Farm & Ranch
[AgriLife Today] Texas Crop and Weather Report for Oct. 18
By: Adam Russell
Texas’ top cotton region appears to be having a good 2016
- Writer: Adam Russell, 903-834-6191, adam.russell@ag.tamu.edu
- Contact: Dr. Seth Byrd, 806-746-6101, seth.byrd@ag.tamu.edu; Dr. Gaylon Morgan, 979-845-0870, gdmorgan@tamu.edu
LUBBOCK – Good late-summer rains improved conditions for cotton in the Rolling and High Plains regions of Texas and likely mean an above-average crop for 2016, according to Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service experts.
Dr. Seth Byrd, AgriLife Extension cotton agronomist, Lubbock, said cotton harvests in two top cotton producing regions began on a small scale a few weeks ago but should ramp up soon. So far, the cotton fields there look better than expected.
“Producers had low expectations for dryland fields because of a hot, dry July, but they seem happy with where the crop is at this point,” he said.
Byrd said leaf grades, which are determined by the amount of plant material left in lint, was a big issue last year. With about 4,000 bales ginned, Byrd said this year’s small sampling of cotton showed leaf grades in the 2-3 range.
“It’s pretty clean cotton so far,” he said.
Dr. Gaylon Morgan, AgriLife Extension state cotton specialist, College Station, visited the Rolling Plains last week and said overall, fields represented “one of the better crops they’ve had in quite some time.
“They caught some more timely rains than previous years and the dryland crop looks like it could be 25 percent better than average, especially in the Northern Rolling Plains.”
Not enough cotton had been harvested to give a good indication about fiber quality, Morgan said.
He said there were issues with weather, pests and diseases. Hail storms led to substantial damage for isolated fields, and stink bugs surprised producers by the amount of damage they caused in some areas. Bacterial blight also impacted production in some of the northern tier counties of the Rolling Plains.
Byrd and Morgan said irrigated fields looked very good and the rainfall also reduced irrigation costs. Morgan estimated 10-15 percent of dryland fields were defoliated, while irrigated and late–planted fields still had a significant number of green bolls.
Morgan said temperatures were at or above 90 degrees and were expected to remain in the region for a while before cooler temperatures return. Fields in the Rolling Plains were planted later than usual due to late May rains, and fields in the High Plains, which are typically harvested late, could be later than usual also.
There remains some concern of frost for some late maturing cotton, Byrd said.
“They’ll be up against a freeze at some point but weather the past two weeks and the forecast for the near future is perfect for maturing cotton,” he said.
AgriLife Extension district reporters compiled the following summaries:
CENTRAL: Armyworms were still present, but the numbers and damage seemed to be dropping. Small grains not eaten by armyworms looked very good. Pecan harvests started and looked good. Cotton harvest was in full swing and nearing completion. Field preparation for winter wheat was underway. Cattle were doing well without supplemental feed. Wheat and oats were almost all planted. Soybean harvests neared completion. Many forage producers battled grassburs in their fields. Most counties reported good soil moisture and fair pasture and rangeland conditions. Most crop conditions were fair as well.
ROLLING PLAINS: No report was available.
COASTAL BEND: Warm temperatures and humid conditions prevailed with highs around 90. Soil moisture levels continued to decline due to the lack of rainfall and unseasonably warm temperatures. Dry field conditions allowed tractors to remove remaining cotton stalks and catch up on fallow land preparation for 2017. Pecan and soybean harvests continued. Hay and forage were in ample supply. Some livestock operations held back last year’s calves to take advantage of high prices, however, cattle prices were lower than expected.
EAST: The district remained hot and dry. Counties needed rain, and several reported drought conditions. Harrison County was under a burn ban. Pond levels were dropping. A cool front moved through the area bringing rain to only a few counties with amounts from a few tenths to more than 1.5 inches. Pasture and range conditions were fair to good. Some producers in Smith and Wood counties were waiting to see if it would rain before preparing ground for winter pastures. Subsoil and topsoil conditions were adequate to short with some counties reporting very short. Hay production in Cherokee County came to a halt due to lack of rain coupled with cool temperatures. Producers were still baling hay in Houston County but grass growth stalled in most places so yields were not good. Upshur County reported final hay cuttings were taking place. Some producers in Smith County hoped to cut additional hay but curing was a problem due to weather conditions. Livestock were in fair to good condition. Cattle were calving and fall cattle work was underway. Cattle prices continued to drop. Smith County producers were weaning calves with some holding replacements. In Polk County, most spring-born calves were marketed but at a price well below last year. Pregnancy checking and culling continued. Predator control was underway in Upshur County.
