Connect with us

Farm & Ranch

Texas crop, weather for April 28, 2015

Published

on

By: Robert Burns

Plantings continue despite frequent rains

Photo above: Fields, such as this one south of Edinburg, continued to have standing water and/or soggy soils, which limited field activities, according to Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service county agent reports. Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service photo by Rod Santa Ana)

COLLEGE STATION – With continuing rains and wet field conditions, planting of most crops in Texas remained behind the five-year average, according to a summary by the U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistical Service, Austin.

The service compiles its summaries from weekly condition reports by Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service county agents throughout the state.

Planting of some crops was closer to catching up than others, according to the service. Corn plantings were catching up from a week ago, with 56 percent of the crop planted compared to the five-year average of 66 percent. Cotton was 9 percent planted compared to the average of 17 percent, and grain sorghum 57 percent compared to the five-year average of 61 percent. Sunflower planting, at 38 percent, was actually ahead of the five-year average of 21 percent.

Download or preview a two-minute MP3 audio version of this report
Further behind were rice and soybeans, according to the AgriLife Extension county agent reports. About 64 percent of rice was planted at this time compared to 87 percent for the five-year average. About 21 percent of intended soybean planting was finished, compared to the five-year average of 56 percent.

But percentages don’t tell the whole story. In East Texas, though heavy rains have replenished groundwater, several AgriLife Extension county agents reported standing water in crop fields and pastures.

In North Texas, Rick Maxwell, AgriLife Extension agent for Collin County, estimated that only about 30 percent of ground intended for corn could be planted.

“Most of these farmers will take prevented planting and let the fields lay fallow until next year when they will try and plant corn again,” Maxwell said. “Some will try to possibly plant another crop in place of the corn, maybe grain sorghum or soybeans, but the fields are still too wet to try and plant those crops.”

In Central Texas, Edward Schneider, AgriLife Extension agent for Robertson County, recorded that 100 percent of the county’s wheat was headed and corn was emerged. But “what has been planted is starting to yellow from excessively wet conditions,” he said. “Pastures are growing rapidly, but farmers are having issues getting equipment in the field to cut hay and fertilize.”

In Southwest Texas, Derrick Drury, AgriLife Extension agent for Medina County, listed wheat as 100 percent headed, with the majority of the crop in good to excellent condition.

However, “rain has been steady this week,” Drury said. “A lot of the wheat stem strength was not strong enough to withstand the high winds and blew over. Unfortunately, it has ruined close to 40 percent of the fields.”

AgriLife Extension district reporters compiled the following summaries:
oct 21 news release
The 12 Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Districts

Central: Soil moisture, rangeland, pastures, crops and livestock were all in good condition. Most of the area received rain, with accumulations of more than 4 inches in some areas. Hail and high winds accompanied some of the rain. Pastures and rangeland were green and growing, but the added moisture made only a few days suitable for fieldwork. Grass was doing well, though coastal Bermuda grass needed warmer weather for growth. Oat s and wheat were doing well throughout the region. Grain sorghum and corn emerged. Oats were ready to cut for hay when weather allowed. Cattle were looking better each week. Most hay was planted and up.

Coastal Bend: More rain and high winds damaged some newly emerged cotton, and farmers had to replant. There was also hail damage to some newly planted crops. Nearly all stock tanks were full or at near capacity. In some counties, excessive rain stalled planting. Many pastures were flooded. It was too early to tell if standing water in some row crop fields would cause some acreage to be replanted. Some wheat was flattened by the weather, but overall the crop looked really good. Wheat harvesting was expected to start in a couple of weeks, possibly sooner. A few fields dried out enough to allow some fieldwork, mostly spraying for weeds. Much cotton and grain in some areas were expected to be classified as prevented planting for crop insurance. Pastures were lush, and cattle were getting fat. Mosquitoes were everywhere.

East: Continued rains kept the ground saturated. Subsoil and topsoil were in the surplus range for most counties. Ponds were full and overflowing. Vegetable growers were behind with planting because of wet soils. Row crop farmers were also behind with planting. Weed and fertilizer applications slowed or stopped due to wet and muddy fields. Houston County had standing water in most locations. The area was also having problems with mosquitos. In Trinity County, even spreader trucks with flotation tires were getting stuck on a regular basis. San Augustine County ryegrass was still growing so prolifically that it was preventing emergence of warm-season grasses. Cattle stopped eating hay in favor of green grass. Livestock were in good condition. Working of new crop calves was underway, while the weaning and selling of older calves and cull cows continued. Feral hogs were active.

