Farm & Ranch
Texas crop, weather for July 14, 2015
By: Robert Burns
State climatologist: Say goodbye to the rain for a while
Writer: Robert Burns, 903-834-6191, rd-burns@tamu.edu
COLLEGE STATION – Tired of it always raining? You’re in luck; the rains will likely cease for the rest of July.
“I think you can say goodbye to the rain for a while,” said Dr. John Nielsen-Gammon, state climatologist, College Station. “We’re entering a dry spell, and it looks like the second half of July is going to be quite dry. Many parts of the state may not see a single drop of rain.”
According to weekly reports from Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service county agents across the state, most producers will welcome the drier weather. As of July 12, the somewhat drier weather had allow field activities such as herbicide and fertilizer applications to resume, but there were still some areas that were too wet to traverse with equipment.
Download or preview a two-minute MP3 audio version of this report
Hay producers, according to the reports, were also rushing to take advantage of the drier weather but still worried about having enough consecutive dry days for cut hay to cure before baling.
In some areas, the AgriLife Extension agents reported, irrigators had to turn on center pivots and would have liked a little more rain to save pumping costs.
But most crops should be okay, Nielsen-Gammon said.
“For most of the state, the rains we had in the spring put enough moisture into the soil profile that crops won’t have trouble making it through the dry period,” he said.
The reason for the drier weather is the usual cause this time of year, Nielsen-Gammon said. An upper level high pressure region over Mexico pushes weather disturbances away and keeps warm air aloft, inhibiting thunderstorms.
Summer temperatures have also been a little cooler than normal, which was a result of the heavy spring rains, he said.
As the moisture evaporates from the soil and transpires from plants, it cools the air in much the same way as houses used to be cooled by swamp coolers, the water-spray machines that pre-dated modern air conditioning, Nielsen-Gammon said.
AgriLife Extension district reporters compiled the following summaries:
Central: Rangeland, soil moisture, pastures, livestock and most crops were all rated as being in good condition. Most corn was mature, and early planted grain sorghum looked good, though there was some that required treating for sugarcane aphids and stink bugs. Late-planted sorghum crops may require spraying too, but there was concern the spraying costs would be excessive as sugarcane aphid pressure was likely to increase later in the growing season. Wet conditions were slowing harvesting of already mature corn and sorghum silage. Otherwise, it was one of the best years in quite a while for many dryland corn and forage sorghum growers. Hay yields were great because of abundant rain toward the end of the growing season. Pastures were in good condition. Cotton began to flower.
Coastal Bend: Some parts of the region needed rain to sustain current growing conditions, while crops in other areas were in poor condition due to excessive rainfall. Cotton generally looked good, and corn was drying down and will soon be ready to harvest. Some farmers will start harvesting corn before grain sorghum. Producers were harvesting a lot of hay, and livestock were doing well with good grazing. Rangeland and pastures looked great, though weedy because of excessive rain. There was some disease pressure on grain sorghum, as well as a large boll-worm egg count and some stink bug activity in cotton. But other than the scattered reports, insect problems were not severe. Some cotton producers were applying growth regulators.
East: Weather conditions were hot and dry, with only a few counties reporting scattered showers. Ponds and creeks were full. Windy days dried out topsoils somewhat, but in most counties topsoil moisture was adequate, with a couple of counties reporting surplus moisture. Hay producers were taking advantage of the dry weather, baling as fast as they could. Because of earlier wet conditions, it was the first cutting for some producers. Some low-lying areas were still too wet to enter. Producers were also spraying or shredding pasture weeds where conditions permitted. Blackberries, blueberries and vegetables were being harvested with good yields. Disease problems on vegetables and ornamental plants leveled off with the drier and hotter weather. Cattle were in good condition. Livestock producers continued weaning and selling market-ready calves and cull cows. Horn flies and mosquitoes created problems for livestock producers.
Far West: The district received from 0.5 inch to 3 inches of rain. Hudspeth and Culberson counties were without electricity for one to two days because of damage to power lines from high winds that accompanied the thunderstorms. Livestock were in good condition. Pastures were in good to fair condition, and corn and sunflowers were in fair condition. The fourth cutting of alfalfa was underway. Cotton began to square and was in good to fair condition. Topsoil and subsoil moisture were adequate.
