Connect with us

Farm & Ranch

Texas crop, weather for Feb. 10, 2015

Published

on

By: Robert Burns

Expert: Farmers could be growing more grain sorghum, less cotton

Writer: Robert Burns, 903-834-6191, rd-burns@tamu.edu
COLLEGE STATION – By all indications, Texas farmers will likely be planting considerably less cotton this year and more grain sorghum, according to a Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service expert.

In the face of much lower commodity prices, farmers are facing real challenges deciding what to plant and what not to plant in order to see a positive return for 2015, according to Dr. Mark Welch, AgriLife Extension grains marketing economist in College Station.

Exactly how the acreage mix for thousands of Texas farmers will pan out remains to be seen, but as it looks right now, they will be planting more grain and less cotton, Welch said.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture won’t release its planting intentions report for spring crops until March 31, Welch noted. But the National Cotton Council recently came out with their own survey, and they are anticipating a large reduction in cotton acreages nationwide, but particularly in Texas.

Download or preview a two-minute MP3 audio version of this report

According to the council’s survey, Texas estimated cotton acreage is 5.34 million acres, down nearly 14 percent from the actual 2014 acreage of 6.2 million acres. The council’s report on the survey can be found at http://bit.ly/1DAOmA4 .

There are many cropping choices farmers can make to replace the nearly 850,000 acres, Welch said. But as farmers typically react to relative prices when making cropping decisions, the most likely one will be grain sorghum.

“Particularly in the grain markets, we’re seeing some very strong cash bids for grain sorghum relative to corn,” he said. “And that’s important for Texas producers, particularly in areas where moisture is the limiting factor. Grain sorghum versus cotton is a pretty viable option for us. So that may create some opportunities, as that strength of cash market for sorghum has been very positive through the winter and is now extending into the spring. We’ll have to see if it continues through harvest.”

Other alternatives would be sunflowers, soybeans, sesame and canola, Welch said.

“One factor that is much more positive is the moisture situation going into spring is much better than it has been in previous years,” he said. “Diversification is it’s own form of risk management. So again, it’s a challenge, but there’s also opportunity.”

AgriLife Extension district reporters compiled the following summaries:

Central: Soil moisture, rangeland, pastures and livestock were all rated as good. Small grains looked particularly good. Warmer temperatures allowed landowners to catch up on winter maintenance and fieldwork. Producers were applying fertilizer, preparing the land for planting corn and sorghum, and getting ready for pesticide and herbicide applications. Peach trees were blooming. Cattle were still receiving supplemental feed. Though soil moisture was good, there was a general need for more rain to raise stock tank and lake water levels. Cattle prices either leveled or dropped a little.

Coastal Bend: Overall, the condition of livestock improved as producers continued to feed hay and protein supplements. There were scattered, short rains throughout the region that limited fieldwork due to already wet conditions. In some areas, winter annual forages greened up and were growing after much-needed sunshine and warmer temperatures. However, in other areas, winter annual forages were only slowly growing due to continued wet weather and lack of sunshine. Wheat emerged and looked good. Corn growers were behind in planting due to field conditions, but were hopeful they could continue planting by mid-February. Grain sorghum producers had similar issues planting due to wet conditions.

East: The region received scattered showers, and lakes, ponds and creeks were full. All counties except Harrison reported subsoil moisture as mostly adequate. Harrison County reported subsoil moisture as mostly short. Conditions were cold, cloudy and windy with little sunshine for most of the reporting period. Due to so many overcast days this year, winter forage production was down. Livestock producers continued to feed hay and supplements. Hay sales were moderate. Marion County reported some cattle were trying to graze and eating less hay. As temperatures rose, along with windy days, some counties reported pastures and fields drying out. The drying out allowed planting and sprigging to resume. Growers were planting onions and cooler season crops, and pruning fruit trees. Livestock were mostly in good condition. Livestock markets remained strong. Weaning and selling of market-ready calves and cull cows continued, though most herds had finished calving for the season. Feral hog problems were increasing.

