Connect with us

Farm & Ranch

Peach crop could be the best in years

Published

on

By: Robert Burns

Writer: Robert Burns, 903-834-6191, rd-burns@tamu.edu

COLLEGE STATION — Conditions are so favorable for an outstanding Texas peach crop this year that he almost hates to talk about them lest he jinxes the crop, joked Dr. Larry Stein, Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service horticulturist for fruits, nuts and vegetable crops at Uvalde.

“We’ve probably had the best chilling year we’ve had in many, many years,” Stein said. “We had a lot of cloudy, cool wet weather – not necessarily extremely cold weather, just cool and wet – which is ideal chilling weather for fruit trees. So the bloom on the trees has been just phenomenal this year, and the crop is potentially outstanding.”

Chilling hours are typically the number of hours of temperature between 32 and 45 degrees that a fruit tree needs to break dormancy. The minimum number of chilling hours a peach tree needs to produce a good crop varies with the variety, but this year all trees have received what they needed and more, he said.

This is true throughout the state, and not just in the Hill County, where a large part of the state’s peach crop is produced, Stein said. In previous years, good filling weather was offset by late freezes, but he doesn’t expect that to happen this year.

“Right now, we’ve dodged the bullet, so far, so to speak, on late freezes,” he said. “You almost don’t want to talk about it because we don’t want to jinx it going into the spring.”

Stein said if there are no hard freezes in the next two weeks, the crop will stay in very good shape.

Download or preview a two-minute MP3 audio version of this report
“Old-timers say Easter is the cutoff date for late freezes, and Easter is coming up this weekend,” he said. “So hopefully, we get past Easter and we’re done with the cold for this year.”

But even a late cold snap in the next two weeks is unlikely to hurt yield potential in many orchards now, Stein said.

“Most trees have bloomed out and we’re into the fruit-set stage, and once you have a small peach there, it will tolerate the cold pretty well,” he said. “Right now, it looks very promising.”

AgriLife Extension district reporters compiled the following summaries:

The 12 Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Districts

Central: Soil moisture, overall rangeland and pastures, and crops were in good condition. Producers were waiting for ground to dry for planting. Stock-water tanks were full. Small grains looked extremely good. The warmer weather stimulated winter forage to provide good grazing. Producers were applying herbicides to knock back weeds. Summer pastures had not started to green up yet. Cattle remained in good condition. Fruit trees wer e budding out, as were other trees and ornamentals. Pecan bud-break was in full process, with some growers beginning to spray for pests. Bees were beginning to swarm.

East: The region had several days of sunshine, warmer temperatures and windy weather, which helped dry out some areas. Fields in other areas still had saturated soils or standing water. More rain was expected this week. Forage conditions improved rapidly with the return of warmer sunny weather. Wet soils hampered fertilizer applications and weed control. Potato growers had to replant after the first sets rotted due to the wet conditions. Fruit trees were in full bloom. Insects of all types were beginning to emerge. Fire ants were an increasing problem due to the saturated conditions. Feral hogs were active. Beaver damage was on the rise in Harrison County. Cattle were holding their weight. Most producers stopped feeding hay and were tapering off feeding supplements. Beef markets remained extremely strong. Calving season continued. Spring cattle work began with producers vaccinating their herds.

Far West: The region had seasonal temperatures and no precipitation. Windy conditions on March 26 caused high fire danger in some counties. Subsoil and topsoil moisture were adequate to short. Pastures and rangeland were in fair condition and starting to green up. Cattle were doing well. Winter wheat was in fair condition and quickly improving from moisture received the previous week. Upland cotton was 100 percent planted. Oats were in fair to good condition. Alfalfa came out of dormancy and was growing.

North: The region had mild temperatures and scattered showers with mostly cloud-covered skies all week. One inch to 2 inches of rain fell across the region. Topsoil moisture was mostly adequate to surplus. Pastures continued to improve. Soils remained too wet in many areas to plant crops. Where conditions allowed, farmers were strip tilling and fertilizing. Irrigation of wheat, alfalfa and prewatering for summer crops was very active. Wheat looked good compared to the last several years, though insect activity was building, with reports of greenbugs and Russian wheat aphids. Stock-water tanks were full. Livestock were in good condition. Supplemental feeding of livestock and spring calving continued.