SOUTH PLAINS: Conditions were warm and dry for most of the district. Some areas experienced cool damp conditions for a few days. Topsoil and subsoil moisture levels in Cochran County were still adequate. Peanut, corn and sorghum harvests continued. Cotton continued to mature. Producers were defoliating most area cotton fields. Cotton harvests were kicking off in some areas, and the moisture was enough to keep farmers out of the fields for a few days. The average yield for irrigated cotton was expected to be three to four bales per acre. Planting of winter wheat continued. Pastures and rangeland continued to improve with the recent moisture, and cattle were in good condition. Rain was received in some areas. Floyd County received anywhere from 0.3-0.8 of an inch of rain, and Lubbock County reported 0.4 of an inch to 1.7 inches. Corn and sorghum were still maturing. Wheat could use rain.
PANHANDLE: The district reported above-average temperatures. Weather was very cool and windy. Some moisture was received. Measurements were from 0.5-1 inch of rain. Soil moisture was mostly adequate. Deaf Smith County producers were close to wrapping up corn harvests. Yield reports were all over the board. Some producers reported very low to average yields while some were above average. Producers blamed low yields on the July heat wave. Sugarcane aphids were still causing problems in area sorghum fields with many producers applying second and third applications of insecticides. Winter wheat planting was ongoing with some of the earlier plantings emerging. Some wheat was irrigated, and cattle were placed on some for grazing. Insect and disease pressures were plaguing some area wheat plantings. Producers will replant some fields. Silage harvests were wrapping up. Hansford County corn harvests were underway. Corn was making around 250 bushels per acre and under. Some late-planted corn could be very late maturing. Soybean harvests started, and yields were better than expected. A few milo fields were harvested, but some fields need a freeze to mature. Randall County was unseasonably warm with daytime temperatures in the lower 80s. Cattle remained in good to fair shape. Rangeland and pastures were mostly fair to good but continued to decline.
NORTH: Topsoil and subsoil moisture levels varied from adequate to short. Weather was dry with warm days and mild nights and little rain. Grass was holding up, but the cool nights slowed growth. Grain farmers continued to plant wheat even though soil moisture was very low. The armyworm problem continued, but was not as bad as a few weeks ago. Early planted wheat was sprayed to combat armyworms. Soybean harvests continued with yields of about 20-25 bushels per acre. Cotton was being harvested, but no yield reports were available yet. Livestock were in good condition. Calf weights were heavy due to the abundance of grass. Spring calves were weaned and doing well on the late warm-season pastures. The cattle market was depressed, and producers hoped for a bounce in prices. Fly and mosquito numbers were still high.
FAR WEST: Temperatures were in the low 90s but dropped drastically with a cold front. Rain showers occurred with amounts ranging up to 1.5 inches. Rangeland grasses were showing stress in drier areas. Many producers were defoliating cotton but were hampered due to the high humidity. Cotton yields were decent so far. Wheat and hay grazer baling started. Supplemental feeding of livestock and wildlife continued.
WEST CENTRAL: Wheat was planted. Cotton bolls were opening and some farmers applied harvest aids. Producers made a final cutting of hay. Properly managed pastures and forages still looked good. Armyworms continued to be a problem. Temperatures were higher than normal before a cold front late in the week brought light showers. Wheat planting was expected to begin soon. Cattle were in excellent condition going into the winter months.
SOUTHEAST: In Fort Bend County, the livestock were in good condition. Producers cut and baled hay. Cotton was harvested with some remaining fields being destroyed relative to insurance claims. Soybeans were in poor condition, and many will likely be destroyed due to insurance requirements. In Montgomery County, hot and dry conditions were delaying the establishment of winter annuals in pastures. Regrowth slowed on grazed pastures. Weed populations continued to manifest with thin stands for grass. A few scattered showers were received but not enough to leave puddles. In Jefferson County, the pastures and fields were in good condition. Livestock were doing well. Soil-moisture levels throughout the district ranged widely from adequate to short, with most ratings in the adequate range.
SOUTHWEST: Producers hoped the next cold front would bring some rain, as land was starting to crack due to dry conditions in some areas. Topsoil moisture conditions continued to decline. All harvests were completed or nearing completion, and farmers were preparing to start planting winter crops. Pecan harvests continued. Rangelands and livestock continued in good to fair conditions.