Far West: Rain and windy conditions continued, with warm temperatures giving way to cooler days later in the week. Pasture and rangeland conditions were in fair to good condition. In some areas, though pastures and rangeland remained green, they were starting to dry out, but were still adequately supporting livestock. Many ranches were able to stop supplemental feeding. Subsoil moisture and topsoil moisture were adequate. In Pecos County, winter wheat was being harvested for grain rather than being baled for feed. In other counties the crop was in good condition and about 90 percent headed out. Cotton and grain sorghum were planted in some counties, while in others farmers were still preparing fields for planting. Glasscock County farmers were planting sunflowers. The second cutting of alfalfa was growing well.

North: Topsoil moisture was surplus to adequate. More rain, 3 to 6 inches, worsened the muddy conditions of fields. The soggy conditions was expected to prevent fieldwork in some areas into the first week of May. Winter pastures still looked very good, but many had not been fertilized on time because of so much rain. The wet conditions also put farmers behind on weed control. Wheat was looking great. Corn was emerging. Pastures were in good shape for the spring. Creeks were overflowing, and mosquitoes were flourishing. Livestock were showing some stress and feet problems because of the wet conditions but were gaining weight.

Panhandle: Temperatures were near average for most of the week, with a trace to as much as 6 inches of rain received. Soil moisture continued to be rated mostly adequate to short. Where weather permitted, farmers were preparing seedbeds and applying preplant herbicides, and were expected to begin planting within one to two weeks. Corn planting was already underway for many and will be very active for several weeks. Wheat made good progress in some counties, with potential yields for irrigated fields better than in recent years. Alfalfa also looked good, but the first cutting was still several weeks away. Cutting wheat for hay was expected to start within a week. Cattle grazing wheat were doing well, but some cattle were being moved from wheat to grass. Deaf Smith County producers had a challenging week, starting with four hours of below freezing temperatures on the wheat crop then pea- to golf-ball size hail at the end of t he week. Preliminary observations were that approximately 10 to 15 circles of wheat and triticale were damaged or totally lost due to hail. Some wind damage to center pivots was also reported by producers. Most ranchers neared being finished with spring calving, and some started shipping fall-born calves. Lipscomb County received 1.5 to 3 inches of rain, which helped rangeland but came too late to save dryland wheat. Rangeland and pastures were in poor to fair condition with most counties reporting good to fair. Cattle were in good condition.

Rolling Plains: Rain continued to fall across parts of the region. Hail accompanied the rain in some counties, but no damage was reported. Topsoil moisture was good. Farmers were preparing land for cotton planting. Pastures continued to improve, as was the body condition scores of cattle. Spring calving was well underway. Ranchers were working cattle, and with prices remaining high, some producers were selling instead of keeping their calves. Rust problems in wheat continued, and a lot of the crop was in the flowering stage. Moisture was needed for head-fill. Oats looked good. Hay fields looked good as well, but weeds were abundant in untreated fields. Peach growers were thinning fruit. Stock-water tank and lake levels were improving.

South: The region had near continuous rainfall of one degree or another, from light and scattered showers to heavy downpours. Rangeland, pasture and soil moisture were mostly improved by the rain, but planting was further delayed in some areas. In the northern part of the region, hail accompanied the thunderstorms in some areas. In Atascosa County, some crops were knocked down by the hail. Otherwise, 75 percent of corn was emerged, oats were in fair condition and headed out, and 90 percent of the sorghum was planted. Wheat was starting to turn color and ripen, and corn and sorghum were progressing well in Frio County. Soil moisture was mostly adequate. In the eastern part of the region, wheat was flattened by high winds and hail, but producers believed they may still be able to harvest the crop. Planting in Kleberg and Kenedy counties remained at a standstill due to saturated field conditions. Soil moisture ranged from mos tly adequate to 100 percent surplus. In the western part of the region, parts of Zapata County received 6 to 10 inches of rain. Wheat and oats made progress, and all cotton was emerged. Watermelon transplanting began but was halted due to wet field conditions. Spinach harvesting, both for fresh market and processed spinach varieties, was completed. Soil moisture was mostly adequate in Dimmit and Zapata counties, with Zavala County reporting 100 percent short subsoil moisture but 100 percent adequate topsoil moisture. In the southern part of the region, field activities, such as hay harvesting, were stymied due to continuous light and scattered showers. Grain sorghum and cotton progressed well, but weed problems increased. Starr County got 3 to 5 inches of rain. Soil moisture ranged from 90 percent adequate to mostly surplus.

