Connect with us

Farm & Ranch

Texas crop, weather report for Aug. 11, 2015

Published

on

By: Robert Burns

Triple-digit temperatures stressing beef cattle and calves

Extremely hot weather across Texas kept beef cattle and calves in shade or near water. (Texas A&M AgriLife Communications photo by Steve Byrns)

Writer: Robert Burns, 903-834-6191, rd-burns@tamu.edu

COLLEGE STATION – As temperatures reached 100 degrees and above, the stress on beef cattle increased, said Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service experts.

Though there are no reports of large death losses yet, the stress does affect beef cattle health and certainly reduces their feed efficiency and daily gains, both on pastures and in the feedlots, the experts said.

“The really high temperatures we’ve had the last several weeks have caused cattle to undergo a lot of heat stress,” said Dr. Joe Paschal, AgriLife Extension livestock specialist, Corpus Christi. “Typically, cattle are going to shade up a lot more, particularly if they are black-hided rather than if they are of Bos indicus or Brahman influence.”

Download or preview this report as a two-minute MP3 audio file

Paschal said in addition to staying in the shade much of the day rather than grazing, cattle are going to look for ways to cool off, such as standing in ponds or stock-water tanks.

If these measures aren’t enough, then they will start showing physiological signs of heat stress, he said. Cattle mainly cool themselves by panting. Bringing in cool, moist air will allow them to lower their core temperature, and by turn, their outer body by increasing the amount of blood to their hides.

“If they can bring cool air into their lungs, that’s fine, but they can’t now,” Paschal said. “They are bringing in air that’s at 100 degrees and at very low humidity, and it’s making them even hotter. This affects their entire metabolic process. It’s even harder on feedlot cattle as they’re fatter.”

Dr. Ted McCollum, AgriLife Extension beef cattle specialist, Amarillo, said it is true that feedlot cattle are more susceptible to heat stress. This is because they are generally fatter or “fleshier,” and the fat acts as an insulator, making it harder for them to dispel heat by convection.

However, he hasn’t heard that many reports on death loss this summer, he said.

Of the 120 or so feedlots that finish cattle in Texas, Oklahoma and eastern New Mexico, most are in the Texas Panhandle, McCollum said. And one of the several reasons that most confined cattle feeding units are there is because of the climate.

“The one thing about this part of Texas as compared to South Texas, or farther north in Nebraska where you hear about death losses from heat stress in feed yard cattle, is that we do cool down at night,” McCollum said.

The cooler nighttime air means cattle in Panhandle feed yards have the chance to “unload” that heat at night.

This isn’t to say that some cattle in Panhandle feed yards haven’t suffered health problems during the past several weeks, but to his knowledge there haven’t been any large-scale problems, he said.

Some performance losses have occurred because of reduced feed consumption during the hot weather. Digestive processes generate body heat. So in response to hot ambient temperatures, cattle will often reduce feed intake in an effort to reduce their heat load, he said.

AgriLife Extension district reporters compiled the following summaries:

The 12 Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Districts

Coastal Bend: Some parts of the region had not received rain for nearly four weeks. Others got a few scattered showers, but nothing significant. The dry conditions helped farmers get some crops harvested, but some had to irrigate soybeans and cotton. The dry weather was expected to reduce the yield potentials of soybeans and hay fields. Many producers were taking a second cutting of hay, but grass regrowth was slow to non-existent due to lack of topsoil moisture. The corn and grain harvests should be completed by the middle of August. Rice was starting to arrive at grain elevators. Livestock owners were checking water sources daily to assure all livestock had adequate water. Cattle were generally in good condition, but more calves were being shipped as forage supplies began to wane.