Panhandle: Temperatures were near to above average most of the week with no precipitation. Producers were cultivating cotton ground and applying preplant herbicides and fertilizer. Spring calves were being weaned. Irrigation of wheat, alfalfa and prewatering for summer crops was very active. Wheat looked good in some areas compared to the last several years, but the hot dry conditions were causing it to go downhill in others. Weeds such as Kochia and Russian thistle were a problem in rangeland that lost turf from years of drought. Some producers were opting to graze out their wheat by placing more stocker cattle on fields. Insect activity on wheat was building, with greenbugs and Russian wheat aphid being reported. Flies were already being seen on some cattle. Cattle remained in fair condition. Pastures were greening up with cool-season annuals. Rangeland and pastures varied from poor to fair condition, with most areas rep orting good to fair. Supplemental feeding of livestock and spring calving continued.

Rolling Plains: The agricultural outlook continued to improve on the heels of a mild and moisture-filled late winter. Rain fell across parts of the region for the second week in a row, with some counties reporting between 0.5 inch and 2 inches. Cropland was in good shape for spring fieldwork. Rangeland grasses were expected to show significant growth when sustained warmer weather returned. Winter wheat was improving. Livestock were in good condition. Peach trees were still blooming and beginning to leaf out. Stock-water tanks and lakes still needed runoff.

South: Scattered showers – some light and some a bit heavy — continued. Soil moisture remained mostly adequate. Although most of the area had partly cloudy to fairly clear skies, wet field conditions continued to delay planting, especially in the northern parts of the region. In the northern part of the region, some producers were planting hay. Potatoes were flowering and in good condition, and corn planting continued, with some early planted corn already emerging. Grain sorghum planting began. With warmer temperatures, spring forages were greening, but winter annuals continued to compete with warm-season grasses. Supplemental feeding of livestock declined, and cattle body condition scores remained fair to good. In the eastern part of the region, light rains coupled with sunshine boosted rangeland and pasture grass growth. Farmers in Jim Wells, Kleberg and Kenedy counties were still not able to begin planting any a dditional row crops due to excessive moisture in all fields. In the western part of the region, winter oats remained in good condition. Coastal Bermuda grass was good and green, and crop farmers were actively preparing soil and purchasing seeds for planting. Ranchers were lightly culling cattle, with hopes of building up their base herds, and supplemental feeding was light. In the southern part of the region, fields remained wet. There were reports of weed problems in row crop fields. Sugarcane harvesting remained at a standstill due to wet conditions, but citrus and vegetable harvesting continued. Fields were still too wet in many areas for tractors to make their way in to plant.

South Plains: The region had generally warm weather with clear skies, though wind gusts did reach 42 mph one day. Winter wheat continued to progress, with primary tillers beginning to joint in some fields. Producers were preparing for planting, applying herbicides, shredding stalks and listing seedbeds. Rangeland and pastures were in mostly fair to good condition, with warm-season grasses beginning to green up. Cattle were mostly in good condition and expected to improve during the next few weeks as pastures further improved.

Southeast: Soil-moisture levels throughout the region varied widely, but were mostly in the adequate to surplus range. Rangeland and pasture ratings varied widely too, mostly from excellent to good, with fair ratings being the most common. Pasture production was coming along well. Vegetables were being planted as field conditions allowed, but soils were too wet in many areas to plant anything. Some fields dried enough to allow corn planting. Corn planting in Waller County was still delayed due to wet conditions. Livestock water tanks were full. Cattle were eating less hay as warmer weather brought on grass growth. Livestock were in fair to good condition.

Southwest: Recent rains and sunny conditions jump started spring growth. Grasses were starting to grow. Soil moisture remained high throughout the region. Some corn emerged, and the planting of sorghum would resume as field conditions allowed. Temperatures were normal for this time of year. Livestock and wildlife had better grazing, but still may need to be supplemented until full spring conditions arrived.