North: Topsoil moisture was mostly adequate, with some areas reporting short. Weather was generally normal for early July, with high temperatures in the mid 90s. Some areas received from 0.5 inch to 5 inches of rain. Most all fields and pastures dried out enough to allow fieldwork and harvesting operations. Hay producers were taking either their first or second cutting of Bermuda grass hay. Yields were about average. The wheat harvest was mostly completed. Corn plants were short and not looking good. Late-planted cotton was behind in development. Pastures looked good despite some grasshopper pressure. Livestock were in good condition. Feral hogs continued to damage pastures and crops. Flies and mosquitoes were abundant.
Panhandle: Thunderstorms swept through the region, bringing hail, high winds and 1 inch to 6 inches of rain. While many producers escaped major damages from the storm, others weren’t so lucky. In Deaf Smith County, 2,000 to 4,000 crop acres were damaged, with some fields a total loss. Cornfields, with most of the crop in pre-tassel, were mainly affected. Sunflowers and grain- and forage-sorghum fields were also damaged but to a lesser extent. Producers across the region were gearing up to battle pests and weeds brought on by the wet conditions. Generally, crops were about two to three weeks behind normal development. Grasshoppers were becoming a serious problem in many areas. Cattle were doing well. The breeding season was almost over and calf weights were expected to be excellent as pastures were in good condition over most of the region.
Rolling Plains: Parts of the region received from 0.3 inch to 4 inches of rain. Pastures were green, and livestock were generally in good to excellent condition. Stock-water tanks were full. Hay production was ongoing with very high yields. Peach growers were also seeing high quality and good yields. Most wheat was harvested. Wheat yields and test weights varied widely. Cotton and peanuts were slow to develop. There was some insect pressure from grasshoppers and fleahoppers in cotton.
South: Temperatures rose throughout the region, drying soils in rangeland, pastures and croplands. Only a few areas in the western parts of the region had substantial rainfall. The rest of the region only received light showers. Rangeland and pastures generally were in fair to good condition. In the northern part of the region, corn and sorghum were drying out and maturing, cotton was forming bolls and early planted peanuts were flowering. Hay harvesting continued. Some producers began irrigating crops due to the drier conditions. Soil moisture was mostly adequate in the northern counties. In the eastern part of the region, most row crops were steadily maturing, and some were about ready for harvesting. However, harvesting of these crops will be spread out over time, as planting times and growth stages of most crops varied widely. Soil moisture remained adequate throughout the eastern counties. In the western part of the r egion, growers in Maverick County were able to harvest most vegetable crops before the heavy rains came. In Zavala County, some producers began irrigating cotton and some late-planted grain sorghum. The irrigation was likely the last needed to finish the crops. Watermelon growers were busy harvesting, and pecan producers were on the lookout for second-generation pecan case bearers. Soil moisture was mostly adequate in the western counties, except for Zavala County, which had 100 percent short subsoil and topsoil moisture. In the southern part of the region, corn and grain sorghum harvest was ongoing, and livestock remained in good condition. In Hidalgo County, sunflower harvesting wound down with disappointing yields. Sugarcane harvesting continued. In Starr County, grain sorghum harvesting just began. Soil moisture was rated as adequate throughout the southern counties.
South Plains: Many counties received rain, from 2 to 7 inches, which kept producers out of the fields for a few days. The timing was perfect for irrigators, as the dry conditions had resulted in center pivots being run around the clock. Muddy conditions in Hale County were delaying cotton and causing some lameness in livestock. The Bailey County wheat harvest was nearly complete. Grasshoppers were a serious problem there, with many producers having already sprayed three times. Cochran County cotton was squaring. There was very little insect pressure on field crops there, and corn continued to mature. Peanuts were in full bloom, developing pegs and beginning to form pods. Lubbock County cotton was late but looked good. Grain sorghum and corn were entering reproductive stages. Some Garza County cotton fields were in standing water and others were saturated after 6 inches of rain. Rangeland and pastures were in mostly excellent condition. Some stock-water tanks received much-needed runoff. Mitchell County lakes were at higher levels than they have been for years after the rains. Rangeland was recovering from the multi-year drought, and grass was growing. Scurry County cotton was struggling with wind damage and standing water in fields after the thunderstorms brought 7 inches of rain.
Southeast: Soil moisture throughout the region was mostly adequate to short, with adequate ratings being the most common. Rangeland and pastures were mostly in fair to good condition, with good ratings being the most common. With drier weather, many producers were harvesting hay while struggling to control weeds. Hay quality was down due to producers not being able to apply herbicides and fertilizers in a timely fashion, but yields were good. Waller County corn was stunted and yellowed due to excessive moisture, but pastures continued to improve and rangeland was in good condition. Cattle were stressed by high horn fly numbers. Mosquitoes and houseflies were nuisances. Grasshoppers were active. Watermelon growers were harvesting. In Fort Bend County, the drier weather allowed many producers to begin harvesting grain sorghum. Cotton there was progressing, and corn neared being harvest-ready.
