Farm & Ranch
[AgriLife Today] Options discussed for farmers battling cotton root rot
By: Blair Fannin
Writer: Blair Fannin, 979-845-2259, [email protected]
Contact: Dr. Tom Isakeit, 979-862-1340, [email protected]
WACO – Cotton root rot disease continues to be a major threat to Texas cotton, but there are options available to farmers to fend off potential threats or lessen the potential economic hardship, according to a Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service plant pathologist in College Station.
Dr. Tom Isakeit gave an update on cotton root rot research at the recent Blackland Income Growth Conference in Waco.
The fungicide Topguard Terra has a Section 3 full label registration for control of cotton root rot, Isakeit said. The recent trials in Texas fields focused on evaluating different methods of application. He said these alternative methods are intended to minimize the risk of phytotoxicity that sometimes occur when Topguard Terra is applied at planting.
Side-dressing has been evaluated over several years and it doesn’t seem to work, he said.“With pre-plant treatment application, if the fungicide is right on the planted row 4-6 inches deep, it’s quite effective,” Isakeit said. “Topguard is very persistent, so it can be applied several weeks before planting. Generally, it’s going to remain where it is applied and won’t leach out. Our research is demonstrating effectiveness if it is banded on the row before emergence or banded over the emerged seedlings. However, with these methods, rain or overhead irrigation is needed afterwards to activate the fungicide.”
“You have to get the fungicide close to the plant for it to be effective,” Isakeit said.
At present, application of the fungicide at planting is the only legal method of application. FMC, the manufacturer of Topguard Terra, has applied to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for an amended label to include other application methods, and they are hopeful this will be granted prior to the start of planting in 2017, Isakeit said.
“Growers need to follow the current label until the amendment has been approved,” he said.
Isakeit said that it was a challenge to establish trials at the Stiles Farm Foundation near Thrall last year. Planting, delayed by frequent rains, was finally accomplished on June 10. Then, it turned dry.
“There was no rain until July 27 and also, very little disease. Additional rain in August led to increasing disease from early September into October, and consequently, provided some useful data,” Isakeit said. “In our design, we apply treatments to two adjacent rows, leaving two non-treated on either side. The non-treated rows can verify that the pathogenic fungus is present and active. It’s quite common that the fungus is consistently limited to portions of a field.
“Some growers can take advantage of this predictability and, using GPS technology, can apply the fungicide only to portions of the field where it has been previously seen. One of the farmers we worked with this year used prescription maps to apply the fungicide. In one field, out of 101 acres, only 37 percent needed to be treated, resulting in a savings on fungicide costs of $3,200.”
In addition to the risk of phytotoxicity with an at-planting fungicide treatment, producers have observed problems caused by clogging of application orifices. This problem can inadvertently show that the fungicide is working, similar to the adjacent, non-treated rows that are used in the experimental trials.
“Growers should pay attention to this problem, particularly first-time users,” he said. “Flow meters could identify when clogging occurs. Different application products may alleviate the problem, such as larger orifices in the rebounder or a T-band spray nozzle set higher. If and when the label amendments are approved, growers interested in trying different application methods for the first time should consider leaving a small, non-treated area in the field to identify performance and allow comparisons of crop emergence.”
Detailed information about cotton root rot and its management can be found in a factsheet at http://cotton.tamu.edu/Nematodes/16_FC010_CRR.pdf .
Additionally, Isakeit said producers who have questions should email him at [email protected] or call 979-862-1340.
-30-
Find more stories, photos, videos and audio at http://today.agrilife.org
Farm & Ranch
Acorn Toxicity
By Barry Whitworth, DVM, MPH
With the prolonged drought, most pastures in Oklahoma end up in poor condition. With the lack of available forage, animals may go in search of alternative foods.
If oak trees are in the pastures, acorns may be a favorite meal for some livestock in the fall. This may result in oak poisoning.
Oak leaves, twigs, buds, and acorns may be toxic to some animals when consumed.
To read more, pick up a copy of the November edition of North Texas Farm & Ranch magazine, available digitally and in print. To subscribe by mail, call 940-872-5922.
Farm & Ranch
Silver Bluestems
By: Tony Dean
There are a handful of grasses on North Texas grazing lands ranchers need to know, not because they are highly desirable, but rather because they are not of much value. I call them “decom” plants, which is am acronym for “Don’t Ever Count On Me.” Silver bluestem is a “decom” grass.
Silver bluestem is a perennial which grows in all areas of Texas. It can survive in almost all soil types, and in full sun conditions or in semi shade. It grows up to three feet tall and is easily recognized with the presence of the white fuzzy seed head. Also, one of the identifying characteristics of Silver bluestem is a bend in the stems at each node, causing the plants to take on a rounded shape as they mature.
To read more, pick up a copy of the November edition of North Texas Farm & Ranch magazine, available digitally and in print. To subscribe by mail, call 940-872-5922.
Farm & Ranch
Meanwhile Back At The Ranch
By: Rayford Pullen
Fall is here which means winter is closing in on us and before we officially get into winter, we need to make sure our factories are either producing or will be producing in a few months.
We have been pregnancy testing our cows this fall and if they are not bred or nursing a calf, we are bidding them adios. With annual costs somewhere between $900.00 and $1,000.00 per cow, those cows not producing a live weaned calf are costing us quite a bit.
To read more, pick up a copy of the November edition of North Texas Farm & Ranch magazine, available digitally and in print. To subscribe by mail, call 940-872-5922.
-
Country Lifestyles2 years ago
Scott & Stacey Schumacher: A Growth Mindset
-
Country Lifestyles8 years ago
Style Your Profile – What your style cowboy hat says about you and new trends in 2017
-
HOME8 years ago
Grazing North Texas – Wilman Lovegrass
-
Equine1 year ago
The Will to Win
-
Country Lifestyles5 years ago
Amber Crawford, Breakaway Roper
-
Outdoor9 years ago
Buttercup or Primrose?
-
Country Lifestyles8 years ago
June 2016 Profile – The man behind the mic: Bob Tallman
-
Country Lifestyles8 years ago
December 2016 Profile, Rusty Riddle – The Riddle Way