Farm & Ranch
Southwest Texas deer crop expected to be great this year
Writer: Robert Burns, 903-834-6191, rd-burns@tamu.edu
COLLEGE STATION – Deer hunting in Southwest Texas is expected to be “really terrific” this year thanks to timely rains, according to Dr. Rob Hogan, Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service economist, Uvalde.
“Though it hasn’t been a year with a lot of moisture from the beginning, when we really needed it, the moisture came, from Memorial Day on,” Hogan said. “There’s been a lot of grass made, a lot of browsing material, such as forbs, and a tremendous acorn crop.”
Good browsing means more and larger deer and can even affect the size and development of racks, he said.
“There was also a lot of oilseed made, and already we’ve had reports of good dove hunting,” Hogan said.
Deer hunting has a huge economic impact upon the 21-county Southwest AgriLife Extension district, which stretches from Sutton County at its northwest corner to Bastrop County, east of Austin, he said. The yearly average economic impact from 2010 through 2013 was about $550 million.
“Every hunter that comes to the region spends about $2,000 to hunt an average of 13 days,” Hogan said. “Oddly, enough, Texans are their own best customers. About 89 percent of the people who hunted in Texas are Texans.”
By far, the favorite animals to hunt in Texas are deer, he said. In the past few years, landowners have built a lot of high fences for deer farming.
“So there are a lot of exotic species to go along with our native white-tailed deer,” Hogan said. “There are a lot of fallow deer, exotic antelope and axis deer, which are a favorite because they have such a terrific rack.”
AgriLife Extension district reporters compiled the following summaries:
Central: Most counties reported the condition of soil moisture, rangeland and pastures, and crop conditions as fair. Overall, livestock were in good condition. After rains two weeks ago — along with warmer weather — most Bermuda grass fields were recovering from the drought. Small grains looked much better. Livestock were in good condition. Some producers who planted oats early were turning cattle into graze. Wheat and oats that were planted in the previous week needed rain, but rain was in the forecast. Many producers are planting more wheat instead of corn due to projected prices. Forages were generally in good shape.
Coastal Bend: Days were warm with temperatures in the low 80s and little humidity, with cool nights. The pecan harvest of earlier maturing varieties began. Farmers were catching up on fieldwork in preparation for the 2015 season. Fall activities were continuing at a normal pace with the exception of those rushing to take a last hay cutting before frost. Cattle were in good condition. After recent rains, most producers were optimistic about the next growing season but concerned about projected low commodity prices.
East: The haying season wound down. Producers had harvested a tremendous amount of hay. With cooler temperatures, winter pastures made good progress but could have used more rain. Most counties were in need of rain. Many producers continued to plant cooler-temperature forages. Counties in the western and southern areas reported short topsoil and subsoil moisture levels. Trinity County had high winds that dried out topsoils. Cattle remained in good to excellent condition. Many producers were finding it a hard choice to retain ownership of any potential replacement heifers with current market value. Fall calving was in progress. Feral hogs were active, and damage continued.
Far West: The region was dry and cool. Glasscock County had strong winds Nov. 1 – 2 that caused cotton to drop bolls on the ground. Subsoil and topsoil moisture ranged from adequate to short. Pasture and rangeland were rated fair to very poor. Upland cotton was generally in fair to good condition, with some fields harvested and others with bolls still opening. Grain sorghum was from 72 to 80 percent harvested. The sunflower harvest was completed. From 45 to 100 percent of winter wheat was emerged across the region. Glasscock County reported wheat was suffering from moisture stress, with newly emerged stands struggling and many fields starting to die. Other fields had skimpy stands. In El Paso County, Pawnee pecans were harvested, with Western varieties at 40 percent pecan shuck separation.
