Farm & Ranch
Southwest Texas deer crop expected to be great this year
Writer: Robert Burns, 903-834-6191, rd-burns@tamu.edu
COLLEGE STATION – Deer hunting in Southwest Texas is expected to be “really terrific” this year thanks to timely rains, according to Dr. Rob Hogan, Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service economist, Uvalde.
“Though it hasn’t been a year with a lot of moisture from the beginning, when we really needed it, the moisture came, from Memorial Day on,” Hogan said. “There’s been a lot of grass made, a lot of browsing material, such as forbs, and a tremendous acorn crop.”
Good browsing means more and larger deer and can even affect the size and development of racks, he said.
“There was also a lot of oilseed made, and already we’ve had reports of good dove hunting,” Hogan said.
Deer hunting has a huge economic impact upon the 21-county Southwest AgriLife Extension district, which stretches from Sutton County at its northwest corner to Bastrop County, east of Austin, he said. The yearly average economic impact from 2010 through 2013 was about $550 million.
“Every hunter that comes to the region spends about $2,000 to hunt an average of 13 days,” Hogan said. “Oddly, enough, Texans are their own best customers. About 89 percent of the people who hunted in Texas are Texans.”
By far, the favorite animals to hunt in Texas are deer, he said. In the past few years, landowners have built a lot of high fences for deer farming.
“So there are a lot of exotic species to go along with our native white-tailed deer,” Hogan said. “There are a lot of fallow deer, exotic antelope and axis deer, which are a favorite because they have such a terrific rack.”
AgriLife Extension district reporters compiled the following summaries:
Central: Most counties reported the condition of soil moisture, rangeland and pastures, and crop conditions as fair. Overall, livestock were in good condition. After rains two weeks ago — along with warmer weather — most Bermuda grass fields were recovering from the drought. Small grains looked much better. Livestock were in good condition. Some producers who planted oats early were turning cattle into graze. Wheat and oats that were planted in the previous week needed rain, but rain was in the forecast. Many producers are planting more wheat instead of corn due to projected prices. Forages were generally in good shape.
Coastal Bend: Days were warm with temperatures in the low 80s and little humidity, with cool nights. The pecan harvest of earlier maturing varieties began. Farmers were catching up on fieldwork in preparation for the 2015 season. Fall activities were continuing at a normal pace with the exception of those rushing to take a last hay cutting before frost. Cattle were in good condition. After recent rains, most producers were optimistic about the next growing season but concerned about projected low commodity prices.
East: The haying season wound down. Producers had harvested a tremendous amount of hay. With cooler temperatures, winter pastures made good progress but could have used more rain. Most counties were in need of rain. Many producers continued to plant cooler-temperature forages. Counties in the western and southern areas reported short topsoil and subsoil moisture levels. Trinity County had high winds that dried out topsoils. Cattle remained in good to excellent condition. Many producers were finding it a hard choice to retain ownership of any potential replacement heifers with current market value. Fall calving was in progress. Feral hogs were active, and damage continued.
Far West: The region was dry and cool. Glasscock County had strong winds Nov. 1 – 2 that caused cotton to drop bolls on the ground. Subsoil and topsoil moisture ranged from adequate to short. Pasture and rangeland were rated fair to very poor. Upland cotton was generally in fair to good condition, with some fields harvested and others with bolls still opening. Grain sorghum was from 72 to 80 percent harvested. The sunflower harvest was completed. From 45 to 100 percent of winter wheat was emerged across the region. Glasscock County reported wheat was suffering from moisture stress, with newly emerged stands struggling and many fields starting to die. Other fields had skimpy stands. In El Paso County, Pawnee pecans were harvested, with Western varieties at 40 percent pecan shuck separation.
North: Topsoil moisture was adequate to short throughout the region, with no significant rains. Daytime temperatures were in the 70s, with nighttime lows in the 50s. Some low-lying parts of Bowie County had the first official freeze in the early morning of Nov. 1. The freezing temperatures were accompanied by a heavy frost. Pastures looked good, but some producers had to start providing supplemental feed to cattle. Winter wheat planting was nearly finished in some counties. Winter pasture grasses were emerging. Livestock were in good condition, though horn fly pressure remained high. The feral hog population was on the rise and continued to cause damage throughout the area.