Southwest: Higher temperatures were the rule for the week, though generally mild for mid-July. Producers continued cutting and baling hay. Some sugarcane aphids were found in grain sorghum. Corn was rapidly maturing with the hotter and drier conditions. Some areas were having problems with rust in corn. Livestock were generally in good condition. Rangeland and pastures were also in good condition.
West Central: Days were hot with warm nights. Heavy rains mid-week caused flash flooding in many areas. Stock-water tanks, ponds and soil moisture levels were in good condition. Field activities were slowed by wet conditions. Most cotton and early planted grain sorghum was in excellent condition. However, some cotton stands were expected to be lost due to standing water in fields. Summer forages were being harvested for hay, with excellent yields reported. Rangeland continued to recover from severe drought conditions. Pastures were in better shape than they have been in several years. Hay harvesting continued, with above-average yields. More hay had already been harvested in 2015 than in several years. A second cutting was expected to be taken soon on some fields. Livestock were in good to excellent condition. Livestock prices remained high, and herd rebuilding increased.
-30-
Farm & Ranch
Frog Fruit
By Tony Dean, tonydean.tx1@gmail.com
Frog fruit is a native, low-growing perennial forb adapted to most of the eastern U.S., but few grazers know it well. It contributes more to our plant communities than we realize. It generally grows no more than a few inches tall and roots at the nodes. It can form dense mats several feet across and develop runners up to 3 feet long.
The leaves are thick, one to two inches long and 3/8 inch wide, and toothed from the middle to the tip. Tiny white flowers form a ring around a flower head, and the head then elongates into a cylinder an inch long or longer. Frog fruit has a four-angled stem.
Frog fruit can grow almost anywhere in Texas and on many soil types. It can grow in drier soils and likes good drainage, but it needs additional moisture to survive the hottest months. You can find it almost anywhere in a pasture, though it often grows in depressions and near water sources.
“Frog fruit is used as forage by livestock and deer. I recall an instance when I was moving cattle from one pasture to the next on a Jack County ranch. As I opened the gate, I stood by a beautiful green plant of switchgrass which I expected to be immediately grazed down. The cattle walked right by the switchgrass and stuck their heads in a small patch of frog fruit a few feet away,” Dean said.
Frog fruit is gaining popularity as a ground cover for homes and gardens for these reasons:
- Frog fruit grows quickly, maybe too quickly. If it gets out of bounds, you can always trim it back.
- Frog fruit is low maintenance. Once you get it established with adequate watering, it can survive with little care.
- Frog fruit has a long bloom period, from April to October.
- It is a host plant for several butterfly species and other insects.
Farm & Ranch
Theileria orientalis
By Barry Whitworth, DVM
Over the past few years, veterinarians have detected Theileria orientalis in Oklahoma cattle. Early cases were primarily diagnosed in adult cattle, but more recent Oklahoma cases have been identified in stocker cattle. All cattle producers should be familiar with the clinical signs of this disease and check their cattle daily for signs of trouble.
The first U.S. case of theileriosis was identified in Virginia in August 2017. Those cattle showed weakness and anemia, and veterinarians made an initial diagnosis of anaplasmosis. Blood samples from the animals were tested for Anaplasma, Babesia and Leptospira. Results were negative for all three, but the tests revealed a blood protozoan, later identified as T. orientalis genotype Ikeda. Since that first herd outbreak, the organism has been detected in several states.
Cattle sick with T. orientalis genotype Ikeda may show fever, weakness, anorexia and exercise intolerance. If forced to move, affected cattle may stagger and gasp for air. If stressed excessively, they may collapse and die. On examination, the gums, eyes or vaginal mucosa may appear pale (white) or yellow. Reproductive losses, including stillbirths and late-term abortions, may occur, along with a drop in milk production.
Clinical signs reported in adult cattle in Oklahoma include anemia, sudden death, weight loss, abortion, failure to thrive and failure to calve. In stocker cattle, producers have reported weight loss, anemia, poor performance and sudden death.
Because Anaplasma marginale and T. orientalis genotype Ikeda produce similar clinical signs, telling the two apart can be difficult. One difference is that clinical signs are more common in young cattle infected with T. orientalis than in young cattle infected with A. marginale. Cattle with anaplasmosis also often display aggression, while those with T. orientalis genotype Ikeda typically do not. A laboratory test is required to tell the two diseases apart with certainty.