SOUTH: Warm daytime temperatures and cool nighttime temperatures continued throughout the district. Conditions were hot and dry in some areas, including highs in the 90s and up to 100 degrees. Rangeland and pastures were good in some areas and began to show signs of stress as a result of the lack of rainfall in other parts of the district. Harvesting and planting activities increased. Peanut harvests were underway and irrigation pivots were running constantly. The cotton harvest was complete. Wheat and oats planting continued. There were some reports of armyworms in hayfields. Body condition scores on cattle remained good, while the cattle market remained low but constant. Wildlife populations remained in great shape for the fall hunting season. Some hunters were preparing their deer leases. Spinach planting for both fresh market and processed spinach was active. Cotton harvests kept gins very busy. The pecan harvest was still more than a week away. Yields and quality were expected to be average to above average. Cabbage made good progress after irrigation, and wheat planting continued. Sugarcane harvests were ongoing, and early orange harvests picked up momentum. Onions were being planted.
-30-
Find more stories, photos, videos and audio at http://today.agrilife.org
Farm & Ranch
Forage Needs in the Fall
By Savannah Magoteaux
Two bales can look almost identical and feed very differently. Color, smell and leafiness tell part of the story, but a forage test tells you what your cattle are actually being offered. If you buy hay by the ton or are trying to stretch winter feed, that little lab sheet can be one of the cheapest management tools on the place.
Reading the report
Start with dry matter. Hay contains water, and labs report nutrients either “as fed” or on a dry-matter basis. Feeds are easiest to compare on a dry-matter basis because it takes moisture out of the comparison. Hay that is 90 percent dry matter is about 10 percent water.
Crude protein, usually abbreviated CP, is the number most people recognize. It estimates protein from the forage’s nitrogen content. Higher isn’t automatically better. The goal is to match the hay to the animal. A dry, mature cow in mid-gestation doesn’t need the same protein as a lactating cow, a growing replacement heifer or a young calf.
Energy matters just as much. Beef cattle forage reports commonly estimate energy as total digestible nutrients, or TDN. Low-TDN hay may fill a cow up before it supplies enough energy, particularly when her requirements rise late in gestation or during lactation. That is when you may need better forage, an energy supplement or a different feeding plan.
Fiber numbers explain why some hay looks coarse and why animals may not be able to eat enough of it. Neutral detergent fiber, or NDF, is closely tied to intake. As NDF climbs, cattle generally eat less because the forage moves through the digestive tract more slowly. Acid detergent fiber, or ADF, is tied to digestibility. Higher ADF generally means lower digestibility.
Some reports also include relative feed value or relative forage quality. These indexes help compare lots of forage, particularly alfalfa and mixed hay, but they aren’t a complete ration. They don’t replace looking at protein, energy, minerals, animal class and expected intake.
Then come the numbers you hope are boring. Nitrate testing matters when drought, heavy nitrogen fertilization, cloudy weather or other conditions have stressed the forage enough to cause nitrate accumulation. Sorghum-type forages, johnsongrass, corn and some weeds deserve particular attention. Nitrates stay in hay after it is cut and baled, so a risky crop doesn’t become safe just because it dried.
Minerals deserve a look, but this is where a hay report gets harder to interpret. Calcium, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium and other minerals may be listed, yet a complete mineral program depends on water, other feeds and local conditions. A high number isn’t always an advantage. Excessive potassium, for example, can interfere with magnesium use under some circumstances. If you are balancing a ration for high-risk animals, work with a nutritionist or Extension specialist rather than treating the lab sheet as a stand-alone mineral prescription.
Moisture tells another story. Hay baled too wet is at greater risk of heating and mold, and very wet hay can become a fire hazard as microbial activity raises its internal temperature. A test taken months later can’t reconstruct every storage problem, so inspect the stack, too. A musty odor, visible mold, unusual heat and dark discoloration are all reasons to investigate.
Getting a good sample
A hay test is only as good as the sample, and sampling is the step most likely to ruin a good analysis. A handful pulled from the outside of one convenient bale doesn’t represent a stack of 100 bales. Round bales aren’t uniform from the outside to the center, and one bale may not represent the whole cutting.
Texas A&M AgriLife recommends using a hay probe and collecting cores from multiple bales in a lot, then combining them into one representative sample. A coring probe reaches through the layers of the bale and gives the lab a much better cross-section. Test different cuttings, fields or hay types separately, and don’t blend samples from separate fields or cuttings to save the cost of a test if you will feed them as separate lots.
Putting the numbers to work
The most useful way to read the report is backward from the cattle. What class of animal will eat this hay, at what stage of production, and how much is she likely to eat? Once you answer those questions, the lab numbers start to mean something.
A mature dry cow in good body condition can often use lower-quality forage than a first-calf heifer nursing a calf. Young cattle need nutrients for growth on top of maintenance, and cold stress raises energy demand. A hay test becomes valuable when you pair it with those real-world differences.