East: Most counties reported temperatures above 100 degrees, along with dry and windy conditions. All counties needed rain. Pasture and hay fields were showing drought stress. There was a general browning of all grasses, and a great reduction in regrowth. Producers who had overstocked their pastures were beginning to run out of grass. Soil moisture continued to dwindle. Most counties rated topsoil as short, with several rating it as very short. Burn bans were being issued throughout the region. Many Anderson County oak trees were dying. Vegetable harvesting was nearly over. Some truck farmers were preparing for fall planting. Pond and creek levels were dropping. Cattle were in good condition. Weaning and selling of market-ready calves and cull cows continued. Some producers were supplementing livestock with protein. Horn flies continued to be a problem. Feral hogs were on the move, rooting up pastures and lawns.

Far West: The entire region had temperatures well above 100 degrees. A few counties received measurable rainfall. Dryland cotton in Glasscock County was showing signs of heat and moisture stress. Cotton in most other counties was in good condition, at full bloom and setting bolls. Corn was in fair to good condition. Alfalfa growers were taking a fourth cutting. Pecans looked good. Sorghum crops were in fair condition. Pastures and rangeland were beginning to dry out but were in fair to good condition. Subsoil and topsoil moisture ranged from adequate to short. Cattle were generally in good condition. Calves and stocker cattle were gaining weight.

North: Temperatures reached 100 degrees every day. Topsoil moisture was short to very short. The ground was cracking in many places, and pastures were drying out very quickly. Producers continued to harvest Bermuda grass hay and annual forage sorghum. Corn and grain sorghum were maturing very quickly, with harvesting likely to begin in the next week or two. Yields of both crops were expected to be below average as both were planted late due to excessive rain during the spring and early summer. Soybeans were struggling with the heat. Sunflowers looked good in some areas but were stressed in others. Livestock were in good condition for August but were seeking refuge in stock tanks and waterways to stay cool. Flies and mosquitoes were abundant. Wild hogs continued to cause damage.

Panhandle: The region remained hot and humid, with temperatures near normal for early August. Isolated areas received showers, from a trace to 3 inches. Grasshoppers were a problem throughout the region. Spider mites were being monitored in Deaf Smith County corn fields, along with sugarcane aphids in Hansford and Lipscomb counties. In Collingsworth County, the hot weather added much needed heat units for cotton and sped up the maturing of grain sorghum. Irrigators were watering cotton while the crop was setting bolls. Deaf Smith County producers were evaluating damage from the past storms. Several corn, sorghum and wheat fields were totally lost. Otherwise, Deaf Smith County crops were generally in good shape, with much of the corn in the milk to early dough stage. Grain sorghum was coming along well too, with early planted fields setting seed. Cotton was struggling as many fields were behind and needed more heat units. Gra sshoppers were particularly bad in Deaf Smith County, with many producers having already sprayed multiple times in an effort to control the invasion. Producers were concerned about planting early wheat until the grasshopper problem was resolved. In Hall County, extremely hot weather stressed crops and livestock. Hansford County received another 1.7 to 2 inches of rain. Weeds were becoming a big problem in some fields. Corn looked great, and some irrigation pumps were turned off to allow cutting of silage. Irrigated and dryland sorghum looked great. Irrigated cotton also looked very good. Dryland cotton stands were spotty in places. Lipscomb County reported sugarcane aphid infestations in grain sorghum. Randall County crops continued to progress after some rain. Wheeler County cotton was still behind normal development.

Rolling Plains: Summer heat hit the region, with high temperatures ranging from 100 to 107 degrees. The heat rapidly dried out topsoils but was good for most cotton, though some fields were showing signs of stress. Summer annual forages were being harvested. There were reports of sugarcane aphids on grain sorghum. Cattle were in good condition, and pastures were holding up, though some grasses were drying out quickly. Grasshoppers were still damaging trees and crops, but populations were declining.