South Plains: Except for Cochran and Garza counties, the region received moisture. Some areas received only spotty showers, but others got up to 1.5 inches. Swisher County also received quarter to golf-ball sized hail that damaged about 40 percent of the wheat crop. Corn planting, pre-watering and herbicide applications were brought to a halt by the rains. Daytime temperatures in the upper 80s and high winds were depleting topsoil moisture in many areas. Producers in Hockley and Lubbock counties began to plant corn and grain sorghum. While soil temperatures were in the 60s, a couple of cooler days were forecast, which prevented optimum planting conditions for cotton. Wheat continued to mature and had reached the heading stage in many counties. Pastures and rangeland remained in good to excellent condition. Cattle were in mostly good condition.

Southeast: Soil-moisture levels throughout the region varied widely, though were mostly in the adequate to surplus range. Rangeland and pastures varied from excellent to good, with good ratings being the most common. Walker County was exceptionally wet. Pastures were still very wet, with limited access possible. Scattered showers continued across Brazos County. Temperatures rose into the mid-80s causing cool-season forage growth to slow. Winter annual grasses were still providing good grazing in Montgomery County. Bermuda grass and Bahia grass were growing. In Waller County, fly and other insect populations were increasing. In Chambers County, rice planting was halted by heavy rains. In Fort Bend County, fields were slowly drying out but more rain was expected. Livestock were in good condition.

Southwest: Soils were saturated by continuous rainfall. Rangeland and pasture forages were very abundant in all areas. Winter wheat was damaged by high winds and excessive rains. Some wheat was flattened. Corn and grain sorghum looked good. Livestock remained in good condition due to the quality of readily available forages.

West Central: Days were warm with mild nights. Most of the region received more rain, with hail and high winds causing damage to some crops. The rains improved overall crop and pasture conditions, but field activity was delayed due to the wet conditions in some areas. Where field conditions allowed, hay producers were applying fertilizers and weed killers. Some cutting and baling of small grains for hay was underway. Wheat was mostly in good to excellent condition, but much will likely be grazed out or baled for hay due to current low grain prices. Wheat harvested for grain was expected to produce above-average yields. Rangeland and pastures continued to improve with good moisture and warm temperatures. Livestock remained in good condition, and ranchers were doing spring cattle work.

-30-

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Forage Needs in the Fall

Published

on

By

By Savannah Magoteaux

Two bales can look almost identical and feed very differently. Color, smell and leafiness tell part of the story, but a forage test tells you what your cattle are actually being offered. If you buy hay by the ton or are trying to stretch winter feed, that little lab sheet can be one of the cheapest management tools on the place.

Reading the report

Start with dry matter. Hay contains water, and labs report nutrients either “as fed” or on a dry-matter basis. Feeds are easiest to compare on a dry-matter basis because it takes moisture out of the comparison. Hay that is 90 percent dry matter is about 10 percent water.

Crude protein, usually abbreviated CP, is the number most people recognize. It estimates protein from the forage’s nitrogen content. Higher isn’t automatically better. The goal is to match the hay to the animal. A dry, mature cow in mid-gestation doesn’t need the same protein as a lactating cow, a growing replacement heifer or a young calf.

Energy matters just as much. Beef cattle forage reports commonly estimate energy as total digestible nutrients, or TDN. Low-TDN hay may fill a cow up before it supplies enough energy, particularly when her requirements rise late in gestation or during lactation. That is when you may need better forage, an energy supplement or a different feeding plan.

Fiber numbers explain why some hay looks coarse and why animals may not be able to eat enough of it. Neutral detergent fiber, or NDF, is closely tied to intake. As NDF climbs, cattle generally eat less because the forage moves through the digestive tract more slowly. Acid detergent fiber, or ADF, is tied to digestibility. Higher ADF generally means lower digestibility.

Some reports also include relative feed value or relative forage quality. These indexes help compare lots of forage, particularly alfalfa and mixed hay, but they aren’t a complete ration. They don’t replace looking at protein, energy, minerals, animal class and expected intake.

Then come the numbers you hope are boring. Nitrate testing matters when drought, heavy nitrogen fertilization, cloudy weather or other conditions have stressed the forage enough to cause nitrate accumulation. Sorghum-type forages, johnsongrass, corn and some weeds deserve particular attention. Nitrates stay in hay after it is cut and baled, so a risky crop doesn’t become safe just because it dried.