Panhandle: Temperatures were near to slightly above average for most of the week. No moisture was received. The cotton harvest was in full swing in Collingsworth County and coming along in Hansford and Hall counties. Yields were better than anticipated. In other counties, low temperatures over the weekend helped knock some leaves off cotton, but in lieu of a real killing freeze, some farmers were spraying defoliants to aid harvest. The Hansford County peanut harvest was completed. Yields and quality were slightly above average. Deaf Smith County corn was doing very well, with many fields finally drying out. Grain sorghum there was doing well too, with several fields harvested with good yields being reported. Hay crops were still being swathed and baled, with many acres yet to be harvested. Deaf Smith producers were scurrying to get crops harvested and to get wheat planted before the freeze. Wheat was looking good, though it needed rain, but there were a few producers grazing cattle on wheat already. The Hall County peanut harvest was going well. The Hansford County corn harvest was finished except for about 1,000 acres that were hailed out early and had to be replanted. Soybean yields were averaging 60 to 65 bushels per acre. Producers were planting wheat behind the corn harvest. The Lipscomb County corn harvest was almost completed, and the grain sorghum harvest was underway. Ochiltree County wheat planting was completed. Stands looked excellent. The corn harvest was nearing completion, though some late-planted fields still needed to dry down. All Wheeler County corn was harvested except for some late-planted fields.
Rolling Plains: Rain showers fell in parts of the region, with as much as 1.25 inches reported. Other parts of the region remained dry. Wheat fields that received rain were responding and showing new growth. Some wheat looked really good, while other fields were hit by armyworms and grubs. With much cooler temperatures all week, native and improved warm-season pastures showed little to no growth. Producers continue to overseed small grains into summer pastures. Cotton gins were running constantly in some counties. Yields from irrigated acres were good. Livestock remained in good to fair condition. A good portion of the spring calf crop was sold over the last few weeks with excellent prices received. Stock water tanks and lakes still needed runoff water. The pecan harvest continued, with good yields reported.
South: Temperatures throughout the region were much cooler, with scattered showers later in the week. In the northern part of the region, from 0.75 to 1 inch of rain was received. Peanut harvesting was slowed by the rain. The planting of wheat and oats was completed, with most of the crop emerged. Rangeland and pasture remained mostly in fair condition. Supplemental feeding remained steady. Cattle body condition scores were low to fair as producers weaned spring calves. Soil moisture was mostly adequate in Atascosa and Frio counties, and short in McMullen County. In the eastern part of the region, Brooks County reported 0.56 inch of rain. Jim Hogg County reported moisture in the form of early-morning fog, but no rain. Jim Wells County forage conditions declined due to lack of rain. Overall, rangeland and pastures remained in fair to good condition. Livestock producers continued supplemental feeding. Soil moisture was shor t throughout most of the area, except in Brooks County, where it was adequate. The western part of the region only received light showers. Field preparations for next season’s crops continued. Webb County growers were planting winter oats. Livestock producers continued supplemental feeding and were stocking up on hay for the winter. Some producers were rebuilding herds. However, the restocking process was proceeding slowly due to the high costs of replacements. In Zavala County, pecan harvesting continued, and irrigated cabbage, onions and spinach were progressing well. Soil moisture was mostly adequate in Dimmit, Maverick and Zavala counties, with Webb County reporting short levels. In the southern part of the region, Cameron County received light showers late in the week, and crop producers reported all crops progressing well. Hidalgo County growers were planting onions and cabbage. In Starr County, fall vegetable crops were doing well, and hay baling continued. Willacy County r eceived 0.5 inch of rain. Soil moisture was mostly adequate in Cameron, Hidalgo and Willacy counties, and short in the Starr County.
South Plains: The cotton harvest was in full swing throughout the region, with many producers using harvest aids, hoping they could finish before bad weather set in. The Floyd County harvest will be ‘spread out’ this year due to early rains and hail that required many fields to be replanted. The harvesting of cotton, grain and corn will likely continue until December. The weather was dry, and cooler temperatures were expected for the coming week. Garza County reported that regrowth in cotton was difficult to control after rains last month. Cotton yields appeared to vary widely from dryland and irrigated crops. Rangeland and pastures were still mostly in good to excellent condition. Lubbock County producers increased harvest efforts during a dry week in advance of increasing rain chances. Approximately half of the cotton crop there received harvest-aid treatments. Some early planted grain sorghum has been harvested , but re planted sorghum and corn remained in the field. Winter wheat looked good. Swisher County producers were also hustling to defoliate cotton before a rain or freeze. The grain sorghum harvest there was in full swing even though moisture levels were high and yields are lower than expected. The second and third cuttings of hay grazer were finished, and wheat was in great condition. Some wheat fields had been negatively affected by early signs of rust and green bug infestations. Silage harvesting in Bailey County was nearly done, and cotton harvesting began, with average yields reported.
