repair water gaps. Stock-water tanks began to fill from runoff. Many producers started applying fertilizers and planting oats and wheat just ahead of predicted showers. Winter wheat planting was expected to resume when field conditions allowed. The cotton harvest was in full swing but was then delayed by the rains. Some yield and quality loss was expected. Rangeland and pastures were expected to respond well to the rains. Livestock remained in fair to good condition. Cattle prices remained high.

-30-

LikeTweet

Find more stories, photos, videos and audio at http://today.agrilife.org

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Changing the Way We Handle Hay

Published

on

By

Few machines have reshaped livestock operations as much as the round baler. Before its arrival, haymaking was slow, labor-intensive, and limited by the storage and handling of small square bales. The round baler mechanized the process, producing large rolls that could be handled with tractors instead of back-breaking labor. Today, those big bales are a familiar sight across Oklahoma, Texas, and much of the world, stacked along fence lines or dotting pastures.

The modern round baler traces back to the mid-20th century. While early versions of hay-rolling machines appeared in Europe in the 1940s and 1950s, it was a man from Iowa who brought the design into practical use in America. In 1971, Vermeer Corporation, led by Gary Vermeer, introduced the first large round baler that could be mass-produced and widely adopted. His design gathered hay into a chamber, rolled it into a tight cylindrical package, and then wrapped it with twine before ejecting it onto the ground.

This solved a long-standing bottleneck. Small square bales required enormous labor — lifting, stacking, hauling, and feeding by hand. One person with a tractor and round baler could do in hours what once took a crew all day. The new bales were weather-resistant, stored easily outdoors, and reduced spoilage. They also fit well with the larger scale of modern cattle operations.

By the 1980s, other manufacturers such as John Deere, New Holland, and Case IH offered their own models. Improvements included variable chamber sizes, better pickup systems, and stronger tying methods. Round balers quickly became the standard for beef and dairy producers in Oklahoma, Texas, and beyond.

Though models vary, the principle remains the same. The baler picks up cut hay from the windrow and feeds it into a chamber with belts, rollers, or chains. As the hay circulates, it rolls into a tight cylinder. Once the bale reaches the set size — often 4×5 or 5×6 feet, weighing between 800 and 1,200 pounds — the machine stops feeding, and the bale is wrapped for storage.

The result is a dense, weather-resistant package that can be moved with a tractor spear or loader. Unlike small square bales that require dry storage, round bales can be stacked outdoors, especially when wrapped correctly.

The biggest evolution in round baling since its invention has been the way bales are bound. Early machines used only twine, usually sisal or synthetic. Twine is inexpensive and reliable, but it has drawbacks. Wrapping a bale with twine can take up to two minutes, slowing production. Twine also leaves more exposed surface area, allowing moisture to penetrate and spoil hay.

Net wrap was introduced in the 1990s as a solution. Made of high-strength polyethylene, it wraps the bale quickly — usually in 10 to 20 seconds — and covers more surface area. This tighter, more uniform wrap sheds water better and reduces spoilage, especially for bales stored outside. Net-wrapped bales also hold their shape better, making them easier to stack and transport.

Producers must weigh cost against efficiency. Net wrap is more expensive than twine, both in material and in required equipment, but many ranchers find the savings in time and hay quality worth the investment. Twine remains common for operations feeding hay quickly or storing it under cover, while net wrap dominates in large-scale or commercial setups.

In recent years, bale film wrap has also entered the market. Similar to plastic used in silage, film wrap can seal bales almost completely, reducing spoilage even further. While more expensive, it is gaining ground in wet climates and dairies where feed quality is critical.

The round baler is more than a machine — it changed the rhythm of haymaking. Producers can now harvest, bale, and store hundreds of tons of hay with a fraction of the labor once required. In regions like Oklahoma and North Texas, where cattle herds are large and hay is often stored outdoors, round balers became indispensable.

The machine also influenced land use. With the ability to bale quickly and efficiently, ranchers could harvest larger fields and manage forage with precision. It also reduced dependence on hired labor during peak hay season, a major benefit as rural populations declined.

While square balers still have their place — especially for horse hay and small-scale operations — round bales remain the workhorse of modern cattle ranching.

From its introduction in the 1970s to its widespread adoption today, the round baler has proven to be one of the most influential farm inventions of the last century. It solved the labor bottleneck of haymaking, improved storage and feed efficiency, and fit seamlessly into the mechanization of modern agriculture.

Whether wrapped in twine, net, or film, those big round bales are more than just scenery on a country road. They are symbols of an innovation that continues to save time, labor, and feed across ranch country. Like the steel plow, barbed wire, and windmill, the round baler is an invention that permanently changed the way we work the land.

References

Vermeer Corporation. History of the Round Baler. https://www.vermeer.com

John Deere Equipment. Hay and Forage History. https://www.deere.com

Oklahoma State University Extension. Hay Storage and Preservation.

Texas A&M AgriLife Extension. Net Wrap vs. Twine for Round Bales.

Farm Progress. “Round Balers: The Machine That Changed Haymaking.”

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Lotebush – Nature’s Quail House

Published

on

By

By Tony Dean

Although of little livestock grazing value, this spiny bush has a place in North Texas grazing lands. Probably the most important use of Lotebush is that it is an almost perfect “quail house”.  The thorny overhead provides protection from aerial predators like hawks, but the open view at ground level allows quail to see if other predators are approaching.