Researchers have identified Haemaphysalis longicornis as a possible vector of T. orientalis genotype Ikeda. In 2017, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL) confirmed the presence of H. longicornis, commonly called the Asian longhorned tick (ALT) or bush tick. While trying to determine how the tick arrived in the United States, USDA officials discovered it had been present in West Virginia as early as 2010. The tick has now been confirmed in at least 26 states, including Oklahoma. Some evidence suggests other insect vectors may also transmit T. orientalis genotype Ikeda. Needle transfer is another possible route of transmission.
The ALT has been identified in Craig and Mayes counties in Oklahoma. This tick thrives in areas with high humidity, such as wooded regions, brush or tall grass. Ticks are often found where large numbers of wildlife gather, such as along deer trails. Producers can find more information about the ALT on the USDA website at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/livestock-poultry-disease/cattle/ticks/asian-longhorned.
Other countries have developed treatments for T. orientalis, but no approved treatments are available in the United States, and no vaccine exists for this disease. The best defense is prevention: buying cattle free of the organism, avoiding blood transfer between animals and using effective tick control. Producers should purchase cattle from reputable sources. Clean instruments between animals during procedures such as castration or dehorning, and change needles between every animal. Control external parasites with appropriate insecticide treatments. Pasture management also helps, such as rotating cattle away from wooded or brushy areas where ticks thrive. Patch burning may also help reduce tick populations.
Theileria orientalis remains a concern for some cow/calf and stocker producers in Oklahoma. Producers who want more information about T. orientalis genotype Ikeda should contact their local veterinarian or Oklahoma State University County Extension agriculture educator.
References
Hammer, J. F., Emery, D., Bogema, D. R., & Jenkins, C. (2015). Detection of Theileria orientalis genotypes in Haemaphysalis longicornis ticks from southern Australia. Parasites & Vectors, 8, 229.
Oakes, V. J., Yabsley, M. J., Schwartz, D., LeRoith, T., Bissett, C., Broaddus, C., Schlater, J. L., Todd, S. M., Boes, K. M., Brookhart, M., & Lahmers, K. K. (2019). Theileria orientalis Ikeda genotype in cattle, Virginia, USA. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 25(9), 1653-1659.
Spickler, Anna Rovid. (2019). Theileriosis. Retrieved from http://www.cfsph.iastate.edu/DiseaseInfo/factsheets.php.
Watts, J. G., Playford, M. C., & Hickey, K. L. (2016). Theileria orientalis: A review. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 64(1), 3-9.
Farm & Ranch
Is the Pond Safe for Livestock?
By OKFR Staff
During the hottest part of summer, a farm pond can look like a welcome source of water. Cattle may be standing belly-deep along the bank, and the pond may still hold enough water to seem dependable. Looks alone won’t tell you whether that water is safe.
Hot weather, limited rainfall and falling pond levels can create water-quality problems. As water evaporates, salts, minerals, nutrients and other substances become more concentrated. Warm, still water can also encourage blue-green algae, and some forms can produce toxins capable of killing livestock.
Producers sometimes treat water as an afterthought compared to grass, hay and supplemental feed. Livestock need a dependable supply of clean water to maintain feed intake, regulate body temperature and support production. Poor-quality water can reduce consumption and performance even when it does not cause obvious poisoning.
A pond that has watered cattle for years is not safe under every set of conditions. Pay particular attention during drought, extreme heat or any period when the water level drops significantly.
Watch the Water and the Livestock
One of the most serious late-summer concerns is a bloom of cyanobacteria, commonly called blue-green algae. These organisms live naturally in many bodies of water, and most do not produce dangerous toxins. The risk rises when certain toxin-producing species multiply rapidly under favorable conditions.
According to Oklahoma State University Extension, toxic blue-green algal blooms typically develop in standing water after periods of hot, dry, calm weather. Nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus can fuel excessive growth. Those nutrients may reach a pond through manure, fertilizer runoff, soil erosion and decaying vegetation.
A suspicious bloom may turn the water bright green, blue-green, pea-soup green or even brownish. Scum, foam or mats may collect along the shoreline, particularly where the wind pushes floating material into one area. Some blooms look like spilled paint.
Not every green pond is poisonous. Common aquatic plants and harmless algae can also change the color or surface of the water. You usually cannot tell whether a bloom is toxic by looking at it, and a pond can contain toxin-producing cyanobacteria without showing every commonly described warning sign.