Far West: Conditions were warmer, almost spring-like. With the precipitation of the last few weeks, topsoil moisture was mostly adequate while subsoil moisture was short to adequate. Pastures and rangeland were mostly in fair condition. Upland cotton and pecans were 100 percent harvested. Reeves County reported that oats were not yet emerged. Winter wheat was 100 percent emerged, but mostly in poor condition.

North: Topsoil moisture varied widely from short to surplus, with adequate being the most common rating. Temperatures also varied widely after two cold fronts came through early in the week. At the end of the reporting period, days warmed to the mid-50s and 70s. Some counties reported as much as 0.75 inch of rain. Winter wheat looked a little better, and winter pastures showed some growth. Ryegrass growth slowed back down after a freeze and was looking somewhat stressed in most areas. Livestock were in good condition. The cattle market was still strong. Scouting found grasshopper nymphs near Como.

Panhandle: Temperatures were up and down through most of the week before warming and breaking high records by the weekend. There were reports of the up-and-down temperatures causing some sickness for animals. Fields were being prepared for planting. Seed and spraying decisions were being made. In some counties, the above-average temperatures allowed producers to finish stripping the cotton that had been left in the field. Winter wheat was starting to perk up, with many of the dryland fields looking very good. There were spotty reports of pesticide applications for greenbugs, which were earlier than usual. Limited numbers of stocker cattle were being placed to graze on early planted wheat to help with feed cost. Some producers were doing small amounts of fieldwork as they were still trying to decide what to plant. Hansford County soils were still wet from snow last week and only feeding cattle was being done. Rangeland and pa sture varied from poor to fair condition, with most reporting good to fair.

Rolling Plains: Recent moisture helped winter wheat tremendously. Fields were lush and green, and producers had a positive outlook. Some producers began moving cattle to wheat for grazing as pasture stands were becoming thin. Pastures and rangeland were in fair condition, but ranchers wanted to relieve grazing pressure to give stands time to rebound. Livestock were in good condition. The cotton harvest was finally finished after wet weather stalled harvesting for several weeks. Yields were good, but cotton prices were discouraging. With ever-increasing input costs and declining cotton prices, some producers were looking for other options.

South: Cool night and warm daytime temperatures continued, with light, scattered showers throughout the region. In the northern part of the region, winter oats were doing well. Potato planting was completed, and the light rains helped wheat and oats. Winter annual forb growth improved, boosting grazing conditions for cattle and wildlife. Supplemental feeding continued as the calving season progressed. Cattle body condition scores remained fair. Soil moisture conditions were 100 percent adequate in Atascosa and McMullen counties, and 40 to 65 percent adequate in La Salle County. In the eastern part of the region, good rains helped rangeland and pastures in some counties, but livestock producers were still providing supplemental feed in order to allow rangeland and pastures to recover. A cold front swept through Jim Wells County dropping temperatures significantly. Soil moisture conditions remained mostly adequate in Brooks , Jim Hogg and Jim Wells counties. In the western part of the region, slow rain benefited forage production, but producers were still supplying mineral blocks and hay to cattle. A few days of heavy drizzle and light rain put a stop to spinach harvesting for a while, but harvesting resumed as soon as the fields were dry enough. Onions, carrots and cabbage continued to make good progress. Soil moisture conditions were 80 to 90 percent adequate in Dimmit County, 80 to 85 percent short in Zapata County and 100 percent adequate in Zavala County. In the southern part of the region, planting conditions were good in Cameron County, and farmers were preparing fields for corn, sorghum and sunflowers. Forage availability for livestock was good to excellent. Harvesting of citrus and vegetables continued in Hidalgo County. In Starr County, spring vegetable and row crop preparations continued, fall onion crops were progressing well and supplemental feeding of cattle continued. In Willacy County, after another 1 inch to 2 inches of rain, fields were too wet for any fieldwork.

South Plains: The weather was mild, allowing producers to resume fieldwork. Producers were shredding cotton stalks and plowing land. Wheat improved with the warmer weather and was in fair to good condition. Soil moisture was short to adequate after last week’s precipitation. Pastures and rangeland were in fair to good condition. Cattle were mostly in good condition. Ranchers only had to supplement cattle on cold and/or wet days.