South: Very hot and dry conditions were the rule throughout the district, and soil moisture levels were dropping. In some areas, there had been no rain for as long as six weeks. In the northern part of the district, corn and sorghum harvesting continued. Peanut development ranged from the flowering stage to setting pods. Cotton was opening bolls. Pastures and rangeland were drying out, but they generally were still in fair shape. Some producers were baling hay. Body condition scores of cattle remained good. In the eastern part of the district, most pastures still looked good despite the lack of rain, but producers expected they will have to provide supplemental feed to livestock soon if there is no rain. The grain sorghum harvest was underway with some producers reporting yields of 5,000 pounds to 6,000 pounds per acre. Small fires broke out in rangeland and pastures in Jim Hogg County. Cotton growers did not expect harves ting to begin in earnest until Sept. 1. Soil moisture in the eastern counties ranged from adequate to short. In the western part of the district, the continuing hot, dry weather meant producers still had to irrigate cotton, pecans and some late-planted sorghum fields. The harvesting of corn and sorghum was active. The availability and quality of native rangeland and pastures grasses further declined. Producers who had heavy grazing pressure on native rangeland had to provide light supplemental feeding. Cotton was making good progress. In the south part of the district, soil moisture was short. Producers were defoliating cotton, and the sugarcane harvest was ramping up.

South Plains: Temperatures were in the triple digits, which for some counties was a first for the year. Cotton development ranged from just beginning to bloom, with eight nodes above white flower, to physiological cutout with five or fewer nodes above white flower. The heat was generally good for cotton in helping it somewhat catch up on development. Floyd County cotton started to set bolls, and grain crops continued to look great. Hale County received timely, scattered showers that provided significant moisture in a few areas. Cochran County also received showers that improved subsoil and topsoil moisture. Peanuts there were doing very well. Sugarcane aphids were confirmed in grain sorghum, while cotton was impacted by fleahoppers and lygus bugs during the last few weeks. Lubbock County recorded its first official 100-degree day on Aug. 6. However, temperatures had been consistently near 100 for days, with higher than normal humidity. Spotty rain showers amounted to 0.5 to 1 inch of moisture. Cotton was stressed where no rain was received. Grain sorghum producers were closely monitoring widespread sugarcane aphid infestations. Some fields reached economic threshold levels for treatment. Garza County also received rain, from a trace to as much as 2 inches. Cotton continued to progress but needed rain to maintain development. Mitchell County had several 100-degree days. Rangeland condition declined, and the increased chances of wildfire became a concern.

Southeast: Soil moisture varied widely throughout the region, but was mostly in the adequate to short range, with short being the most common. Rangeland and pastures were mostly rated in fair to poor condition, with fair ratings being the most common. Temperatures were at or above 100 degrees. Soils and lowland areas were drying out. Pasture conditions were beginning to fade. In some areas, there had been no regrowth of grass after the first cutting of hay about three weeks ago. Corn was drying down very quickly. In Chambers County, early rice that did not have to be replanted was being harvested. Dry conditions made draining rice fields a hard decision, but the alternative was to chance plants dying and lodging. In Fort Bend County, the grain sorghum harvest was mostly finished. Yields ranged from 3,500 pounds to as much as 7,500 pounds per acre. The corn harvest began, with yields ranging from less than 100 bushels to as muc h as 240 bushels per acre. Cotton was progressing quickly, and some producers expected to begin defoliating within a week. Livestock were in fair to good condition.

Southwest: Hot, dry conditions persisted throughout the region with no rain reported. Temperatures have been in the high 90s to over 100 for weeks, which was cooking grasses and forbs. Burn bans were instituted in some counties. The grain sorghum harvest neared completion, and the corn harvest was in full swing. Pasture conditions continue to decline with hot and dry conditions. Hay yields have been very high, but most fields were already going to seed or becoming dormant. Cotton was doing well. Wildlife generally were in good condition. With pastures declining, due to the hot weather, livestock were showing signs of stress.