North: Topsoil moisture was adequate to short throughout the region, with no significant rains. Daytime temperatures were in the 70s, with nighttime lows in the 50s. Some low-lying parts of Bowie County had the first official freeze in the early morning of Nov. 1. The freezing temperatures were accompanied by a heavy frost. Pastures looked good, but some producers had to start providing supplemental feed to cattle. Winter wheat planting was nearly finished in some counties. Winter pasture grasses were emerging. Livestock were in good condition, though horn fly pressure remained high. The feral hog population was on the rise and continued to cause damage throughout the area.
Panhandle: Temperatures were near to slightly above average for most of the week. No moisture was received. The cotton harvest was in full swing in Collingsworth County and coming along in Hansford and Hall counties. Yields were better than anticipated. In other counties, low temperatures over the weekend helped knock some leaves off cotton, but in lieu of a real killing freeze, some farmers were spraying defoliants to aid harvest. The Hansford County peanut harvest was completed. Yields and quality were slightly above average. Deaf Smith County corn was doing very well, with many fields finally drying out. Grain sorghum there was doing well too, with several fields harvested with good yields being reported. Hay crops were still being swathed and baled, with many acres yet to be harvested. Deaf Smith producers were scurrying to get crops harvested and to get wheat planted before the freeze. Wheat was looking good, though it needed rain, but there were a few producers grazing cattle on wheat already. The Hall County peanut harvest was going well. The Hansford County corn harvest was finished except for about 1,000 acres that were hailed out early and had to be replanted. Soybean yields were averaging 60 to 65 bushels per acre. Producers were planting wheat behind the corn harvest. The Lipscomb County corn harvest was almost completed, and the grain sorghum harvest was underway. Ochiltree County wheat planting was completed. Stands looked excellent. The corn harvest was nearing completion, though some late-planted fields still needed to dry down. All Wheeler County corn was harvested except for some late-planted fields.
Rolling Plains: Rain showers fell in parts of the region, with as much as 1.25 inches reported. Other parts of the region remained dry. Wheat fields that received rain were responding and showing new growth. Some wheat looked really good, while other fields were hit by armyworms and grubs. With much cooler temperatures all week, native and improved warm-season pastures showed little to no growth. Producers continue to overseed small grains into summer pastures. Cotton gins were running constantly in some counties. Yields from irrigated acres were good. Livestock remained in good to fair condition. A good portion of the spring calf crop was sold over the last few weeks with excellent prices received. Stock water tanks and lakes still needed runoff water. The pecan harvest continued, with good yields reported.
South: Temperatures throughout the region were much cooler, with scattered showers later in the week. In the northern part of the region, from 0.75 to 1 inch of rain was received. Peanut harvesting was slowed by the rain. The planting of wheat and oats was completed, with most of the crop emerged. Rangeland and pasture remained mostly in fair condition. Supplemental feeding remained steady. Cattle body condition scores were low to fair as producers weaned spring calves. Soil moisture was mostly adequate in Atascosa and Frio counties, and short in McMullen County. In the eastern part of the region, Brooks County reported 0.56 inch of rain. Jim Hogg County reported moisture in the form of early-morning fog, but no rain. Jim Wells County forage conditions declined due to lack of rain. Overall, rangeland and pastures remained in fair to good condition. Livestock producers continued supplemental feeding. Soil moisture was shor t throughout most of the area, except in Brooks County, where it was adequate. The western part of the region only received light showers. Field preparations for next season’s crops continued. Webb County growers were planting winter oats. Livestock producers continued supplemental feeding and were stocking up on hay for the winter. Some producers were rebuilding herds. However, the restocking process was proceeding slowly due to the high costs of replacements. In Zavala County, pecan harvesting continued, and irrigated cabbage, onions and spinach were progressing well. Soil moisture was mostly adequate in Dimmit, Maverick and Zavala counties, with Webb County reporting short levels. In the southern part of the region, Cameron County received light showers late in the week, and crop producers reported all crops progressing well. Hidalgo County growers were planting onions and cabbage. In Starr County, fall vegetable crops were doing well, and hay baling continued. Willacy County r eceived 0.5 inch of rain. Soil moisture was mostly adequate in Cameron, Hidalgo and Willacy counties, and short in the Starr County.