West Central: The region had mild weather with warm days and cool nights. The warmer daytime temperatures dried out pastures and fields enough for producers to re-enter. Field activity and preparation continued for spring cotton planting. Some grain sorghum was planted. Cotton producers were spraying for spring weeds. Corn planting was underway where moisture conditions allowed. Winter wheat continued to improve and progress quickly. Some wheat was in flagging and/or boot stages. Rust on wheat was still being reported, with producers treating as necessary. Rangeland and pastures remained in good shape and continued to improve with warm-season grasses breaking dormancy and beginning to grow. Recent moisture and warmer temperatures initiated a fast spring-like green-up. Livestock remained in fair to good condition with green grass and other forages available. Most livestock producers no longer had to provide supplemental feed . Fruit and other trees were budding out.

-30-

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Forage Needs in the Fall

Published

on

By

By Savannah Magoteaux

Two bales can look almost identical and feed very differently. Color, smell and leafiness tell part of the story, but a forage test tells you what your cattle are actually being offered. If you buy hay by the ton or are trying to stretch winter feed, that little lab sheet can be one of the cheapest management tools on the place.

Reading the report

Start with dry matter. Hay contains water, and labs report nutrients either “as fed” or on a dry-matter basis. Feeds are easiest to compare on a dry-matter basis because it takes moisture out of the comparison. Hay that is 90 percent dry matter is about 10 percent water.

Crude protein, usually abbreviated CP, is the number most people recognize. It estimates protein from the forage’s nitrogen content. Higher isn’t automatically better. The goal is to match the hay to the animal. A dry, mature cow in mid-gestation doesn’t need the same protein as a lactating cow, a growing replacement heifer or a young calf.

Energy matters just as much. Beef cattle forage reports commonly estimate energy as total digestible nutrients, or TDN. Low-TDN hay may fill a cow up before it supplies enough energy, particularly when her requirements rise late in gestation or during lactation. That is when you may need better forage, an energy supplement or a different feeding plan.

Fiber numbers explain why some hay looks coarse and why animals may not be able to eat enough of it. Neutral detergent fiber, or NDF, is closely tied to intake. As NDF climbs, cattle generally eat less because the forage moves through the digestive tract more slowly. Acid detergent fiber, or ADF, is tied to digestibility. Higher ADF generally means lower digestibility.

Some reports also include relative feed value or relative forage quality. These indexes help compare lots of forage, particularly alfalfa and mixed hay, but they aren’t a complete ration. They don’t replace looking at protein, energy, minerals, animal class and expected intake.

Then come the numbers you hope are boring. Nitrate testing matters when drought, heavy nitrogen fertilization, cloudy weather or other conditions have stressed the forage enough to cause nitrate accumulation. Sorghum-type forages, johnsongrass, corn and some weeds deserve particular attention. Nitrates stay in hay after it is cut and baled, so a risky crop doesn’t become safe just because it dried.

Minerals deserve a look, but this is where a hay report gets harder to interpret. Calcium, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium and other minerals may be listed, yet a complete mineral program depends on water, other feeds and local conditions. A high number isn’t always an advantage. Excessive potassium, for example, can interfere with magnesium use under some circumstances. If you are balancing a ration for high-risk animals, work with a nutritionist or Extension specialist rather than treating the lab sheet as a stand-alone mineral prescription.

Moisture tells another story. Hay baled too wet is at greater risk of heating and mold, and very wet hay can become a fire hazard as microbial activity raises its internal temperature. A test taken months later can’t reconstruct every storage problem, so inspect the stack, too. A musty odor, visible mold, unusual heat and dark discoloration are all reasons to investigate.

Getting a good sample

A hay test is only as good as the sample, and sampling is the step most likely to ruin a good analysis. A handful pulled from the outside of one convenient bale doesn’t represent a stack of 100 bales. Round bales aren’t uniform from the outside to the center, and one bale may not represent the whole cutting.