West Central: The region had triple-digit temperatures with no rain forecast. The continued hot, dry, windy conditions were drying out soils, pastures and stock-water tanks. Row crops were showing signs of heat and moisture stress. Some producers were preparing fields for fall planting, but many were waiting for a rain before beginning. The danger of wildfire was high and increasing every day. Cotton was maturing fast thanks to the hot days and warm nights. The grain sorghum harvest began. Hay harvesting continued, with many producers taking a second cutting. Some expected to get a third cutting. Grasshoppers were becoming an issue in some areas, and producers were applying pesticides. Rangeland and pastures remained in fair to good condition, but were beginning to show signs of stress. Livestock remained in fair to good condition. Calf weaning continued.

-30-

LikeTweet

Find more stories, photos, videos and audio at http://today.agrilife.org

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Forage Needs in the Fall

Published

on

By

By Savannah Magoteaux

Two bales can look almost identical and feed very differently. Color, smell and leafiness tell part of the story, but a forage test tells you what your cattle are actually being offered. If you buy hay by the ton or are trying to stretch winter feed, that little lab sheet can be one of the cheapest management tools on the place.

Reading the report

Start with dry matter. Hay contains water, and labs report nutrients either “as fed” or on a dry-matter basis. Feeds are easiest to compare on a dry-matter basis because it takes moisture out of the comparison. Hay that is 90 percent dry matter is about 10 percent water.

Crude protein, usually abbreviated CP, is the number most people recognize. It estimates protein from the forage’s nitrogen content. Higher isn’t automatically better. The goal is to match the hay to the animal. A dry, mature cow in mid-gestation doesn’t need the same protein as a lactating cow, a growing replacement heifer or a young calf.

Energy matters just as much. Beef cattle forage reports commonly estimate energy as total digestible nutrients, or TDN. Low-TDN hay may fill a cow up before it supplies enough energy, particularly when her requirements rise late in gestation or during lactation. That is when you may need better forage, an energy supplement or a different feeding plan.

Fiber numbers explain why some hay looks coarse and why animals may not be able to eat enough of it. Neutral detergent fiber, or NDF, is closely tied to intake. As NDF climbs, cattle generally eat less because the forage moves through the digestive tract more slowly. Acid detergent fiber, or ADF, is tied to digestibility. Higher ADF generally means lower digestibility.

Some reports also include relative feed value or relative forage quality. These indexes help compare lots of forage, particularly alfalfa and mixed hay, but they aren’t a complete ration. They don’t replace looking at protein, energy, minerals, animal class and expected intake.

Then come the numbers you hope are boring. Nitrate testing matters when drought, heavy nitrogen fertilization, cloudy weather or other conditions have stressed the forage enough to cause nitrate accumulation. Sorghum-type forages, johnsongrass, corn and some weeds deserve particular attention. Nitrates stay in hay after it is cut and baled, so a risky crop doesn’t become safe just because it dried.

Minerals deserve a look, but this is where a hay report gets harder to interpret. Calcium, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium and other minerals may be listed, yet a complete mineral program depends on water, other feeds and local conditions. A high number isn’t always an advantage. Excessive potassium, for example, can interfere with magnesium use under some circumstances. If you are balancing a ration for high-risk animals, work with a nutritionist or Extension specialist rather than treating the lab sheet as a stand-alone mineral prescription.

Moisture tells another story. Hay baled too wet is at greater risk of heating and mold, and very wet hay can become a fire hazard as microbial activity raises its internal temperature. A test taken months later can’t reconstruct every storage problem, so inspect the stack, too. A musty odor, visible mold, unusual heat and dark discoloration are all reasons to investigate.

Getting a good sample

A hay test is only as good as the sample, and sampling is the step most likely to ruin a good analysis. A handful pulled from the outside of one convenient bale doesn’t represent a stack of 100 bales. Round bales aren’t uniform from the outside to the center, and one bale may not represent the whole cutting.

Texas A&M AgriLife recommends using a hay probe and collecting cores from multiple bales in a lot, then combining them into one representative sample. A coring probe reaches through the layers of the bale and gives the lab a much better cross-section. Test different cuttings, fields or hay types separately, and don’t blend samples from separate fields or cuttings to save the cost of a test if you will feed them as separate lots.