Southwest: Dry weather continued with no rain and cooler temperatures. Winter pastures needed rain. Row crops, pastures and rangeland remained in good condition. The pecan harvest was ongoing, as well as planting of small grains for grazing. The sesame harvest began. Some late-season hay harvesting continued. Fly populations declined, and producers began supplemental feeding of cattle on rangeland. Most native grasses had seeded and gone dormant. Livestock and wildlife were in good condition. Browsing for deer, including acorns, was very plentiful.
West Central: The entire area needed rain. Dry, windy conditions depleted soil moisture. Daytime temperatures were mild and nights cool. Producers increased field activities, mainly planting small grains. Some wheat was planted, but most growers were waiting on a rain. Early planted small grains were mostly in good condition but were beginning to show moisture stress. The cotton harvest was in full swing, with mostly good yields. Some late-planted fields were being sprayed with harvest aids. All late-planted sorghum was harvested. Some end-of-season hay harvesting continued. Rangeland and pastures were in fair condition and still looked good but will need moisture soon to keep winter grasses growing. Livestock remained in fair to good condition. Fall cattle work was ongoing. Pecan harvesting began with promising early yields.
-30-
Farm & Ranch
Frog Fruit
By Tony Dean, tonydean.tx1@gmail.com
Frog fruit is a native, low-growing perennial forb adapted to most of the eastern U.S., but few grazers know it well. It contributes more to our plant communities than we realize. It generally grows no more than a few inches tall and roots at the nodes. It can form dense mats several feet across and develop runners up to 3 feet long.
The leaves are thick, one to two inches long and 3/8 inch wide, and toothed from the middle to the tip. Tiny white flowers form a ring around a flower head, and the head then elongates into a cylinder an inch long or longer. Frog fruit has a four-angled stem.
Frog fruit can grow almost anywhere in Texas and on many soil types. It can grow in drier soils and likes good drainage, but it needs additional moisture to survive the hottest months. You can find it almost anywhere in a pasture, though it often grows in depressions and near water sources.
“Frog fruit is used as forage by livestock and deer. I recall an instance when I was moving cattle from one pasture to the next on a Jack County ranch. As I opened the gate, I stood by a beautiful green plant of switchgrass which I expected to be immediately grazed down. The cattle walked right by the switchgrass and stuck their heads in a small patch of frog fruit a few feet away,” Dean said.
Frog fruit is gaining popularity as a ground cover for homes and gardens for these reasons:
- Frog fruit grows quickly, maybe too quickly. If it gets out of bounds, you can always trim it back.
- Frog fruit is low maintenance. Once you get it established with adequate watering, it can survive with little care.
- Frog fruit has a long bloom period, from April to October.
- It is a host plant for several butterfly species and other insects.
Farm & Ranch
Theileria orientalis
By Barry Whitworth, DVM
Over the past few years, veterinarians have detected Theileria orientalis in Oklahoma cattle. Early cases were primarily diagnosed in adult cattle, but more recent Oklahoma cases have been identified in stocker cattle. All cattle producers should be familiar with the clinical signs of this disease and check their cattle daily for signs of trouble.
The first U.S. case of theileriosis was identified in Virginia in August 2017. Those cattle showed weakness and anemia, and veterinarians made an initial diagnosis of anaplasmosis. Blood samples from the animals were tested for Anaplasma, Babesia and Leptospira. Results were negative for all three, but the tests revealed a blood protozoan, later identified as T. orientalis genotype Ikeda. Since that first herd outbreak, the organism has been detected in several states.
Cattle sick with T. orientalis genotype Ikeda may show fever, weakness, anorexia and exercise intolerance. If forced to move, affected cattle may stagger and gasp for air. If stressed excessively, they may collapse and die. On examination, the gums, eyes or vaginal mucosa may appear pale (white) or yellow. Reproductive losses, including stillbirths and late-term abortions, may occur, along with a drop in milk production.
Clinical signs reported in adult cattle in Oklahoma include anemia, sudden death, weight loss, abortion, failure to thrive and failure to calve. In stocker cattle, producers have reported weight loss, anemia, poor performance and sudden death.
Because Anaplasma marginale and T. orientalis genotype Ikeda produce similar clinical signs, telling the two apart can be difficult. One difference is that clinical signs are more common in young cattle infected with T. orientalis than in young cattle infected with A. marginale. Cattle with anaplasmosis also often display aggression, while those with T. orientalis genotype Ikeda typically do not. A laboratory test is required to tell the two diseases apart with certainty.