Remember that price per bale isn’t the same as price per unit of nutrition. A cheap bale with very low energy and protein may require expensive supplementation, and better hay can turn out to be the lower-cost feed once you count waste and supplements.
Before buying, try putting two hay reports side by side. Compare dry matter, crude protein, TDN and fiber first. Then add delivered cost and likely feeding waste. A heavier, denser bale isn’t automatically more economical, and a greener bale isn’t automatically more nutritious. The numbers make the comparison fair.
Testing is especially valuable after a hard weather year. Drought hay may be lower in yield and higher in nitrate risk. Mature, rain-damaged hay may test lower in protein and energy than it looks. Hay cut from a fertilized field after stress may deserve a safety screen before it ever reaches a feeder.
A forage test won’t make poor hay better. It shows you where the gaps are before your cattle show them through lost condition or lower performance. One report can’t answer every feeding question, but it replaces several guesses with measurements, and that makes winter nutrition planning much more accurate.
Farm & Ranch
When Acorns Become a Problem
By Savannah Magoteaux
A heavy crop of acorns under an oak tree usually looks more like a sign of fall than a livestock problem. For most cattle in most years, that is all it is. Trouble starts when acorns stop being an occasional bite and become a meaningful part of the diet.
Oak leaves, buds and acorns contain tannins that can damage the digestive tract and kidneys when cattle eat enough of them. Green acorns are generally considered more toxic than mature brown ones, but either can cause problems if cattle eat too many.
The risk climbs when forage is short and cattle go looking for something else to eat. Drought, overgrazed pastures or simply a heavy acorn crop can set up that situation.
Cattle aren’t equally interested in acorns. A few animals in a herd may eat far more than the rest, which helps explain why cases can appear scattered.
Early signs can be vague. Affected cattle may go off feed, look depressed or become constipated. As the damage progresses, you may see dark or bloody manure, abdominal pain, frequent urination followed by reduced urine output, dehydration and weakness. Kidney failure is the most serious concern.
You can’t remove every acorn from a wooded pasture, so prevention comes down to keeping cattle from relying on them. Adequate forage and supplementation take away the incentive to eat large amounts.
You can also fence cattle away from heavily producing oaks for a while, especially when pasture conditions are poor. If several animals seem to be seeking out acorns, take a close look at the rest of the ration instead of assuming they will quit on their own.
If you suspect oak poisoning, call a veterinarian early. Treatment is supportive and does much more good before severe kidney damage sets in. Moving unaffected cattle away from the source and providing good-quality feed and water may prevent more cases.
Acorns are an important fall food for deer, squirrels and other wildlife, and a few acorns generally don’t spell disaster for cattle. The concern is quantity. A pasture full of oaks becomes a different management problem when grass is short, cattle are hungry and the ground is covered with something they are willing to eat.
Oak toxicity comes up most often in cattle, but other livestock can be affected, too. And the risk isn’t limited to acorns. Oak buds and young leaves also contain tannins, so spring can occasionally bring problems as well. In fall, though, the obvious temptation is lying on the ground where cattle can eat it quickly.
Watch where your cattle spend their time. If cows that normally graze open grass start camping under oaks and hunting acorns, that behavior tells you something.
Walk the pasture, estimate how much usable forage is left and check whether a few dominant animals are eating more than the rest. Hay or supplemental feed may help, but place it where all the cattle can reach it rather than assuming one feeder will solve the problem.
Oak poisoning can look like other illnesses, and no one can diagnose kidney damage from pasture observation alone. A veterinarian may use history, clinical signs and lab work to separate it from dehydration, digestive disease or other toxicities. That is another reason to mention a heavy acorn crop when you call. A detail that seems like an ordinary part of fall can be an important part of the history.
Your pasture plan doesn’t have to be complicated. If one wooded trap has a much heavier acorn crop than the rest, use another pasture while you still have the choice.
If you can’t move the herd, make sure hay and supplement are adequate before the animals get hungry enough to seek out acorns aggressively. Salt or mineral by itself won’t make up for a shortage of forage.
The problem usually fades as cattle eat through the crop or the acorns weather or get covered. Don’t return cattle that have already shown signs as soon as they look better, though. Kidney injury can be serious. Follow your veterinarian’s recommendations and reassess the pasture before turning recovered animals back out.
Farm & Ranch
Land Market Report
By Jared Groce
Late summer has been brutal on our livestock, our grass and the rural land market in North Texas. We currently have an astounding 42 months of inventory on hand in our report area, and the only properties selling are the ones priced right. Overpriced properties aren’t even getting looked at, much less receiving offers, so pricing your property correctly matters more than ever right now.