Keep livestock, horses, pets and people away from water that has an unusual color, heavy surface scum, a bad odor or unexplained dead fish or wildlife nearby. Do not let livestock drink from another part of the same pond on the assumption that the water is safe there. Wind can move a bloom, and toxin levels may vary across the pond.
Blue-green algae can produce toxins that affect the nervous system or liver. Depending on the toxin and the amount consumed, affected animals may develop weakness, staggering, difficulty breathing, tremors, convulsions, diarrhea or collapse. In severe cases, owners find animals dead near the water before realizing anything is wrong. Treatment often fails, which makes prevention especially important.
Treat any suspected poisoning as an emergency. Move the herd away from the water source without driving or stressing animals that may already be affected. Provide another clean water supply and contact a veterinarian immediately. Your county Extension office can also help you determine where and how to submit a water sample.
Blue-green algae is not the only potential problem. Pond water may contain elevated levels of dissolved salts, sulfates, nitrates, bacteria or other contaminants. Runoff can carry manure, fertilizer, pesticides and organic matter into the pond. Low water levels make some of these problems worse because the remaining water grows more concentrated.
Water with excessive dissolved solids may taste bitter or salty, so animals drink less of it. Depending on the substances involved and their concentrations, poor-quality water may contribute to diarrhea, reduced feed intake, poor weight gain or other health concerns. Young animals and livestock that are not used to the water may be more vulnerable.
Watch the cattle themselves, too. Are they reluctant to drink? Are they crowding around a different water source? Has feed intake or weight gain dropped without an obvious explanation? Are several animals having digestive problems? Changes across multiple animals can be an early clue that you need to look at the feed or water.
OSU Extension recommends collecting a representative sample and submitting it for a livestock water test whenever you suspect a water supply is harming animal health or performance. A standard livestock water test covers several characteristics, but blue-green algae can require different sampling and testing procedures. Contact the laboratory or county Extension office before collecting the sample so you take it from the right location, use the proper container and handle it correctly.
Reduce Problems Before They Develop
Good pond management cannot eliminate every water-quality problem, but it can lower the risk. One of the most effective steps is limiting the manure, soil and nutrients that enter the water.
Cattle with unrestricted access to an entire pond can damage the banks, muddy the water and deposit large amounts of manure in or near it. Hoof traffic strips vegetation and speeds erosion. Sediment fills the pond over time, while manure supplies nutrients that can encourage excessive algae growth.
Where practical, fence livestock away from most of the pond and provide a limited-access watering point. Another option is piping water to a trough below the dam or elsewhere in the pasture. OSU notes that reducing cattle manure in the pond can reduce the conditions that favor toxic algae and make the water more palatable.
A vegetated buffer around the pond can slow runoff and trap soil and nutrients before they reach the water. Apply fertilizer and manure carefully in the watershed, particularly before heavy rain, and do not let large amounts of hay, feed or organic debris pile up at the water’s edge.
Alternative watering systems need maintenance, too. Check troughs for algae, manure, drowned animals and other contamination. Install wildlife escape ramps in tanks so birds and small animals can climb out instead of drowning and fouling the water.
Be cautious about treating a pond on your own. Some owners use copper sulfate and other algaecides for algae control, but improper treatment can create new problems. Killing a large amount of algae or aquatic vegetation at once can deplete dissolved oxygen as the material decomposes, which can lead to a fish kill. Treatment may also release toxins from affected cyanobacteria into the water. Base any chemical application on proper identification and professional recommendations, not guesswork.
Livestock should always have enough water for the weather, their size and their stage of production. Demand rises sharply in hot weather, and a pond that barely meets the herd’s needs in spring may fall short in August. Check the source regularly instead of waiting for cattle to gather around a muddy shoreline.
Ponds can fool you. Crystal-clear water isn’t always safe, and a green pond doesn’t always mean toxic algae. Regular observation, testing and prevention are the best ways to keep a pond safe for your herd.
-
Country Lifestyles4 years agoScott & Stacey Schumacher: A Growth Mindset
-
Country Lifestyles10 years agoStyle Your Profile – What your style cowboy hat says about you and new trends in 2017
-
Horsefeathers12 years agoMount Scott: Country Humor with David Gregory
-
Country Lifestyles10 years agoJune 2016 Profile – The man behind the mic: Bob Tallman
-
Outdoor11 years agoButtercup or Primrose?
-
Country Lifestyles10 years agoDecember 2016 Profile, Rusty Riddle – The Riddle Way
-
HOME10 years agoGrazing North Texas – Wilman Lovegrass
-
The Natural Horseman9 years agoThis is why we do what we do — RayeAnn and Cisco





