Farm & Ranch
Arctic blast unlikely to hurt newly emerged wheat
Writer: Robert Burns, 903-834-6191, rd-burns@tamu.edu
COLLEGE STATION – It’s highly unlikely the sub-freezing weather will damage any of the state’s winter wheat crop, even newly emerged plants, according to a Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service expert.
“It would have to get pretty darn cold for it to do any damage to the wheat,” said Dr. Clark Neely, AgriLife Extension small grains and oilseed specialist, College Station. “If you have a healthy crop, winter wheat can handle temperatures below zero Fahrenheit prior to vernalization.”
Vernalization refers to a certain number of chilling hours a plant must experience before it switches from vegetative to reproductive growth, he said.
Winter wheat can be damaged in certain instances, such as when a cold front comes through and there’s a sudden 50-degree temperature swing, but even then it is rare, Neely said.
“Soil temperatures are also still relatively warm, which will help protect plants,” he said.
From reports Neely received from area specialists, temperatures got down to freezing in the more northern parts of the state on the morning of Nov. 10, and may be in the mid-20s on Nov. 11, he said.
“I don’t expect to see damage, though,” Neely said. “I don’t think it got cold enough quick enough for us to see any damage.”
In fact, the early cold weather may be good for winter wheat, but may reduce fall growth for grazing.
“This cold snap we had should go a long way to hardening the crop off,” he said.
Neely explained that “hardening off” refers to wheat acclimating to colder temperatures.
“Overall, we’re sitting pretty good for both canola and wheat crops across the state,” he said. “Most of the Blacklands has recharged soil moisture profiles at the moment. This past week we got 1 to 3 inches across a wide swathe of the state, from South Texas all the way up to north East Texas. The Rolling Plains and the High Plains could always use a bit more moisture, but they’re in a lot better shape than they were last year. So I think the crop is off to a good start up there too.”
Neely added that forecast of a “moderately wet” winter because of a weak El Nino would be “ideal” for the state’s wheat and canola crops.
AgriLife Extension district reporters compiled the following summaries:
Central: Most counties reported soil moisture, rangeland and pastures and crop conditions as good. Overall, livestock were also in good condition. The region received good rains, and small grains were looking good. Bermuda grass pastures were recovering, but a predicted frost will likely bring an end to growth. Wheat and oats emerged. Rangeland was in fair to good condition. The pecan crop looked promising. Livestock were in good condition. Stock-tank water levels were good, and creeks and rivers were up, all of which provided ample drinking water for livestock. The rains also provided excellent forage production. Livestock numbers were strong.
Coastal Bend: The counties received steady, soaking rains as a front moved slowly through the area. Most counties received from 1.5 to 3.5 inches of rain. Winter pastures got a boost from the rains, as did wheat and oats. The pecan harvest was delayed by the rains. Most field activities were on hold due to sloppy conditions.
East: Subsoil moisture varied widely throughout the counties, from 90 percent surplus in Henderson County to 75 percent short in Angelina County. In many counties, a common report was a fairly even split between adequate and short moisture levels. Pasture and rangeland ratings varied widely as well, from 100 percent poor to mostly good, with good being the most common rating. From 1 inch to 4 inches of rain fell in some areas, which when coupled with cooler weather gave cool-season forages a boost. Producers were beginning to supply supplemental feed for the winter. Fall vegetables were doing well. Lake and pond levels improved. Calf weaning and cow culling neared completion. Livestock were in good condition due to great summer conditions that supplied sufficient summer grazing. Producers finished harvesting warm-season forages, and the majority of cool season forages were planted and emerging. Fall calving was in pro gress. F eral hogs damaged pastures.