Southeast: Soil moisture levels throughout the region varied widely, but were mostly in the adequate to surplus range. Rangeland and pasture ratings varied widely too, but fair ratings were most common. Hardin County was the exception, reporting 100 percent poor moisture levels. With good moisture, Chambers County winter ryegrass pastures were actively growing. No fieldwork has started due to the wet weather. In Montgomery County, the winter annuals showed growth when there was sunshine. Walker County crops were still in a holding pattern, waiting for warmer growing weather. Clovers were emerging in pastures, but there was little top growth. Some cool-season vegetables were receiving too much moisture. However, protected early planted and/or later cool-season/spring vegetables were doing well. In Brazos County, cold and wet field conditions limited cool-season forage growth. Fields were still too wet for farmers to start plant ing corn.

Southwest: Cold, damp weather continued, but soil moisture was favorable for spring planting. Wheat and pasture grasses needed sunshine. Fields were being cultivated and prepared for spring plantings. Supplemental feeding was necessary to maintain the body condition of both wildlife and livestock. The external parasite loads were heavy on some livestock and wildlife.

West Central: Daytime weather was unseasonably warm. Scattered showers were received early in the week. Soil moisture continued to improve and was adequate, though very little field activity was being done due to wet conditions. Good moisture and warm weather improved winter wheat; most of the crop was in above-average condition. Producers were starting to spray for winter weeds. The cotton harvest was completed, though the gins were expecting to be running for a few more weeks. Rangeland and pastures were in good condition. Pastures were showing more green winter forbs and grasses. Livestock remained in fair to good condition. Supplemental feeding of livestock with cubes and protein tubs continued. Hay was being fed only sparingly. Some areas were starting to see some increase in livestock herds. All areas needed heavy rain to fill stock tanks and ponds. The pecan harvest was mostly complete.

-30-

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Grazing North Texas: Who’s Your Neighbor?

Published

on

By

By Tony Dean, tonydean.tx1@gmail.com

Who qualifies as your neighbor? Webster says it is someone who lives nearby, but it isn’t always that simple. Is my neighbor the person next door, or someone in the next county? It could be both.

Our neighbors are an important part of life on the ranch and the grazing lands we share. Many of us find comfort in knowing another human being is somewhere in our neck of the woods, and that someone nearby cares what happens to us.

Being a good neighbor is part of being a productive and responsible rancher, so let’s look at some of the qualities that make a good one.

Protect your neighbor

Watch out for him.

The cattle business is dangerous. Almost everything we work with is bigger and faster than we are. A mad cow can turn an otherwise wonderful day into a disaster. Sooner or later, all of us will need some help.

The average age of today’s rancher keeps climbing. Be aware of your neighbors’ ages, limitations or disabilities, and keep an eye out for anything outside their normal routine.

More women own and operate ranches today, too. Some may suddenly find themselves responsible for parts of the operation that a spouse or family member used to handle. As neighbors, we can be a valuable backup system, helping one another learn, adjust and keep the operation moving.

And then there is wildfire. It can be on us in minutes. You may need to help move a family down the road to safety or move livestock out of harm’s way. Have a plan in mind before the emergency happens.

Be a friend

Some of us who live in the country drive to town for work or make regular trips for other reasons. Others are stay-at-home ranchers, and life can get a little lonely. A friendly smile, a phone call or an invitation to lunch can mean more than we realize.

Things aren’t always wine and roses at the ranch. Few occupations ask people to juggle such a mix of complex markets, weather, natural resource management, livestock management and countless other issues.

Spirits can get low. If we are listening, we can hear and feel the stress in someone’s life. On those days, you have a chance to be a special kind of friend.

Help your neighbor

Have you ever tried to load a trailer by yourself and needed someone to stand in the gate for a couple of minutes? All of us will need help at some point, and our neighbors should be among the people we can call.

Do your best to be there when needed, and your neighbors will likely be there when it is your turn to ask. Sometimes it will be a small job. Other times, it will be a big one. It doesn’t matter. We help our neighbors.