Many sellers are still picturing the daily price increases we saw in 2020 to 2023, but those days are behind us, and agents need to be more realistic with listing prices to get any activity for their clients. Hopefully the rains will come soon and bring more land buyers with them this fall, but right now it is still very much a buyer’s market. No one knows how long this dry spell will last, but it will likely take a flood to end it. The same is true of the weather!
They say the best time to plant a tree, or buy land, was 20 years ago, and the second-best time is today.
| County | Area | Acres | $/Acre | List Price | Sold Price | Sale/List | DOM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clay | Henrietta | 120.07 | $5,150 | $714,000 | $618,309 | 86.60% | 434 |
| Clay | Bellevue | 159.44 | $6,184 | $981,000 | $985,959 | 100.50% | 48 |
| Clay | Henrietta | 293 | $4,982 | $1,538,250 | $1,459,600 | 94.90% | 212 |
| Clay | Average | 190.84 | $5,438 | $1,077,750 | $1,021,289 | 94.00% | 231 |
| Collin | Anna | 11.08 | $84,356 | $1,200,000 | $935,000 | 77.90% | 634 |
| Collin | Average | 11.08 | $84,356 | $1,200,000 | $935,000 | 77.90% | 634 |
| Cooke | Muenster | 11 | $18,000 | $209,000 | $198,000 | 94.70% | 250 |
| Cooke | Gainesville | 19.3 | $16,580 | $345,000 | $320,000 | 92.80% | 541 |
| Cooke | Valley View | 96.23 | $15,500 | $1,679,215 | $1,491,565 | 88.80% | 194 |
| Cooke | Average | 42.18 | $16,693 | $744,405 | $669,855 | 92.10% | 328 |
| Denton | Sanger | 16.46 | $39,422 | $649,000 | $649,000 | 100.00% | 47 |
| Denton | Cross Roads | 10.35 | $97,575 | $1,200,000 | $1,010,000 | 84.20% | 40 |
| Denton | Sanger | 300 | $14,000 | $4,999,999 | $4,200,000 | 84.00% | 1,327 |
| Denton | Aubrey | 74.09 | $57,684 | $4,815,525 | $4,273,550 | 88.70% | 302 |
| Denton | Average | 100.22 | $52,170 | $2,916,131 | $2,533,138 | 89.20% | 429 |
| Grayson | Collinsville | 11.61 | $46,516 | $600,000 | $540,000 | 90.00% | 280 |
| Grayson | Van Alstyne | 18.8 | $58,511 | $1,175,000 | $1,100,000 | 93.60% | 280 |
| Grayson | Whitesboro | 30 | $37,984 | $1,170,000 | $1,139,506 | 97.40% | 277 |
| Grayson | Average | 20.14 | $47,670 | $981,667 | $926,502 | 93.70% | 237 |
| Jack | No sales reported | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Montague | Montague | 485 | N/A | $5,566,000 | N/A | N/A | 333 |
| Montague | Bowie | 26 | $12,244 | $323,500 | $318,352 | 98.40% | 743 |
| Montague | Montague | 37.3 | $10,327 | $428,950 | $385,195 | 89.80% | 1 |
| Montague | Saint Jo | 1,185 | $7,764 | $10,000,000 | $9,199,829 | 92.00% | 19 |
| Montague | Average | 433.33 | $10,112 | $4,079,613 | $3,301,125 | 93.40% | 274 |
| Wise | Sunset | 12 | $19,027 | $234,000 | $228,320 | 97.60% | 16 |
| Wise | Sunset | 12 | $19,027 | $234,000 | $228,320 | 97.60% | 14 |
| Wise | Chico | 11.44 | $24,476 | $299,000 | $280,000 | 93.60% | 24 |
| Wise | Chico | 10.25 | $29,265 | $315,000 | $300,000 | 95.20% | 12 |
| Wise | Average | 11.42 | $22,949 | $270,000 | $259,160 | 96.00% | 17 |
DOM = days on market
-
Country Lifestyles4 years agoScott & Stacey Schumacher: A Growth Mindset
-
Country Lifestyles10 years agoStyle Your Profile – What your style cowboy hat says about you and new trends in 2017
-
Horsefeathers13 years agoMount Scott: Country Humor with David Gregory
-
Outdoor11 years agoButtercup or Primrose?
-
Country Lifestyles10 years agoJune 2016 Profile – The man behind the mic: Bob Tallman
-
HOME10 years agoGrazing North Texas – Wilman Lovegrass
-
Country Lifestyles10 years agoDecember 2016 Profile, Rusty Riddle – The Riddle Way
-
The Natural Horseman9 years agoThis is why we do what we do — RayeAnn and Cisco