Far West: Warm days and cool nights were the norm, with much of the area receiving from 0.3 inch to 1.5 inches of rain. Glasscock, Upton, and Presidio counties received from 2 to 4 inches of rain. Subsoil moisture ranged from fair to very poor. Topsoil moisture was from adequate to short. Upland cotton was in fair to poor condition, with the harvest in various stages of progress from county to county. Most corn and grain sorghum were harvested. The sunflower harvest was completed. Most winter wheat had emerged and was in fair to poor condition. The El Paso County cotton harvest was on hold because of wet conditions. Pecan shuck separation was in progress, with some pecan nuts falling. Alfalfa was slowly growing after recent rains. Another light cutting might be possible when fields dry out.
North: Topsoil moisture was mostly adequate, with a few counties reporting surplus. About 2 inches of rain fell across the region. The rains came very slowly, which greatly benefited newly planted wheat and winter annual pastures. Warm-season forage growth was minimal as temperatures cooled. Winter pastures were starting to grow in most areas. Acorns, persimmons and pecans were bountiful. Livestock were in good condition. The feral hog population was on the rise, and the invasive species continued to cause damage.
Panhandle: Temperatures were up and down for the week — cool at first, then warming to slightly above average by the weekend. Soil moisture varied from very short to adequate, with most counties reporting short to adequate. From a trace to 2 inches of rain fell in isolated areas. Most of the region experienced the first freeze of the season about midweek. The Collingsworth County cotton harvest was stalled by wet conditions until late in the week. However, the rain significantly improved the wheat crop. Deaf Smith County producers had a good week with most corn harvested before the forecast arctic blast that came Nov. 11. Grain sorghum was doing well with many acres getting harvested, and about average yields so far. Earlier plantings of winter wheat were progressing well, though many acres had yet to be planted. Producers were turning stockers into graze on the earliest plantings of wheat — if they could procure the cattle. Hansford County remained very dry and cool. The cotton harvest there was in full swing, except for a couple of days when it was too windy to strip. In Dallam and Hartley counties, the corn harvest wound down as the sorghum and cotton harvests got started in earnest. Most cow/calf producers had already weaned spring calves. Most cattle were in good condition, but livestock producers were still doctoring calves for respiratory and shipping fever, which was typical for this time of year as temperatures fluctuated widely. Rangeland and pastures were rated mostly fair to good.
Rolling Plains: Parts of the region got up to 1.25 inches of rain, while others remained dry. Winter wheat used for grazing that received rain was responding well. Some wheat looked especially good, but other fields had bit knocked back by infestations of armyworms and grubs. With the much colder temperatures, native and improved warm-season pastures showed little to no growth. Producers continued to over-seed small grains onto summer pastures. Cotton gins were running consistently in some counties. Yields from irrigated cotton acres were good. Livestock remained in good to fair condition. A large portion of the spring calf crop was sold during the past few weeks with excellent prices received. Stock-water tanks and lakes remained in great need of runoff water. The pecan harvest continued with good yields reported.
South: A cold front brought moderate to heavy rainfall and cooler temperatures, halting field activities but benefiting rangeland and pastures. In the northern part of the region, from 2 to 4.5 inches of rain boosted soil moisture to 60 to 100 percent adequate in all counties. The rain slowed peanut harvesting in Atascosa and Frio counties. McMullen County rangeland and pastures showed great response to the rain, but the cooler weather slowed growth. Livestock producers were able to reduce supplemental feeding. Cattle body conditions scores continued to improve as most cowherds completed calf weaning. In the eastern part of the region, 2 to 3 inches of rain was common, with some areas getting 5 inches. The rain came slowly, with minimal runoff. Soil moisture was 50 to 100 percent adequate through the area. Producers were making plans to start planting wheat as a result of the added moisture. Livestock remained in good con dition with prices remaining high for both feeder and replacement cattle. The western part of the region, also received quite a lot of rain, which supplied moisture to recently planted wheat. Where field conditions were dry enough, producers were preparing fields for crops such as winter oats. In Zavala County, the rains delayed cabbage harvesting, but otherwise benefited the crop, as well as spinach and onions. Native forages on local ranches were improved by the rain. Stock-tank water levels were improved by runoff in areas that received harder and faster rains. Soil moisture was 40 to 100 percent adequate throughout the area. In the southern part of the region, the rains halted harvesting, though all fall vegetable crops were progressing well. Soil moisture was 100 percent adequate in Cameron and Hidalgo counties, 80 percent short in Starr County and 45 percent adequate in Willacy County. Rangeland and pasture conditions were fair to good.