South Plains: The cotton harvest was in full swing throughout the region, with many producers using harvest aids, hoping they could finish before bad weather set in. The Floyd County harvest will be ‘spread out’ this year due to early rains and hail that required many fields to be replanted. The harvesting of cotton, grain and corn will likely continue until December. The weather was dry, and cooler temperatures were expected for the coming week. Garza County reported that regrowth in cotton was difficult to control after rains last month. Cotton yields appeared to vary widely from dryland and irrigated crops. Rangeland and pastures were still mostly in good to excellent condition. Lubbock County producers increased harvest efforts during a dry week in advance of increasing rain chances. Approximately half of the cotton crop there received harvest-aid treatments. Some early planted grain sorghum has been harvested , but re planted sorghum and corn remained in the field. Winter wheat looked good. Swisher County producers were also hustling to defoliate cotton before a rain or freeze. The grain sorghum harvest there was in full swing even though moisture levels were high and yields are lower than expected. The second and third cuttings of hay grazer were finished, and wheat was in great condition. Some wheat fields had been negatively affected by early signs of rust and green bug infestations. Silage harvesting in Bailey County was nearly done, and cotton harvesting began, with average yields reported.
Southwest: Dry weather continued with no rain and cooler temperatures. Winter pastures needed rain. Row crops, pastures and rangeland remained in good condition. The pecan harvest was ongoing, as well as planting of small grains for grazing. The sesame harvest began. Some late-season hay harvesting continued. Fly populations declined, and producers began supplemental feeding of cattle on rangeland. Most native grasses had seeded and gone dormant. Livestock and wildlife were in good condition. Browsing for deer, including acorns, was very plentiful.
West Central: The entire area needed rain. Dry, windy conditions depleted soil moisture. Daytime temperatures were mild and nights cool. Producers increased field activities, mainly planting small grains. Some wheat was planted, but most growers were waiting on a rain. Early planted small grains were mostly in good condition but were beginning to show moisture stress. The cotton harvest was in full swing, with mostly good yields. Some late-planted fields were being sprayed with harvest aids. All late-planted sorghum was harvested. Some end-of-season hay harvesting continued. Rangeland and pastures were in fair condition and still looked good but will need moisture soon to keep winter grasses growing. Livestock remained in fair to good condition. Fall cattle work was ongoing. Pecan harvesting began with promising early yields.
-30-
Farm & Ranch
Forage Needs in the Fall
By Savannah Magoteaux
Two bales can look almost identical and feed very differently. Color, smell and leafiness tell part of the story, but a forage test tells you what your cattle are actually being offered. If you buy hay by the ton or are trying to stretch winter feed, that little lab sheet can be one of the cheapest management tools on the place.
Reading the report
Start with dry matter. Hay contains water, and labs report nutrients either “as fed” or on a dry-matter basis. Feeds are easiest to compare on a dry-matter basis because it takes moisture out of the comparison. Hay that is 90 percent dry matter is about 10 percent water.
Crude protein, usually abbreviated CP, is the number most people recognize. It estimates protein from the forage’s nitrogen content. Higher isn’t automatically better. The goal is to match the hay to the animal. A dry, mature cow in mid-gestation doesn’t need the same protein as a lactating cow, a growing replacement heifer or a young calf.
Energy matters just as much. Beef cattle forage reports commonly estimate energy as total digestible nutrients, or TDN. Low-TDN hay may fill a cow up before it supplies enough energy, particularly when her requirements rise late in gestation or during lactation. That is when you may need better forage, an energy supplement or a different feeding plan.
Fiber numbers explain why some hay looks coarse and why animals may not be able to eat enough of it. Neutral detergent fiber, or NDF, is closely tied to intake. As NDF climbs, cattle generally eat less because the forage moves through the digestive tract more slowly. Acid detergent fiber, or ADF, is tied to digestibility. Higher ADF generally means lower digestibility.