Researchers have identified Haemaphysalis longicornis as a possible vector of T. orientalis genotype Ikeda. In 2017, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL) confirmed the presence of H. longicornis, commonly called the Asian longhorned tick (ALT) or bush tick. While trying to determine how the tick arrived in the United States, USDA officials discovered it had been present in West Virginia as early as 2010. The tick has now been confirmed in at least 26 states, including Oklahoma. Some evidence suggests other insect vectors may also transmit T. orientalis genotype Ikeda. Needle transfer is another possible route of transmission.
The ALT has been identified in Craig and Mayes counties in Oklahoma. This tick thrives in areas with high humidity, such as wooded regions, brush or tall grass. Ticks are often found where large numbers of wildlife gather, such as along deer trails. Producers can find more information about the ALT on the USDA website at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/livestock-poultry-disease/cattle/ticks/asian-longhorned.
Other countries have developed treatments for T. orientalis, but no approved treatments are available in the United States, and no vaccine exists for this disease. The best defense is prevention: buying cattle free of the organism, avoiding blood transfer between animals and using effective tick control. Producers should purchase cattle from reputable sources. Clean instruments between animals during procedures such as castration or dehorning, and change needles between every animal. Control external parasites with appropriate insecticide treatments. Pasture management also helps, such as rotating cattle away from wooded or brushy areas where ticks thrive. Patch burning may also help reduce tick populations.
Theileria orientalis remains a concern for some cow/calf and stocker producers in Oklahoma. Producers who want more information about T. orientalis genotype Ikeda should contact their local veterinarian or Oklahoma State University County Extension agriculture educator.
References
Hammer, J. F., Emery, D., Bogema, D. R., & Jenkins, C. (2015). Detection of Theileria orientalis genotypes in Haemaphysalis longicornis ticks from southern Australia. Parasites & Vectors, 8, 229.
Oakes, V. J., Yabsley, M. J., Schwartz, D., LeRoith, T., Bissett, C., Broaddus, C., Schlater, J. L., Todd, S. M., Boes, K. M., Brookhart, M., & Lahmers, K. K. (2019). Theileria orientalis Ikeda genotype in cattle, Virginia, USA. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 25(9), 1653-1659.
Spickler, Anna Rovid. (2019). Theileriosis. Retrieved from http://www.cfsph.iastate.edu/DiseaseInfo/factsheets.php.
Watts, J. G., Playford, M. C., & Hickey, K. L. (2016). Theileria orientalis: A review. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 64(1), 3-9.
Farm & Ranch
Is the Pond Safe for Livestock?
By OKFR Staff
During the hottest part of summer, a farm pond can look like a welcome source of water. Cattle may be standing belly-deep along the bank, and the pond may still hold enough water to seem dependable. Looks alone won’t tell you whether that water is safe.
Hot weather, limited rainfall and falling pond levels can create water-quality problems. As water evaporates, salts, minerals, nutrients and other substances become more concentrated. Warm, still water can also encourage blue-green algae, and some forms can produce toxins capable of killing livestock.
Producers sometimes treat water as an afterthought compared to grass, hay and supplemental feed. Livestock need a dependable supply of clean water to maintain feed intake, regulate body temperature and support production. Poor-quality water can reduce consumption and performance even when it does not cause obvious poisoning.
A pond that has watered cattle for years is not safe under every set of conditions. Pay particular attention during drought, extreme heat or any period when the water level drops significantly.
Watch the Water and the Livestock
One of the most serious late-summer concerns is a bloom of cyanobacteria, commonly called blue-green algae. These organisms live naturally in many bodies of water, and most do not produce dangerous toxins. The risk rises when certain toxin-producing species multiply rapidly under favorable conditions.
According to Oklahoma State University Extension, toxic blue-green algal blooms typically develop in standing water after periods of hot, dry, calm weather. Nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus can fuel excessive growth. Those nutrients may reach a pond through manure, fertilizer runoff, soil erosion and decaying vegetation.
A suspicious bloom may turn the water bright green, blue-green, pea-soup green or even brownish. Scum, foam or mats may collect along the shoreline, particularly where the wind pushes floating material into one area. Some blooms look like spilled paint.
Not every green pond is poisonous. Common aquatic plants and harmless algae can also change the color or surface of the water. You usually cannot tell whether a bloom is toxic by looking at it, and a pond can contain toxin-producing cyanobacteria without showing every commonly described warning sign.