South Plains: Parts of the region received from 1 inch to nearly 3 inches of rain, which brought the cotton harvest to a standstill in some counties. But strippers were expected to be back out in fields in full force soon. Where bolls were open, the rains may have caused a slight discoloration in cotton lint. Many producers were applying defoliants and desiccants. So far, cotton yields were are mostly good but were expected to vary widely before the harvest is completed. Rangeland and pastures were in good to excellent condition, as were livestock. Area wheat fields were in very good condition. Hockley County grain sorghum producers had all but completed this year’s harvest. In Mitchell County, the cotton harvest was in full swing, but many of acres had to be shredded. Total ginned bales were expected to be down from last year.
Southeast: Soil-moisture was mostly in the adequate to surplus range, with Hardin County reporting 100 percent adequate. Rangeland and pasture ratings varied widely, but were mostly fair to poor, with fair ratings being the most common. Rain was greatly welcomed by hay producers who fertilized pastures in recent weeks. However, the forecasted additional rain and cool weather would slow grass growth. Livestock were in good condition. Cool-season forages were doing well, and clover emerged.
Southwest: From 1 inch to 4 inches of rain fell, benefiting rangeland, oats and wheat. However, there was not much runoff, and stock tanks remained low. The pecan harvest continued with decent yields so far. Livestock and wildlife were in extremely good condition. The hunting season was much more active than previous years, and the rut was still in full swing. Kinney County reported a 250-pound white-tailed buck having been taken, which would make it a ranch-weight record.
West Central: The region had mild days with cool nights. Most areas reported a good soaking rain from 1 inch to 3 inches. The rain helped replenish soil moisture and allowed fall planting to continue. Producers continued to plant small grains as fields dried out. A forecast cold front was expected to drop temperatures to freezing and below for several days. Wheat was responding well to rain and warm temperatures, but the wet weather halted cotton harvesting and wheat planting. Rangeland and pastures were in good condition going into the winter. The recent moisture also promoted cool-season grass growth and green-up. Fall cattle work continued. Livestock remained in fair to good condition. The pecan harvest was well underway with good yields so far. Hunting season began, and deer were in good condition.
-30-
Farm & Ranch
Forage Needs in the Fall
By Savannah Magoteaux
Two bales can look almost identical and feed very differently. Color, smell and leafiness tell part of the story, but a forage test tells you what your cattle are actually being offered. If you buy hay by the ton or are trying to stretch winter feed, that little lab sheet can be one of the cheapest management tools on the place.
Reading the report
Start with dry matter. Hay contains water, and labs report nutrients either “as fed” or on a dry-matter basis. Feeds are easiest to compare on a dry-matter basis because it takes moisture out of the comparison. Hay that is 90 percent dry matter is about 10 percent water.
Crude protein, usually abbreviated CP, is the number most people recognize. It estimates protein from the forage’s nitrogen content. Higher isn’t automatically better. The goal is to match the hay to the animal. A dry, mature cow in mid-gestation doesn’t need the same protein as a lactating cow, a growing replacement heifer or a young calf.
Energy matters just as much. Beef cattle forage reports commonly estimate energy as total digestible nutrients, or TDN. Low-TDN hay may fill a cow up before it supplies enough energy, particularly when her requirements rise late in gestation or during lactation. That is when you may need better forage, an energy supplement or a different feeding plan.
Fiber numbers explain why some hay looks coarse and why animals may not be able to eat enough of it. Neutral detergent fiber, or NDF, is closely tied to intake. As NDF climbs, cattle generally eat less because the forage moves through the digestive tract more slowly. Acid detergent fiber, or ADF, is tied to digestibility. Higher ADF generally means lower digestibility.