Some reports also include relative feed value or relative forage quality. These indexes help compare lots of forage, particularly alfalfa and mixed hay, but they aren’t a complete ration. They don’t replace looking at protein, energy, minerals, animal class and expected intake.
Then come the numbers you hope are boring. Nitrate testing matters when drought, heavy nitrogen fertilization, cloudy weather or other conditions have stressed the forage enough to cause nitrate accumulation. Sorghum-type forages, johnsongrass, corn and some weeds deserve particular attention. Nitrates stay in hay after it is cut and baled, so a risky crop doesn’t become safe just because it dried.
Minerals deserve a look, but this is where a hay report gets harder to interpret. Calcium, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium and other minerals may be listed, yet a complete mineral program depends on water, other feeds and local conditions. A high number isn’t always an advantage. Excessive potassium, for example, can interfere with magnesium use under some circumstances. If you are balancing a ration for high-risk animals, work with a nutritionist or Extension specialist rather than treating the lab sheet as a stand-alone mineral prescription.
Moisture tells another story. Hay baled too wet is at greater risk of heating and mold, and very wet hay can become a fire hazard as microbial activity raises its internal temperature. A test taken months later can’t reconstruct every storage problem, so inspect the stack, too. A musty odor, visible mold, unusual heat and dark discoloration are all reasons to investigate.
Getting a good sample
A hay test is only as good as the sample, and sampling is the step most likely to ruin a good analysis. A handful pulled from the outside of one convenient bale doesn’t represent a stack of 100 bales. Round bales aren’t uniform from the outside to the center, and one bale may not represent the whole cutting.
Texas A&M AgriLife recommends using a hay probe and collecting cores from multiple bales in a lot, then combining them into one representative sample. A coring probe reaches through the layers of the bale and gives the lab a much better cross-section. Test different cuttings, fields or hay types separately, and don’t blend samples from separate fields or cuttings to save the cost of a test if you will feed them as separate lots.
Putting the numbers to work
The most useful way to read the report is backward from the cattle. What class of animal will eat this hay, at what stage of production, and how much is she likely to eat? Once you answer those questions, the lab numbers start to mean something.
A mature dry cow in good body condition can often use lower-quality forage than a first-calf heifer nursing a calf. Young cattle need nutrients for growth on top of maintenance, and cold stress raises energy demand. A hay test becomes valuable when you pair it with those real-world differences.
Remember that price per bale isn’t the same as price per unit of nutrition. A cheap bale with very low energy and protein may require expensive supplementation, and better hay can turn out to be the lower-cost feed once you count waste and supplements.
Before buying, try putting two hay reports side by side. Compare dry matter, crude protein, TDN and fiber first. Then add delivered cost and likely feeding waste. A heavier, denser bale isn’t automatically more economical, and a greener bale isn’t automatically more nutritious. The numbers make the comparison fair.
Testing is especially valuable after a hard weather year. Drought hay may be lower in yield and higher in nitrate risk. Mature, rain-damaged hay may test lower in protein and energy than it looks. Hay cut from a fertilized field after stress may deserve a safety screen before it ever reaches a feeder.
A forage test won’t make poor hay better. It shows you where the gaps are before your cattle show them through lost condition or lower performance. One report can’t answer every feeding question, but it replaces several guesses with measurements, and that makes winter nutrition planning much more accurate.
Farm & Ranch
When Acorns Become a Problem
By Savannah Magoteaux
A heavy crop of acorns under an oak tree usually looks more like a sign of fall than a livestock problem. For most cattle in most years, that is all it is. Trouble starts when acorns stop being an occasional bite and become a meaningful part of the diet.
Oak leaves, buds and acorns contain tannins that can damage the digestive tract and kidneys when cattle eat enough of them. Green acorns are generally considered more toxic than mature brown ones, but either can cause problems if cattle eat too many.