Putting the numbers to work

The most useful way to read the report is backward from the cattle. What class of animal will eat this hay, at what stage of production, and how much is she likely to eat? Once you answer those questions, the lab numbers start to mean something.

A mature dry cow in good body condition can often use lower-quality forage than a first-calf heifer nursing a calf. Young cattle need nutrients for growth on top of maintenance, and cold stress raises energy demand. A hay test becomes valuable when you pair it with those real-world differences.

Remember that price per bale isn’t the same as price per unit of nutrition. A cheap bale with very low energy and protein may require expensive supplementation, and better hay can turn out to be the lower-cost feed once you count waste and supplements.

Before buying, try putting two hay reports side by side. Compare dry matter, crude protein, TDN and fiber first. Then add delivered cost and likely feeding waste. A heavier, denser bale isn’t automatically more economical, and a greener bale isn’t automatically more nutritious. The numbers make the comparison fair.

Testing is especially valuable after a hard weather year. Drought hay may be lower in yield and higher in nitrate risk. Mature, rain-damaged hay may test lower in protein and energy than it looks. Hay cut from a fertilized field after stress may deserve a safety screen before it ever reaches a feeder.

A forage test won’t make poor hay better. It shows you where the gaps are before your cattle show them through lost condition or lower performance. One report can’t answer every feeding question, but it replaces several guesses with measurements, and that makes winter nutrition planning much more accurate.

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

When Acorns Become a Problem

Published

on

By

By Savannah Magoteaux

A heavy crop of acorns under an oak tree usually looks more like a sign of fall than a livestock problem. For most cattle in most years, that is all it is. Trouble starts when acorns stop being an occasional bite and become a meaningful part of the diet.

Oak leaves, buds and acorns contain tannins that can damage the digestive tract and kidneys when cattle eat enough of them. Green acorns are generally considered more toxic than mature brown ones, but either can cause problems if cattle eat too many.

The risk climbs when forage is short and cattle go looking for something else to eat. Drought, overgrazed pastures or simply a heavy acorn crop can set up that situation.

Cattle aren’t equally interested in acorns. A few animals in a herd may eat far more than the rest, which helps explain why cases can appear scattered.

Early signs can be vague. Affected cattle may go off feed, look depressed or become constipated. As the damage progresses, you may see dark or bloody manure, abdominal pain, frequent urination followed by reduced urine output, dehydration and weakness. Kidney failure is the most serious concern.

You can’t remove every acorn from a wooded pasture, so prevention comes down to keeping cattle from relying on them. Adequate forage and supplementation take away the incentive to eat large amounts.

You can also fence cattle away from heavily producing oaks for a while, especially when pasture conditions are poor. If several animals seem to be seeking out acorns, take a close look at the rest of the ration instead of assuming they will quit on their own.

If you suspect oak poisoning, call a veterinarian early. Treatment is supportive and does much more good before severe kidney damage sets in. Moving unaffected cattle away from the source and providing good-quality feed and water may prevent more cases.

Acorns are an important fall food for deer, squirrels and other wildlife, and a few acorns generally don’t spell disaster for cattle. The concern is quantity. A pasture full of oaks becomes a different management problem when grass is short, cattle are hungry and the ground is covered with something they are willing to eat.

Oak toxicity comes up most often in cattle, but other livestock can be affected, too. And the risk isn’t limited to acorns. Oak buds and young leaves also contain tannins, so spring can occasionally bring problems as well. In fall, though, the obvious temptation is lying on the ground where cattle can eat it quickly.

Watch where your cattle spend their time. If cows that normally graze open grass start camping under oaks and hunting acorns, that behavior tells you something.

Walk the pasture, estimate how much usable forage is left and check whether a few dominant animals are eating more than the rest. Hay or supplemental feed may help, but place it where all the cattle can reach it rather than assuming one feeder will solve the problem.