 Lotebush is a native perennial shrub that can grow up to seven feet in height and width. The smooth bark can have dark and light gray patches. The zigzag twigs support greenish stout spines up to three inches long with a dark sharp pointed tip. The small leaves are bluish to grayish green.

Lotebush is in the Buckhorn family and has many other common names, including Condalia, Blue-thorn, Chaparral Bush, Texas Buckthorn, Chaparral Prieto, and Abrojo. The name Condalia is derived from Antonio Condal, a Spanish physician.  The roots have been used as a soap substitute, and as a treatment for wounds and sores of domestic animals.

Livestock occasionally browse on new tender growth, especially after a fire, and this sometimes results in mouth soreness in the grazing animal due to the sharp thorns on Lotebush.  Lotebush provides fair browsing value for deer.  Crude protein level has been tested at 18 to 24 percent in spring, 15 to 20 percent through summer and fall, and 12 to 15 percent in winter.

The small black fruit, about 3/8 inch in diameter, usually ripens in July.  It is eaten by quail, turkey, coyotes, small mammals, and many song birds.

Some birds, like the Cactus Wren, will nest in this plant. The Cactus Wren is the largest wren in North America.  It lives year round in drier areas of southwestern states and Northern Mexico.  It is a true bird of the desert and can survive without standing water.  It is very aggressive in protecting its nest.

Lotebush is adapted to clay soils and limestone soils and grows in most areas of the state except extreme East Texas. It also grows in Arizona, New Mexico, and Northern Mexico.

When it is not in dense stands, Lotebush should be protected when planning brush control as it can be a valuable part of our wildlife management efforts. It often appears on areas in the pasture where grass is rather thin, so we are not giving up much grazing production by leaving a few plants. If desired, it can be controlled mechanically or chemically with certain ground-applied chemicals.

Birds and small mammals that feed on our grazing lands often deposit seeds in their droppings from other plants under the canopy of Lotebush. If these seeds germinate, Lotebush can serve as a “protective skeleton” to prevent grazing or browsing on these new plants.  Some of these protected plants might be otherwise totally grazed out of a pasture due to preference by livestock or wildlife, so at least we can preserve a seed source within the spiny protection of our Lotebush plants.

Lotebush will root sprout when top killed by fire, but it will take a decade for a plant to again become adequate cover for quail. A plant or group of plants about the size of a pickup works best for quail cover.

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Tracks in the Sand

Published

on

By

This morning, I walked out into my arena and noticed something that gave me pause. The roping steers had been in there the day before, and even though the ground was wide and level, the sand carried their story. Hoofprints crossed every direction, but in several spots, the same trail was pressed deeper than the rest. Twelve steers had been turned out, yet more than a few chose the exact same path, wearing it down until it stood out from all the other tracks.

Cattle are creatures of habit. Anyone who has spent time around them knows this. They like routine: the same feed, the same water trough, the same shade tree in the pasture. When they are turned loose, they rarely wander without purpose. More often than not, they move together, following the same course as the steer in front of them. There are reasons for this: efficiency, safety, instinct. Walking a beaten path conserves energy, and following the herd is their natural defense. Even in an arena with no real destination, those instincts come through. By the end of a short turnout, you will see the evidence, lines where they have chosen the easiest way to travel and stuck with it.

Out on the range, those lines last longer. Before fences and highways, cattle drives cut deep paths across the land. The Chisholm Trail, which carried herds north from Texas through Oklahoma into Kansas, was walked by millions of cattle in the late 1800s. More than a century later, faint traces of those trails remain, worn so deep by hooves and wagon wheels that the land still carries the mark. On ranches today, you can see the same effect in pastures where cattle walk the same lines between water and grazing. From the ground those trails might look like nothing more than dusty ruts, but from the air, they sometimes stand out as sharp lines winding through otherwise open fields. Cattle do not simply pass over the land; they shape it. Every step adds up.

That simple truth extends beyond livestock. We all make tracks. Our habits and routines are our trails, worn in by repetition, sometimes efficient, sometimes limiting. Like the cow paths, they can serve a purpose, keeping us steady and helping us move forward. But when repeated without thought, they risk becoming ruts, keeping us from stepping into new ground. History offers perspective here too. The old cattle trails built towns and economies, but once railroads and fences changed the landscape, those paths were no longer useful. Sticking to them would have meant going in circles. Progress required something new.


The Tracks We Leave

Standing in the arena, I thought about the kind of tracks I leave behind. Most of mine are not visible in the dirt. They are pressed into my daily life, how I work, the way I handle challenges, the example I set. Some are helpful and worth keeping. Others may have outlived their purpose. The difference comes in knowing when to stay in the track and when to step out of it.

Tomorrow I will drag the arena and smooth it all clean again. The next time the steers are turned in, they will make the same trails. That is their nature. But unlike them, I have a choice. I can decide which paths are worth walking, which ones to change, and what kind of tracks I want to leave for others who might follow.

Tracks tell a story. Sometimes they are only temporary, fading with the next rain. Other times they last for generations, reminders of where herds and people once walked. This morning, the cattle showed me again that even the smallest things on the ranch carry meaning. Their tracks in the arena were not just marks in the sand. They were a lesson: every step matters, and the paths we choose shape more than just the ground beneath our feet.

Continue Reading
Ad
Ad
Ad

Trending