Texas A&M AgriLife recommends using a hay probe and collecting cores from multiple bales in a lot, then combining them into one representative sample. A coring probe reaches through the layers of the bale and gives the lab a much better cross-section. Test different cuttings, fields or hay types separately, and don’t blend samples from separate fields or cuttings to save the cost of a test if you will feed them as separate lots.

Putting the numbers to work

The most useful way to read the report is backward from the cattle. What class of animal will eat this hay, at what stage of production, and how much is she likely to eat? Once you answer those questions, the lab numbers start to mean something.

A mature dry cow in good body condition can often use lower-quality forage than a first-calf heifer nursing a calf. Young cattle need nutrients for growth on top of maintenance, and cold stress raises energy demand. A hay test becomes valuable when you pair it with those real-world differences.

Remember that price per bale isn’t the same as price per unit of nutrition. A cheap bale with very low energy and protein may require expensive supplementation, and better hay can turn out to be the lower-cost feed once you count waste and supplements.

Before buying, try putting two hay reports side by side. Compare dry matter, crude protein, TDN and fiber first. Then add delivered cost and likely feeding waste. A heavier, denser bale isn’t automatically more economical, and a greener bale isn’t automatically more nutritious. The numbers make the comparison fair.

Testing is especially valuable after a hard weather year. Drought hay may be lower in yield and higher in nitrate risk. Mature, rain-damaged hay may test lower in protein and energy than it looks. Hay cut from a fertilized field after stress may deserve a safety screen before it ever reaches a feeder.

A forage test won’t make poor hay better. It shows you where the gaps are before your cattle show them through lost condition or lower performance. One report can’t answer every feeding question, but it replaces several guesses with measurements, and that makes winter nutrition planning much more accurate.

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

When Acorns Become a Problem

Published

on

By

By Savannah Magoteaux

A heavy crop of acorns under an oak tree usually looks more like a sign of fall than a livestock problem. For most cattle in most years, that is all it is. Trouble starts when acorns stop being an occasional bite and become a meaningful part of the diet.

Oak leaves, buds and acorns contain tannins that can damage the digestive tract and kidneys when cattle eat enough of them. Green acorns are generally considered more toxic than mature brown ones, but either can cause problems if cattle eat too many.

The risk climbs when forage is short and cattle go looking for something else to eat. Drought, overgrazed pastures or simply a heavy acorn crop can set up that situation.

Cattle aren’t equally interested in acorns. A few animals in a herd may eat far more than the rest, which helps explain why cases can appear scattered.

Early signs can be vague. Affected cattle may go off feed, look depressed or become constipated. As the damage progresses, you may see dark or bloody manure, abdominal pain, frequent urination followed by reduced urine output, dehydration and weakness. Kidney failure is the most serious concern.

You can’t remove every acorn from a wooded pasture, so prevention comes down to keeping cattle from relying on them. Adequate forage and supplementation take away the incentive to eat large amounts.

You can also fence cattle away from heavily producing oaks for a while, especially when pasture conditions are poor. If several animals seem to be seeking out acorns, take a close look at the rest of the ration instead of assuming they will quit on their own.

If you suspect oak poisoning, call a veterinarian early. Treatment is supportive and does much more good before severe kidney damage sets in. Moving unaffected cattle away from the source and providing good-quality feed and water may prevent more cases.

Acorns are an important fall food for deer, squirrels and other wildlife, and a few acorns generally don’t spell disaster for cattle. The concern is quantity. A pasture full of oaks becomes a different management problem when grass is short, cattle are hungry and the ground is covered with something they are willing to eat.

Oak toxicity comes up most often in cattle, but other livestock can be affected, too. And the risk isn’t limited to acorns. Oak buds and young leaves also contain tannins, so spring can occasionally bring problems as well. In fall, though, the obvious temptation is lying on the ground where cattle can eat it quickly.

Watch where your cattle spend their time. If cows that normally graze open grass start camping under oaks and hunting acorns, that behavior tells you something.

Walk the pasture, estimate how much usable forage is left and check whether a few dominant animals are eating more than the rest. Hay or supplemental feed may help, but place it where all the cattle can reach it rather than assuming one feeder will solve the problem.