The risk climbs when forage is short and cattle go looking for something else to eat. Drought, overgrazed pastures or simply a heavy acorn crop can set up that situation.
Cattle aren’t equally interested in acorns. A few animals in a herd may eat far more than the rest, which helps explain why cases can appear scattered.
Early signs can be vague. Affected cattle may go off feed, look depressed or become constipated. As the damage progresses, you may see dark or bloody manure, abdominal pain, frequent urination followed by reduced urine output, dehydration and weakness. Kidney failure is the most serious concern.
You can’t remove every acorn from a wooded pasture, so prevention comes down to keeping cattle from relying on them. Adequate forage and supplementation take away the incentive to eat large amounts.
You can also fence cattle away from heavily producing oaks for a while, especially when pasture conditions are poor. If several animals seem to be seeking out acorns, take a close look at the rest of the ration instead of assuming they will quit on their own.
If you suspect oak poisoning, call a veterinarian early. Treatment is supportive and does much more good before severe kidney damage sets in. Moving unaffected cattle away from the source and providing good-quality feed and water may prevent more cases.
Acorns are an important fall food for deer, squirrels and other wildlife, and a few acorns generally don’t spell disaster for cattle. The concern is quantity. A pasture full of oaks becomes a different management problem when grass is short, cattle are hungry and the ground is covered with something they are willing to eat.
Oak toxicity comes up most often in cattle, but other livestock can be affected, too. And the risk isn’t limited to acorns. Oak buds and young leaves also contain tannins, so spring can occasionally bring problems as well. In fall, though, the obvious temptation is lying on the ground where cattle can eat it quickly.
Watch where your cattle spend their time. If cows that normally graze open grass start camping under oaks and hunting acorns, that behavior tells you something.
Walk the pasture, estimate how much usable forage is left and check whether a few dominant animals are eating more than the rest. Hay or supplemental feed may help, but place it where all the cattle can reach it rather than assuming one feeder will solve the problem.
Oak poisoning can look like other illnesses, and no one can diagnose kidney damage from pasture observation alone. A veterinarian may use history, clinical signs and lab work to separate it from dehydration, digestive disease or other toxicities. That is another reason to mention a heavy acorn crop when you call. A detail that seems like an ordinary part of fall can be an important part of the history.
Your pasture plan doesn’t have to be complicated. If one wooded trap has a much heavier acorn crop than the rest, use another pasture while you still have the choice.
If you can’t move the herd, make sure hay and supplement are adequate before the animals get hungry enough to seek out acorns aggressively. Salt or mineral by itself won’t make up for a shortage of forage.
The problem usually fades as cattle eat through the crop or the acorns weather or get covered. Don’t return cattle that have already shown signs as soon as they look better, though. Kidney injury can be serious. Follow your veterinarian’s recommendations and reassess the pasture before turning recovered animals back out.
Farm & Ranch
Land Market Report
By Jared Groce
Late summer has been brutal on our livestock, our grass and the rural land market in North Texas. We currently have an astounding 42 months of inventory on hand in our report area, and the only properties selling are the ones priced right. Overpriced properties aren’t even getting looked at, much less receiving offers, so pricing your property correctly matters more than ever right now.
Many sellers are still picturing the daily price increases we saw in 2020 to 2023, but those days are behind us, and agents need to be more realistic with listing prices to get any activity for their clients. Hopefully the rains will come soon and bring more land buyers with them this fall, but right now it is still very much a buyer’s market. No one knows how long this dry spell will last, but it will likely take a flood to end it. The same is true of the weather!