It’s also smart to make sure someone nearby knows your ranching program and understands the land you use. At some point, one of you may need to take care of business for the other for several days.

Be cooperative

There is no end to the situations that can involve more than one family. Fencing, road maintenance and livestock getting where they don’t belong are common ones.

If you don’t handle these things with a friendly, cooperative attitude, they can create problems between neighbors that last for years.

Good fences are something to be proud of. Nothing is gained by years of bickering. Reaching an agreement may be hard at times, but neighbors should be able to work things out. Clear your head, use common sense and come up with an answer everyone can live with.

If your cattle get mixed up with your neighbor’s, make it a priority to separate them as soon as possible. It is rude to let your cattle stay in your neighbor’s pasture eating his grass while you do nothing about it.

One good way to handle strays is for the rancher whose pasture they are in to pen his own cattle along with the strays. The other rancher can then load his cattle and take them home. Afterward, both ranchers can work together on any fence repairs.

By the way, a gate between neighbors is almost always a good policy.

Take ownership

The only way to avoid mistakes is to do nothing. But it isn’t in us as ranchers to sit around and watch the world go by. We are men and women of action, so things are going to go sideways from time to time.

When that happens, and it will, own your mistakes. Decisive action can prevent misunderstandings and make a problem go away much faster.

Be honest, and never, ever lie.

Be patient

We all have bad days. When your neighbor is a little grouchy, he or she probably has something weighing on them.

That is a chance to be a good neighbor. Be patient. Be a good listener. Help your neighbor through the turmoil if you can.

Respect property boundaries

Trespassing is wrong, illegal and rude. Never do it except in an emergency.

In the Southwest, where we live, land ownership is considered a sacred right, and it is a right available to anyone. With ownership comes an expectation of privacy and respect. When you trespass, you violate those rights.

And yes, it is trespassing when you cross a fence to fish or hunt without permission. Texas is a private-property state, which makes respecting these boundaries especially important.

That doesn’t mean you can’t have an understanding with your neighbors that lets you onto their land. Many good friends and neighbors work together on one another’s ranches, but both parties should always communicate well.

You have a cell phone. Use it any time you doubt whether you have the right to go through the gate. An invitation onto another person’s ranch is a privilege, so don’t abuse it.

Your word

Your word as a rancher, neighbor, man or woman helps define you in your community and throughout your life. Your neighbors want to trust you. They want to know that all they need from you is a handshake and that they can depend on what you say.

It is a blessing to live in North Texas, where people still respect and honor a life lived with truth and love.

A good life to live

Having good neighbors is a great way to live. It brings comfort and enjoyment to life. Sometimes it takes a little extra effort, but a friendly neighborhood, even one that covers many acres, is enjoyable and can help keep all of us safer.

It is worth the effort.

The Bible

The Bible has many references to being a good neighbor. Being a good neighbor was good judgment 2,000 years ago, and it is good judgment today. Jesus made it clear that love should guide a good neighbor.

Leviticus 19:18 tells us to love our neighbors as ourselves. That is a tall order. In Matthew 5:44, Jesus takes it further, telling us to love our enemies and pray for those who persecute us.

Our goal should always be to love one another, lift each other up, and help and protect our neighbors.

All of us face drought, floods, wildfire, tornadoes, low cattle prices, rattlesnakes and feral hogs, so let’s fight the fight together. Stand by your neighbor’s side, and he will stand by yours.

A North Texas minister was recently asked, “What do you do if you have a neighbor who is really hard to love?”

His answer was short and to the point: “Love him anyway.”

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Beyond Crude Protein

Published

on

By

By NTFR Staff

A stack of hay may look good from the outside. The bales may be heavy, green and free of obvious weeds or mold. None of that tells a cattle producer what the hay will provide once it reaches the feed bunk.

Two bales from the same field can differ noticeably in nutrition if they were cut at different stages of maturity, weathered differently or stored under different conditions. The differences grow even larger when you compare hay bought from separate farms or produced in different growing seasons.