Some reports also include relative feed value or relative forage quality. These indexes help compare lots of forage, particularly alfalfa and mixed hay, but they aren’t a complete ration. They don’t replace looking at protein, energy, minerals, animal class and expected intake.
Then come the numbers you hope are boring. Nitrate testing matters when drought, heavy nitrogen fertilization, cloudy weather or other conditions have stressed the forage enough to cause nitrate accumulation. Sorghum-type forages, johnsongrass, corn and some weeds deserve particular attention. Nitrates stay in hay after it is cut and baled, so a risky crop doesn’t become safe just because it dried.
Minerals deserve a look, but this is where a hay report gets harder to interpret. Calcium, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium and other minerals may be listed, yet a complete mineral program depends on water, other feeds and local conditions. A high number isn’t always an advantage. Excessive potassium, for example, can interfere with magnesium use under some circumstances. If you are balancing a ration for high-risk animals, work with a nutritionist or Extension specialist rather than treating the lab sheet as a stand-alone mineral prescription.
Moisture tells another story. Hay baled too wet is at greater risk of heating and mold, and very wet hay can become a fire hazard as microbial activity raises its internal temperature. A test taken months later can’t reconstruct every storage problem, so inspect the stack, too. A musty odor, visible mold, unusual heat and dark discoloration are all reasons to investigate.
Getting a good sample
A hay test is only as good as the sample, and sampling is the step most likely to ruin a good analysis. A handful pulled from the outside of one convenient bale doesn’t represent a stack of 100 bales. Round bales aren’t uniform from the outside to the center, and one bale may not represent the whole cutting.
Texas A&M AgriLife recommends using a hay probe and collecting cores from multiple bales in a lot, then combining them into one representative sample. A coring probe reaches through the layers of the bale and gives the lab a much better cross-section. Test different cuttings, fields or hay types separately, and don’t blend samples from separate fields or cuttings to save the cost of a test if you will feed them as separate lots.
Putting the numbers to work
The most useful way to read the report is backward from the cattle. What class of animal will eat this hay, at what stage of production, and how much is she likely to eat? Once you answer those questions, the lab numbers start to mean something.
A mature dry cow in good body condition can often use lower-quality forage than a first-calf heifer nursing a calf. Young cattle need nutrients for growth on top of maintenance, and cold stress raises energy demand. A hay test becomes valuable when you pair it with those real-world differences.
Remember that price per bale isn’t the same as price per unit of nutrition. A cheap bale with very low energy and protein may require expensive supplementation, and better hay can turn out to be the lower-cost feed once you count waste and supplements.
Before buying, try putting two hay reports side by side. Compare dry matter, crude protein, TDN and fiber first. Then add delivered cost and likely feeding waste. A heavier, denser bale isn’t automatically more economical, and a greener bale isn’t automatically more nutritious. The numbers make the comparison fair.
Testing is especially valuable after a hard weather year. Drought hay may be lower in yield and higher in nitrate risk. Mature, rain-damaged hay may test lower in protein and energy than it looks. Hay cut from a fertilized field after stress may deserve a safety screen before it ever reaches a feeder.
A forage test won’t make poor hay better. It shows you where the gaps are before your cattle show them through lost condition or lower performance. One report can’t answer every feeding question, but it replaces several guesses with measurements, and that makes winter nutrition planning much more accurate.
Farm & Ranch
When Acorns Become a Problem
By Savannah Magoteaux
A heavy crop of acorns under an oak tree usually looks more like a sign of fall than a livestock problem. For most cattle in most years, that is all it is. Trouble starts when acorns stop being an occasional bite and become a meaningful part of the diet.
Oak leaves, buds and acorns contain tannins that can damage the digestive tract and kidneys when cattle eat enough of them. Green acorns are generally considered more toxic than mature brown ones, but either can cause problems if cattle eat too many.