They say the best time to plant a tree, or buy land, was 20 years ago, and the second-best time is today.
| County | Area | Acres | $/Acre | List Price | Sold Price | Sale/List | DOM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clay | Henrietta | 120.07 | $5,150 | $714,000 | $618,309 | 86.60% | 434 |
| Clay | Bellevue | 159.44 | $6,184 | $981,000 | $985,959 | 100.50% | 48 |
| Clay | Henrietta | 293 | $4,982 | $1,538,250 | $1,459,600 | 94.90% | 212 |
| Clay | Average | 190.84 | $5,438 | $1,077,750 | $1,021,289 | 94.00% | 231 |
| Collin | Anna | 11.08 | $84,356 | $1,200,000 | $935,000 | 77.90% | 634 |
| Collin | Average | 11.08 | $84,356 | $1,200,000 | $935,000 | 77.90% | 634 |
| Cooke | Muenster | 11 | $18,000 | $209,000 | $198,000 | 94.70% | 250 |
| Cooke | Gainesville | 19.3 | $16,580 | $345,000 | $320,000 | 92.80% | 541 |
| Cooke | Valley View | 96.23 | $15,500 | $1,679,215 | $1,491,565 | 88.80% | 194 |
| Cooke | Average | 42.18 | $16,693 | $744,405 | $669,855 | 92.10% | 328 |
| Denton | Sanger | 16.46 | $39,422 | $649,000 | $649,000 | 100.00% | 47 |
| Denton | Cross Roads | 10.35 | $97,575 | $1,200,000 | $1,010,000 | 84.20% | 40 |
| Denton | Sanger | 300 | $14,000 | $4,999,999 | $4,200,000 | 84.00% | 1,327 |
| Denton | Aubrey | 74.09 | $57,684 | $4,815,525 | $4,273,550 | 88.70% | 302 |
| Denton | Average | 100.22 | $52,170 | $2,916,131 | $2,533,138 | 89.20% | 429 |
| Grayson | Collinsville | 11.61 | $46,516 | $600,000 | $540,000 | 90.00% | 280 |
| Grayson | Van Alstyne | 18.8 | $58,511 | $1,175,000 | $1,100,000 | 93.60% | 280 |
| Grayson | Whitesboro | 30 | $37,984 | $1,170,000 | $1,139,506 | 97.40% | 277 |
| Grayson | Average | 20.14 | $47,670 | $981,667 | $926,502 | 93.70% | 237 |
| Jack | No sales reported | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Montague | Montague | 485 | N/A | $5,566,000 | N/A | N/A | 333 |
| Montague | Bowie | 26 | $12,244 | $323,500 | $318,352 | 98.40% | 743 |
| Montague | Montague | 37.3 | $10,327 | $428,950 | $385,195 | 89.80% | 1 |
| Montague | Saint Jo | 1,185 | $7,764 | $10,000,000 | $9,199,829 | 92.00% | 19 |
| Montague | Average | 433.33 | $10,112 | $4,079,613 | $3,301,125 | 93.40% | 274 |
| Wise | Sunset | 12 | $19,027 | $234,000 | $228,320 | 97.60% | 16 |
| Wise | Sunset | 12 | $19,027 | $234,000 | $228,320 | 97.60% | 14 |
| Wise | Chico | 11.44 | $24,476 | $299,000 | $280,000 | 93.60% | 24 |
| Wise | Chico | 10.25 | $29,265 | $315,000 | $300,000 | 95.20% | 12 |
| Wise | Average | 11.42 | $22,949 | $270,000 | $259,160 | 96.00% | 17 |
DOM = days on market
-
Country Lifestyles4 years agoScott & Stacey Schumacher: A Growth Mindset
-
Country Lifestyles10 years agoStyle Your Profile – What your style cowboy hat says about you and new trends in 2017
-
Horsefeathers13 years agoMount Scott: Country Humor with David Gregory
-
Outdoor11 years agoButtercup or Primrose?
-
Country Lifestyles10 years agoJune 2016 Profile – The man behind the mic: Bob Tallman
-
HOME10 years agoGrazing North Texas – Wilman Lovegrass
-
Country Lifestyles10 years agoDecember 2016 Profile, Rusty Riddle – The Riddle Way
-
The Natural Horseman9 years agoThis is why we do what we do — RayeAnn and Cisco