A forage analysis takes much of the guesswork out by showing what the hay contains and where you may need to supplement.

Crude protein is often the first number producers check, but it is only one part of the report. Energy, fiber, moisture and possible toxicity concerns can matter just as much when deciding whether a lot of hay suits dry cows, lactating cows, replacement heifers or growing calves.

Reading beyond the protein number

Most forage reports show results on both an “as received” and a dry-matter basis. The as-received column includes the water in the hay. The dry-matter column takes moisture out of the calculation so you can compare feeds with different moisture levels fairly.

For ration planning, the dry-matter values are usually the most useful. If you’re comparing dry hay with silage, cubes or another feed, make the comparison on a dry-matter basis rather than on the numbers as fed.

Moisture still deserves attention. Hay baled too wet is more likely to heat, mold or deteriorate in storage. In severe cases, heating can create a fire risk. Moisture also affects how many pounds of actual nutrients you are buying. A heavy bale isn’t necessarily a nutrient-dense bale if much of its weight is water.

Crude protein, usually listed as CP, estimates the protein in the forage based on its nitrogen content. Protein keeps the rumen microbes that help cattle digest forage working. When forage protein drops too low, intake and digestion may decline because those microbes can’t function as well.

The amount of protein a cow needs changes a great deal through the year. A mature, dry cow in mid-pregnancy needs less than a cow in late pregnancy or early lactation. Young, growing cattle and first-calf heifers may also need more protein than mature dry cows. Hay that is adequate for one group may fall short for another.

Always compare a forage report with the needs of the cattle that will eat the hay. Oklahoma State University notes that cattle requirements vary with weight, age, stage of production, desired gain and milk production. A single protein target can’t describe the needs of an entire herd.

Energy is another major piece of the feeding decision. Many forage reports express energy as total digestible nutrients, or TDN, an estimate of the digestible energy in the feed. Protein supports rumen function and tissue growth, while energy fuels maintenance, pregnancy, milk production and weight gain.

Hay can test well for protein and still come up short on energy. That matters most for cows nearing calving or producing milk. Low-energy hay may leave cattle feeling full without giving them enough nutrition to hold body condition. University of Nebraska Extension stresses evaluating both protein and energy when judging the feeding value of forage.

Fiber measurements help explain why cattle eat one hay readily and less of another. Neutral detergent fiber, or NDF, represents much of the plant’s structural material, including cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. As NDF rises, cattle generally eat less because bulky, fibrous forage stays in the digestive tract longer.

Acid detergent fiber, or ADF, includes the least digestible parts of the plant. Higher ADF generally means lower digestibility and less available energy. Put simply, high NDF can limit how much cattle eat, and high ADF can mean they get less energy from what they do eat.

Both numbers tend to climb as forage plants mature. Mature hay usually has more stem and less leaf than hay cut earlier. It may still be acceptable feed for animals with lower needs, but it is less likely to support lactating cows or growing cattle without supplementation.

Some reports also include relative feed value, or RFV. This index uses ADF and NDF to compare forage quality, particularly for alfalfa and other legumes. It can help when you compare similar types of hay, but it doesn’t account for every nutrient cattle need. Don’t let RFV replace a closer look at crude protein, energy and the animal’s stage of production.

Depending on the lab package you choose, the report may include minerals. Labs commonly report calcium and phosphorus, but a forage analysis can’t replace a well-designed mineral program. Water quality, other feeds and interactions among minerals all affect mineral needs and availability. Work with an Extension specialist, veterinarian or livestock nutritionist before making major mineral changes.

Nitrate and prussic acid

A standard forage analysis may not include nitrates, and you often have to request that test separately. Nitrate testing is especially important for drought-stressed forage, heavily fertilized fields and crops such as sorghum, sudangrass, sorghum-sudan hybrids, millet, oats and some weeds.

Nitrate can remain in cured hay and doesn’t reliably disappear in storage. Test any hay you suspect of high nitrate before feeding it. Oklahoma State University recommends a laboratory analysis because field screening tests can show that nitrate is present but can’t measure how much.