Oak poisoning can look like other illnesses, and no one can diagnose kidney damage from pasture observation alone. A veterinarian may use history, clinical signs and lab work to separate it from dehydration, digestive disease or other toxicities. That is another reason to mention a heavy acorn crop when you call. A detail that seems like an ordinary part of fall can be an important part of the history.

Your pasture plan doesn’t have to be complicated. If one wooded trap has a much heavier acorn crop than the rest, use another pasture while you still have the choice.

If you can’t move the herd, make sure hay and supplement are adequate before the animals get hungry enough to seek out acorns aggressively. Salt or mineral by itself won’t make up for a shortage of forage.

The problem usually fades as cattle eat through the crop or the acorns weather or get covered. Don’t return cattle that have already shown signs as soon as they look better, though. Kidney injury can be serious. Follow your veterinarian’s recommendations and reassess the pasture before turning recovered animals back out.

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Land Market Report

Published

on

By

By Jared Groce

Late summer has been brutal on our livestock, our grass and the rural land market in North Texas. We currently have an astounding 42 months of inventory on hand in our report area, and the only properties selling are the ones priced right. Overpriced properties aren’t even getting looked at, much less receiving offers, so pricing your property correctly matters more than ever right now.

Many sellers are still picturing the daily price increases we saw in 2020 to 2023, but those days are behind us, and agents need to be more realistic with listing prices to get any activity for their clients. Hopefully the rains will come soon and bring more land buyers with them this fall, but right now it is still very much a buyer’s market. No one knows how long this dry spell will last, but it will likely take a flood to end it. The same is true of the weather!

They say the best time to plant a tree, or buy land, was 20 years ago, and the second-best time is today.

CountyAreaAcres$/AcreList PriceSold PriceSale/ListDOM
ClayHenrietta120.07$5,150$714,000$618,30986.60%434
ClayBellevue159.44$6,184$981,000$985,959100.50%48
ClayHenrietta293$4,982$1,538,250$1,459,60094.90%212
ClayAverage190.84$5,438$1,077,750$1,021,28994.00%231
CollinAnna11.08$84,356$1,200,000$935,00077.90%634
CollinAverage11.08$84,356$1,200,000$935,00077.90%634
CookeMuenster11$18,000$209,000$198,00094.70%250
CookeGainesville19.3$16,580$345,000$320,00092.80%541
CookeValley View96.23$15,500$1,679,215$1,491,56588.80%194
CookeAverage42.18$16,693$744,405$669,85592.10%328
DentonSanger16.46$39,422$649,000$649,000100.00%47
DentonCross Roads10.35$97,575$1,200,000$1,010,00084.20%40
DentonSanger300$14,000$4,999,999$4,200,00084.00%1,327
DentonAubrey74.09$57,684$4,815,525$4,273,55088.70%302
DentonAverage100.22$52,170$2,916,131$2,533,13889.20%429
GraysonCollinsville11.61$46,516$600,000$540,00090.00%280
GraysonVan Alstyne18.8$58,511$1,175,000$1,100,00093.60%280
GraysonWhitesboro30$37,984$1,170,000$1,139,50697.40%277
GraysonAverage20.14$47,670$981,667$926,50293.70%237
JackNo sales reported——————
MontagueMontague485N/A$5,566,000N/AN/A333
MontagueBowie26$12,244$323,500$318,35298.40%743
MontagueMontague37.3$10,327$428,950$385,19589.80%1
MontagueSaint Jo1,185$7,764$10,000,000$9,199,82992.00%19
MontagueAverage433.33$10,112$4,079,613$3,301,12593.40%274
WiseSunset12$19,027$234,000$228,32097.60%16
WiseSunset12$19,027$234,000$228,32097.60%14
WiseChico11.44$24,476$299,000$280,00093.60%24
WiseChico10.25$29,265$315,000$300,00095.20%12
WiseAverage11.42$22,949$270,000$259,16096.00%17

DOM = days on market

Continue Reading
Ad
Ad
Ad

Trending