Oak poisoning can look like other illnesses, and no one can diagnose kidney damage from pasture observation alone. A veterinarian may use history, clinical signs and lab work to separate it from dehydration, digestive disease or other toxicities. That is another reason to mention a heavy acorn crop when you call. A detail that seems like an ordinary part of fall can be an important part of the history.

Your pasture plan doesn’t have to be complicated. If one wooded trap has a much heavier acorn crop than the rest, use another pasture while you still have the choice.

If you can’t move the herd, make sure hay and supplement are adequate before the animals get hungry enough to seek out acorns aggressively. Salt or mineral by itself won’t make up for a shortage of forage.

The problem usually fades as cattle eat through the crop or the acorns weather or get covered. Don’t return cattle that have already shown signs as soon as they look better, though. Kidney injury can be serious. Follow your veterinarian’s recommendations and reassess the pasture before turning recovered animals back out.

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Land Market Report

Published

on

By

By Jared Groce

Late summer has been brutal on our livestock, our grass and the rural land market in North Texas. We currently have an astounding 42 months of inventory on hand in our report area, and the only properties selling are the ones priced right. Overpriced properties aren’t even getting looked at, much less receiving offers, so pricing your property correctly matters more than ever right now.

Many sellers are still picturing the daily price increases we saw in 2020 to 2023, but those days are behind us, and agents need to be more realistic with listing prices to get any activity for their clients. Hopefully the rains will come soon and bring more land buyers with them this fall, but right now it is still very much a buyer’s market. No one knows how long this dry spell will last, but it will likely take a flood to end it. The same is true of the weather!

They say the best time to plant a tree, or buy land, was 20 years ago, and the second-best time is today.

CountyAreaAcres$/AcreList PriceSold PriceSale/ListDOM
ClayHenrietta120.07$5,150$714,000$618,30986.60%434
ClayBellevue159.44$6,184$981,000$985,959100.50%48
ClayHenrietta293$4,982$1,538,250$1,459,60094.90%212
ClayAverage190.84$5,438$1,077,750$1,021,28994.00%231
CollinAnna11.08$84,356$1,200,000$935,00077.90%634
CollinAverage11.08$84,356$1,200,000$935,00077.90%634
CookeMuenster11$18,000$209,000$198,00094.70%250
CookeGainesville19.3$16,580$345,000$320,00092.80%541
CookeValley View96.23$15,500$1,679,215$1,491,56588.80%194
CookeAverage42.18$16,693$744,405$669,85592.10%328
DentonSanger16.46$39,422$649,000$649,000100.00%47
DentonCross Roads10.35$97,575$1,200,000$1,010,00084.20%40
DentonSanger300$14,000$4,999,999$4,200,00084.00%1,327
DentonAubrey74.09$57,684$4,815,525$4,273,55088.70%302
DentonAverage100.22$52,170$2,916,131$2,533,13889.20%429
GraysonCollinsville11.61$46,516$600,000$540,00090.00%280
GraysonVan Alstyne18.8$58,511$1,175,000$1,100,00093.60%280
GraysonWhitesboro30$37,984$1,170,000$1,139,50697.40%277
GraysonAverage20.14$47,670$981,667$926,50293.70%237
JackNo sales reported——————
MontagueMontague485N/A$5,566,000N/AN/A333
MontagueBowie26$12,244$323,500$318,35298.40%743
MontagueMontague37.3$10,327$428,950$385,19589.80%1
MontagueSaint Jo1,185$7,764$10,000,000$9,199,82992.00%19
MontagueAverage433.33$10,112$4,079,613$3,301,12593.40%274
WiseSunset12$19,027$234,000$228,32097.60%16
WiseSunset12$19,027$234,000$228,32097.60%14
WiseChico11.44$24,476$299,000$280,00093.60%24
WiseChico10.25$29,265$315,000$300,00095.20%12
WiseAverage11.42$22,949$270,000$259,16096.00%17

DOM = days on market

Continue Reading
Ad
Ad
Ad

Trending