Keep livestock, horses, pets and people away from water that has an unusual color, heavy surface scum, a bad odor or unexplained dead fish or wildlife nearby. Do not let livestock drink from another part of the same pond on the assumption that the water is safe there. Wind can move a bloom, and toxin levels may vary across the pond.
Blue-green algae can produce toxins that affect the nervous system or liver. Depending on the toxin and the amount consumed, affected animals may develop weakness, staggering, difficulty breathing, tremors, convulsions, diarrhea or collapse. In severe cases, owners find animals dead near the water before realizing anything is wrong. Treatment often fails, which makes prevention especially important.
Treat any suspected poisoning as an emergency. Move the herd away from the water source without driving or stressing animals that may already be affected. Provide another clean water supply and contact a veterinarian immediately. Your county Extension office can also help you determine where and how to submit a water sample.
Blue-green algae is not the only potential problem. Pond water may contain elevated levels of dissolved salts, sulfates, nitrates, bacteria or other contaminants. Runoff can carry manure, fertilizer, pesticides and organic matter into the pond. Low water levels make some of these problems worse because the remaining water grows more concentrated.
Water with excessive dissolved solids may taste bitter or salty, so animals drink less of it. Depending on the substances involved and their concentrations, poor-quality water may contribute to diarrhea, reduced feed intake, poor weight gain or other health concerns. Young animals and livestock that are not used to the water may be more vulnerable.
Watch the cattle themselves, too. Are they reluctant to drink? Are they crowding around a different water source? Has feed intake or weight gain dropped without an obvious explanation? Are several animals having digestive problems? Changes across multiple animals can be an early clue that you need to look at the feed or water.
OSU Extension recommends collecting a representative sample and submitting it for a livestock water test whenever you suspect a water supply is harming animal health or performance. A standard livestock water test covers several characteristics, but blue-green algae can require different sampling and testing procedures. Contact the laboratory or county Extension office before collecting the sample so you take it from the right location, use the proper container and handle it correctly.
Reduce Problems Before They Develop
Good pond management cannot eliminate every water-quality problem, but it can lower the risk. One of the most effective steps is limiting the manure, soil and nutrients that enter the water.
Cattle with unrestricted access to an entire pond can damage the banks, muddy the water and deposit large amounts of manure in or near it. Hoof traffic strips vegetation and speeds erosion. Sediment fills the pond over time, while manure supplies nutrients that can encourage excessive algae growth.
Where practical, fence livestock away from most of the pond and provide a limited-access watering point. Another option is piping water to a trough below the dam or elsewhere in the pasture. OSU notes that reducing cattle manure in the pond can reduce the conditions that favor toxic algae and make the water more palatable.
A vegetated buffer around the pond can slow runoff and trap soil and nutrients before they reach the water. Apply fertilizer and manure carefully in the watershed, particularly before heavy rain, and do not let large amounts of hay, feed or organic debris pile up at the water’s edge.
Alternative watering systems need maintenance, too. Check troughs for algae, manure, drowned animals and other contamination. Install wildlife escape ramps in tanks so birds and small animals can climb out instead of drowning and fouling the water.
Be cautious about treating a pond on your own. Some owners use copper sulfate and other algaecides for algae control, but improper treatment can create new problems. Killing a large amount of algae or aquatic vegetation at once can deplete dissolved oxygen as the material decomposes, which can lead to a fish kill. Treatment may also release toxins from affected cyanobacteria into the water. Base any chemical application on proper identification and professional recommendations, not guesswork.
Livestock should always have enough water for the weather, their size and their stage of production. Demand rises sharply in hot weather, and a pond that barely meets the herd’s needs in spring may fall short in August. Check the source regularly instead of waiting for cattle to gather around a muddy shoreline.
Ponds can fool you. Crystal-clear water isn’t always safe, and a green pond doesn’t always mean toxic algae. Regular observation, testing and prevention are the best ways to keep a pond safe for your herd.
-
Country Lifestyles4 years agoScott & Stacey Schumacher: A Growth Mindset
-
Country Lifestyles10 years agoStyle Your Profile – What your style cowboy hat says about you and new trends in 2017
-
Horsefeathers12 years agoMount Scott: Country Humor with David Gregory
-
Country Lifestyles10 years agoJune 2016 Profile – The man behind the mic: Bob Tallman
-
Outdoor11 years agoButtercup or Primrose?
-
Country Lifestyles10 years agoDecember 2016 Profile, Rusty Riddle – The Riddle Way
-
HOME10 years agoGrazing North Texas – Wilman Lovegrass
-
The Natural Horseman9 years agoThis is why we do what we do — RayeAnn and Cisco