The risk climbs when forage is short and cattle go looking for something else to eat. Drought, overgrazed pastures or simply a heavy acorn crop can set up that situation.
Cattle aren’t equally interested in acorns. A few animals in a herd may eat far more than the rest, which helps explain why cases can appear scattered.
Early signs can be vague. Affected cattle may go off feed, look depressed or become constipated. As the damage progresses, you may see dark or bloody manure, abdominal pain, frequent urination followed by reduced urine output, dehydration and weakness. Kidney failure is the most serious concern.
You can’t remove every acorn from a wooded pasture, so prevention comes down to keeping cattle from relying on them. Adequate forage and supplementation take away the incentive to eat large amounts.
You can also fence cattle away from heavily producing oaks for a while, especially when pasture conditions are poor. If several animals seem to be seeking out acorns, take a close look at the rest of the ration instead of assuming they will quit on their own.
If you suspect oak poisoning, call a veterinarian early. Treatment is supportive and does much more good before severe kidney damage sets in. Moving unaffected cattle away from the source and providing good-quality feed and water may prevent more cases.
Acorns are an important fall food for deer, squirrels and other wildlife, and a few acorns generally don’t spell disaster for cattle. The concern is quantity. A pasture full of oaks becomes a different management problem when grass is short, cattle are hungry and the ground is covered with something they are willing to eat.
Oak toxicity comes up most often in cattle, but other livestock can be affected, too. And the risk isn’t limited to acorns. Oak buds and young leaves also contain tannins, so spring can occasionally bring problems as well. In fall, though, the obvious temptation is lying on the ground where cattle can eat it quickly.
Watch where your cattle spend their time. If cows that normally graze open grass start camping under oaks and hunting acorns, that behavior tells you something.
Walk the pasture, estimate how much usable forage is left and check whether a few dominant animals are eating more than the rest. Hay or supplemental feed may help, but place it where all the cattle can reach it rather than assuming one feeder will solve the problem.
Oak poisoning can look like other illnesses, and no one can diagnose kidney damage from pasture observation alone. A veterinarian may use history, clinical signs and lab work to separate it from dehydration, digestive disease or other toxicities. That is another reason to mention a heavy acorn crop when you call. A detail that seems like an ordinary part of fall can be an important part of the history.
Your pasture plan doesn’t have to be complicated. If one wooded trap has a much heavier acorn crop than the rest, use another pasture while you still have the choice.
If you can’t move the herd, make sure hay and supplement are adequate before the animals get hungry enough to seek out acorns aggressively. Salt or mineral by itself won’t make up for a shortage of forage.
The problem usually fades as cattle eat through the crop or the acorns weather or get covered. Don’t return cattle that have already shown signs as soon as they look better, though. Kidney injury can be serious. Follow your veterinarian’s recommendations and reassess the pasture before turning recovered animals back out.
Farm & Ranch
Land Market Report
By Jared Groce
Late summer has been brutal on our livestock, our grass and the rural land market in North Texas. We currently have an astounding 42 months of inventory on hand in our report area, and the only properties selling are the ones priced right. Overpriced properties aren’t even getting looked at, much less receiving offers, so pricing your property correctly matters more than ever right now.
Many sellers are still picturing the daily price increases we saw in 2020 to 2023, but those days are behind us, and agents need to be more realistic with listing prices to get any activity for their clients. Hopefully the rains will come soon and bring more land buyers with them this fall, but right now it is still very much a buyer’s market. No one knows how long this dry spell will last, but it will likely take a flood to end it. The same is true of the weather!