Minerals deserve a look, but this is where a hay report gets harder to interpret. Calcium, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium and other minerals may be listed, yet a complete mineral program depends on water, other feeds and local conditions. A high number isn’t always an advantage. Excessive potassium, for example, can interfere with magnesium use under some circumstances. If you are balancing a ration for high-risk animals, work with a nutritionist or Extension specialist rather than treating the lab sheet as a stand-alone mineral prescription.

Moisture tells another story. Hay baled too wet is at greater risk of heating and mold, and very wet hay can become a fire hazard as microbial activity raises its internal temperature. A test taken months later can’t reconstruct every storage problem, so inspect the stack, too. A musty odor, visible mold, unusual heat and dark discoloration are all reasons to investigate.

Getting a good sample

A hay test is only as good as the sample, and sampling is the step most likely to ruin a good analysis. A handful pulled from the outside of one convenient bale doesn’t represent a stack of 100 bales. Round bales aren’t uniform from the outside to the center, and one bale may not represent the whole cutting.

Texas A&M AgriLife recommends using a hay probe and collecting cores from multiple bales in a lot, then combining them into one representative sample. A coring probe reaches through the layers of the bale and gives the lab a much better cross-section. Test different cuttings, fields or hay types separately, and don’t blend samples from separate fields or cuttings to save the cost of a test if you will feed them as separate lots.

Putting the numbers to work

The most useful way to read the report is backward from the cattle. What class of animal will eat this hay, at what stage of production, and how much is she likely to eat? Once you answer those questions, the lab numbers start to mean something.

A mature dry cow in good body condition can often use lower-quality forage than a first-calf heifer nursing a calf. Young cattle need nutrients for growth on top of maintenance, and cold stress raises energy demand. A hay test becomes valuable when you pair it with those real-world differences.

Remember that price per bale isn’t the same as price per unit of nutrition. A cheap bale with very low energy and protein may require expensive supplementation, and better hay can turn out to be the lower-cost feed once you count waste and supplements.

Before buying, try putting two hay reports side by side. Compare dry matter, crude protein, TDN and fiber first. Then add delivered cost and likely feeding waste. A heavier, denser bale isn’t automatically more economical, and a greener bale isn’t automatically more nutritious. The numbers make the comparison fair.

Testing is especially valuable after a hard weather year. Drought hay may be lower in yield and higher in nitrate risk. Mature, rain-damaged hay may test lower in protein and energy than it looks. Hay cut from a fertilized field after stress may deserve a safety screen before it ever reaches a feeder.

A forage test won’t make poor hay better. It shows you where the gaps are before your cattle show them through lost condition or lower performance. One report can’t answer every feeding question, but it replaces several guesses with measurements, and that makes winter nutrition planning much more accurate.

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

When Acorns Become a Problem

Published

on

By

By Savannah Magoteaux

A heavy crop of acorns under an oak tree usually looks more like a sign of fall than a livestock problem. For most cattle in most years, that is all it is. Trouble starts when acorns stop being an occasional bite and become a meaningful part of the diet.

Oak leaves, buds and acorns contain tannins that can damage the digestive tract and kidneys when cattle eat enough of them. Green acorns are generally considered more toxic than mature brown ones, but either can cause problems if cattle eat too many.

The risk climbs when forage is short and cattle go looking for something else to eat. Drought, overgrazed pastures or simply a heavy acorn crop can set up that situation.

Cattle aren’t equally interested in acorns. A few animals in a herd may eat far more than the rest, which helps explain why cases can appear scattered.

Early signs can be vague. Affected cattle may go off feed, look depressed or become constipated. As the damage progresses, you may see dark or bloody manure, abdominal pain, frequent urination followed by reduced urine output, dehydration and weakness. Kidney failure is the most serious concern.

You can’t remove every acorn from a wooded pasture, so prevention comes down to keeping cattle from relying on them. Adequate forage and supplementation take away the incentive to eat large amounts.

You can also fence cattle away from heavily producing oaks for a while, especially when pasture conditions are poor. If several animals seem to be seeking out acorns, take a close look at the rest of the ration instead of assuming they will quit on their own.

If you suspect oak poisoning, call a veterinarian early. Treatment is supportive and does much more good before severe kidney damage sets in. Moving unaffected cattle away from the source and providing good-quality feed and water may prevent more cases.

Acorns are an important fall food for deer, squirrels and other wildlife, and a few acorns generally don’t spell disaster for cattle. The concern is quantity. A pasture full of oaks becomes a different management problem when grass is short, cattle are hungry and the ground is covered with something they are willing to eat.