Prussic acid is a different concern. Unlike nitrate, prussic acid usually dissipates as properly cured hay sits in storage, though suspect forage still needs careful management and professional guidance. Be sure which test you need, and don’t treat the terms nitrate and prussic acid as interchangeable.

Putting the numbers to work

A hay test pays off when it leads to a feeding plan. Once you have the results, you can match the hay to the right class of cattle. Save better hay for replacement heifers, thin cows, late-gestation cows or cows with calves at side. Feed lower-quality hay to mature dry cows with modest requirements.

Testing can also prevent unnecessary supplementation. Without an analysis, you may buy protein tubs, cubes or other supplements your cattle don’t need. The opposite mistake costs just as much. Assuming hay is better than it is can lead to lost body condition, lower milk production, poor breed-back rates and lighter calves.

Visual inspection still matters. Don’t ignore mold, foreign material, weeds, dust or heat damage because a lab report shows acceptable numbers. At the same time, color and appearance can’t reliably predict nutrient content. University of Nebraska notes that forage nutrient values vary widely, which makes average book values a poor substitute for testing the feed you have on hand.

A forage analysis won’t make poor hay better, but it can show you how to use that hay well. For the cost of a test, you get information that can guide hay purchases, cut supplement waste and put each lot of hay where it will do the most good.

The protein number may get the most attention, but it doesn’t tell the whole story. Understanding moisture, TDN, NDF, ADF and potential toxicity gives you a much clearer picture of what is inside the bale.

Continue Reading

Farm & Ranch

Don’t Be Caught Off Guard

Published

on

By

By Savannah Magoteaux

A September rain can be exactly what a North Texas pasture needs, but that flush of green can bring an unwelcome guest.

Fall armyworms are a familiar late-summer and early-fall pest across Texas, and they can do serious damage to pastures and hay fields when conditions are right. Bermudagrass is a common target, but armyworms also feed on small grains, ryegrass and other forage crops. The key is catching them early, before a manageable infestation turns into a field that seems to disappear overnight.

Despite the name, fall armyworms are caterpillars. The adult moths migrate into Texas and lay masses of eggs on grasses, fence posts, buildings and other surfaces. Once the larvae hatch, they start feeding on plants.

Young armyworms are small and hard to spot unless you are actively scouting. As they grow, their appetite climbs. Larger larvae can strip leaves fast, leaving stems behind and cutting into available forage or hay yield.

Look for an inverted, light-colored “Y” on the caterpillar’s head. Mature larvae can reach about 1½ inches long and often have several dark and light stripes running the length of the body.

Armyworms feed most actively during the cooler parts of the day, so early morning and late afternoon are good times to scout. Walk through several areas of the pasture rather than checking only along the edge. Look closely near the soil surface and beneath grass leaves, especially where you see fresh feeding damage.

Scouting matters most after rain or irrigation. New grass growth draws newly hatched larvae, and populations can build quickly when conditions favor them.

Texas A&M AgriLife Extension generally recommends considering treatment in improved pastures when you find about three or more armyworms per square foot. The decision should also weigh the size of the larvae, how much forage is present, the expected hay value and how severe the damage is.

Timing matters. Small armyworms are easier to control than large ones, and an insecticide does less good once the caterpillars are nearly mature and have already eaten much of the forage. If you treat, follow the product label carefully, including grazing and hay-harvest restrictions.

Don’t assume one treatment or one scouting trip will carry a pasture through the season. Fall armyworm moths can keep moving into an area, laying more eggs and starting another generation of larvae. Keep checking fields even after you have controlled an infestation.

For hay producers, an approaching harvest date can also shape the decision. When the crop is close to harvest, cutting the field may be a better option than spraying. The best choice depends on the number and size of the armyworms, how much forage remains and whether the weather allows you to cut hay.

September rain is usually welcome across North Texas, especially after a long, hot summer. Just remember that fresh green grass deserves a closer look. A few minutes of scouting can make the difference between catching fall armyworms early and finding the damage after they have eaten their fill.

Continue Reading
Ad
Ad
Ad

Trending