They say the best time to plant a tree, or buy land, was 20 years ago, and the second-best time is today.
| County | Area | Acres | $/Acre | List Price | Sold Price | Sale/List | DOM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clay | Henrietta | 120.07 | $5,150 | $714,000 | $618,309 | 86.60% | 434 |
| Clay | Bellevue | 159.44 | $6,184 | $981,000 | $985,959 | 100.50% | 48 |
| Clay | Henrietta | 293 | $4,982 | $1,538,250 | $1,459,600 | 94.90% | 212 |
| Clay | Average | 190.84 | $5,438 | $1,077,750 | $1,021,289 | 94.00% | 231 |
| Collin | Anna | 11.08 | $84,356 | $1,200,000 | $935,000 | 77.90% | 634 |
| Collin | Average | 11.08 | $84,356 | $1,200,000 | $935,000 | 77.90% | 634 |
| Cooke | Muenster | 11 | $18,000 | $209,000 | $198,000 | 94.70% | 250 |
| Cooke | Gainesville | 19.3 | $16,580 | $345,000 | $320,000 | 92.80% | 541 |
| Cooke | Valley View | 96.23 | $15,500 | $1,679,215 | $1,491,565 | 88.80% | 194 |
| Cooke | Average | 42.18 | $16,693 | $744,405 | $669,855 | 92.10% | 328 |
| Denton | Sanger | 16.46 | $39,422 | $649,000 | $649,000 | 100.00% | 47 |
| Denton | Cross Roads | 10.35 | $97,575 | $1,200,000 | $1,010,000 | 84.20% | 40 |
| Denton | Sanger | 300 | $14,000 | $4,999,999 | $4,200,000 | 84.00% | 1,327 |
| Denton | Aubrey | 74.09 | $57,684 | $4,815,525 | $4,273,550 | 88.70% | 302 |
| Denton | Average | 100.22 | $52,170 | $2,916,131 | $2,533,138 | 89.20% | 429 |
| Grayson | Collinsville | 11.61 | $46,516 | $600,000 | $540,000 | 90.00% | 280 |
| Grayson | Van Alstyne | 18.8 | $58,511 | $1,175,000 | $1,100,000 | 93.60% | 280 |
| Grayson | Whitesboro | 30 | $37,984 | $1,170,000 | $1,139,506 | 97.40% | 277 |
| Grayson | Average | 20.14 | $47,670 | $981,667 | $926,502 | 93.70% | 237 |
| Jack | No sales reported | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Montague | Montague | 485 | N/A | $5,566,000 | N/A | N/A | 333 |
| Montague | Bowie | 26 | $12,244 | $323,500 | $318,352 | 98.40% | 743 |
| Montague | Montague | 37.3 | $10,327 | $428,950 | $385,195 | 89.80% | 1 |
| Montague | Saint Jo | 1,185 | $7,764 | $10,000,000 | $9,199,829 | 92.00% | 19 |
| Montague | Average | 433.33 | $10,112 | $4,079,613 | $3,301,125 | 93.40% | 274 |
| Wise | Sunset | 12 | $19,027 | $234,000 | $228,320 | 97.60% | 16 |
| Wise | Sunset | 12 | $19,027 | $234,000 | $228,320 | 97.60% | 14 |
| Wise | Chico | 11.44 | $24,476 | $299,000 | $280,000 | 93.60% | 24 |
| Wise | Chico | 10.25 | $29,265 | $315,000 | $300,000 | 95.20% | 12 |
| Wise | Average | 11.42 | $22,949 | $270,000 | $259,160 | 96.00% | 17 |
DOM = days on market
-
Country Lifestyles4 years agoScott & Stacey Schumacher: A Growth Mindset
-
Country Lifestyles10 years agoStyle Your Profile – What your style cowboy hat says about you and new trends in 2017
-
Horsefeathers13 years agoMount Scott: Country Humor with David Gregory
-
Outdoor11 years agoButtercup or Primrose?
-
Country Lifestyles10 years agoJune 2016 Profile – The man behind the mic: Bob Tallman
-
HOME10 years agoGrazing North Texas – Wilman Lovegrass
-
Country Lifestyles10 years agoDecember 2016 Profile, Rusty Riddle – The Riddle Way
-
The Natural Horseman9 years agoThis is why we do what we do — RayeAnn and Cisco