Oak toxicity comes up most often in cattle, but other livestock can be affected, too. And the risk isn’t limited to acorns. Oak buds and young leaves also contain tannins, so spring can occasionally bring problems as well. In fall, though, the obvious temptation is lying on the ground where cattle can eat it quickly.

Watch where your cattle spend their time. If cows that normally graze open grass start camping under oaks and hunting acorns, that behavior tells you something.

Walk the pasture, estimate how much usable forage is left and check whether a few dominant animals are eating more than the rest. Hay or supplemental feed may help, but place it where all the cattle can reach it rather than assuming one feeder will solve the problem.

Oak poisoning can look like other illnesses, and no one can diagnose kidney damage from pasture observation alone. A veterinarian may use history, clinical signs and lab work to separate it from dehydration, digestive disease or other toxicities. That is another reason to mention a heavy acorn crop when you call. A detail that seems like an ordinary part of fall can be an important part of the history.

Your pasture plan doesn’t have to be complicated. If one wooded trap has a much heavier acorn crop than the rest, use another pasture while you still have the choice.

If you can’t move the herd, make sure hay and supplement are adequate before the animals get hungry enough to seek out acorns aggressively. Salt or mineral by itself won’t make up for a shortage of forage.

The problem usually fades as cattle eat through the crop or the acorns weather or get covered. Don’t return cattle that have already shown signs as soon as they look better, though. Kidney injury can be serious. Follow your veterinarian’s recommendations and reassess the pasture before turning recovered animals back out.

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Land Market Report

Published

on

By

By Jared Groce

Late summer has been brutal on our livestock, our grass and the rural land market in North Texas. We currently have an astounding 42 months of inventory on hand in our report area, and the only properties selling are the ones priced right. Overpriced properties aren’t even getting looked at, much less receiving offers, so pricing your property correctly matters more than ever right now.

Many sellers are still picturing the daily price increases we saw in 2020 to 2023, but those days are behind us, and agents need to be more realistic with listing prices to get any activity for their clients. Hopefully the rains will come soon and bring more land buyers with them this fall, but right now it is still very much a buyer’s market. No one knows how long this dry spell will last, but it will likely take a flood to end it. The same is true of the weather!

They say the best time to plant a tree, or buy land, was 20 years ago, and the second-best time is today.

CountyAreaAcres$/AcreList PriceSold PriceSale/ListDOM
ClayHenrietta120.07$5,150$714,000$618,30986.60%434
ClayBellevue159.44$6,184$981,000$985,959100.50%48
ClayHenrietta293$4,982$1,538,250$1,459,60094.90%212
ClayAverage190.84$5,438$1,077,750$1,021,28994.00%231
CollinAnna11.08$84,356$1,200,000$935,00077.90%634
CollinAverage11.08$84,356$1,200,000$935,00077.90%634
CookeMuenster11$18,000$209,000$198,00094.70%250
CookeGainesville19.3$16,580$345,000$320,00092.80%541
CookeValley View96.23$15,500$1,679,215$1,491,56588.80%194
CookeAverage42.18$16,693$744,405$669,85592.10%328
DentonSanger16.46$39,422$649,000$649,000100.00%47
DentonCross Roads10.35$97,575$1,200,000$1,010,00084.20%40
DentonSanger300$14,000$4,999,999$4,200,00084.00%1,327
DentonAubrey74.09$57,684$4,815,525$4,273,55088.70%302
DentonAverage100.22$52,170$2,916,131$2,533,13889.20%429
GraysonCollinsville11.61$46,516$600,000$540,00090.00%280
GraysonVan Alstyne18.8$58,511$1,175,000$1,100,00093.60%280
GraysonWhitesboro30$37,984$1,170,000$1,139,50697.40%277
GraysonAverage20.14$47,670$981,667$926,50293.70%237
JackNo sales reported——————
MontagueMontague485N/A$5,566,000N/AN/A333
MontagueBowie26$12,244$323,500$318,35298.40%743
MontagueMontague37.3$10,327$428,950$385,19589.80%1
MontagueSaint Jo1,185$7,764$10,000,000$9,199,82992.00%19
MontagueAverage433.33$10,112$4,079,613$3,301,12593.40%274
WiseSunset12$19,027$234,000$228,32097.60%16
WiseSunset12$19,027$234,000$228,32097.60%14
WiseChico11.44$24,476$299,000$280,00093.60%24
WiseChico10.25$29,265$315,000$300,00095.20%12
WiseAverage11.42$22,949$270,000$259,16096.00%17

DOM = days on market

Continue Reading
Ad
Ad
Ad

Trending